Verbal Truce In The Catholic Left vs Right Debate?

Verbal Truce In The Catholic Left vs Right Debate?
By:  Eric Gajewski
Refutation to John Allen's latest gem (Crux)

So I am sitting here trying my best to read one of the latest pieces from the novus ordo website Cruxnow and I admit it is tougher than I first thought it would be.  The piece tries to pretend there is a Catholic left and right that exists in the Church today when in fact there is no such thing.  You are either Catholic or you are not.  I always know when I am talking to some modernist by that language alone.  In this disastrous piece John Allen tries to relay how "overboard" certain traditionalists are by implying the "Catholic left" are heretics.  In the same breathe he cries out the heretics (in reality) ought not call real Catholics...crazy!  What fantasyland is Mr. Allen living in?  This is another propaganda piece which is theologically flawed as already pointed out but it gets worse.  John Allen suggests there ought be a verbal truce! 

That is right no longer should I call John Allen a heretic but soften my language and be more politically correct.  Indeed, we know these Modernists are pacifists but now as many of them cannot simply defend Francis anymore they now are running to this "card" (attempted defense).  It is truly sad to witness.
The nastiness out in InternetLand.  I admit there is a bit of nastiness and sometimes even I have crossed the line but there will be no softening of my language.  You are either are following the Faith or you are not.  Can you imagine if I went into the local Baptist church and used such soft language?  Now, John Allen, who is an obvious modernist, wants us to soften the language with them?  Not a chance and they need to be continually "called out" in charity for the sake of their conversion.  Scream it from the rooftops!  There will be no truce but only a reload with the ammo we have from infallible preVatican II teachings.  John even suggests to "conservatives" that they ought not be calling the Vatican II modernists "enemies of the Faith".  Perhaps John has not read Pope St. Pius X?  If he has and still walks away saying that those following Vatican II are (objectively speaking) are Catholic then what else can I say?  I cannot make the blind see like Jesus.  Which is why we need to step up our rosary game for these blind souls.

The middle ground is hell.  From Catholic teaching we know that holding to one heresy may cost us our souls but now John suggests lets choose a middle ground.  In Don King fashion he is trying to step in between the "conservatives" and "Catholic lefters"  (whatever that means) and trying to call this truce.  It ain't going to happen friend.  If you cant properly defend your position without being completely exposed then there's no need to run to Mama calling out "they called me names".  I will make no such truce with heretics like John Allen nor any of his ilk.  They are to be avoided and prayed for until they repent.  He doesn't even realize that by posting such an article he has already waved the white flag of defeat.

VII Popes teaching heresy.  Again why does everyone get hung up on Francis and this latest Apostolic Exhortation?  He has already proven time and gain that he teaches heresy.  He taught heresy in his first encyclical suggesting the Old Covenant was not revoked and how in the world does a modernist like John Allen not understand that is heretical?  Or does he want to?  This is the problem with the Novus ordo prints my friends.  They see only to a certain degree than shutdown.  Venerable Holzhauser warned us of the John Allen's of the world when he suggested that there would be a noble attempt to defend heresy even the Bishops.  This is a clear proof that Vatican II was not from God.  There is hardly grace to distinguish what is Catholic and what is not anymore.  The mere fact that Mr. Allen would suggest there is even a Catholic left and right demonstrates quite concretely his is theologically incompetent.  There is no such thing as the "Catholic left"  for they are called heretics and outside of the Body of Christ.  He finishes this disaster of an article by suggesting the Church will officially adopt a "compromised" position.  No such chance for no Catholic can compromise nor tolerate heresy.  The Vatican II Revolution will be squashed beneath the heel of Our Lady.  Besides that Francis is not even the real Pope so what he says goes in one ear and out the other.  It is not binding at all.  In the end, the modernists are now waving the white flag as Francis gets goofier and goofier and this Mr. Allens way of "tapping out" and saying Uncle.


https://cruxnow.com/analysis/2016/12/17/thoughts-turning-heat-amoris-debate/

TradCatKnight Radio: "Catholicism vs. New Age"