Conservatism Coopted by Freemasonry in UK
Freemasonry is the reason conservatives are impotent and the white race is going
down the toilet. It is the reason why you always hear about the Jews but never the “Juewes”
-the Freemasons who betrayed their nation, race and religion for a seat at the devil’s table. It is the reason the West is quite literally satanically possessed.
“Masonry permeates every aspect of conservative civil society
in the U.K., which helps explain why radically subversive ideas such
as same sex marriage have insinuated themselves almost effortlessly into
the mainstream of society. “
‘Conservatives have conserved nothing but the record of their own impotence’ the 19th century French Catholic writer Louis Veuillot, once observed’.
As this epigram makes clear, conservatism’s problems didn’t
start with the takeover of the movement by the Neocons in the 1970s and
1980s. That takeover was a symptom – not the cause of the conservative
malaise. Rather than endlessly lamenting the co-option of the right by
Trotskyist Neocons, paleocons would do better to reflect upon why the
right so often succumbs to such co-option.
Modern conservatism, even the admittedly less toxic Paleo con
brand, has its roots in British Whig Masonry. That explains why ideas,
which, as recently as the 1980s, only lurked on the most radical
fringes of Trotskyist cultural subversion, are now mainstream policies
of the British Tory Party.
Indeed the very use of relativist and subjective terms such
as “extremism” and “radicalism” to marginalize or even criminalize
dissent is a giveaway to the Masonic nature of modern political
discourse. Any movement that exalts the ‘religion on which all men
agree’, as Anglo-Masonry does, exalts consensus and worldly expediency
over eternal principle. Freemasonry is relativistic by its very nature,
and this applies as much to Anglo masonry as to the continental
European variety.
Apologists for Anglo-masonry, from Augustin Barruel in the
late 18th century to Nesta Webster in the 20th, tried to draw a
distinction between radical “nasty” continental Grand Orient Masonry and
“nice” moderate conservative Anglo-Masonry. Many conservatives, even
traditionalist Catholics, unconsciously accept this distinction, hence
their obsessive focus on the French Revolution as the source of all
modern evil.
But the French Revolution’s influence on world history has
been negligible when compared with that of Anglo-Masonry. It is the
English language, English sports (the English Football Association was
founded in the Freemasons Arms hotel), English liberalism, and
Anglo-American culture both high and low, which have conquered the
world. Furthermore the French Revolution itself began as a British Whig
conspiracy to subvert French Catholic power. Anglo-Whigs only turned
against the Revolution when the conspiracy started slipping beyond their
control, and trained its guns on its “moderate” Masonic sponsors.
At first glance monarchical Britain may seem a more
traditional place than Republican France, but first glances can deceive.
When the British Conservative government legislated for so called gay
marriage, almost no one in the UK seriously opposed it, whereas in
France a huge organic movement mobilized against a similar law there.
Furthermore as continental Europe becomes more anglicized culturally and
linguistically, it becomes more socially nihilist.
CONTAGIOUS
Around twenty years ago I asked a young Spanish woman how
most of her compatriots viewed the British. She curled her lip and
uttered one word: “Tattoos”. Two years ago I visited Spain for the first
time since 2009, and found tattoos pretty much ubiquitous among the
natives, male and female. Mocking, as they say, is catching. If
imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, the British should feel
very flattered indeed.
Freemasonry in Britain never appears very radical or
threatening. Often it seems like a rest-home for the terminally uncool:
gin sodden golf club bores (Denis Thatcher), cheesy 1970s comedians (Bob
Monkhouse, Jim Davidson) cheesier MOR pop stars (Phil Collins, Brian
May)- middle Britain embodied in institutional form. Its close
association with the established Protestant Church of England and the
British Royal family only add to its image as a bastion of fuddy
duddyism.
But therein lies the rub. The very conservative image of “the
Craft” in Britain makes it an ideal vehicle for cultural subversion.
Masonry permeates every aspect of conservative civil society in the
U.K., which helps explain why radically subversive ideas such as same
sex marriage have insinuated themselves almost effortlessly into the
mainstream of society. Once such ideas are part of the cultural
furniture, Anglo-conservatives condemn any efforts to reverse such laws
as dangerous extremism – or horror or horrors, a form of inverted
radical utopianism.
All revolutions need a conservative element of stabilizing
ballast, and in the western context, the Masonic cult of unquestioning
obedience provides that ballast. In a culture where constant change is
institutionalized, a conservative temperament can, paradoxically, speed
up, rather than slow down the pace of destruction.
This conundrum is summed up in the old saying: If we want
things to stay the same, things are going to have to change. If you’re
on a speeding runaway bus heading towards a cliff, the really
conservative thing to do is not to sit quietly reading the collected
essays of Roger Scruton, but to rush to the driver’s cabin and jam on
the hand-break.
Perhaps, it is the very protean nature of Anglo-Masonry that
makes Catholics and other conservatives so reluctant to acknowledge it
as an implacable enemy of Christianity.
For such folk, the French Revolution is simple to understand:
secular, anti-Christian, fanatical. Ditto the Bolshevik revolution.
Many traditional Catholics even condemn the American Revolution as a
secularist project. When it comes to the so called Glorious Orange
Revolution of the late 17th century, they don’t seem nearly so sure of
themselves. Traditionalists like monarchy, pomp and circumstance, an
established church, ancient institutions, and the United Kingdom still
has all these things. The only problem is they’ve all been put to work
in the service of a godless police state at home, and endless Zionist
sponsored revolution abroad.
The UK is the land with more CCTV than anywhere on earth, the
land where bakers are forced to make cakes with pro-gay marriage
slogans, the land where criticism of the Zionist lobby can land you in
jail – and the land where false flag terror was a way of life for the
security services in Northern Ireland and elsewhere long before 9/11, or
even Operation Gladio.
To make matters worse, the same UK government that many
nationalist British small c conservatives are hysterically cheering on
for confronting the tyrannical Brussels bureaucrats, has just presented
an election manifesto vowing to completely control all modes of
expression on the internet.
The Anglo white nationalist fraternity tend to dismiss talk
of freemasonry as a diversion from the real issue of Jewish control.
However they always struggle to explain how, if Masonry is a red
herring, Jewish supremacism has progressed in tandem with the Craft’s
rise.
To adapt a favourite rhetorical device of David Duke, is it
just a coincidence that the Balfour Declaration was the product of a
British Masonic government, that the two World Wars were instigated by
Masonic regimes, or that even in modern times, many of the leading
facilitators of the Zio endless war agenda just happen to be members of
Masonic secret societies like Skull and Bones?
—
Related -The Masonic Grip on England
Note- Jude Duffy on Brexit- Re
Brexit, you’re right, the EU is Masonic, but I agree with Dr Adrian
Salbuchi of Argentina who said on David Duke’s radio that he thought the
City of London had decided the EU had outlived its usefulness as far as
Britain was concerned. British alternativists (for want of better
general term) tend to see the EU, the U.S. etc as the source of all
their woes, when in truth the real enemy is even closer to home. In
general such folk don’t like being told that most hardcore Zionists in
Britain supported Brexit, but the facts on this score are irrefutable.
There are no establishment efforts to undo Brexit – quite the reverse –
it’s going full steam ahead.
