Fatima Watch: Putin: It Has Begun – Russia Is At War With NATO?
According to the report, Putin told his top Defense officials: “I order[you] to act extremely tough. Any targets that threaten Russian forces or our infrastructure on the ground should be immediately destroyed.”
This means that Russia could potentially use the nuclear weapons in their arsenalagainst NATO-allied countries in Syria, potentially sparking a World War III scenario.
Spurring these latest Federation war moves, this report explains, are Syrian battlefield reports showing that the American, French, and British aircraft that have been deployed to this war zone are jet fighters whose purpose is air-to-air combat, not ground attack—and that these jet fighters are not deployed to attack Islamic State terrorist forces on the ground, but to threaten the Russian fighter-bombers that are attacking their ground targets—and which in knowing President Putin’s psychology, it is always better to strike first then second.
Even more concerning to MoD experts, this report continues, is that the Obama regime is, also, preparing to unleash total war in the Levant by combining20,000 American-NATO troops with 80,000 Sunni Arab troops from the nations of Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar and Jordan to join Turkish military forces that have already invaded Iraq.
In order for President Obama to justify this total war move, this report says, he is backing within the US Congress the Kaine-Flake bill in the Senate (the Rigell-Welch bill in the House) that has bipartisan backers in both the House and the Senate that repeals the previous Iraq War authorization and authorizes three years of conflict, with options to reauthorize it.
With Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu reporting today, however, that 4,000 sorties by Aerospace Forces have destroyedmore than 8,000 Islamic State terrorist facilities, and even though these barbarians still hold 70% of Syria’s territory, sheer numbers of military forces can in no way defeat them—because this war isn’t only against men, but the mental-religious ideology that controls them.
In explaining this mental-religious mindset, this report continues, it must be noted that the online magazine of these Islamic State terrorists is called Dabiq and sets out their vision—and that this title is no accident as it is a town in northern Syria currently held by them where, according to Islamic prophecy, “the armies of Rome will mass to meet the armies of Islam”.
Confidential comments about this Islamic States mental-religious mindset, too, made by Major General Michael K. Nagata, then US Special Operations commander in the Middle East, this report points out, were even more correct than the West is telling their peoples about this grave threat—and as he stated: “We have not defeated the idea. We do not even understand the idea.”
Also to be noted about the Islamic State, this report grimly states, are that these types of Caliphates cannot exist as underground movements, because territorial authority is a requirement. But take away its command of territory, and all those oaths of allegiance are no longer binding—which by the Obama regimes and its Sunni Arab allies protection of them most assuredly will ensure its continued existence.
As to why the Obama regime and its allies are supporting a Sunni Muslim world where those who embrace “Hollywood values” regarding abortion, adultery and homosexuality would get their heads chopped off as quickly as converts to Christianity, this report continues, it should be noted that some in the West are beginning to see the danger they are in—after all, in nations where these Sunni Muslims are already huge majorities, one needs to rightly ask: Where are the Jews? Where have all the Christians gone?
With nations like Japan and Israel (for example) never allowing immigration into their countries by peoples of Muslim faith, this report continues, they have protected themselves from internal Islamic destruction—unlike the United States, though, where the highly influential American imam and college professor, Yasir Qadhi, described by a 2011 New York Times Magazine essay as “one of the most influential conservative clerics in American Islam”, has told his followers: “Christians are “by necessity and by definition … the most evil of all evils. Like all “unbelievers” and “polytheists,” Christians are “filthy.” They are “najusa” (feces, urine) — “a filthy impure dirty substance.”
And with these Western nations, like the United States, allowing themselves to be continually invaded by these Islamic State terrorists and their supporters, this report concludes, more attacks against them are soon to come too—especially when viewed in the light of Germany reporting today that over 400 of these terrorists in their country are “ready to attack at a moments notices”, and new reports coming from the American Midwest State of Missouri that suspected Islamic terrorists this past week have bought over 150 cell phonesand have, also, been stealing propane tanks.
"Aggressive" Russian Fighter Jets Buzz US Warship; Navy Releases VideosIn a rerun of what happened two years ago when in April 2014 a Russian Su-24 fighter jet flew repeatedly within 1000 yards of a US warship, CNN reports that the Pentagon is furious that while sailing in the Baltic Sea, US warship the USS Donald Cook had two "extremely close overflights" by unarmed Russian fighter jets.
