"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven,
saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth....
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]

Sunday, August 31, 2014

Fr. Voigt, Sunday Reflection - Which God do you Love?‏

 Fr. Voigt, Sunday Reflection - Which God do you Love?‏ 

Modern man has succeeded in crucifying God on the altars of materialism and now we
ask "Which God will they love with their whole heart, whole soul, whole mind and whole strength?"Man possesses an eternal cry for a god.  There must be a goal in life and so modern man has created three gods to substitute for the True God.  

First, modern man produced the god of sensuality in which man's body and his sensual 
experiences form the mistaken infinite he seeks.  Eroticism is plastered on every billboard,
is presented in every Hollywood film and is sold in every nickel and dime store in the USA.
Is this the god that we must love with all that we are?  Sensuality is finite and the experiences come to an end producing no happiness but a desire for something more.  Perhaps man's 
second god can fill the gap.

In the second place, modern man had constructed an ever growing ego that demands that 
everyone be subjected to his will or whims.  From body pleasures he moves to the pleasure of power.  I make the rules.  Be sure that no one cross me or an explosion will occur that will create fear in the other.  The ego has become so large that sooner or later the bubble of pride must burst.  When the bubble blows up then the smallness and misery of man becomes all too obvious. For this reason man must look to another god.

In the third place man enters into the arena of business.  Commercial machinations and the 
desire for an accumulation of things may fill the void in the desire of the infinite.  Modern man
seeks a temporal eternity by placing his value in what he comes to possess.  In the end his 
possessions come to possess the man.  The consequences of the three modern gods of man's making cause frustration, anxiety and depression leading to many suicides.
There is but one infinite God Who recognizes the misery of man and answers it with His mercy. He has sent His only begotten Son that whosoever believes might possess eternal life.  We must desire to love Him with all our heart, all our soul, all our strength and all our mind.  In this way we will come to the work of the infinity within our souls:  to love the other as we have been loved.  This divine love has been implanted in each person created in the image and likeness of  God.  Without this religious realization modern man is doomed to reap leadership that is Marxist.
Tyrants will dominate our age and millions will lose their lives on the altars of the maniacs that
killed the love of God within.  

Therefore the role of each believer is to ransom as many souls as we can by daily offering ourprayer and works in a sacrificial mode for the souls of modern man who seeks anonymity in the masses.  Let us pray to become the Persons that God created for the restoration of the kingdom of God in this world.
In the hearts of Jesus, Mary and Joseph,

Fr. Richard Voigt

Saturday, August 30, 2014

Rome's Exorcist & Fatima

Rome's Exorcist & Fatima

Father Gabriele Amorth, the famous exorcist of Rome, claims John Paul II was pressured not to name Russia in his consecration of the world and Russia as requested during the historic Fatima apparitions.

 "We don't have time to analyze this subject, but I do hold it very dear," he said of the consecration to an outlet called Fatima TV. "Sister Lucia always said Our Lady requested the consecration of Russia and only the consecration of Russia. She also asked the consecration of the world to another great and young Portuguese saint, Alexandrina Maria da Costa. But these two things are very different and very separate. Now Our Lady requested a consecration of Russia in a very solemn and public ceremony to be performed by the Pope with all the bishops of the world. This was specified in detail by Our Lord Jesus, Who continued to appear to Sister Lucy, as Our Lady also did. He wanted this consecration to be recognized as the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary so that she would be honored together with His Sacred Heart. These are the words of Our Lord, but the time has passed and the consecration not done and Our Lord is deeply offended. You see, with our free will we can affect world events. 

"Our Lady said the consecration would be done, but that it would be too late. I feel shivers run down my spine when I remember the words 'it will be too late,'" the exorcist said in a 2012 interview that only now has come to our attention.

 "Unfortunately, they didn't open the secret up in 1960 and Russia spread her errors all over the world. The conversion of Russia would have been a triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary," the priest, now in his eighties, added.

 It was an event, said Father Amorth, that would have changed the world.
 "In 1984 the Pope quite timidly attempted to consecrate the world to Mary in St. Peter's Square," the exorcist told the organization, which long has argued about Fatima issues. "I was there, just a few feet away from him. I was the organizer of the event in St. Peter's Square. It was March 25 and the Pope had the statue of Our Lady of Fatima coming over from Fatima, the statue that usually stays in the large sanctuary at Fatima. But on that occasion he wanted the statue there. Kneeling in front of the statue, he attempted the consecration, but all around him were politicians who told him, 'You can't name Russia. You can't.'  And he asked again, 'Can I name it,' and they said, 'No, no, no.'"

