N.O. Bishop Following Vatican II FreeMasonry Says Stay from Catholics
Depart from Tradition and you cease to be Catholic. Vatican II was the modernist new playbook which is leading souls into a soon formalized one world religion forewarned by St. Pius X and Our Lady. The Eagle Warns. Dont feel intimidated by these delusional prelates I have debated enough over time to know they are incompetent!
Robert C. Molrino, Bishop of Madison
It is a Catholic's duty to warn and admonish using Tradition as the foundation for our rebuking and thus we must tell those in Madison, Wisconsin to stay from this Bishop and his teachings until he converts to the Catholic religion from the Novus Ordo new religion. This warning to avoid goes out to any Pope, bishop or cardinal for that matter following Vatican II who have left the Church objectively speaking. Let us highlight his errors (indicated in red) from his article:
Blessed
Anne Emmerick (early 1800's)
"I saw a strange Church being built against every rule no angels were accompanying it. In that Church nothing came from above there was only division and chaos. It is probably a church of human creation, following the latest fashion as well as the new heterodox Church of Rome which seems of the same kind. I saw again this strange big church that was being built in Rome. There was nothing holy in it. I saw this just as I saw a movement led by Ecclesiastics to which contributed angels, saints and other Christians. But in this strange Church all work was being done mechanically according to set rules and formulae. Everything was done according to human reason. I saw all sorts of peoples, things, doctrines and opinions. There was something proud, presumptuous and violent about it and they seemed very successful. I did not see a single Angel helping in their work.
"“Among the strangest things that I saw, were long processions of bishops. Their thoughts and utterances were made known to me through images issuing from their mouths. Their faults towards religion were shown by external deformities. A few had only a body, with a dark cloud of fog instead of a head. Others had only a head, their bodies and hearts were like thick vapors. Some were lame; others were paralytics; others were asleep or staggering.” “I saw what I believe to be nearly all the bishops of the world, but only a small number were perfectly sound…”
"I see many excommunicated ecclesiastics who do not seem to be concerned about it nor even aware of it. Yet they are ipso facto excommunicated whenever they cooperate to sic enterprises, enter into associations and embrace opinions upon which an anathema has been cast. I saw very clearly from the errors, the aberrations and countless sins of men. I saw the folly and the wickedness of their actions against all truth and all reason. Priests were among them and I gladly endured my sufferings so that they may return to a more sound mind."
“I saw that many pastors allowed themselves to be taken with ideas that were dangerous to the Church. They were building a great, strange, and extravagant Church. Everyone was to be admitted in it in order to be unified and have equal rights; Evangelicals, Catholics, sects of every description (masonic teaching). Such was to be of the New Church...but God has other designs."
~Archbishop Lefebvre (modern day St. Athanasius)
"If we are to understand fully and to measure the harm done by Vatican II, we must study this Council in the light of the Pontifical documents which, for nearly two centuries, put bishops, clergy and faithful on their guard against the conspiracy of the enemies of the Church acting through Liberalism and Modernism.
It is also essential to know the documents of the opponents of the Church, and especially of the secret societies which had been preparing for this Council for more than a century.
Finally, it will be very instructive to follow the reactions of Protestants, Masons and Liberal1 Catholics during and after the Council.
Even, however, if we leave it to God and to Peter’s true successors to sit in judgment of these things, it is nonetheless certain that the Council was deflected from its purposes by a group of conspirators and that it is impossible for us to take any part in this conspiracy despite the fact that there may be many satisfactory declarations in Vatican II. The good texts have served as cover to get those texts which are snares, equivocal, and denuded of meaning, accepted and passed.
We are left with only one solution: to abandon these dangerous examples and cling firmly to tradition, i .e., to the official Magisterium of the Church throughout 2,000 years.
...Would not Cardinal Suenens be right in declaring that this Council has been the French Revolution of the Church!
