NWO Global Depopulation: Flouride In Your Water & Weed Killer In Your Cheerios
Scientists Conclude Fluoride Causes Hypothyroidism Leading To Depression, Weight Gain and Worse
Two damning studies on the effects of fluoride in our water have been released in the hope that people will wake up to this real problem.Researchers at the University of Kent are the latest establishment to have studied this growing problem.
The extensive study involved them looking at data from nearly every single medical practice in England, and they found that fluoride may be increasing the risk for hypothyroidism, or an underactive thyroid, a condition in which the thyroid gland fails to produce enough hormones, resulting in symptoms such as fatigue, obesity and depression.
The study, published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, included the largest population ever to be analysed in relation to fluoride consumption.
Data was collected from 99% of the 8,020 general medical practices in England, and the results showed locations with fluoridated water were 30 percent more likely to have high levels of hypothyroidism, compared to areas with low, natural levels of the chemical in the water.
According to The Telegraph, this means that as many as 15,000 people could be suffering from depression, weight gain, fatigue and aching muscles, which could be cured if the fluoride problem was solved.
“Overall, there were 9 percent more cases of underactive thyroid in fluoridated places,” reports Newsweek.
Trevor Sheldon, a medical researcher and dean of the Hill York Medical School who has published numerous studies in this field said “The study is an important one because it is large enough to detect differences of potential significance to the health of the population,”
Sheldon has changed his stance on fluoride, in the past he supported it, but now admits that the “case for general water fluoridation” is no longer clear.
To offset this study, shockingly a Public Health England’s report states that “there is no evidence of harm to health in fluoridated areas,” and no differences were found between fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas in regard to rates of hip fractures, osteosarcoma, cancers overall and Down’s syndrome birth, although these are different to the illnesses that the University of Kent was focused on.
Scientifically Proven Method to Reverse Diabetes (Ad)
The high levels of hyperthyroidism has been dubbed “concerning for people living in those areas.”The study’s lead author Stephen Peckham said:
The difference between the West Midlands, which fluoridates, and Manchester, which doesn’t was particularly striking. There were nearly double the number of cases in Manchester.If you enjoyed this article or learned something new, please don’t forget to share it with others so they have a chance to enjoy this free information. This article is open source and free to reblog or use if you give a direct link back to the original article URL http://www.organicandhealthy.org/2016/11/scientists-conclude-fluoride-causes.html. Thanks for taking the time to support an open source initiative. We believe all information should be free and available to everyone. Have a good day and we hope to see you soon!
Fluoride: Poison On Tap - Full Documentary
Tests Show Monsanto Weed Killer in Cheerios, Other Popular Foods
Independent testing on an array of popular American food products found many samples contained residue levels of the weed killer called glyphosate, leading the nonprofit organization behind the testing to call for corporate and regulatory action to address consumer safety concerns.
The herbicide residues were found in cookies, crackers, popular cold
cereals and chips commonly consumed by children and adults, according to
Food Democracy Now and the group’s “Detox Project,” which arranged for the testing at the San Francisco-based Anresco lab.
Anresco uses liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS),
a method widely considered by the scientific community and regulators
as the most reliable for analyzing glyphosate residues. The groups issued a report Monday that details the findings.
The
announcement of the private tests comes as the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is struggling with its own efforts to analyze how
much of the herbicide residues might be present in certain foods. Though
the FDA routinely tests foods for other pesticide residues, it never
tested for glyphosate until this year. The testing for glyphosate
residues was recently suspended,
however. Glyphosate is under particular scrutiny now because last year
the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC) classified it as a probable human carcinogen.
Glyphosate is the world’s most widely used herbicide and is the key
ingredient in Monsanto Co.’s branded Roundup, as well as in hundreds of
other products. The Environmental Protection Agency is now finalizing a
risk assessment for glyphosate to determine if future use should be
limited.
The tests
conducted by Anresco were done on 29 foods commonly found on grocery
store shelves. Glyphosate residues were found in General Mills’ Cheerios
at 1,125.3 parts per billion (ppb), in Kashi soft-baked oatmeal dark
chocolate cookies at 275.57 ppb, and in Ritz Crackers at 270.24 ppb,
according to the report. Different levels were found in Kellogg’s
Special K cereal, Triscuit Crackers and several other products. The
report noted that for some of the findings, the amounts were “rough
estimates at best and may not represent an accurate representation of
the sample.” The food companies did not respond to a request for
comment.
The EPA sets a
“maximum residue limit” (MRL), also known as a tolerance, for pesticide
residues on food commodities, like corn and soybeans. MRLs for glyphosate
vary depending upon the commodity. Finished food products like those
tested at Anresco might contain ingredients from many different
commodities.
The nonprofit behind the report said that concerns about glyphosate comes as research shows that Roundup can cause liver and kidney damage in rats at only 0.05 ppb, and additional studies have found that levels as low as 10 ppb can have toxic effects
on the livers of fish. The groups criticized U.S. regulators for
setting an acceptable daily intake (ADI) at for glyphosate at much
higher levels than other countries consider safe. The United States has
set the ADI for glyphosate at 1.75 milligrams per kilogram of
bodyweight per day (mg/kg/bw/day) while the European Union has set it at
0.3, for instance. The EPA is supposed to set an ADI from all food and
water sources that is at least 100 times lower than levels that have
been demonstrated to cause no effect in animal testing. But critics
assert that the EPA’s analyses have been unduly influenced by the
agrichemical industry.
The groups said
that the federal government should conduct an investigation into the
“harmful effects of glyphosate on human health and the environment,” and
the relationships between regulators and the agrichemical industry that
has long touted the safety of glyphosate.
Monsanto has
said repeatedly that there are no legitimate safety concerns regarding
glyphosate when it is used as intended, and that toxicological studies
in animals have demonstrated that glyphosate does not cause cancer,
birth defects, DNA damage, nervous system effects, immune system
effects, endocrine disruption or reproductive problems. The company,
which has been reaping roughly $5 billion a year from glyphosate-based
products, says any glyphosate residues in food are too minimal to be
harmful.
Both the U.S.
Department of Agriculture and the FDA have echoed Monsanto’s
reassurances in the past, citing the chemical’s proven safety as
justification for not including glyphosate residue testing in annual
programs that test thousands of food products each year for hundreds of
different types of pesticides. But the lack of routine government
monitoring has made it impossible for consumers or regulators to
determine what levels of glyphosate are present in foods, and questions
about the chemical’s safety persist.
A key reason
glyphosate residues persist in so many food products has to do with its
widespread use in food production. Glyphosate is sprayed directly on
several crops genetically engineered to tolerate the herbicide, such as
corn, soybeans, sugar beets, and canola. Glyphosate is also sprayed
directly on many types of conventional crops ahead of harvest, including
wheat, oats and barley. In all, glyphosate is used in some fashion in
the production of at least 70 food crops, according to the EPA,
including a range of fruits, nuts and veggies. Even spinach growers use
glyphosate. In the report issued Monday, the groups call for a
permanent ban on the use of glyphosate as a pre-harvest drying agent
because of the residue levels.
A recent analysis done by a senior FDA chemist found glyphosate residues in several types of oatmeal products, including baby food, and in several honey samples. The glyphosate residues found in honey were higher than allowed in the European Union.