 There are no details from the priest on who the "politicians" allegedly were, nor any substantiation of what was said and when it was stated. It is a hot-button issue, with the Vatican maintaining that the 1984 consecration met the requirement (as outlined in the secrets of 1917) and Sister Lucia herself, in interviews during the 1990s, saying that the consecration was accepted by Our Lady. The seer asked that those who disputed this stop.

 It also has been pointed out that Communism miraculously fell immediately after that consecration -- and that Russia itself appears to some as being in the throes of a Christian revival -- in some ways more Christian, at least in the public square, than the United States.

 For our discernment. The interview arrives at a time when an Italian journalist has released alleged comments from Sister Lucia in an unpublished diary in which the seer seemingly relates additional details about the third secret, including a description of huge geologic events occurring as an angel touches the earth's axis with the flame of a spear.

It also comes at a time when others have pointed out that another major request from Fatima -- the First Saturday devotion -- has never spread in a significant way, which was another requirement for world peace.
 Meanwhile, tensions between Russia and Ukraine remain a cause for acute international concern.

"Whoever thinks the prophetic message of Fatima is over deceives himself," asserts the exorcist. "The apparitions of Our Lady of Fatima are unique in the history of the Church. They have a great influence over the course of human history. They have religious importance as well as historical significance."

Thus far, mankind has headed down the wrong road, he believes, as has the Church. "Vatican Two: instead of a Renaissance, a disaster," intoned the well-known expert on demonology.

 "But the end is glorious and in the end Russia will be converted and the Immaculate Heart will triumph. It hasn't yet, but it will, and the world will experience a period of peace."

 "Before this finale it is probable that man will suffer some kind of chastisement by God due to the sin and cold hearts. But we're not facing the end of the world, not as some crazy men are saying. We're going toward the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart."

The video was dispensed by a group that staunchly insists three consecrations by the Vatican have not been valid responses to the request of the Virgin, who in 1917 had said, "When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by God that he is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father. To prevent this, I shall come to ask for the Consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of reparation on the First Saturdays. 

 "If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred; the Holy Father will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated. In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world." 

How a request meant to forestall what turned out to be World War Two is still relevant is a matter of debate. The tragic war is now a chapter deep in history.    

Father Malachi Martin: The Failure to Consecrate Russia 


Bishop Williamson: Moses Explains

Number CCCLXXII (372)
August 30, 2014

Moses Explains

And the Lord appeared to him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush. Exodus 3:2


If any Catholic seeks an in-depth explanation of the on-going madness in Gaza, he should read Moses in the Old Testament. For instance, if the Israelites do not keep the commandments of God, they will be stricken with “madness and blindness and fury of mind” (Deut. XXVIII, 28), among many other curses. As Fr Meinvielle said, the Jews are a theological race, and they cannot escape their theological destiny – they are bound to God like no other people on earth.
In Deuteronomy Moses is giving to the Israelites their last solemn instructions before they enter the Promised Land, and before he dies. In Chapter 28 (parallelled by Levit. XXVI) Moses makes very clear the mind of Jehovah (or Yahweh), the God of the Old Testament, identical with the God of the New Testament: the Jews will be specially blessed (v.1–14) if they obey the one true God, they will be specially cursed (v. 15–68) if they disobey him. Either way, they are a special race being given a special knowledge of the one true God for a special mission that they must fulfil for him, with a special reward or punishment from him, depending on how they fulfil that mission.
No wonder Jews think they are special! Among the blessings listed here by Moses, God will raise them “higher than all nations” (v.1); “to be a holy people unto himself” (v.9); to be “the head and not the tail” (v.13). But in every one of these three verses it is noteworthy how Moses makes the Israelites’ superiority depend on their obedience to God: if they will “hear the voice of God and keep all his commandments” (v.1); if they “hear his commandments and walk in his ways” (v.9); if they will “hear the commandments of God and keep and do them” (v.13).