Now the article in question:
A word of caution about the Society of Saint Pius X
| Bishop's Column | |||||||
| Written by Robert C. Molrino, Bishop of Madison |
The 50 years since the close of the Second Vatican Council have been tumultuous for the Church. Forces both inside and outside of the Church tried to distort and exploit the council (wrong, it is blatant Masonry) and the post-conciliar liturgical reforms to create a new Church after their own image (wrong; it is a New Church in light of its rupture from Tradition).
Too many of us endured years of sloppy or irreverent liturgy and mushy or even unorthodox preaching and catechesis. Too often when we voiced our concerns we were ignored.
Most of the faithful Catholics (this bishop is a heretic) who saw this happening fought hard for a “reform of the reform.” Sadly, others decided that the only way forward was to work outside of (outside of heretical buildings, yes)-- and sometimes against -- the hierarchical Church and its structures (that is actually what the Church teaches; where the Faith is not a Catholic cannot be ask St. Athanasius).
This was the choice made by the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), a worldwide society of priests best known for its strong opposition to the post-conciliar reform of the Mass. The Masses that they celebrate in their own chapels according to the 1962 Missal have attracted sizeable communities of the lay faithful, even here in the Diocese of Madison.
I want to be cautious and fair about the SSPX. Many of their concerns are legitimate. Many of their values and aspirations are admirable, and their zeal is impressive. Their priests wish to serve the Lord and His people. The people who attend their chapels are fervent.
We should always be cordial, respectful, and welcoming to them as brothers and sisters in Christ. Yet, their relationship with the Church is complex and developing (wrong; those holding the Faith are in the Church wilst those following Vatican II remain outside the Church). Moreover, the situation of SSPX bishops, of SSPX priests, of the faithful who formally align themselves with the SSPX, and of the faithful who occasionally or informally attend Mass with the SSPX, are all different in important ways. It would be inaccurate to call it a schismatic group in a strict sense, and we should all pray that it may someday be fully reconciled with the Church (wrong the Novus Ordites must repent and come back to Tradition and the Catholic religion).
Having said that, all is not well with the SSPX, and my advice, my plea to the traditionally-minded faithful of the diocese is to have nothing to do with them (spoken like a true heretic who cant figure out hes a modernist/liberal). As Pope Benedict XVI made clear, the SSPX “does not possess a canonical status in the Church” (wrong; they do) and its ministers “do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the Church” (March 10, 2009, Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church) (BXVI was a modernist and never had the Catholic Faith his judgement is invalid and illicit).
The priests of the SSPX are validly ordained priests, but because for the most part they were ordained illicitly (i.e., by a bishop who had no jurisdiction over them and no permission to ordain), they are suspended ipso facto from the moment of their ordination (c. 1383); that is to say, even though they are ordained, they have no permission from the Church, which is necessary, to exercise priestly ministry (wrong; supplied jurisdiction per canon law makes them valid and licit wilst those following vatican 2 are valid but illicit since they follow heresy; this poor bishop has it backwards).
Their Masses are valid but are illegitimately celebrated (wrong; they are both valid and licit). The same is true, in most cases, with their baptisms, their conferral of the anointing of the sick, and provided it is administered by a bishop, their confirmations. Thus, Catholics should not frequent SSPX chapels or seek sacraments from the priests of the SSPX.
But there are two other, serious, sacramental problems that must be understood by everyone who may wish to attend SSPX chapels. If you take nothing else away from this letter, at least hear this -- the SSPX’s marriages and absolutions are invalid because their priests lack the necessary faculties (wrong; once again due to supplied jurisdiction).
The SSPX argues for the validity of their marriages and absolutions based on the canonical principle that the Church supplies the faculty in cases of doubt or common error. In certain rare and exceptional cases that might apply to their situation, especially with regard to confession, but for the most part their arguments are not persuasive (?? this is called I cannot refute that valid argument).
Part of their argument hinges on the faithful erroneously believing that the SSPX priests have the requisite faculty; well, if you were in error about that up until now, you are not in error anymore.
