JUDAISM IS A GEOPOLITICAL PROJECT OF A INCESTUOUS MASTER-RACE CULT
WARNING: Sensitive Material
By: Smoloko
The Jews differ
from all other races and peoples because of Judaism; Judaism differs
from all other religions because of Jehovah; and Jehovah differs from
all other gods. All other gods dwell in heaven. But Jehovah comes down
from heaven to dwell on this earth and to embody himself in mankind.
Judaism concerns itself only about this earth and promises all reward
right here on this earth.
Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race. The races and the nations will cheerfully submit to the spiritual power of Judaism, and all will become Jews....
Rabbi Harry Waton Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race. The races and the nations will cheerfully submit to the spiritual power of Judaism, and all will become Jews....
HERV RYSSEN EXPLAINS JUDAISM IS NOT A FAITH BUT THE GEOPOLITICAL PROJECT OF A HYSTERICAL, INCESTUOUS MASTER-RACE CULT
Interview by Margaret Huffstickler in Paris for The Barnes Review magazine
Interview by Margaret Huffstickler in Paris for The Barnes Review magazine� (www.barnesreview.org)
Herv Ryssen, born in 1967, is a
French writer and activist who specializes in Judaism as a geopolitical
project, and graduated from the famous Sorbonne in Paris. He was fired
for his views as a high school history teacher and became a militant
with the Front National and then other groups. In 2003, he threw a pie
in the face of a famous Catholic priest who, on television, had condoned
illegal immigrants occupying his cathedral. He has been constantly
fined and given prison sentences for denouncing Judaism, and especially
the practice of incest in Jewish families, which he says makes Jews
suffer from both inbreeding and hysteria. He is known for his definition
of Judaism as a political project of world domination over a planet of
uniform slaves. His website:�http://herveryssen.over-blog.com/
TBR: Hello, Herv Ryssen. Between
2005 and 2010, you published five major books on Judaism. We are in the
age of the Internet, videos and blogs, but you persist in writing books.
Why? Do young people in France still read?
HR: From 2005 to 2010, I actually published six, six major books on Judaism (http://www.amazon.fr/s/ref%3Dnb_sb_noss_1?__mk_fr_FR=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=Herv%C3%A9+Ryssen),
which are the fruit of my research on the subject. It was in 2004 that I
began systematically, voluminously, and daily to read Jewish authors,
to devour books written by Jewish intellectuals, philosophers,
sociologists, novelists, historians, etc. I realized that their thinking
was extraordinarily uniform. Whether they were religious Jews or
atheists, liberals, socialists or communists, Zionists [committed to
Israel] or “fully integrated” [supposedly committed to their host
country] I found in every epoch–and regardless of nationality or
language of origin—the same ideas, the same paradoxes, and the same
messianic expectations.
����������� As as I advanced in my
reading, I sorted into chapters everything appertaining to the same
Jewish subjects. After completing the first book back in September 2005,
I found that I still had many more things to say, and so I continued to
document my findings in new books. . . until I realized now that I have
completely covered the subject of Judaism.
All my books are very well-documented
and factually unassailable. Moreover, none have triggered prosecution
[Ed: unlike his interviews] and In order to avoid this, I had to do
exhaustive research and follow strict procedures. In France, for many
decades, the only available ”judeo-skeptic” books were old compilations
of quotesfrom the Thirties and these never clearly understood or
explained the global political project of Judaism or the pathological
nature of this sect. So to go beyond mere quotes, I had to do a great
deal ofwork analyzing Jewish texts and also bringing the progress of the
Jewish project up to our times.
I believe the message has been received,
because I estimate that at least 15,000 people have read at least one
of my books. And I also know that reading one of these books tends to
make the reader into a fanatic! That’s not so bad for just a few years’
time. I am thinking of Freud, who had sold only 700 copies of his first
book after ten years.