Thou shalt hear his voice, and do the commandments and justices which I command thee. Deuteronomy 27:10
 On the other hand if the Israelites try to be that superior nation on their own terms, disobeying God (v.15), then a multitude of curs es will come upon them (v.16–68), and they will be scorned, hated and trampled upon by all other nations: they will be “scattered throughout all the kingdoms of the earth” (v.25); they will be stricken with “madness and blindness and fury of mind” (v.28 – think of Gaza!); the stranger with whom they live will “rise up over” them, he will be the head and they will be the tail (v.43–44); their enemy will put an “iron yoke” upon their neck (v.48); the Lord God will afflict them with all kinds of sufferings (v.59–61), and they will be “taken away from the land which they will go in to possess” (v.63). And all of this they will suffer because of not keeping and fulfilling the words of God’s law (v.58).
Alas, did all these blessings and curses announced by the great Moses avail to make the Israelites recognize and serve their Messiah and Incarnate God when he came, as also prophesied by Moses (D eut. XVIII, 15–18)? No, they crucified him instead, which has for now nearly 2000 years brought down on their heads all of Moses’ curses. They made themselves into the most despised and downtrodden nation on earth, and they lost their right to the Promised Land, being driven out and scattered everywhere else from the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.
Nor does their regaining possession of the Holy Land mean that the curse is being lifted, because they are doing it on their own terms and not on God’s, so that the very re-possession turns into part of the curse. As Plato said (Georgias), it is better to suffer than to commit an injustice, and therefore in spiritual reality, the Israelis are more to be pitied than the Palestinians. Patience. We “all have sinned and do need the glory of God” (Rom. III, 22–23).
Kyrie eleison.

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Latest Resistance Apologetics...

Latest Resistance Apologetics

Fr. Yves le Roux: A Writer of Fanciful Fiction!

More vague talk from the Neo-SSPX. We consistently hear from the Neo-SSPX, that the objective material we present, is either "rumors", hearsay" or  just "internet gossip". Ultimately, it is simply, a futile attempt to impotently defend against the "known". 

 Article from the Recusant: 



LATEST Bishop Williamson Eleison Comments:


Some readers of these Comments no doubt objected to the reference made last week (EC 370) to the “Resistance” presently making “little apparent headway.” They might have preferred a valiant call to arms. But we must stay real. For instance, when the Traditional diocese of Campos in Brazil fell back into the arms of Newrome back in 2001, did not several of us say that out of some 25 priests formed in Bishop de Castro Mayer’s school, at least a few would break ranks? Yet not one of them has gone independent since then to continue defending Tradition as Campos had always defended it, and so all of them are more or less on the neo-modernist slide. However, if we do stay real, there is not nothing to be said.

Read More... 


Latest Resistance Videos 

 Fr. Chazal Conference Brisbane 


Fr. Hewko: St Louis IX

Fr. Pfeiffer: Pope Liberius & the Sin of Compromise


Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Francis' interfaith soccer match....

Francis' interfaith soccer match 

In Following with Vatican II modernism based upon the "new theology" Francis is slated to have arranged for an "interfaith" soccer match to  help promote "peace" in these very turbulent times. Now, one must ask "what peace does he speak of? Is it the peace in which the world gives or the peace which Christ gives which only comes about when true conversion takes place? I must remind everyone that Vatican II's "new doctrine" of false ecumenism does not entail conversion. So then I ask, "If there is no need to convert to Christ's Catholic Faith then how can true peace be wrought? This is more propaganda which is being laid down for the soon Apostate Church, a "Church" free of Dogma and imprisoned by "secular humanism" that Our Lady has been warning us about for hundreds of years. We cannot expect anything less from NewChurch but we can continue to wake up the masses to the deception in our days. Watch and pray(Mk 13:33)! Set to take place at 8:45 p.m. local time on Sept. 1 in Rome's Olympic Stadium, the match will draw together past soccer players who represent different cultures and religions, including Buddhists, Christians – Catholic and Protestant – Jews, Hindus, Muslims and Shintos.  The Masonic sect teaches convergence and coexistence; the Catholic Church rightly teaches conversion. Unfortunately, man is going to find out very shortly that this silly notion of "world peace" ends in sudden destruction. "For when they shall say, peace and security; then shall sudden destruction come upon them..." 1 Thessalonians 5:3 


