7 Reasons As To Why I Cannot Take Bishop Fellay
Seriously
By: Eric Gajewski
I have reported in recent months how
the pseudo trad camp is beginning to free fall backing up this claim up with
objective statistics coming from Alexa.
Alexa, is an independent website ranker, which is commonly used to
identify a variety of statistical trends for websites in general. Since I last made that report some months ago
it hasn’t been any better with the pseudo trads as all of their websites have
dramatically fallen including OnePeterFive which had fallen from a rank of 108k
to about 132K. That is pretty
significant over that short period of time.
What this says is (and what I am saying in general) that a lot of people
are tired of these websites and groups and looking for a “little bit of reality”.
Pseudo Trad Falsehood. Whats that? Your own bishop just said the Virgin Mary is a
fourth member of the Trinity? No problem
just continue going to that Church(es) because you cannot leave it until a future Pope/Council
declares him a heretic… you "schismatic"! Theological fools are these pseudo
traditionalists. These groups/websites
still hide behind the Council and many of them still cling to the New Mass
being the “Ordinary Form”. However, in this
particular article I intend to call out Bishop Fellay for all the harm he has
done to Tradition. It should be no
surprise to anyone now that he follows a certain false mystic who has been
“guiding” him in this process of coming back under Modernist Rome. It certainly has not been the principles of his
founder guiding him. Lets dig deeper as
I once attended the NeoSSPX (for nearly two years) praying they would wake up
but they are hell bent on their compromising path without any desire for
return. So why is Bishop Fellay not to
be taken seriously?
Vatican II cannot be accepted as (95 percent in the light of Tradition) as the NeoSSPX says and formally holds to
First, the new position of the
Society to formally accept Vatican II as a Catholic Council. Archbishop Lefebvre (as he left the Society)
said EXACTLY the OPPOSITE! There are
still to many ignorant attendees of these chapels who argue “my priest is
against Vatican II!” You need to be more
precise folks. The Society will say
there are novelties in the Council BUT that does not mean they REJECT the
COUNCIL WHOLESALE as Catholics ought.
Again, this is how the NeoSSPX could eventually be embraced by Modernist
Rome once gain. By talking to Rome and
asking for reclarifications on certain points is not the Catholic answer to the
situation. They are not demanding Rome’s
conversion (as Love would dictate) they are playing pussyfoot so they can gain
some sort of appearance of being Catholic by the mainstream/false
traditionalist sites which are so readily available today. Once again, thank goodness these websites and
their apologists are failing miserably in recent times. The people see way too many loopholes and
realize they can no longer support the compromise.
Second, he thinks he is really
following what Archbishop Lefebvre taught.
In used car salesman approach he is desperately seeking a Catholic label
by the heretics of Rome. Desperate is a
light word to really describe what is going on.
How many times have we documented his slide away from what Archbishop
Lefebvre had said and then had the audacity to kick out the faithful priests of
Archbishop Lefebvre. It is truly
criminal to say the least. Honestly, I
could not stand people like that in the business world and have no respect nor
tolerance for any Bishop let alone priest who acts as such (because he is
leading the flock astray). He should
have been removed a long time ago but as they say the blind will lead the
blind. Bishop Fellay follows liberals
along side of his false mystic and now he thinks that the conservative
cardinals aren’t so bad! Did you all
catch how the NeoSSPX is now more consistently using the Conciliarist language
of “Extraordinary Form” for the true
Mass? Blind eyes will never want to see
though, right?
Third, he states that Sedevacantists
and Resistance types have lost their love for the Church. This is yet another laughable argument. He loves the truth and the Church so much
that he is willing to positively be identified as a Catholic by Francis! He loves the Church so much that he was
willing to hide his negotiations with Rome only to be later caught red handed
in his compromise! He loves the Church
so much he told his priests to stop combating error as the Society was talking
with Rome! Please don’t give me that
NONSENSE as to how we don’t love the Church.
This Bishop has long lost it folks like his two minions Salza and Siscoe.
I almost want to use the word con artist as his own actions dictate his
disdain for truth and speak to his love for human respect. I would personally love to talk to him or any
of his supporters via phone on the matter but they know better. They cannot prove what I said to be false. I haven’t had one of them last more than ten
minutes on the phone before hanging up because they couldn’t admit the facts of
the situation.
Fourth, his constant flip flopping
and downright lying about areas that Catholics have a duty in knowing. “No, we are not talking to rome”…only to find
out they were…then it was a grievous sin for us to be trying to figure what was
going on. Sound like the Light? Or the deeds done in darkness trying to hide
things? Folks, if you change your overall
position on the Council you then have to rebrand and then you have to change
your narrative and that is exactly what they have done. It is the “updating” of the Society wilst
trying to convince the masses there is a “hermeneutics of continuity” between
Fellay and Lefebvre. Pride ruins many.
You can do a simple search on google for all my articles exposing the pseudo
traditionalists, Bishop Fellay and the NeoSSPX.
Five, he actually thinks Francis is
Catholic and that he is not so bad. Did
he ever really read Pope St. Pius X’s warnings on the Modernists and how they
act? I remember when for a few days on
the SSPX official website they had Francis pegged as a true Modernist and then
in their stupidity they realized that didn’t fit their narrative so they had to
pull it. Folks the Society no longer
speaks truth because they are bottled into a certain narrative all in an effort
to be accepted. What type of idiot still
wants to be recognized by those who openly admit they are trying to convert us
and not the other way around? Bishop
Fellay is gullible and naïve in the very least, however, from my perspective,
it is far worse than this. Someone who
has the track record as he does cannot be claimed to be gullible/naïve.
Six, he has the audacity to try and
convince others that true prudence “is being put under the Conciliarists” when
his own founder said otherwise. How in
the world do people gobble up this garbage without ever questioning nor looking
into the matter is beyond me. However we
have a situation similar to the Conciliar Church in the Society. People blindly followed the Pope and Vatican
II now you have the followers of Fellay doing the same. Ignorance and pride yet again rearing its
ugly head. “We can convert them” he
argues and yet people (good ones) are dropping out in droves from the Society
and the people who do stay or are coming in are already poisoned
(largely). This is nothing to boast
over. In all honesty he has a difficult
time convincing himself let alone others in some of the theological vomit which
comes out of his smiling mouth.
Lastly, his disastrous recent
interviews. I have appeared on many
shows this past year yet I do not claim to be an expert in giving
interviews. However, people closely
associated with Fellay were even rolling their eyes after some of the
interviews he gave this past year. He
could not even get the basics of our Faith down (concerning the Jews) and even
tried to demonize the Resistance by resorting to the “holocaust denying
card”. Bishop Fellay is truly a piece of
work to say the least. I am astonished how
there are still as many as there are taking this Bishop seriously. His cheerleaders/apologists are truly no
better in general. In fact, they can be
largely to blame as well. They are just
as incompetent. I recently had Robert
Siscoe (out of nowhere) email me recently in desperate attempt to be heard (as
if I wanted to hear it). Salza and Siscoe
are heretics and Fr. Kramer has exposed these two theological clowns enough
over the past month. How did Siscoe even
get my email and when did I ask to be solicited by Him? Desperation is coming from all angles folks. The “house of cards” called the NeoSSPX is
crumbling fast and they are doing anything and everything to salvage what is
left (which is not much) to the detriment of their own character.
TradCatKnight Radio, "The Neo-SSPX Revisited"
TradCatKnight Radio "Francis & Fellay"
Resistance: Brand New Watered Down Position of SSPX
