Fr. Kramer 12-13-16 (Facebook)
For 40 years I have been telling people that the crisis in the Church
that began after Vatican II would lead to a split in the Church, when
there will be two popes. I always said you will be able to tell which
one is the false pope, because he will permit things like divorce &
re-marriage, etc. — and many other such things that a Catholic pope
would never allow. Francis is a heretic. He has openly rejected Christ's
teaching to preach the Gospel to all nations and convert them to our Christian faith. Francis says it is wrong to do that! He is not a Catholic, but is a heretic.
Bergoglio's pertinacity is manifest. He is obstinately against many manifest & defined dogmas. The conciliar popes expressed heretical opinions, but pertinacity was not patent. They could have been material heretics, not entirely innocent (invincible ignorance), but ignorant nevertheless, and not pertinaceous. Even St. Robert Bellarmine who favoured the opinion that a pope cannot be a formal heretic, wrote that a pope can be a a material heretic due to ignorance. Such ignorance can even be culpable, but without the obstinate and knowing refusal to believe, there is no pertinacity, which is the form of the sin of heresy.
Bergoglio's pertinacity is manifest. He is obstinately against many manifest & defined dogmas. The conciliar popes expressed heretical opinions, but pertinacity was not patent. They could have been material heretics, not entirely innocent (invincible ignorance), but ignorant nevertheless, and not pertinaceous. Even St. Robert Bellarmine who favoured the opinion that a pope cannot be a formal heretic, wrote that a pope can be a a material heretic due to ignorance. Such ignorance can even be culpable, but without the obstinate and knowing refusal to believe, there is no pertinacity, which is the form of the sin of heresy.