Soccer stars get ready for inter-religious match in Rome 


Tuesday, August 26, 2014

How Bugnini Grew Up under Pius XII

How Bugnini Grew Up under Pius XII 

Dr. Carol Byrne, Great Britain

Fr. Annibale Bugnini, CM, was a priest of the Congregation of the Mission, an institution founded by St. Vincent de Paul (hence the epithet Vincentian) to preach the Gospel to the poor, as its motto, “evangelizare pauperibus” indicates. In 1947, a scandal arose in the residence where Bugnini and his and co-worker, Fr. Francesco Bossarelli, CM, lived in Rome at the Church of San Silvestro al Quirinale, which belonged to the Congregation of the Mission. Inside the murky world of San Silvestro: the ‘Bossarelli Case’

Bugnini and Bossarelli had been close collaborators, running the Congregation’s affairs at San Silvestro and editing its missionary publications, Edizioni Liturgiche e Missionarie.

Records from the Vincentian archives show that in 1947 Bugnini, as Secretary of the Congregation’s Provincial Council, was in charge of its administrative affairs when millions of dollars of Vatican funds went missing. 

Bugnini and Bossarelli plotted from the the Church of San Silvestro al Quirinale in Rome

A special Commission set up by Pius XII found that Fr. Francesco Bossarelli “and his associates” were guilty of embezzling $2,000,000 belonging to the Vatican in “black market financial dealings.” 

The Provincial Superior at San Silvestro was dismissed by the Holy See for covering up the affair. Bugnini must also have had confidential knowledge of these criminal activities, a situation from which he could not have emerged with clean hands.

Hiding behind a shield of secrecy

Unknown to Pius XII, Fr. Bugnini had been making clandestine visits to the Centre de Pastorale Liturgique (CPL), a progressivist conference centre for liturgical reform which organized national weeks for priests.

Inaugurated in Paris in 1943 on the private initiative of two Dominican priests under the presidency of Fr. Lambert Beauduin, it was a magnet for all who considered themselves in the vanguard of the Liturgical Movement. It would play host to some of the most famous names who influenced the direction of Vatican II: Frs. Beauduin, Guardini, Congar, Chenu, Daniélou, Gy, von Balthasar, de Lubac, Boyer, Gelineau etc.

Archbishop Bugnini greeted by Pope Montini, who since he was a Monsignor cleared the way for Fr. Bugnini's work of destruction

 It could, therefore, be considered as the confluence of all the forces of Progressivism, which saved and re-established Modernism condemned by Pope Pius X in Pascendi

According to its co-founder and director, Fr. Pie Duployé, OP, Bugnini had requested a “discreet” invitation to attend a CPL study week held near Chartres in September 1946:

“I had a visit from an Italian Lazarist, Fr. Bugnini, who had asked me to obtain an invitation for him… During our return journey to Paris, as the train was passing along the Swiss Lake at Versailles, he said to me: 'I admire what you are doing, but the greatest service I can render you is never to say a word in Rome about all that I have just heard.'” 

Much more was involved here than the issue of secrecy. The person whose heart beat as one with the interests of the reformers would return to Rome to be placed by an unsuspecting Pope in charge of his Commission for the General Reform of the Liturgy.  

The plot thickens

But someone in the Roman Curia did know about the CPL – Msgr. Giovanni Battista Montini, the acting Secretary of State and future Paul VI – who sent a telegram to the CPL dated January 3, 1947. It purported to come from the Pope with an apostolic blessing. If, in Bugnini’s estimation, the Roman authorities were to be kept in the dark about the CPL so as not to compromise its activities, a mystery remains. Was the telegram issued under false pretences, or did Pius XII really know and approve of the CPL?

What is certain is that Fr. Bugnini could not have been appointed as Secretary of the 1948 Commission without Msgr. Montini’s intervention with Pius XII, as it was the Secretary of State who, in the normal course of Vatican affairs, had the biggest say in forwarding names for papal appointments.
Sow Bugnini, reap corruption

Card.. Bea, confessor of Pius XII, won the Pope to the cause of the reforms

 As history has shown, appointing Bugnini as Secretary of the Liturgical Commission was the equivalent of placing Dracula in charge of the blood bank. This monstrous figure was allowed to assume complete control of the Commission and to work against a centralized control of the liturgy vested in the Curia.

His ultimate foe was the Congregation of Rites, which had been founded by Pope Sixtus V in 1588 to safeguard the uniformity of the Roman Rite. He complained that “for centuries the Church willed that all worship in the Roman Rite should everywhere show perfect uniformity.” 

