Masonic Mass Murder on the Somme 100
Years Ago
by Henry Makow Ph.D.
"Testament of Youth,"
poignantly dramatizes lives shattered
by Judeo Masonic First World War.
Western Civilization Died on the
Somme a Century Ago...
On July 1,1916, General
Douglas Haig, a Freemason, began the Battle of the Somme which by November
resulted in the death of one million Christian, British patriots in
their prime. Fathers, sons, husbands, brothers, lovers. War is a ruse by
which the globalist satanic elite kills patriots under the guise of national
duty.
"When we started to fire, we
just had to load and reload. They went down in their hundreds. We didn't have
to aim, we just fired into them. " German machine gunner.
About 10 million soldiers died in battle on both sides in World War One, one of the costliest wars in history. The
needless slaughter in trench warfare is usually portrayed by
the Masonic-controlled media and education system as an unintended
consequence.
In fact, these wars are
orchestrated by the Illuminati Jewish bankers and their Masonic minions to
kill Christians in order to degrade Western civilization in advance of the
Satanic NWO now clearly manifesting itself. (See, World
War One- First Christian Holocaust) Ritual human sacrifice
to their god Moloch may also be a factor.
All wars are designed to enrich and
empower the bankers while destroying and demoralizing humanity.
Warmongering "patriotism" is a ruse. The sooner gullible
non-Satanists stop falling on a sword, the better.
I'm going to focus on the Battle of
the Somme, one of the biggest battles of the first world war. My information is
based on John Laffin's British Butchers and Bunglers of World War One,
(1988, p. 63ff.)
Both General Douglas Haig, Commander
in Chief, Western Front, and his principal co-planner Sir Henry Rawlinson
were Freemasons. The Somme offensive ("The Big Push")
was intended to end the stalemate and win the war. The Allies had 700,000
men, a 7-1 numerical superiority. Haig and Rawlinson anticipated losing
500,000 men.
The plan was simple: to bomb the
Germans for five days and nights then walk to the enemy trench and kill the
remaining soldiers or capture those who surrendered.
However, after 5 days of bombing,
the German trenches and their defences were barely scratched. The English
neglected to reconnoitre or observe this from the air. The Germans just
had to shoot their machine guns, reload and shoot again. The same type of
attack continued from the 1st of July until November 1916. Over a million men
died; 58,000 on the first day.
On July 1 1916, 11 British
divisions attacked on a 13-mile front. By 7.30 am the six German divisions
finished breakfast, wiped their faces with their napkins, and carried their
machine guns from comfortable deep cellars. They began spraying the attackers
who were advancing in neat rows, "to maintain order."
A German machine gunner wrote,
"We were surprised to see them walking, we had never seen that before. The
officers went in front. One was carrying a walking stick...When we started to
fire, we just had to load and reload. They went down in their hundreds. We
didn't have to aim, we just fired into them. "
A German officer reported his
impression of the attack. "Whole sections appeared to fall. All along the
line, Englishmen could be seen throwing their arms into the air and collapsing,
never to move again. Badly wounded rolled about in agony, while badly wounded
crawled into shell-holes for shelter. "
John Laffin: "Of the 110,000
men who attacked, 60,000 were killed or wounded on this one day. About 20,000
lay dead between the lines. Haig and Rawlinson were directly responsible
for the assumption bombardment would cut barbed wire and render the Germans
vulnerable. The Germans lost an estimated 8000 men on July 1. 2000 were
taken prisoner." (64)
A hospital station dealt with 10,000
casualties in the first 48 hours. A surgeon wrote: "Streams of
ambulances a mile long waited to be unloaded. The whole area of the camp, a
field of six acres, was completely covered with stretchers placed side-by-side,
each with its suffering or dying man. We surgeons were hard at it in the
operating theatre, a good hut holding four tables. Occasionally we made a brief
look around to select from the thousands of patients those few we had time to
save. It was terrible. (73)
Haig's chronicler Colonel Boraston
wrote that the attack, "bore out the conclusions of the British High
Command, and amply justified the tactical methods employed." (No doubt
these men were all Freemasons.)
Laffin writes: "This is an
outrageous statement. It is more accurate to call 1 July 1916, as H. L'Etang
does, 'probably the greatest disaster to British arms since
Hastings....Certainly never before nor since has such wanton pointless carnage
been seen...' (70)
Laffin bemoans the complete
"absence of cleverness" in the military strategy. He emphasizes
that, "high casualties were a basic rule of the game and simply had
to be accepted." (76)
Who knows how the world would be
different if the cream of that generation of Christians had not been trampled
into the mud of France in 1915-18?
There is simply no explanation for
sending wave after wave of men to their slaughter other than that this was the
deliberate goal. Any sane general would have stopped the attack as soon as it
became apparent that the strategy was a failure.
Western society is controlled by a satanic cult
whose goal is to degrade and exploit humanity.
It's time we stopped we being
complicit in our own destruction.
-----
Related :