According to the initial reports, two concerning encounters occurred Tuesday night in international waters. A third overflight, at a more acceptable distance, happened Sunday, according to the source.
CNN adds that the ship, an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, also had a Polish helicopter on board as part of routine training, according to the official, leading to some speculation in military circles that the Russians were also "sending a message to Poland," the official said.
Navy officials are not commenting publicly, but inside the Pentagon there is an intense discussion about releasing video and still photos of the Russian encounter to demonstrate the danger the jets posed to the ship, a U.S. official told CNN.
EUCOM added some additional details moments ago:A U.S. official described the Russian maneuver as "strafing runs" without firing any weapons. The unarmed Russian aircraft swooped in over the deck in the same flight profile that would have been used if an attack was underway.
A second U.S. defense official told CNN that the overflights were conducted by a Russian SU-24 and helicopter. Flight operations by the Polish helicopter were interrupted because one of the overflight was so close.
CNN reports that the Cook had been shadowed by a Russian intelligence-gathering ship for some time before the aircraft encounter. The U.S. crew had radioed the Russian ship that it was conducting routine operations, according to the official.On April 12, while Donald Cook was operating in international waters in the Baltic Sea, a Russian KA-27 Helix helicopter conducted circles at low altitude around the ship, seven in total, at approximately 5 p.m. local. The helicopter passes were also deemed unsafe and unprofessional by the ship's commanding officer. About 40 minutes following the interaction with the Russian helicopter, two Russian SU-24 jets made numerous close-range and low altitude passes, 11 in total.
The Pentagon is livid because while there have been encounters between US ships and aircraft and Russian counterparts, this time Russia appears to have gone too far according to CNN sources.
Moments ago the US Navey released the following photos of the overflights.
And the following video clips:
EUCOM released the following statement:
It is unclear if Russia was simply, as the CNN source says, sending Poland a message, or if the Su-24 pilots were just being friendlyU.S. Navy ship encounters aggressive Russian aircraft in Baltic Sea
STUTTGART, GERMANY - A United States Navy Destroyer operating in international waters in the Baltic Sea experienced several close interactions by Russian aircraft on April 11 and 12. USS Donald Cook (DDG 75) encountered multiple, aggressive flight maneuvers by Russian aircraft that were performed within close proximity 51 155 ship.
On April 11, Donald Cook was conducting deck landing drills with an Allied military helicopter when two Russian SU-24 jets made numerous, close-range and low altitude passes at approximately a p.m. local. One of the passes, which occurred while the Allied helicopter was refueling on the deck of Donald Cook, was deemed unsafe by the ship's commanding officer. As a safety precaution, flight operations were suspended until the SU-24s departed the area.
On April 12, while Donald Cook was operating in international waters in the Baltic Sea, a Russian KA-27 Helix helicopter conducted circles at low altitude around the ship, seven in total, at approximately 5 p.m. local. The helicopter passes were also deemed unsafe and unprofessional by the ship's commanding officer. About 40 minutes following the interaction with the Russian helicopter, two Russian SU-24 jets made numerous close-range and low altitude passes, 11 in total. The Russian aircraft flew in a simulated attack profile and failed to respond to repeated safety advisories in both English and Russian. USS Donald Cook's commanding officer deemed several of these maneuvers as unsafe and unprofessional.
China Says Russia “Humiliated” Arrogant U.S. With ‘Simulated Attack’ on Warship
Mouthpiece of Communist Party praises Putin for provocation
The mouthpiece of the ruling Chinese Communist Party asserts that Russia “humiliated” an “arrogant” United States with its warplane passes near a U.S. missile destroyer in the Baltic Sea on Tuesday, an incident that the Pentagon described as a “simulated attack”.
Video released by the U.S. military yesterday shows two Sukhoi SU-24 warplanes conducting repeated close attack passes near a U.S. guided missile destroyer which was located about 70 nautical miles away from Russian territory.
U.S. military officials later described the maneuvers as some of the most aggressive interactions in recent memory.
However, an editorial in the Global Times, an official mouthpiece for China’s ruling Communist Party, characterizes the incident as a huge blow to American prestige.
“The Russian pilots have demonstrated high professional skills to conduct such extremely dangerous maneuvers,” states the editorial. “The US military, which intends to provoke Russia in the Baltic Sea, was humiliated by its Russian counterpart instead. The US must feel furious.”