His objective was to smash “the hegemony of the Congregation of Rites.” Soon it would be reduced to a tin pot army incapable of defending the realm of the Church’s worship against his policy of “inculturation.” Then, it would be abolished by Paul VI in 1969.

Fr. Bugnini informs us in his posthumous memoirs that the Commission met in “absolute secrecy.” The result was that not even the Pope could be certain of its deliberations. The only updates he received were relayed through biased intermediaries: Msgr. Montini whose own credibility was bound up with the reforms and Fr. Augustin Bea, a member of the Commission, who had already been permitted by Pius XII to dabble in liturgical matters and break with Tradition. 

Bugnini stated: “The Commission enjoyed the full confidence of the Pope, who was kept informed by Msgr. Montini, and even more so, weekly, by Fr. Bea, the confessor of Pius XII. Thanks to this intermediary, we could arrive at remarkable results, even during the periods when the Pope's illness prevented anyone else getting near him.” 

The reason for the secrecy was not hard to find: Fr. Bugnini’s agenda included liturgical deviations condemned by Pius XII in Mediator Dei, even though he could not introduce them all immediately. In the light of this collusion, the Novus Ordo of 1969 was simply the end game of a decades-long strategy masterminded by Fr. Bugnini with Msgr. Montini acting as his personal consigliere and “Grand Vizier” to Pius XII. 

The hermeneutic of ‘Bugninuity’

 One of the most objectionable characteristics of Bugnini was his capacity for deception. He crossed his heart and swore repeatedly that he was carrying out the wishes of Pope Pius X and following the tradition of the Council of Trent in overhauling the liturgy. His self-declared aim was to return the liturgy of the Roman Rite from a “dark age” of unintelligibility to “worship in spirit and truth” in which all could actively participate.

A reform already in practice in the '50s in Portland, above, and Kansas City

 This agenda was set out as early as 1949 in the Ephemerides Liturgicae, a leading Roman review on liturgical studies of which Fr. Bugnini was Editor from 1944 to 1965.

First, he denigrated the traditional liturgy as a dilapidated building (“un vecchio edificio”), which should be condemned because it was in danger of falling to pieces (“sgretolarsi”) and, therefore, beyond repair.

Then, he criticized it for its alleged “deficiencies, incongruities and difficulties,” which rendered it spiritually “sterile” and would prevent it appealing to modern sensibilities. 

It is difficult to understand how, in the same year that he published this anti-Catholic diatribe, he was made a Professor of Liturgy in Rome’s Propaganda Fide (Propagation of the Faith) University. 

His solution was to return to the simplicity of early Christian liturgies and jettison all subsequent developments, especially traditional devotions. 

These ideas expressed in 1949 would form the foundational principles of Vatican II’s Sacrosanctum Concilium. For all practical purposes, the Roman Rite was dead in the water many years before it was officially buried by Paul VI.
To be continued...

Source: TraditionInAction 


 Fr Hesse: Cardinal Stickler says new Mass is Protestant 



Sunday, August 24, 2014

NEW! TradCatKnight Exclusive: Our Lady of Heede

NEW! TradCatKnight Exclusive: Our Lady of Heede 

Another unknown but important prophecy: Heede, Germany 1937 , very related with the most important message Our Lady of Fatima .
Our Lord Jesus spoke to the children of Heede ( Anna Schulte, Greta and Maria Gauseforth and Susanna Bruns- Our Lady then appeared to them subsequently....

 Youtube Version

Gloria.Tv Version  

Special Sunday Message: "True Gain"

Special Sunday Message: "True Gain"

2 Corinthians 13:4
For although he was crucified through weakness, yet he liveth by the power of God. For we also are weak in him: but we shall live with him by the power of God towards you. 

