The “Pope” Who Is Not Catholic Says “Who Is” Catholic?
By: Eric Gajewski
Does Bishop Fellay understand the difference between the Universal or Catholic Church and the New Universalist Vatican II Church? Time and time again he demonstrates that he cannot tell the difference. He is against the errors in the Council and yet the Universalist’s, since Vatican II, who stood behind those errors, now take it to the next level by accepting the Society “as is”. Well of course in theory they should because they are all Universalists (accepting of all) not Catholics. Francis is no different. In fact I could label him with a dozen other names not Catholic and all of which are not good.
Put aside the argument that Francis is not even the true Pope and we still see the delusion on the part of Bishop Fellay and the other blind leaders in the Society. We both agree they are the lawful authorities but does the Vatican profess the Faith? No we are in the Apostasy forewarned in Scripture and Tradition. Thus, how does Francis, a modernist/universalist, understand what a Catholic is? He does not even have the proper understanding of what Tradition is! And how does Bishop Fellay have the audacity to accept this label from him? Francis calling anyone Catholic is like a dog calling a cat a dog. Yet we got two different “things” going on here.
Yves Marsaudon, 33rd degree Scottish Rite Freemason: “The sense of universalism that is rampant in Rome these days is very close to our purpose for existence… with all our hearts we support the revolution of John XXIII.”
We must remember that according to the Universalist texts of Vatican II “all humanity” is to be considered as in the Church so of course Francis should say to Fellay they are "Catholics"! It is only common sense. Yet any real Catholic who fundamentally understands this difference would outright protest and ask that Francis and Rome convert (before accepting such a label). Talk about a disastrous response on the part of Bishop Fellay who continues to show his double mindedness. Yea! We are now called Catholics by these heretics and the pseudo trad world rejoices! But wait Francis himself does not profess the Catholic Faith so should we be so joyous? Catholic ain't your grandma’s “Catholic” anymore my friends….Catholic, these days, is Universalist therefore “we got’s a problem”.
Pseudo Trad Land rejoices over Francis calling the Neo SSPX "Catholic"
In Vatican II NewChurch all have a “right” to an opinion (liberty of conscience) it is the basis of Masonry and the new Universalist Church. The Vatican has been merely giving an illusion that the SSPX was not inside this Conciliar Church (from their perspective) when in reality per the texts all would be considered to be in it (unknowingly). But do we want to? Absolutely not and neither did Archbishop Lefebvre but Bishop Fellay does. He wants to hold to his thesis that there are novelties in Vatican II and be accepted by the Modernists as Catholic but the Modernists are not Catholic and do not have the proper notion of the Church and the Faith. Whoohoo! And the Pseudo Trads go wild! Francis said I am Catholic. Frightening! Sadly, it is not at all going to surprise me if Bishop Fellay “recognizes” the soon False Prophet as an actual Pope and take orders from him. He is blind as a bat unfortunately. We should all take lessons from St. Athanasius and Archbishop Lefebvre not Bishop Fellay. The ultimate question is not "if Francis would consider us Catholic". No, the ultimate question is if Francis is first Catholic himself and the answer is no. Bishop Fellay = FAIL
Rorate, Remnant, OnePeterFive, SSPX, Cfnnews, akacatholic cannot compose themselves...
In Summary: Vatican 2 Ecumenism and Universalism go hand in hand both coming from Masonry. Further Modernist mercy is a tool used by the Universalists. Francis is not Catholic but a Universalist and Universalists embrace all. Catholics in return cannot embrace Universalists and this is exactly what Bishop Fellay is doing....
"To stay inside the Church, or to put oneself inside the Church - what does that mean? Firstly, what Church are we talking about? If you mean the Conciliar Church, then we who have struggled against the Council for twenty years because we want the Catholic Church, we would have to re-enter this Conciliar Church in order, supposedly, to make it Catholic. That is a complete illusion. It is not the subjects that make the superiors, but the superiors who make the subjects. ... This talk about the "visible Church" on the part of Dom Gerard and Mr. Madiran is childish. It is incredible that anyone can talk of the "visible Church", meaning the Conciliar Church as opposed to the Catholic Church which we are trying to represent and continue. I am not saying that we are the Catholic Church. I have never said so. No one can reproach me with ever having wished to set myself up as pope. But, we truly represent the Catholic Church such as it was before, because we are continuing what it always did. It is we who have the notes of the visible Church: One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic. That is what makes the visible Church."