Making Sense of the Supernatural: Aliens/UFOs, Fallen Angels, Nephilim, the Flood, the Bible, Transhumanism, and the Illuminati. Yes, They All Tie Together.

 Making Sense of the Supernatural: Aliens/UFOs, Fallen Angels, Nephilim, the Flood, the Bible, Transhumanism, and the Illuminati. Yes, They All Tie Together.

James Perloff

There is a reference in the satanic talmud about the Nephilim returning before the messianic era (Antichrist) begins

Those familiar with my writing know I have never written an article or post on aliens and UFOs. In Chapter 22 of Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, I was pretty content to dismiss them as a high-tech government psyop.
Indeed, there were reasons to take that position. Report from Iron Mountain (1967) was an alleged and credible leaked report of a U.S. government thinktank, whose task had been to find methods of controlling populations in light of the possibility that nuclear weapons might render war impractical as a coercive threat. The group favored environmental threats as the way to go, and in their report’s wake, numerous environmental scares were raised: global warming, acid rain, overpopulation, ozone depletion, toxic waste, deforestation, endangered species, etc. However, the study had also explored the possibility of a simulated UFO attack, but did not think it practical given the existing technology at that time:

Credibility, in fact, lies at the heart of the problem of developing a political substitute for war. . . . The most ambitious and unrealistic space project cannot of itself generate a believable external menace. It has been hotly argued that such a menace would offer the “last, best hope of peace,” etc., by uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by “creatures” from other planets or from outer space. Experiments have been proposed to test the credibility of an out-of-our-world invasion threat; it is possible that a few of the more difficult-to-explain “flying saucer” incidents of recent years were in fact early experiments of this kind. If so, they could hardly have been judged encouraging.¹

Faking an alien attack is nothing new: in 1938, Orson Welles did just that. He made media history when he panicked the nation by broadcasting The War of the Worlds on radio as “news reports” of a Martian invasion.

The idea that an alien attack could unite mankind (i.e., accept world government) was voiced by President Ronald Reagan before the UN:

Former President Bill Clinton echoed that perspective on Jimmy Kimmel Live:

On CNN, economist Paul Krugman proposed a fake alien invasion to fix the economy:

Furthermore, the technology necessary to simulate an invasion, which the Iron Mountain group had rejected as inadequate in the 1960s, has obviously stridden far ahead in the half-century since, outlined in some detail by the late Serge Monast in his description of NASA’s Project Blue Beam, by which high tech (such as holograms projected from satellites) would convince people of an impending alien attack, as well as a returned Messiah and other deceptions. I realize Monast has been criticized for not substantiating his claims with hard documentation from NASA, but since he died in 1996 of an alleged heart attack, very shortly after going public with his revelations, I think this criticism itself lacks teeth. Had Monast been alive all these years, evading questions and never following through with a book, his critics would have a stronger platform.
Certainly one point is undeniable: Hollywood has produced a slew of films dramatizing aliens and space travel. The public has been acclimated to the degree that these things seem normal and real. The 1950s saw a rash of “creatures from outer space” B-movies that later went on to serve as unintentional humor for bored late-night TV viewers. All that changed in the 1970s as Hollywood invested countless millions to give the genre a makeover with epics like Close Encounters of the Third Kind, Star Wars and ET, and numerous blockbusters since, such as Alien, Independence Day, and Men in Black.
Because Hollywood is governed by the same financial oligarchy that controls the government, I long believed this sci-fi explosion was probably a run-up to the postulated fake alien invasion. I believed the recent increase in UFO sightings was probably just a reflection of advances in high-tech fakery, funded by a military “black budget.” With all the false flags that have brought America into the interminable Middle East conflicts, why not an alien false flag, with human-zapping extraterrestrials replacing those ISIS beheading videos, to bring us – at last – into world government?
However, after a fellow 9-11 Truther introduced me to the work of L . A. Marzulli, my perspective has changed. Far too many credible witnesses, ranging from pilots to scholars, have encountered not only UFOs, but aliens themselves. A friend of mine who is an Air Force veteran told me of how he and his crew encountered a UFO while on a nighttime bombing mission during the Vietnam War. I do not believe that the UFO/alien phenomena can be dismissed as purely a psyop that has deceived gullible people. I believe we are dealing with a more complex picture, with significant implications for both history and the future.

The Flood and Fallen Angels

“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” is a famous and valid maxim. Fully observing it sometimes requires searching the deep past. For our purposes, we start with the Flood of Noah. In my atheist youth, I regarded it as nothing more than a fairy tale for naïve Sunday School children. But when I began studying creationist literature in the 1990s, I was stunned by the scientific evidence supporting it.
About 75 percent of the rock in the Earth’s geologic column is sedimentary (deposited chiefly by water, like limestone or sandstone). Since the days of Charles Darwin’s close friend Charles Lyell (1797-1875), evolutionary geologists have argued that the geologic layers simply resulted from natural processes visible today – gradual erosion and sedimentation, from oceans covering Earth. This explanation supplied Darwin with the endless millions of years his theory of evolution required in order to work.
However, this claim is belied by the countless billions of fossils found throughout the geologic layers. Most fossils are remains mineralized by sediments. It’s not just bones we find, but soft body parts such as fishes’ fins and scales, jellyfish, worms, and tree leaves. We even have fossils of animals in the act of giving birth and eating each other.

