Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Paul Craig Roberts: Will Russia surrender to US aggression?

In addition: False Flag Op: This Is Why the US Attacked the UN Convoy and Blamed Russia

The Russian government's sincere and diligent effort to prevent chaos in Syria and additional massive refugee flow into Europe, all the while avoiding conflict with Washington and its vassals, has been brought to an end by Washington's intentional attack on a known Syrian army position, thus wrecking the cease-fire agreement that Russia sacrificed so much to achieve.

The response to this fact by the Obama regime's ambassador to the UN, Samantha Power, reveals that Washington will lie to the hilt in order to achieve its agenda of reducing Syria to the same chaos as Washington has reduced Iraq and Libya. Washington, and Washington alone, is responsible for the war in Syria. When the British Parliament and the Russian government blocked Obama's intended US invasion of Syria, the Obama regime armed and financed jihadist mercenaries to invade Syria, pretending that the jihadists were Syrian rebels fighting for democracy in Syria. Samantha Power turned history upside down and blames the war on Russia's intervention at the request of the Syrian government against the ISIL jihadists that Washington sent to destabilize Syria. What Samantha means is that if Russia had not come to the aid of Syria, Washington and ISIL would already have destroyed Syria, and there would be no war.

Ambassador Vitaly Churkin, Russia's ambassador to the UN, said that in his 40 years of diplomacy he had never seen such a high-handed and demagogic performance as Samantha's. Churkin seemed to imply that such an unrealistic and twisted response to known facts as Samantha delivered leaves him without hope of any successful diplomatic outcome.

If the Russian government has finally arrived at the conclusion that Washington is determined to destroy political stability in Syria and to replace it with chaos, it has taken a long time.
The Russian government has studiously avoided this conclusion, because once diplomacy is acknowledged as useless, force confronts force. In today's context that means thermo-nuclear war and the end of life on Earth.

This is the reason that the Russian government has replied diplomatically to Washington's coercive provocations, offering Washington cooperation in place of conflict.
However, Washington wants conflict. The Russians have pretended that Washington has a common interest with Russia in combating terrorism, but terrorism is Washington's tool for destabilizing Syria, then Iran, and then the Muslim provinces of the Russian Federation and China.

Washington wants hegemeny not cooperation. Now that Samantha Power has made this so clear that the Russian government can no longer pretend otherwise, what will Russia (and China) do?

If Russia and China are not ready for the war that Washington is bringing to them, will they retreat in the face of the aggression, sacrificing Syria, the break-away Russian provinces from Ukraine, and the various disputed island issues in the Pacific Ocean while they gather their strength? Or will they decide to break-up the NATO alliance by making the cost of conflict very clear to Washington's European vassals? Clearly, Europe has nothing to gain from Washington's aggression against Russia and China.

Or is Russia unable to do anything now that diplomacy is a proven dead-end?

Perhaps this is the over-riding question. As far as someone who is not a member of the Russian government can tell, Russia is not completely in control of its destiny. Elements in the Russian government known as "Atlanticist Integrationists" believe that it is more important for Russia to be part of the West and to be integrated into the Western system than to be a sovereign country. They argue that if formerly great powers, such as Great Britain, Germany, and France, can profit from being American vassals, so can Russia.

Atlanticist Integrationists claim that Russia's strategic nuclear capability and land mass means that Russia can maintain some sovereignty and only partially submit as a vassal. One problem with this position is that it assumes the neoconservatives are content with less than complete hegemony and would not capitalize on Russia's weakened position to achieve full hegemony.

The Russian government probably still has hopes that at least some European governments will recognize their responsibility to avoid war and exit NATO, thus removing political cover for Washington's aggression. Possibly there is some such hope, but the main European political figures are bought-and-paid-for by Washington. As a high US government official told me as long ago as the 1970s, "we own them; they belong to us."

