Vatican II Ambiguity: Let Your Yea
Be Your No?
By: Eric Gajewski
Matthew 5:37
But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.
But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.
I am completely amused by those who still think we, as Catholics, can accept Vatican II and give obedience to those preaching another Gospel and Faith. We have had prelates such as Kasper who have been open about the reality that there were intentional ambiguities in the text of Vatican II. We have had others like Cardinal Suenens state that Vatican II was a Revolution and yet still so many are hopeful that Vatican II was of God and the Church. It does not get anymore delusional than this no matter how you slice it. Ambiguity which is assuredly to bring about confusion is a sign that something comes from the evil one and not God. So then while this is admitted by some prelates themselves why do the Pseudo traditionalists like those at the Remnant or now the NeoSSPX suggest to Catholics that we can accept the Council? At the end of this blog is a great resource to demonstrate how the prelates themselves saw the texts of Vatican II as ambiguous.
It
is admitted that the texts were both ambiguous and Vatican II as a whole
represented a Revolution. How do these
pseudo traditionalists still fly under the banner of “it was just the spirit of
the Council”? It is precisely because of
this buffoonery that we cannot work with these types. There can be no compromising the Catholic
Faith. This is not at all the lead in position for the Counter Revolution. There is no “tap-dancing” around getting rid
of this evil from the sight of God. Our
Lord said let your yea be your yea and yet the clear double mindedness of the
texts of Vatican II themselves prove this did not come from the Holy Ghost and
the new doctrines are rotten. Until a
Pope, the prelates and priests get this reality the whole world will suffer in
the chastisements until there is an outcry for its removal!
Clear
texts are the narrow path. Unfortunately
Vatican II as a whole is not only outright heretical in certain areas it is
also ambiguous which tries to “broaden” the path. Now we have a whole different context these
days of what the Church is, who is on the Church, on justice, peace, mercy and
charity. Vatican II is irreconcilable with
Tradition and thus must be rejected by anyone professing the Catholic Religion
and not the Novus Ordo Religion. Thus,
we must be very clear in our rejection of this new twisted “Faith” which is
leading souls into the formalized one world religion. How would you respond if you asked your
significant other if they cheated on you and the response you got was a nodding
of the yes but what came out of the mouth was no? Is this a sign of truth or a sign of trying
to hide something deeper? That is exactly
how it is with Vatican II. They say the
teachings are “Catholic” wilst professing this other man centered religion (Novus
Ordo) under the banner of “hermeneutics of continuity”. However, the grand finale is about to
commence when the formalized New Age Religion in Rome will be apparent before
all and those who clung to the Council will realized they have been shammed.
LOGIC 101: If Vatican II is ambiguous it means it is from the devil and Catholics cannot accept it. It does not mean, as the pseudo traditionalists say, that, we can go back and re-clarify it. For how can you re-clarify the Novus Ordo Religion (largely Masonry) and try to make it sound Catholic? That is what Vatican II already attempted to do to deceive people and they did a great job. Now I close with this profound statement. Our Lord said anything less than a yea or a no is from the devil and therefore any suggestion less than a “wholesale nullification/removal” of the Revolution (Vatican II/New Mass) is from the devil!
Reference
Material on Vatican II Ambiguity from the Prelates themselves
Think
your confused? Vatican II can be summed
in these humorous videos below.