����������� TBR: For decades,
writers and activists have indulged in “anti-Zionist” talk and agreed on
the hatred of Jewstoward gentiles. But you think the Jews havenot only
negative attitudes and feelings, such as resentment, toward gentiles,
but also a kind of concrete geopolitical plan. What exactly is their
plan?
����������� HR:To understand and
explain Judaism, one must always begin withthe idea that Jews are
obsessed with a vision of “peace” on earth (“shalom“) as depicted
by their prophets. This is because they are convinced that only when
peace reigns over all mankind, only then will their messiah finally come
and establish the new kingdom of David, which will mean their absolute
domination of the planet earth.
In order to achieve this peace which
they envisage, they feel they must remove all possible sources of
conflict, that is to say, they must eradicate all the differences
between people, because differences for them cause conflict. The Jewish
theorists who gave birth to communism wanted to abolish social classes,
but not just that. They sought to also liquidate all religions, all
national borders and even all separate nations.
So the current globalism means we must
do away with separate races, hybridize humanity and create a one-world
government. And feminism, which is also Jewish in essence, intends to
abolish all differences between the sexes. We see that all this massive
trend springs from one single project, the“pacification” of humanity by
making everyone exactly the same. And every committed Jew works daily to
carry out this project.
When there is nothing left on earth butindividuals without any roots, sans
racial identity or pride, deprived of any religion, and existing only
to be a consumer, the Jews �who, however, will have kept their own
traditions and identity � will be recognized by all as “God’s Chosen
People.”
You see, Judaism is, first and foremost,
a political project of world unification under the rule of the Jews. It
is also, as we have seen, a sophisticated worldwide war machine,
deployed against the rest of humanity so it obeys.
How does one recognize a Jew?
By what he says, how he writes, and what he does.
The Jew wants a world without borders and a global government. It all starts with this one goal.
It is very rare, I have found, that
committed Jewish intellectuals ever clearly express their true goal and
idea, but it forms the background of their every thought. But nowadays,
with the power the Jews have acquired in recent decades, some feel
bolder and more arrogant, and sometimes they let their goal slip out
unintentionally, especially in certain novels, non-fiction books and
articles which however are put out only by small Jewish publishers and
are intended only for an audience within the Jewish community. In these
works that we gentiles are not supposed to read we find the most
extraordinary pearls.
One that we discovered in the April 2003 issue of Israel Magazine
is too beautiful not to be mentioned. This is a monthly magazine in
color, sold in French kiosks. Dr. Yitzhak Attia, the “director of
French-language seminars at the International School for Holocaust
Studies of Yad Vashem” in Tel Aviv,used very explicit language here,
writing with a clarity unusual among Jewish intellectuals:
“Even though our reason shouts out with all its might the absurdity of this confrontation between a small people as insignificant as the people of Israel and the rest of humanity,… as absurd, as incoherent, as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations, and it can only be genocidal and total,because it is a question of our respective identities.“
You have read that right: Attia of Yad
Vashem writes that between the Jewish people and the rest of humanity,
the battle can only be “genocidal and total.”
The Jews, therefore, inevitably trigger the hatred against them, and it is as old as Judaism itself.
����������� TBR: What do you think are the main characteristics of the Jewish mind ?
������������ HR:If one adopts the
perspective of the Jewish public, we note first that the history of
Judaism is depicted as a succession of tragedies. From the Exodus out of
Egypt all the way to Auschwitz, passing through the destruction of the
Temple and the ravages of the Cossacks, Jews present themseves as an
eternally persecuted, unjustly persecuted community.
Now, if you look closely, dissecting
their texts, I can assure you that there is also great pride taken in
belonging to the “Chosen People” and no less contempt for the
traditional cultures of the goyim.
Major French-Jewish writers such as
Bernard-Henri Levy, Emmanuel Levinas and Alain Minc have declared their
distaste for our indigenous, deeply-rooted cultures. This is associated
with a deep desire for“revenge” (an ever-present Jewish theme) and an
absolute faith in the final Hebrew victory over mankind.