Not much hope can be found in the European media. Udo Ulfkotte, a former editor of Germany's Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, published a book in which he said that every significant European journalist was on the CIA's payroll.

With politicians and media bought off, where can European leadership come from?

Europeans have become accustomed to their role as hired vassals. As no European politician or newspaper editor can assume that an act of rebellion would succeed, they are more likely to enjoy their life enriched by American gratuities than to take a risk for humanity.

The wider question is whether the extant socio-politico-economic systems can act on behalf of humanity. It is not clear that capitalist civilizations are capable of being humane, because worth is based on money, which makes greed and power the overpowering factors. It is possible that human evil and incompetence have destroyed not only the planet's environment but also humane social systems. Globalism is not a scheme for cooperation. It is Washington's scheme for American domination.

False Flag Op: This Is Why the US Attacked the UN Convoy and Blamed Russia

Russia and Syria Blamed for an egregious war crime committed by the Western Powers

article-doc-gb58t-4nsxz53dv5a95357fd40228fc9f6-606_634x422

The Zio-Anglo-American Axis was compelled to change
the conversation from their previous war crime of killing
over 60 Syrian soldiers on their base. Their handiwork
is shown here: First daylight pics of UN aid convoy that
was destroyed last night by American/Israeli airstrikes.

State of the Nation
The USA has been operating under fierce criticism ever since their Air Force committed the most egregious war crime since the recent agreement with Russia and Syria was signed.
ACT OF WAR: US Military Kills 62 Syrian Soldiers After Violating Syrian Airspace
Not even a week went by and the American military went rogue by attacking a Syrian government base killing 62 soldiers and injuring more than 100 with surgically precise airstrikes.
HOW THE US BECAME ISIS’S AIR FORCE
Not only was this atrocity not an accident, it was perfectly coordinated with two critical military initiatives. As follows:
“Seven minutes after U.S.-led coalition bombed the Syrian Army with phosphorus bombs, killing more than 60 soldiers and wounding more than 100, Daesh unleashed their assault on the Deri-Ezzor government enclave. The U.S. pretends it was an accident, and that the timing was a coincidence.”
(Source: Connecting The Dots Between: NYC Explosion, U.S. War Crime in Syria, and the Daesh Assault on Deri-Ezzor)
A second military assault was also exactly timed with these U.S. airstrikes as the Israeli military attacked Syrian positions contiguous to the Golan heights.
Both of these military incursions were quite deliberately carried out with the U.S. attacks on the Syrian troops. Hence, there is no plausible deniability for the Obama Administration to lean on. They knew exactly what they were doing by committing the war crime(s). The Syrian War in its entirety is actually one protracted war crime.
The Syrian Holocaust: A Preplanned Genocide And Forced Exodus

Please click on this photo to enlarge.

Russia Denies Any And All Involvement With the UN Convoy Attack

The Russian media has since been swift and emphatic to deny any involvement with the attack on the UN convoy. Each of the major Russian news platforms has posted articles wherein the MoD (Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation) asserts with the highest authority that Russia had nothing to do with these attacks.
Russia, Syria did not deliver strikes on UN aid convoy near Aleppo — ministry
Russian, Syrian Air Forces did not strike UN aid convoy in Aleppo – Russian MoD
Russian and Syrian aircraft did not carry out any airstrikes against a UN humanitarian aid convoy

Why did the U.S. and ISIS attack a UN convoy?

The Zio-Anglo-American war strategy in Syria (as well as throughout the Northern Levant) has always been to remove the indigenous populations from their ancestral lands. Only in this way can the Greater Israel project be completed. By showing the Syrian people that even the UN missions are no longer safe and/or able to convey direly needed food and supplies, the will be compelled to migrate from their homes far away from the war zone. The flood of war refugees and economic migrants that has washed over Europe is the direct result of this purposeful plan.
This US attack on the UN convoy and warehouse dramatically destroyed vital subsistence material for those in the greatest need and also showed them that nothing is safe. It also sends a message to the whole of humanity that the United Nations is nothing but a puppet of the Anglo-American Axis.[1] Not only is the UN headquarters located in New York City and funded to a highly disproportionate level by the USA, it is a creature of Anglo-American imperialism as executed by the international banking cartel—a global crime syndicate.