Brothers and Sisters I write to you in the Selfless Love and peace of the Union and Marriage of Jesus Christ and of His Sacred Heart and all the blessings that flow forth from it. If we are to truly advance in the spiritual life we must enter within first to identify our own weaknesses.for it is written that throughst my weaknesses I would arrive at Your Strength. Therefore, exalting, my own unworthiness, I arise in the power of thy Selfless Love which come from Thy Sacred Heart. It is sown in weakness; it shall rise in power. 1 Corinthians 15:43  In so far as I am willing to allow myself to be “crushed” via my daily crosses is to the degree that I will obtain His heavenly strength. For a fine wine is only produced after the grape is crushed and so too it is with our battle against “the self”. It is not by my own strength that I live nor do I have the power alone to choose when I die. No eagle flying in the sky flies by his own strength. Modern men are rabbits running to and fro but going nowhere in their horizontal limited view. From our end, we must be vehicles of faith and hope, which “rests” upon the Wind of God, so that we may arise not only above the storm but to to the Son who is our Source and End
  Verily, who is this man who can identify his own weakness? It is the man of prayer who longs for the Isle of silence and solitude; it is the man not tied down to earthly affairs for his heart belongs to thee Beloved. Therefore, the more I stay inward and am in prayer the more humble I become recognizing my own wretchedness and shortcomings. Yea, it is the Hands of Christ which shapes and molds us not our own. For He who dwells above us seeks to dwell in that which He hast created in great mystery. His humble Sacred Heart hast shown us the way, in so that, in His weakness am I made strong. “…the weakness of God is stronger than men.” 1 Corinthians 1:25  It is due to man’s fallen nature I arrived in this world a stained pilgrim in exile but through Christ  I am cleansed. But why do so many chose to live in and by nature alone? For God’s Love is perfect and my nature which “tends” to self is weak, therefore, we worry, have fear and doubt, which ultimately becomes an act of the heart not suited for any believer. “And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling. 1 Corinthians 2:3  We were meant for the skies as eagles not the cliffs where so many remain in trepidation! Yea it is the Divine Hands which guide; it is He who can only live when I first learn to die.  Man’s measure is not Gods and therefore we must quit trying to please the world and man. We must embrace the lowliness of His Heart and allow ourselves to not only“lower” the self but to get rid of her altogether. If our hearts do not remain "below" our neighbor then how can we serve our neighbor. And if, after examination of conscience, I cannot be lower than my neighbor, of what good use can you be for God and for thy neighbor? This is the Law of Selfless Love. 

Nay, ‘we obtain” when we first learn that earthly gain can be an impediment to our ultimate goal. When all things are soon taken from us we shall still have our faith and hope and our eyes of charity! We can truly rebuild society and make Christ King of all Nations when we first learn we are limited creatures which cannot fly or arise to the bright blue skies above without the assistance of Gods grace. Therefore, start in your own communities. My ‘gain” in all things is to please Him and therefore when I seemingly lose “material” goods how do I really "lose" when this pleases Him? And how so, you ask? This is yet another opportunity for a man to be stripped in so that he will now be "low enough" to embrace those heavy crosses which crush “the self” out of the soul. It is He who left heaven, who left it all, on the account, that I may have all, Who is Him. Is there no greater Love; is there no other more poetic scene of poverty and humility and yet we on a daily basis gloat. May God have mercy upon my own soul! Mayst your own heart exclaim; “In Him I am filled, I am content with nothing at all in earthly gain, so as to keep these potential impediments from my progress toward His Sacred Heart! Let us pray for those daily graces thru the Immaculate Heart so that we might penetrate our own souls in “self knowledge”; so that we may have the scales from our inner eyes removed like Saul. We are weak, my friends, but He who gave all asks the question, "Do you give your WHOLE heart to Me for My good use?" May God forgive us when we ignorantly or obstinately do not allow Him to take ownership over our whole being. Amen  May thee Immaculate Heart of Our Lady guide, protect and guard your heart everyday in this exile, Ave Maria – Amen.

“True Gain”
Weak, I come crying
Strong, Thy Heart art
Trembling, as I see Thee upon Calvary dying
Sin, I cannot escape
But it is Thy Sacred Heart which frees
So that as eagles now we are seen flying
Weighed down, no more,
Thy Love which in return stripped naked, sin 
And from the devil, Ye tore
And shook hell on deep…
This abyss of souls locked in “self” to its very core
For it is in “weakness” in which I have entered this life
But in Thy Heart’s own I choose to remain
In hopes of exiting in grace
For Ye art our hearts only true gain…

 Lenten Meditational Series: Imitation of the Sacred Heart Part 1 
 "On Purifying the Heart"

Saturday, August 23, 2014

Will the REAL Archbishop Lefebvre please stand up...

Will the REAL Archbishop Lefebvre please stand up...