This ferocious state of mind is however
usually embedded in egalitarian phrases advocating “tolerance,” “human
rights” and “universal brotherhood.” At other times, their goals of
domination and revenge are expressed much more frankly.
����������� TBR: Your second book
is entitled “Psychoanalysis of Judaism”. Could you tell us the
connection between the Jews and “psychoanalysis”?
����������� HR:After writing Esp�rances plan�tariennes,
[The Planetary Hope] I recognized, without being able to explain it,
what seemed to me to be an “abnormality.” I noted especially how Jewish
intellectuals are in breathtaking denial about their coreligionists‘
roles in the Bolshevik regime. The truth, as Solzhenitsyn revealed, is
that many Jewish theorists, civil servants and torturers played an
absolutely overwhelming role in this tragedy that remains, with thirty
million dead, the most terrible crime in the history of mankind.
������������ And yet almost all Jewish intellectuals still refuse to shoulder their responsibilities and do their mea culpa. Their impossible contortions to prove otherwise are a dazzling example of”chutzpah.�
One observes constantly their efforts to
deny the obvious, to reverse roles, and finally to place all blame on
others. One thinks, for example, of the role of the influential Jews
surrounding George W. Bush in advocating the invasion of Iraq in 2003,
or the key role of Jews in the African slave trade. And what about the
“Russian mafia” we hear of constantly, of which nothing but the name is
Russian?
While systematically obscuring these
sensitive issues, the media exaggerates disproportionately any incident
of anti-Semitism, causing at regular intervals “an uproar in the
community.” There is indeed, in this community, an emotional fragility, a
need to dramatize, that sometimes takes the form of outright paranoia.
Beside that, there is also a great nervousness whenever the community”
is criticized. Medical diagnosis emphasizes this “great intolerance of
frustration.”
The fact is that the Jewish soul is pathological. A number of Jewish intellectuals (such as Philip Roth, among others, with his Portnoy’s Complaint),
have confided in us their anxieties. They talk about the “mystery” of
Judaism without understanding the nature of the evil that underlies it.
Judaism is for average Jews themselves an “enigma” that they fail to
solve. Bernard-Henri Levy (photo below) says it is “one of the deepest
mysteries facing contemporary consciousness.”
I must say their situation is unique in
all humanity. The truth is that after 3,000 years they still sometimes
feel very alone in this world. Put yourself in their place: for
centuries, they were expelled from almost all the countries where they
settled, and nevertheless — they will not budge on this ? they believe
themselves to be the “chosen people” of God and to have from Him a
“mission” to transform this earth. Elie Wiesel has repeatedly referred
to the“dramatic solitude of this people with a universal vocation.”
���������� TBR: What is your own take on this “mystery of Judaism�? And above all: what is its relationship with Freud and psychoanalysis ?
���������� HR: Freud had already
thought about the Jewish enigma in his time, in studying his own
personal and family case history, but he then projected his discoveries
about the Jews onto the “universal” plane, beyond the Jews onto humanity
as a whole.
����������� “Projection,” it must be
said, is indeed a Freudian concept, as well as typically Jewish. We have
already seen this tendency to systematically reverse roles and invert
situations.
������������ This also explains why
Jewish intellectuals, in their entirety, accuse anti-Semites of being
“mentally ill.” Note what Abraham Foxman, the president of the
Anti-Defamation League in the U.S.,said about Mel Gibson, director of The Passion of the Christ,
who had made remarks considered “anti-Semitic” under the influence of
alcohol before apologizing abjectly to the Jewish community under the
influence of who knows what pressures.
������������ “Treating his alcoholism is
a good thing,� Foxman said in substance, ”but he also needs to treat
his anti-Semitism.”
������������ You understand.