The piece goes on to portray the warplane activity as an “embodiment of Putin,” who has helped achieve a power balance between Russia and the United States by repeatedly standing up to “arrogant US pressure”.
Moscow will continue to use military provocations to challenge Washington even as its economy crumbles, asserts the editorial.
The fact that China, which is still embroiled in tensions with the U.S. over America’s involvement in the South China Sea dispute, is praising Russia’s willingness to use its military muscle to antagonize Washington, is perhaps not a great sign of things to come.
As Reuters reported last year, the Global Times is an, “Influential nationalist tabloid owned by the ruling Communist Party’s official newspaper the People’s Daily,” therefore reflects the views of top Chinese government officials.
War Plans Are Being Drawn Up For WWIII
Americans are planning the largest increase of their military presence
in Eastern Europe since the Cold War. The Pentagon announced plans to
deploy a tank brigade in Europe in February 2017. Why not immediately,
especially against the backdrop of the "Russian aggression?" As a matter
of fact, there is no aggression. Instead, the United States occupies
Not that long ago, Pentagon officials announced plans to deploy 4,000
troops, 250 tanks and Bradley armored vehicles, self-propelled howitzers
and 1,700 pieces of other wheeled vehicles and trucks in Eastern
In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, US Deputy
Secretary of Defense Robert Wark said that many countries of Eastern
Europe questioned the readiness of the United States to protect them,
especially against the background of the "Russian aggression." The
above-mentioned measures were taken to prove otherwise.
Poland and Bulgaria to have the honor to die first in nuclear war
A report from the European Command of the US Armed Forces said that the
total number of US troops in Europe would thus be equal to three
brigades. This contingent will be shared between Poland, Lithuania,
Latvia, Estonia, Romania and Bulgaria. American people and equipment
will be present in each of these countries, Gen. Ben Hodges said.
According to The National Interest, NATO's growing presence in
the Baltic States - the most likely flashpoint for a confrontation with
Russia - will demonstrate NATO's determination to protect its members.
However, it turns out that the tank brigade will not be deployed in
Eastern Europe under the aegis of NATO. The move will be made as part of
the US program titled European Reassurance Initiative. The $3.4-billion program requires approval from Congress to become reality.
Secondly, who is the aggressor? Is Russia building its bases near the
USA to protect Cuba, Mexico, Venezuela and other countries? Does Russia
need to give way to "peace loving" initiatives of the North Atlantic
Alliance? Does Russia's military doctrine mention anything about a
preemptive nuclear strike? No other country has started so many bloody
conflicts all over the world. There is also a very nice American
tradition to betray allies, should something go contrary to plans.
The Americans prefer to bomb someone and see what happens. They will not
die for Europe. The main concern is the Russian-German alliance that
targets Asia. Yet, it is possible to end this initiative by bribing
politicians and spreading adequate propaganda.
Thirdly, if the threat of the Russian aggression is as serious as it is
painted, why not increase the military presence immediately? Why does
the USA want the unlucky Balts, Poles, Romanians and Bulgarians tremble
with fear for nearly a whole year? Is the Russian aggression an
imaginary threat? Why send tanks to Europe if a nuclear conflict could
destroy them in minutes?
USA occupies Europe on Roman Empire principles
As for Europe, it is not just dependent on the United States - it is occupied by the United States. The occupation is based
on principles of the Roman Empire: the Romans used military garrisons
to contain local population should they rebel against Rome's
exploitative and predatory policy.
Russia has no territorial or other claims to Europe. However, moving troops to its borders without a good reason for it is a very dangerous game. Russia will not repeat the experience of 1941. Russia will take necessary security measures in response to NATO's growing military presence in Europe, especially in the eastern part of the continent, Alexander Grushko, Russia's Ambassador to NATO said. Moscow's reaction to such a move will be adequately efficient, he added.
The USA never sends its troops to places where it smells war - it evacuates them from such places instead. For example, We have recently seen the evacuation of NATO's troops from Turkey, a NATO member.
"The Americans do not want to get involved in a real war. They do not want to mess with North Korea, - Eduard Limonov, writer and political activist told Pravda.Ru. - Donald Trump says that it is about time the Americans should stop protecting all for free. The Americans have a plethora of their own problems: a huge public debt, high unemployment, and the situation is getting worse. Instead, they spend enormous money on other countries. This will stop soon. The Americans will return to their North America, and their interference in global affairs will decrease."