MASONIC
SNAKES IN "CATHOLIC" EDUCATION
By
Charlotte Iserbyt
Regarding
Catholic schools accepting the national Common Core curriculum, I am
afraid we will have to understand that the Catholic Bishops are part
of it...willingly part of it. I don't like to say that, but the Bishops
are not stupid. They are following directives from the Vatican that
is up to its eyeballs in Masonic snakes.
That
criticism does not mean that I am not a solid, believing traditional
Catholic. Perhaps the deceit I have seen in American public education,
and how good teachers have been lied to, how the whole community and
nation has been lied to, has made me into a skeptic and a cynic regarding
what is going on.
The
changes in education began a bit prior to Vatican II in the very early
sixties. Vatican II and American public education went down the same
ungodly New Age humanistic path to Liberation theology, Liberation education,
Liberation sex, Liberation drugs and alcohol, Liberation marriage and
family values, Liberation U.S. Constitutional system, Liberation you-name-it.
I
remember a conversation I had in 1983 with a former Commissioner of
Education Francis
Keppel (1965) who not only oversaw the beginning of the Civil Rights
movement in education (desegregation, etc.) but at one time was head
of the Aspen Institute and numerous boards and deeply involved in educational
research...teacher training a la Pavlov/Skinner (OBE). I knew nothing
about Keppel's background when, by chance, I met him in 1983 at a reception
at the local sailing club in N. Hatley, Quebec. He had a summer home
there. I had just been fired from the U.S. Department of Education and
was visiting my former roommate who summered in Hatley and who was a
close friend of Keppel and his wife, Didi. When I left the reception
early I went into a local coffee shop and found Keppel at the counter
drinking his coffee and reading a big book. Evidently he had become
bored at the reception. The big book he was reading was by an important
Dutch Protestant (can't remember his name) regarding how successful
Protestants had been in directing changes during Vatican II. He remarked
to me how important that book was. I was a “dumb-dumb” then
and had no idea what he meant. Keppel chatted with me, telling me he
had very high regard for his successor, the notorious Commissioner of
Education, Yale’s Skull and Bones’ Harold Howe, who, in
this writer’s opinion, pounded the last nail of the coffin into
local control with his desegregation policies. One of Howe’s statements
was to the effect that the affluent middle class white neighborhoods,
with their well-manicured lawns, had to be blown apart through desegregation.
Of
course, as some of us have come to realize, the blowing apart of the
white neighborhoods, deliberate creation of chaos in order to move the
international agenda forward (dialectic), not the improvement of education/life
for the blacks, was the real goal of these people. See my article “Experimentation
on Blacks” which is a pdf
at my website. The whole desegregation movement, starting under
President Lyndon Johnson, became a huge opportunity for experimentation
on the blacks (remember the Chicago Mastery Learning program which Education
Week in 1985 referred to as a "human disaster of enormous proportions"
with “almost half of the 39,500 public school students in the
1980 freshmen class failing to graduate…” This Pavlovian
individualized mastery learning/direct instruction program was one of
the first experiments on the unwary black community.
Across-the-board
acceptance of this dumbing down education program would ultimately result
in its continued use in most of the inner city schools of our nation,
leading up to the present installation of the planned restructured education
system we are looking at today (for all children) with its
individual education plans, no grades, no elected school boards, school
choice/charter schools, etc., necessary for implementing the Soviet/Chinese/Cuban
polytech (workforce training) system of education run by unelected councils.
Of
importance is the fact Keppel was also head of Aspen Institute at one
time. Lawrence Pierce wrote an article for the Aspen Institute in 1976
entitled “School Site Management” which also called for
vouchers (the beginning of the school choice/ charter school movement
with unelected councils agenda) now going in across the country. All
of this was necessary to bring all public and private and
home school education into the long-anticipated era of computer
technology (Skinner called the computer his “box”). This
was necessary for implementation of the Soviet polytech/global school
to work system using partnerships between the public schools (government)
and the private sector (corporations) for a planned economy and lifelong
learning under the umbrella of the unelected school superintendent and
his unelected school council. This so-called “new” system
is not new. It is what used to be referred to as Community Education,
and it is international. Go to: www.americandeception.com
and type “Feld” into search education for excellent report
on Community Education.
Interesting
that all of this started only a few years after President Eisenhower
signed the first agreements with the Soviet Union in 1958 at the peak
of the Cold War, which covered not only education, but many other areas
affecting Americans' daily lives. (There
was little those agreements did not cover).
Also
of interest is fact that during the Congressional Investigation of the
Tax-Exempt foundations in 1952 (six years prior to President Eisenhower’s
signing of the first agreements with the Soviet Union) Norman Dodd,
Research Director for the Investigation, was told by Rowan Gaither,
President of the Ford Foundation, that the tax-exempt foundations got
their instructions from the White House which called for the foundations
to spend their tax-exempt money to bring about a comfortable merger
of the United States with the Soviet Union.
I
personally believe we are “there.” (Lenin and Stalin called
for international communism, also known as World/Global Government,
UN Agenda 21, etc.) And so I, very reluctantly, believe the Catholic
Church is also “there”. The recent call by the Vatican for
a global political and economic system fits into the above, doesn't
it?
If
the Vatican favors such an international system, it follows that it
just might favor an international Common Core curriculum for all nations.
The Common Core specifies outcomes (behaviors and attitudes) to be measured.
Catholic schools in the nineteen eighties and nineties brought in the
infamous federally-funded OBE change agent William Spady to retrain
their teachers in this non-academic Skinnerian system. It was at that
time that Catholic parents finally should have risen up in arms over
the takeover of their formerly excellent education system!
There
is a lesson to be learned here. Private and home school education better
not take a penny from local, state or federal government or their schools
will be taken over by the U.S. Department of Education, as has really
been the case with Catholic education in the USA since it took money
under the federal ESEA in 1965. It began happening to the Catholic schools
in France, starting during World War II under the Vichy regime, when
Catholic schools allowed the state to partially fund their schools,
and it evidently has happened in the USA as well. That’s very
simply the reason why Catholic schools have the Common Core and Catholic
parents can’t do anything about it.
I
wish I could see some light at the end of the tunnel, but I am afraid
there is a freight train coming from the other direction with an oversized
load of Masonic snakes!
Prayer
is in order.