Antisemitism, to them, is a “disease.” Jewish comments along these lines
are legion. And we can understand, reading them, why opponents of the
Judeo-bolsheviks were locked up in mental asylums in the USSR and other
Stalinist countries.
So Freud was projecting his own Jewish
pathology onto the universal level, where it did not belong. As for
pathology, it is not for nothing that he began his career working on the
phenomenon of hysteria. In this condition, countless symptoms are found
that mimic perfectly those I can detect in the behavior anddiscourse of
these cosmopolitan intellectuals. The similarities are truly amazing:
depression, introspection, anxiety, paranoia, constant state of vigilant
arousal, selective amnesia, confabulation, sensitivity to the opinions
of others, egocentrism, tendency to self-dramatize, the narcissistic
inability to observe others, intolerance to frustration, megalomaniacal
delusions, etc. Every trait of hysteria is found in these committed
Jewish writers, just as hysteria is described by Freud himself.
Ryssen in the Swiss Alps
Back when I wrote Esp�rances plan�tariennes
I first noticed, without being able initially to understandwhy, that
the horrific issue of incest � parents having sex with their own
children — returned hauntingly and mysteriously in the writings of some
Jewish intellectuals, such as Jacques Attali, Isaac Bashevis Singer [a
Nobel laureate], St�phane Zagdanski. . . as if they had something to
hide, some tribal secret.
I continued my research on this subject,
and what I discovered is very enlightening, because incest is extremely
traumatizing — and incest triggers hysteria. I think I am the only
writer to bring up this huge issue of the Jews and the widespread
practice of incest.
���������� TBR:You do realize that your work may be highly offensive to members of the Jewish community?
���������� HR: Well, Jewish
intellectuals have never been shy about offending others, and
writingtheir “psychoanalyses of the anti-Semites” that call their
opponents “paranoid,” “pathological� and “crazy,” with opinions that are
“repulsive.” This propensity to insult and slander others is one of the
traits of the cosmopolitan intellectual.
���������� Here, for instance, is what
Elie Wiesel said on TV about Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: “The
religious leader of Iran is crazy, I mean pathologically ill; he is mad
with hatred.” ( May 6, 2006). To this he added, with impeccable logic:
“His bomb does not threaten Israel, but the entire world.” Now there is
some projection for you! Yes, you understood it right — all those who
oppose the plans of Jewry are “crazy,” and Iran threatens the world, not
Israel, so we have a duty to fight their enemies. Soshould we now go to
war in Syria or Iran?
My point is not to insult the Jews. I
just think that the accusation of “the perfidy of the Jews,� as it was
denounced by the Church and all major Western thinkers throughout the
ages, does not come close to describing the real bedrock of the Jewish
personality.
And although no statistics are
available, I can tell you that my research suggests there is a very high
rate of suicide in this community, and it seems the Jews need to
exorcise their “dybbuk,” their demon, as they say!
TBR: How can one resolve the dispute between the Jews and the rest of humanity?
HR: We must once again repeat : Judaism is first and foremost not a religious faith but a political project of world unification.
Its plan is to eradicate all the differences between individuals and
peoples in order to achieve an absolute and definitive peace, because
this �peace� will be conducive to the advent of their Messiah. One must
crush and grind into one single powder all the nations, races,
religions, and civilizations of the earth, raze everything that is
different or unique to the ground, and leave behind only a human mass
which can then be coagulated into a vast planetary workforce for them.
Everyone must be exactly the same, except for the Jews.
Thus, the essence of Judaism is drastic —
to destroy everything that is not Jewish. They are indeed “enemies of
humanity,” just as they were regarded even back in the days of the
ancient Greek and Roman thinkers. Now, if you do ever find that rare Jew
who defends the white race, who supports ethnically homogeneous and
independent nations, and advocates the patriarchal family, etc., it
means only that he is no longer a committed Jew, that he has left his
Judaism behind, or that he lives in its margins. I have written about
that phenomenon too in my books, the Jews who reject Judaism.
