FEAR or FAITH? FRIGHT or FLIGHT?
Welcome Eagles to the New Crusade!
Will thou help defend the Fortress of Faith?

BOOKMARK us & check in DAILY for the latest Endtimes News!
SPREAD WORD TO YOUR FRIENDS & FAMILY!

"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven,
saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth....
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]

Monday, November 13, 2017

JUSTIFYING THE EVIL VATICAN 2 COUNCIL: The Immense “Holiness” of the Novus Ordo Popes

JUSTIFYING THE EVIL VATICAN 2 COUNCIL: The Immense “Holiness” of the Novus Ordo Popes

You would think that a minimum sense of embarrassment would keep the Modernist infiltrators into the Catholic Church from being too blunt about the farce they have been pulling off since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958, but that’s just not the case anymore. At this point, they’re not even trying to hide the patent ridiculousness of their schemes.



The latest case in point is Francis’ declaration that the Modernist Bishop Albino Luciani (1912-1978), better known AS Pope John Paul I (reigned Aug. 26 – Sep. 28, 1978), practiced the Christian virtues to a heroic degree. This decision, which the Vatican announced on Nov. 9, 2017 in its daily press bulletin, grants to John Paul I the title “Venerable”. The next step, called beatification, is the last one before canonization, which is the declaration of sainthood, as the Catholic Encyclopedia explains.
Here are some news stories regarding Francis’ decision to recognize heroic virtue in Bp. Luciani:
Let’s briefly review some of that Lucianian “heroic virtue”: John Paul I abolished the solemn papal coronation ceremony, replacing it instead with a mere “installation”. John Paul I stopped using the gestatorial chair and only resumed its use after people complained they could no longer see their “Pope”. John Paul I was the first in 2,000 years of Christendom to use a curious “papal” double name because he couldn’t decide which of his two Modernist predecessors — John XXIII or Paul VI — he admired more. Although the man nicknamed “the Smiling Pope” reigned for a mere 33 days, this was enough time for him to declare that God is our Mother more than our Father, to call the Protestant then-U.S. President Jimmy Carter a “fervent Christian”, and to praise Italian Satanist Giosuè Carducci during a Sunday Angelus address. Details and more information about Albino Luciani can be found on our John Paul I topical page here.
All of this isn’t even the main focus of this post, however. Rather, the point of this post is to expose the manifest charade that is being pulled off with the obsession to “canonize” every Novus Ordo Pope. If we look at the scorecard of what the Vatican wants you to believe about the very men who have brought about the near-total collapse of Catholicism throughout the entire world in the last 60 years, this is where we’re at:
The only reason why Benedict XVI (2005-2013) has not yet had his canonization proceedings opened is the fact that he is still alive, and not even the Novus Ordo is going to declare to be saints people who are still alive — at least not yet. And of course we all know that as soon as Francis is called to judgment, half the globe will demand his instant canonization.
What is the clear message here? It’s simple, and everybody gets it: Every Vatican II “Pope” is a Saint! It’s just amazing, but ever since that phenomenal council, there simply hasn’t been a bad apple in their ranks yet!
Sure, they also on occasion promote a little bit the causes of Pope Pius IX (“beatified” by John Paul II in 2000) and of Pope Pius XII (declared “venerable” by Benedict XVI in 2009), but that’s just so they can hide behind two pre-conciliar Popes in case someone accuses them of just trying to canonize Vatican II.
The idea that in the last 150 years, seven out of ten Popes have been saints, is patently ridiculous. This becomes clear when you contrast it with pre-conciliar Church history. Consider that out of all the Popes who reigned between 1566 and 1958, only two ended up being canonized (St. Pius V by Clement XI in 1712 and St. Pius X by Pius XII in 1954) — and only one Pope during that time period was beatified (Bl. Innocent XI by Pius XII in 1956). Aside from the many martyrs during the first few centuries of Church history, Pope-Saints are quite rare, perhaps because practicing heroic virtue in the exercise of this most exalted office is extraordinarily difficult.
And now we are supposed to believe that since the glorious “New Springtime” of Vatican II — the stark effects of which we have chronicled and exposed throughout this web site –, one Pope after another has been a saint? Just how stupid do these Novus Ordo Modernists think people are?
This whole thing is not only a sham. Declaring all of your leaders to be extraordinarily holy is also one of the hallmarks of a cult. This label fits the Vatican II Sect quite well, of course, it’s just that one would think they’re not so foolish as to make the fraud so obvious. But at this point, there is probably no more need to disguise it — there are simply not enough people who care, and it is much easier to deceive the masses than to convince them that they’ve been deceived.
For those who would like to review what a real Pope-Saint is like and contrast it with the pseudo-sanctity of John XXIII and John Paul II, for example, the virtues and holiness practiced by Saint Pius X provide a refreshing reality check:
When you consider the real sanctity of St. Pius X and how it relates (not only, of course) to his adherence to and guarding of the true Catholic doctrine, you realize very quickly why “Pope” Francis completely ignored the 100th anniversary of Pius X’s death in 2014, despite professing to have a “strong devotion” to him.