I often find myself scratching my head when reading the Neo-SSPX and their priests' impotent attempts to refute the Resistance on the varying levels of practicality and subsequent positions on doctrine. The Resistance, who still maintains Archbishop Lefebvre's "hardline" stance against Modernist Rome is only growing in this New Crusade. This particular priest(Father Laisney) continues on the path of the Neo-SSPX and their illogicality. We find over and over again contradictory statements from these compromisers on their own founders position & doctrine. Will the REAL Archbishop Lefebvre please stand up! They will also bypass or not make mention of the heretical/schismatic Preamble Bishop Fellay handed over which has never been officially retracted. Furthermore, they break with Archbishop Lefebvre's principle of no practical agreement until the Revolution goes away(Vatican II). There is no need to be recognized by modernists, that is, by the open destroyers of the Catholic Faith. Here, once again, we see this priest, contradicting what Archbishop Lefebvre's says in his own words.

Neo-SSPX priest Father Laisney to Fr. Chazal(4-19-2013):
"Beware of your thinking about the “conciliar church”: if you think it is a separate structure from the Catholic Church, then you are mistaken, nor was this Archbishop Lefebvre’s thinking, and so is very dangerous."

Archbishop Lefebvre:
“What could be clearer? We must [according to Rome] henceforth obey and be faithful to the Conciliar Church, no longer to the Catholic Church. Right there is our whole problem: we are suspended a divinis by the Conciliar Church, the Conciliar Church, to which we have no wish to belong! That Conciliar Church is a schismatic church because it breaks with the Catholic Church that has always been. It has its new dogmas, its new priesthood, its new institutions, its new worship… The Church that affirms such errors is at once schismatic and heretical. This Conciliar Church is, therefore, not Catholic. To whatever extent Pope, Bishops, priests, or the faithful adhere to this new church, they separate themselves from the Catholic Church.” (Archbishop Lefebvre, Reflections on his suspension a divinis, July 29, 1976)

We would have to re-enter this Conciliar Church in order, supposedly, to make it Catholic. That is a complete illusion. It is not the subjects that make the superiors, but the superiors who make the subjects" (Archbishop Lefebvre, Interview, Fideliter, 1989)

“On the other hand, we have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missæ, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the laicization of all society." (Archbishop Lefebvre, letter to Cardinal Gantin, July 6, 1988)

“We believe we can affirm, purely by internal and external criticism of Vatican II, i.e. by analyzing the texts and studying the Council’s ins and outs, that by turning its back on tradition and breaking with the Church of the past, it is a schismatic council.” (Archbishop Lefebvre, Le Figaro, August 4, 1976)

(Archbishop Lefebvre, 1976)
This Council represents, both in the opinion of the Roman authorities as in our own, a NEW church which they call themselves the "Conciliar Church."

(Archbishop Lefebvre, 1976)
In so far as the new Church separates itself from the old Church we cannot follow it. That is the position, and that is why we maintain Tradition, we keep firmly to Tradition; and I am sure we are being of immense service to the Church.

(Archbishop Lefebvre, 1976)
How can one avoid the conclusion: there where the faith of the Church is, there also is her sanctity, and there where the sanctity of the Church is, there is the Catholic Church. A Church which no longer brings forth good fruits, a Church which is sterile, is not the Catholic Church.

The Conciliar Church, having now reached everywhere, is spreading errors contrary to the Catholic Faith and, as a result of these errors, it has corrupted the sources of grace, which are the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Sacraments. This false Church is in an ever-deeper state of rupture with the Catholic Church. Resulting from these principles and facts is the absolute need to continue the Catholic episcopacy in order to continue the Catholic Church. (Archbishop Lefebvre)

"To the degree that the Pope departs from this tradition, he becomes schismatic, he breaks with the Church. Theologians such as Saint Bellarmine, Cajetan, Cardinal Journet and many others have studied this possibility. It is not something inconceivable. "This Council represents, both in the opinion of the Roman authorities as in our own, A NEW CHURCH which they call themselves the "CONCILIAR CHURCH". (Archbishop Lefebvre, 1976)

*The Neo-SSPX priests have no idea what Archbishop Lefebvre truly taught and stood for and they even admit "if he were alive" his position would change to our own" The Neo-SSPX is compromised. Cant commune with nor support compromisers.
I don't know perhaps there is "another" Archbishop Lefebvre out there that I am unaware of that they speak of??
#MarianCorps #Resistance

The Neo-SSPX "Archbishop Lefebvre

The REAL Archbishop! 
A Saint vs. Modernist Rome