This is why great thinkers throughout history have warned men against, in Latin, the detestanda secta, �the
sect one must detest.� Under these conditions, combating Jewish
nihilism is the duty of every human being, for we can be well assured
that they will not halt their activities on their own. They are like
infernal machines that will stop only when smashed!
When faced with the project of total
Jewish destruction of all cultures and nations, it is perfectly
legitimate in turn to contemplate the annihilation of Judaism � at least
in its spirit — in order to save and liberate mankind.
This goal however is probably not very
“Christian.” The Church, indeed, has always protected the Jews as the
“witness people” of the victory of Christianity, a people who must be
preserved to be convertedin some coming end times.
The Church has never changed its
position on the Jews. Throughout history, it has always wanted the Jews
to be respected in their peoplehood and their religion, but still she
wanted them to be kept down, in a state of submission, powerlessness and
isolation, in order to prevent them from harming others. (See our Histoire de l’antis�mitisme [= History of Anti-Semitism], 2010).
Until the French Revolution of 1789,
Jewish power was contained in this way for centuries. But then it was
unchained. The fact is that our history is very hectic, and Jewish power
required a constant effort over the centuries to be contained, which
even before 1789 did not prevent Jewish financiers from beingguilty of
causing many wars and misfortunes.
In my most recent book, La guerre eschatologique [ = The Eschatological War]
( 2013), I showed that according to the doctrine of the Church, the
Jews must endure “until the end of time,” and yet their final conversion
to the “true religion” of Christ will owe nothing to the work of
Christians. But now, at a time when European civilization and nations
around the world are threatened with death by the cosmopolitan venom,
the old Church doctrine of ”charitable segregation of the Jews has shown
its shortcomings.
You do not keep a basket full of writhing snakes around in your home!
Within Catholicism, only the Scottish
theologian Duns Scotus opposed Judaism with an ideological and religious
force that could have confronted it victoriously. Duns Scotus
(1266-1308), a professor at Oxford, was one of the most remarkable minds
of the Middle Ages and the pride of the Franciscan order. He went
further than St. Thomas in proposing a solution to the Jewish problem.
It was not on the basis of segregation, but of the utter destruction of
the sect.
Unlike canonists and theologians of the
thirteenth century � with Thomas Aquinas at their head �who believed
Jewish children should not be baptized against the wishes of their
parents, Duns Scotus believed it was the very duty of kings to take
Jewish children away from their parents, to rescue them, and to baptize
and raise them as Christians.
And readers of our books know that this
salutary measure would also have broken the horrific chain of incest, a
sexual crime that goes forward from generation to generation among the
Jews.
When faced with the old argument that we
need to preserve the Jewish people intact anticipating their conversion
to Christ in the far-off end times, the Franciscan replied that “for
this it is sufficient to preserve just a small number of them, but
isolated out on an island.”
We must never lose sight of the fact
that Judaism is not a religious faith or a race, or an ethnic people who
eat bagels. It is primarily a commitment, a mindset, an ideology and a
project of world Jewish domination over a slave planet. And so it is
primarily through the mind that this evil mindset must be destroyed.
When a Jew is sincerely converted to
Traditional Catholicism, for example, his Judaism, his hate and his
desire to dominate others and wreak vengeance is destroyed within his
heart. Judaism can in fact be rendered harmless in a peaceful manner.
For example, here a few common-sense measures for a future anti-Jewish program:
We must begin by dissolving the major
Jewish-Zionist organizations across the country. It will be established
by law that any statement or written work, book, television program or
film that glorifies immigration, miscegenation, adultery or
homosexuality be punished by a prison sentence.
Likewise, all writings calling for the
establishment of a world government will be punished with imprisonment
and a revocation of citizenship. Anyincitation of Westerners to engage
in a Middle Eastern war against the Muslim world will be punished as
well with a prison sentence. In this way, militant Judaism is sidelined.