Special Note:
There is an extremely critical reason why the US and ISIS attacked this UN convoy. Obama had to do something very dramatic and so egregious that could be plausibly be blamed on the Russians without providing an iota of evidence. The entire community of nations was witness to the US slaughter of Syrian troops at Deir ez-Zor, a key battleground in the Syrian War. The USA had been justifiably on the receiving end of universal condemnation for such a flagrant war crime, which the State Department cynically attempted to spin as an accident. Not only was the massacre not an accident; rather, it was a calculated war crime designed to produce several outcomes which were all successfully served. Most importantly, this act of wartime cowardice underscored, once again, that the U.S. military is working very closely with ISIS, an utterly barbaric terrorist organization. Hence, Team Obama had to change the global conversation…and fast! What also came out was that the Pentagon was coordinating their every war move with Israel in the execution of their joint strategy to advance the Greater Israel project. The Syrian side of the Golan Heights is now under constant attack by the Israeli military who are also working in close collaboration with ISIS.

*

The Hidden ZIO-Anglo-American Agenda

As usual, the US, UK, Israel and other co-conspirators have colluded to carry out a major false flag operation. Once again, Russia and Syria are the targets of carefully scripted propaganda that the whole MSM trumpets throughout the world. They are both immediately blamed — as if in concert by the entire Western MSM — so as to pre-empt even the slightest intention to conduct a high integrity investigation.
This formula has been used time and again to demonize the good guys. Putin’s Russia is only looking to wipe out ISIS, while the USA & Company works intimately with ISIS to guarantee the survival and flourishing of the Islamic State throughout the Northern Levant. President Putin endeavors to eliminate all terrorism in Syria while the US military and CIA collaborate closely with the many terrorist organizations in the region.
All of these false flag attacks and subsequent cover-ups have been engineered to advance the primary Zio-Anglo-American mission known as the Greater Israel project. This is the real purpose behind the unprovoked war on Syria. And even though the world community of nations now knows about this clandestine agenda, the perps seem hellbent to carry out this very imperialistic plan in broad daylight during prime time.
Putin’s Russia Blows Up Scheme For ‘Greater Israel’
In other words, they don’t even care anymore if the whole world is on to their criminally insane and megalomaniacal scheme to take over the entire planetary civilization.

The Western warmongers have transformed Syria into “a dystopian, post-apocalyptic wasteland”.

Conclusion

Let’s face it, the criminally insane and psychopathic leadership of the Anglo-American Axis (AAA) is dead set on starting the hot phase of World War III. They have already proven that they will do anything and everything they can to sufficiently demonize Russia and its allies so that WW3 can be instigated and prosecuted around the globe. Nakedly heinous acts like bombing UN convoys and warehouses do just that.
By attacking vital UN assets, there is an implicit obligation from all the member nations to rise up and punish the country that dared to perpetrate such a deadly and destructive assault on a humanitarian mission. In this fashion will the countries be corralled into a pen of warmongering against the international pariah—Russia (even though Russia had nothing to do with such a barbaric act).
This process is known as the Hegelian Dialectic and is quite effective at manufacturing consent. In this instance, the AAA is determined to generate worldwide consent to make war against Russia. The instigators are livid that Russia has literally blown up their Greater Israel project, as it was the very basis of their future One World Government. Their planned Third World War is also a critical component of their depopulation agenda, which the Kremlin has exposed through the Russian alternative media. The same media has revealed much 9/11 truth, which also irks the Western powers who pulled off that mother of all false flag operations.
Welcome to the New World Disorder! Also known as “Ordo ad chao”.