SOURCE

21 comments:

  1. Didn't Malachi Martin say that John Paul 1 was going to expose the masons in the Vatican?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. he was going to unmask the vatican bank scandal..i think its a stretch to say he was going to reverse the council..

      Delete
    2. Yes.It's quite clear,jp I was as much a modernist as the rest of the vII popes.Unlikely he was going to call out the infiltrators.

      Delete
  2. When does it become Sedevacantism? And doesn't that mean that sedevacantists are outside the dogma of the Catholic Church?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sedevacantism is an opinion and not its not heretical, just dont agree with it

      Delete
    2. Okay, Eric, thank you! I have been concerned about being involved with any group or people who are of that opinion. I am not that, what I consider to be, extreme. Although, I am pro pre-Vatican II beliefs and have become as I learn more, mostly thanks to you, a Traditionalist Catholic!

      Delete
  3. Replies
    1. YES BUT IT IS JUST A RIAL TO SEE WHO WILL BE FAITHFUL

      Delete
  4. With all this going on and since learning so much Truth with your website I am now thankfully aware and joining a Traditional Catholic Church which is in Latin ! Last time I went to a "new" mass the female eucharistic minister dropped the Host on my chest ! I looked at her and said "that is Jesus you just dropped" ! I picked it up with my fingers and placed it on my tongue, which is what she should have done. After that I made sure to go in the line where the Priest was giving out communion. I was going to that church St. Francis Xavier in Phoenix Az because my sister joined the choir there. But I have felt uncomfortable because of a few reasons. The eucharist ministers, the female alter servers , the non reverence and also when the choir receives Holy communion they quickly swallow and sing right away. Other things bother me too but that is just a few. Thank you Eric for guiding me and helping me find a "Traditional" church !

    Nancy Wilkinson/Maureen O'Hara

    ReplyDelete
  5. DEAR FB FRIENDS. I AM PREPARING FOR A SPECIAL ADVENT. I WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE TO COMMENT. MAYBE HERE AND THERE. I WILL PROBABLY CHECK ON ERIC'S POSTS UNLESS IT IS NOT WILL OF GOD.
    PRAY, PRAY, PRAY...
    THANK YOU FOR RESPONDING TO MY CALL.

    ReplyDelete
  6. DEAR FB FRIENDS. I AM PREPARING FOR A SPECIAL ADVENT. I WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE TO COMMENT. MAYBE HERE AND THERE.
    I WILL PROBABLY CHECK ON ERIC'S POSTS UNLESS IT IS NOT WILL OF GOD BECAUSE OF PRAYERS, MEDITATIONS AND FASTING FROM INTERNET.
    PRAY, PRAY, PRAY...
    THANK YOU FOR RESPONDING TO MY CALL.

    ReplyDelete
  7. john 23rd was also not a real pope but again an ani pope as he was also head of the freemasons at the 33rd degree ;eve;-- and the name jon was never to be used again after the firsy John the 23rd in the late 1300's early 1400's he also was head of the masons as he sat on the chair of Peter and was removed fro the papalcy and declared the antipope . it was ordered then that the name John could NEVER used as a papal name ever again So when this antipope in the 60's took this name he broke Vatican law I that and made public his intent to destroy the church from within by doing that-- Remember the masons changed their tactics centuries agi and decided they would destroy our church from within as their outwad attacks did not work

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sedevacnatism is just an opinion not infallible

      Delete
  8. “Immense Holiness” !! Thanks for the humour. Lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. came from novusordowatch....twisted novus ordo disposition...refering to "canonizations"

      Delete
  9. A robber council can never be justified, especially not with the false holiness of modernist popes

    ReplyDelete