Further measures will be needed to put
an end to the Jewish menace once and for all. It will obviously be
necessary to forbid any rabbinical teaching, to close Jewish schools and
synagogues because they teach hatred, and to separate children from
their parents early enough to prevent the horrors of incest, which is
all too frequent among the members of the sect, an atrocity which
generates the characteristic pathology called hysteria in the Jews.
Children from Jewish families must
receive instead a quality education, inculcating all the basic
Indo-European, Greco-Roman values. Jewish youth in the process of
healing will be encouraged to engage in projects that show solidarity
with others, and work with other American and European children who are
out in contact with nature, fresh air, animals, woods and farms.
And the most fragile young elements of the sect will receive the best care in specialized psychiatric hospitals.
After three or four generations, Judaism
will have completely disappeared. We will organize,in the meantime, an
international trial for the crimes of Judaism against peace and
humanity, and repudiate once and for all this disastrous, mankind-hating
cult.
TBR: When I interviewed the
Catalan Revisionist author Joaquin Bochaca, he had a somewhat
pessimistic view of the future. In fact, he compared the work of truth
tellers to someone on a sinking ship who writes a final note and stuffs
it in a bottle for posterity to find. What is your opinion? Do you think
it is not too late to prevail against the forces that seek to enslave
humanity?
HR: Au contraire.In my book La guerre eschatologique [ = The Eschatological War],when speaking of psychological warfare, I took the example of a reader who
expressed his disappointment in poor
election results in 2007 by the Front National here in France [then led
by Jean-Marie Le Pen]. In a nationalist newspaper he wrote in these
terms:
“I am desperate, my friends. . . the
Front National has lost three quarters of its electorate in France. . . I
toreup my voter registration card. Hope is dead; I no longer believe in
anything. We are disarmed; we are done for.”
My comment in the book was:
“After reading this kind of defeatist
prose, I ask three questions. First, is this guy really a supporter — or
an enemy infiltratingour ranks? Secondly, was the letter editor of this
newspaper paid to publish it? And thirdly,should this defeatist be shot
now or wait until later?“
The last line is no doubt a little
exaggerated, but everyone understands what I mean. The war our enemies
are fighting against us is first and foremost a psychological war.
For centuries, when we Europeans were
fighting among ourselves, each side gathered his men and they lined up
openly in front of their opponents on a battlefield. The prince who was
the winner grabbedsome of the conquered territories, and it all ended
there.
Jews, though, do not fight in this way.
They act by stealth and deceit, through the media which they control;
and all their work has one design –to demoralize others, to blame the
white man and paralyze him with a guilt trip so that he will fall to his
knees and submit, begging the Jews’ forgiveness.
So through their films, their newspapers
and television they have constantly portrayed our Western history as
one long succession of crimes: torture under the Roman Empire, the
Inquisition, the pogroms of the First Crusade, colonization and pillage
of the third world, etc. . . So today our teenagers leave school
unconsciously feeling the urge to obliterate their own race in a great,
universal program of miscegenation. All races must merge, then the evil
white man is gone.
To be demoralized faced with the
ugliness of the modern world is to submit to the enemy. Obviously there
are many reasons to be pessimistic if we look at our environment, if we
turn on the TV, if we observe the statistics about unemployment, crime,
immigration, etc. . .
But this is exactly what our enemies
want — to destroy our morale so that we give up defendingourselves, we
fold up our tents and we abandon the field.
below – Sarcastic graphic by Ryssen on his site: “If a Jew says it, it must be true. ‘Antisemitism is not freedom of speech but a crime.’- Haverim Collective.
Consequently, we must consider that
everything that demoralizes the enemy, is good, and everything that
demoralizes and demobilizes us must be combated with the utmost energy,
mercilessly censored, and totally rejected.
To paraphrase Carl von Clausewitz, we can say that “literal war is only the continuation of psychologicalwar.”
HR: Thank you, Herv� Ryssen.
[end]