These cannot have been generated by slow sedimentation. When an animal dies, it normally either (1) decomposes, or (2) is devoured by predators, before it can be buried under sediment. That is why so few fossils have been created in recent years. For example, millions of buffaloes were killed in the 19th century, but they left no fossils – scavengers and decomposing bacteria took care of that. Fossilization requires quick burial.
The epic worldwide flood described in the Bible, by churning up billions of tons of sediment, would have resulted in rapid burial of Earth’s living organisms, and explains why innumerable well-preserved fossils are found throughout the world. It also explains why most of the geologic column’s rock is sedimentary. Further reinforcing the Flood are the flood legends of more than 200 cultures.
The Bible says God brought the Flood on Earth, but does not, at first glance, seem to elaborate on why beyond the wickedness of man:

And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. (Genesis 6:5)

However, much clarification is found in the preceding verses, which are among the Bible’s most controversial:

And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. . . . There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. (Genesis 6:1, 2, 4)

Many theologians today teach that these “sons of God” were simply godly men who were from the lineage of Seth (the third son of Adam and Eve) and that “sons of men” refers to the “ungodly” line of Cain. However, this view was not taught until the 5th century AD.¹ Prior to that, it was understood that these “sons of God” were fallen angels. “Sons of God” was a term used for angels in the Old Testament (e.g., Job 1:6, “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them.”).
The book of Enoch makes the meaning of Genesis 6 unmistakable. (Enoch is not part of the Bible’s official canon, but the Bible does reference Enoch. The book of Jude, for example, references content of Enoch in verse 6, and verses 14-15 loosely quote Enoch 1:9. Likewise 2 Peter 2:4 references content from Enoch. The book of Enoch is found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, and is part of the Ethiopic canon of scriptures.)
Here is the relevant text – chapters 6 and 7 of the book of Enoch:

And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: “Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.” And Semjâzâ, who was their leader, said unto them: “I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.” And they all answered him and said: “Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.” Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And they were in all two hundred; who descended ⌈in the days⌉ of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And these are the names of their leaders: Sêmîazâz, their leader, Arâkîba, Râmêêl, Kôkabîêl, Tâmîêl, Râmîêl, Dânêl, Êzêqêêl, Barâqîjâl, Asâêl, Armârôs, Batârêl, Anânêl, Zaqîêl, Samsâpêêl, Satarêl, Tûrêl, Jômjâêl, Sariêl. These are their chiefs of tens.
And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another’s flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones.

Likewise, the non-canonical book of Jubilees says:

And it came to pass when the children of men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born unto them, that the angels of God saw them on a certain year of this jubilee, that they were beautiful to look upon; and they took themselves wives of all whom they chose, and they bare unto them sons and they were giants. And lawlessness increased on the earth and all flesh corrupted its way, alike men and cattle and beasts and birds and everything that walketh on the earth – all of them corrupted their ways and their orders, and they began to devour each other. (Jubilees 5:1–2)

Yes, that was the understanding: fallen angels had sex with women and their offspring were giants. This is apt to trigger objections, so I’ll address two – one theological, the other scientific.

Would Angel-Human Hybrids Be Possible?

Some Christians say that this would be impossible because Jesus said, speaking of the resurrected dead: “For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.” (Matthew 22:30)
However, Jesus said angels in heaven do not marry. And he did not say sex was impossible for angels. Elsewhere in the Bible, angels manifest bodily functions. For example, in Genesis 18, Abraham prepared a meal for three angels, which they ate.
Likewise, Jesus did not deny that resurrected people have biological functions. When He appeared before his disciples in His own resurrected body, He ate fish and a honeycomb (Luke 24:42-43). Jesus had also told the disciples at the Last Supper, “I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.” (Matthew 26:29).
So apparently both angels and resurrected humans can eat and drink; they have functional digestive systems. Could they not also have functional reproductive systems?
The second objection: Would it be scientifically possible for an angel to mate with a human? This question is only loosely “scientific,” since we don’t know enough about angels to soundly answer it based on observations.
However, we know that, in the Bible, angels could assume the appearance of men – so much so that men of Sodom sought sex with the angels who visited Lot (Genesis 19). Thus sexual attraction could occur between the two.
But to reproduce, the angels would require DNA. Is that possible? The question might seem unanswerable. However, all known living organisms have DNA. Like the rest of the world, angels are part of God’s creation. Psalm 8:5 says God made mankind “a little lower than the angels.” That He used DNA in designing angels does not seem that far-fetched.
If angels mated with humans, creating a race of giants, there should be physical remains of giants. In fact, many have been discovered.

 READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE HERE:

 https://jamesperloff.com/2015/04/28/making-sense-of-the-supernatural/

Jim Vieira/Hugh Newman "Giants In North America"