Modernist Rome: All Roads Lead to
the Woods?
Theological “Clowns” trying to lure
souls off the narrow path
By: Eric Gajewski
By: Eric Gajewski
I could not help but write this
piece as it relates to the connection between the recent “clown” sightings we
are seeing in the United States and Modernist Rome. What connection is there you say? Since the Second Vatican Council we have had
these "theological clowns", also known as, aliens of the Faith, taking over our
buildings. They are great
pretenders and deceivers. They wear a mask trying to
pretend they are orthodox in the Faith but represent and teach a whole other
faith ad gospel. Truly, this is a
“light” word to describe these objective destroyers of our Faith. Then, we have recently had these scary clowns
appearing all over the United States trying to lure people out into the
woods.
They want to get people "out of
the light" and off the clear path so they can have their way. I call to mind now the situation with the NeoSSPX
and Modernist Rome. The evil intentions
of the Conciliarists have been known for some time and yet Bishop Fellay wants
to drag souls out with him into the woods. He is being lured by "wonderful candy and balloons" of these
Conciliarists (enemy).
It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to
remain Catholic to separate himself from this Conciliar Church for as long as
it does not rediscover the tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith.”
(Abp. Lefebvre, Spiritual Journey, p. 13)
These clowns come with their candy
and balloons in attempt to lure in their next victim. You can have your own bishops and some
structure even if you will just come out into the woods for a little while with
us. Unfortunately in Bishop Fellay’s
tunnel vision to be accepted by these heretics he has lost sight of the principles
his own founder laid down. Bishop Fellay
does not see the woods he sees the candy and balloons. Fellay says, “And if somebody is offering something like
that, it can be only because he wants good to us. He wants the good of
tradition, he wants tradition to say, spread in the Church. It is impossible to
think that such a thing could be invented by enemies. The enemies have many
other ways to crush us down. Not that.”
This statement is an overall representation of the unequivocal delusion
these pseudo traditionalists have. Yes,
let us go out in the woods because the candy is nice and the balloons are
vibrant. Bishop Fellay has already gone
too far and taken the bait.
What about the conservatives like Cardinal
Burke and Bishop Schneider?
Pope appointing
conservatives?
Question:
John Paul II has nominated bishops in Austria and elsewhere who are considered
as being traditional to such a point that a group of German theologians, backed
up by French theologians, are criticizing the pope and rebuking him for it.
Recently, also, Cardinal Ratzinger published an instruction with an Oath of
Fidelity and a Profession of Faith preceding it. Can't we see here signs of a
sort of improvement and a return to more traditional formulas?
Archbishop
Lefebvre: I don't think it is a true return to Tradition. Just as in a fight
when the troops are going a little too far ahead one holds them back, so they
are slightly putting the brakes on the impulse of Vatican II because the
supporters of the Council are going too far. Besides, these theologians are
wrong to get upset. The bishops concerned - the supposedly conservative bishops
- are wholly supportive of the Council and of the post-Conciliar reforms, of
ecumenism and of the charismatic movement.
Apparently,
they are being a little more moderate and showing slightly more traditional
religious sentiment, but it does not go deep. The great fundamental principles
of the Council, the errors of the Council, they accept them and put them into
practice. That is no problem for them. On the contrary, I would go so far as to
say that it is these conservative bishops who treat us the worst. It is they
who would the most insistently demand that we submit to the principles of the
Council.
Nothing ever good comes out of being
lured into the woods. Bishop Fellay in
following pseudo mystics and the advice of other poisoned prelates and priests
is far past the point of return. Look at
all the other false traditionalist groups like ICK, FSSP, Good Shepherd who
have all been swallowed up by these clowns.
Sadly, they (false traditionalists) now dress for the same role and why? Because their
doctrine follows these clowns. There was
a Church Father who said heretics come with a false key to entice the faithful
but their key opens the gates of hell not heaven. Now we have the clowns of Vatican II coming
with their candy and balloons trying to lure men into the woods. By rejecting such a prelature would not mean
the Society is at all schismatic. In
fact the reality is since Vatican II, the Conciliar Church is in material
schism and is loaded with heresy. No
intent to convert means a no thank you but not to Bishop Fellay and perhaps his
pseudo mystic “guiding him”.
Question: Some people say,“Yes, but
Archbishop Lefebvre should have accepted an agreement with Rome because once
the Society of St. Pius X had been recognized and the suspensions lifted, he
would have been able to act in a more effective manner inside the Church,
whereas now he has put himself outside.”
Archbishop Lefebvre: Such things are
easy to say. To stay inside the Church, or to put oneself inside the Church –
what does that mean? Firstly, what Church are we talking about? If you mean the
Conciliar Church, then we who have struggled against the Council for twenty
years because we want the Catholic Church, we would have to re-enter this
Conciliar Church in order, supposedly, to make it Catholic. That is a complete
illusion. It is not the subjects that make the superiors, but the superiors who
make the subjects.
The Society can’t save the Church
because they cannot even save themselves at this point. Accept the Council in “light of
Tradition”? No, thank you and how much
candy has Bishop Fellay already eaten to be making some of the insane and
incompetent remarks he has recently. One
of which, was this child like exuberance of being labeled Catholic by
Francis. Goodness, talk about eating
enough of the Modernists candy to throw ones self into a diabetic coma. Remember the woods bringeth death and this is
where Bishop Fellay wants to lead you.
The woods during the day could be navigated however at night it is
impossible! Thus, this is the situation
we find ourselves in. We are in a dark
crisis with clowns patrolling this perpetual darkened woods. Even the conservative cardinals are sadly
counted amongst these clowns and yet Bishop Fellay loves their candy and
balloons.