The SSPX also makes the argument that they have permission because the Church is in a state of “emergency.” However, 1) the Legislator (the Pope) and the bishops with him don’t think there is a state of emergency, and 2) the sacraments offered by the SSPX are already widely available at legitimate parishes and chapels, i.e., no one is being denied the sacraments (wrong; we have had Popes in past make wrongful judgements even teach heresy; argument refuted).
This is not the place for a discourse on the technical points of canon law, but the point is: do you want to take that kind of a risk with your marriage or even with your soul (wrong; following this heretic and more than likely you will lose your soul like he will)? Apart from legal and sacramental concerns, there is also the danger that affiliating with the SSPX can gradually cause one to absorb a schismatic mentality (those following Vatican II are already in a silent pastoral schism the formal schism comes soon).
You might attend your first Mass at an SSPX chapel for good and noble reasons, e.g., such a strong initial desire for a reverently celebrated liturgy that you are willing to tolerate the SSPX’s irregular status. But as you attend more and more, it ceases to become something you tolerate and starts to become a mark of identity, even a badge of pride. You adopt a fixed posture of separation from the Church (what Church? Vatican II New Church! It is heretical no catholic can commune there). That is a perilous position for any soul to be in (he is a perilous state following modernism/liberalism/masonry/marxism).
The larger question is why put yourself in that position in the first place? The Traditional Latin Mass (also called the Tridentine Mass, the Usus Antiquior, or the Extraordinary Form of the Mass) is celebrated regularly in parishes throughout the Diocese of Madison, both on Sundays and on weekdays (no such thing as Extraordinary Form; it is the Mass of all ages; the New Mass is illicit and schismatic). These Masses are beautifully and reverently celebrated by vibrant, faithful priests. I myself celebrate it frequently (the masses there are taught by modernist heretics why would you endanger your Catholic Faith going to diocese?).
As interest in the Traditional Latin Mass grows, these opportunities will increase. Already, there are very few people in the Diocese of Madison who could get to an SSPX chapel on Sunday without passing by a legitimate parish in which the Traditional Latin Mass is celebrated. If you’re knowingly doing that, it’s time to take a good hard look at your motives.
In closing, I want to stress that the need for a reform of the reform is real, and it is underway in our diocese. If you see that the Church needs fixing, work with your bishop, your pastors, and your fellow lay faithful to fix it. Share your needs and your concerns. Leaving is the last thing to do; leaving just doesn’t make sense! Communion with the Church is something to be cherished, safeguarded, and nourished.
Always looking at our Blessed Mother’s fidelity to Her Son, let us turn in prayer to Mary, Mother of the Church and Mother of our faith.
Click here for a list of Traditional Latin Masses celebrated in the Diocese of Madison (stay away from this bishop and those places where VII is taught).
TradCatKnight: You cannot attend any Church that is teaching the New Religion of Vatican II EVEN IF IT IS A LATIN MASS without strong potentiality of losing your own soul as this Bishop finds himself in. We have been warned enough of these heretics who have been occupying our buildings (Novus Ordites). God will soon chastise these unfaithful priests, prelates and laymen who will not listen!
Fr. Hesse explains why Vatican II is Not A Council of the Church
Related:
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/07/novus-ordo-new.html
TradCatKnight Radio (MP3) orderoftheeagle.wordpress.com/mp3/
Please share blogs and help spread information Crusaders!
TradCatKnight is the most viewed
& followed traditional catholic page worldwide.
This is the HOME of the New Crusade
keeping you up to date on the latest Endtime
News stories worldwide as we head closer to the GREAT CHASTISEMENTS foretold by the Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima.
TradCatKnight Mobile Apps For
Download:
OR Search TradCatKnight
on App sites on your phone!
Please Help Keep TradCatKnight Alive
& Growing:
Donate below for a chance to win a
gift via TradCatKnight’s
Monthly raffle. Minimum contribution
is 20$ for the raffle.
Winner announced on every last radio
show of the month!
The latest FAQ video from SSPX might explain Bishop Morlino's reaction?
ReplyDeletehttp://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/new-video-no-obligation-attend-new-mass-9818