“Some are prepared to sacrifice the fight for the faith by
saying: ‘Let us first re-enter the Church! Let us first do everything to
integrate the official, public structure of the Church. Let us be silent about
dogmatic issues. Let us be silent about the malice of the [New] Mass. Let us
keep quiet over the issues of religious freedom, Human Rights, ecumenism. And,
once we are inside the Church, we will be able to do this, we will be able to
achieve that...’ That's absolutely false! You don't enter into a structure,
under superiors, by claiming that you will overthrow everything as soon as you are
inside, whereas they have all the means to suppress us! They have all the
authority.
“What matters to us first and foremost is to maintain the Catholic Faith. That's what we are fighting for. So, the canonical issue, this purely public and exterior issue in the Church, is secondary. What matters is to stay within the Church... inside the Church, in other words, in the Catholic Faith of all time, in the true priesthood, in the true Mass, in the true sacraments, and the same catechism, with the same Bible. That's what matters to us. That's what the Church is. Public recognition is a secondary issue. Thus, we should not seek what is secondary by losing what is primary, by losing what is the primary goal of our fight!
“We cannot place ourselves under an authority whose ideas are liberal and who little by little would condemn us, by the logic of the thing, to accept these liberal ideas and all the consequences of these liberal ideas, which are the new Mass, changes in the liturgy, changes in the Bible, changes in catechism, all these changes...” (Archbishop Lefebvre, Spiritual Conference, Dec. 21, 1984).
“What matters to us first and foremost is to maintain the Catholic Faith. That's what we are fighting for. So, the canonical issue, this purely public and exterior issue in the Church, is secondary. What matters is to stay within the Church... inside the Church, in other words, in the Catholic Faith of all time, in the true priesthood, in the true Mass, in the true sacraments, and the same catechism, with the same Bible. That's what matters to us. That's what the Church is. Public recognition is a secondary issue. Thus, we should not seek what is secondary by losing what is primary, by losing what is the primary goal of our fight!
“We cannot place ourselves under an authority whose ideas are liberal and who little by little would condemn us, by the logic of the thing, to accept these liberal ideas and all the consequences of these liberal ideas, which are the new Mass, changes in the liturgy, changes in the Bible, changes in catechism, all these changes...” (Archbishop Lefebvre, Spiritual Conference, Dec. 21, 1984).
The narrow path although narrow is still safe. Many are afraid of not being able to make it Mass every Sunday in an hour where seemingly every priest is heretical and/or compromising and yet I think this is where God is leading us. Let me explain. It is becoming obvious we cannot even trust our own priests and therefore all the more reason to turn to Our Lady. It is her hour to demonstrate that through her intercession everything will be alright. When heresy and compromise are virtually everywhere we have Our Lady. You are not offending God by making that decision to refrain from compromise and heresy. A good Mother always tells her children don’t talk to strangers and in a certain loose way this also advice applies to the situation (not talking to these strangers of the Faith). “I will place the discussion at the doctrinal level: “Do you agree with the great encyclicals of all the popes who preceded you? Do you agree with Quanta Cura of Pius IX, Immortale Dei and Libertas of Leo XIII, Pascendi Gregis of Pius X, Quas Primas of Pius XI, Humani Generis of Pius XII? Are you in full communion with these Popes and their teachings? Do you still accept the entire Anti-Modernist Oath? Are you in favor of the social reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ? If you do not accept the doctrine of your predecessors, it is useless to talk! As long as you do not accept the correction of the Council, in consideration of the doctrine of these Popes, your predecessors, no dialogue is possible. It is useless.” – Archbishop Lefebvre, Fideliter, November/December 1988
Turn your backs on Modernist Rome for they have turned their backs on Tradition and ultimately Christ
Those in the Resistance are not stupid enough to fall for such tricks from the enemy. Keep your distance, watch and pray for this is the way. Modernist Rome, in fact, will not even convert, which is why it will soon be largely destroyed. Bishop Fellays response should be “we are fine as is, we are Catholic”. Yet he misleads his followers into thinking they need recognition and to work with those who are literally destroying the Faith. Pay attention to the Divine side of the Church he says now in used car salesman rhetoric. No, thank you I see how he has been lulled asleep by the Modernists and I do not want to end up as he is. Rome is Modernist and Universal therefore coming under that umbrella formally serves as no protection. Will or would the Society come under obedience to the soon False Prophet who will formally unite all religions? After all, Catholics will be embraced and accepted if they can play by the rules! Have you noticed in the quotes presented the repeated trend of Archbishop Lefebvre openly admonishing/rejecting the current position and undertakings of Bishop Fellay? Fellay and his cohorts (apologists included) do not at all follow the teachings/principles of the Archbishop. In the end, do not be a clown like Bishop Fellay who is leading people off the narrow path.
Bishop Fellay is falling for the old "balloon trick"
Archbishop Lefebvre sums it up well:
“I said to him [Cardinal
Ratzinger—who became Pope Benedict XVI] ‘Even if you grant us a bishop, even if
you grant us some autonomy from the bishops, even if you grant us the 1962
Liturgy, even if you allow us to continue running our seminaries in the manner
we doing right now —we cannot work together! It is impossible! Impossible!
Because we are working in diametrically opposing directions. You are working to
de-Christianize society, the human person and the Church, and we are working to
Christianize them. We cannot get along
together!’
Rome has lost the Faith, my dear
friends! Rome is inapostasy! I am not speaking empty words! That is the truth!
Rome is in apostasy! One can no longer have any confidence in these people!
They have left the Church! They have left the Church! They have left the
Church! It is certain! Certain! Certain! Certain! ”
(Archbishop Lefebvre, Conference,
October 4, 1987, Marcel Lefebvre by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, pp.
547-548
