Neo-SSPX pushing "forward" for "recognition" from Modernist Rome

Neo-SSPX pushing "forward" for "recognition" from Modernist Rome

Compromiser Bishop Fellay handed over a heretical/schismatic Preamble to Modernist Rome in 2012 with STILL no official retraction. He has left behind the principles of Catholic theology and Archbishop Lefebvre's position on "unity" for the sake of his own new analysis and doctrinal position on the heretical/schismatic Vatican II Council

View Here:
http://www.therecusant.com/doctrinalpreamble-15apr2012

https://traditionalcatholicremnant.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/bishop-fellays-doctrinal-preamble/ 

http://www.truetrad.com/index.php/poison/275-3-13-2013-updated-bishop-fellay-s-damning-2012-doctrinal-preamble-response-to-rome-bishop-williamson-s-and-truetrad-s-commentary-on-it

More evidence you say on the possible re-integration of the Neo-SSPX (Pseudo -Traditionalist group) back into the Conciliar Church occupied by Modernists, Masons and Marxists?

VATICANO - Dominicans of Fanjeaux on Pilgrimage to Rome

 In the Video: Pseudo Traditionalist, Father Pfluger, confuses the notion of "being Roman" as "being able to commune with modernist (heretical) Romans." What did Archbishop Lefebvre REALLY have to say about the difference between modernist Rome and Eternal Rome?

"We hold fast, with all our heart and with all our soul, to Catholic Rome, Guardian of the Catholic faith and of the traditions necessary to preserve this faith, to Eternal Rome, Mistress of wisdom and truth.

We refuse, on the other hand, and have always refused to follow the Rome of neo-Modernist and neo-Protestant tendencies which were clearly evident in the Second Vatican Council and, after the Council, in all the reforms which issued from it.' Archbishop Levebvre, 1974

Does Rome have the intent to abolish the diabolical, heretical, schismatic Second Vatican Council? Answer: In the Negative! Therefore, the problem is not just the Society's philosophically erroneous perception of "prudence" it also relates to their overall new pseudo-traditionalist doctrinal position/analysis which has yet to be formally revoked as "off the table". Bishop Fellay and most of its leaders are theological "trainwrecks" leading the sheep back in the pasture of the wolves. Blind leading the blind. Pride keeps one from seeing the objective reality of this new position.

The Neo-SSPX no longer views the Second Vatican "Council" as modernist; as heretical and schismatic like their own founder. The Neo-SSPX has a new "watered down" "Remnant-like" position on the Second Vatican "Council" which entails fighting against a "few errors here or there"...no mention anymore that we are battling a whole new religion.





 Is this "recognition" possible according to the standards of their own founder Archbishop Lefebvre? Answer: No! But the reason the Neo-SSPX believes they can rejoin the Conciliar Church again is due to this new watered down position. They dont fight heresy they fight errors or some mistakes here or there. It is a completely delusional outlook on what has transpired since the second Vatican Council. The Second Vatican Council was the pastoral basis for the new religion of the New World Order how can Catholics accept this "Council" as legit but only resist in some errors therein? The answer is a true Catholic cannot because it is the modernists new fairytale of what "Catholicism" is.

Neo-SSPX: The official church is the visible one, it is the Catholic Church, full stop!”

      (Bishop Fellay, ordinations sermon in La Reja, Argentina, 20/12/14)

The Real Archbishop Lefebvre: "But it is the Second Vatican Council and its reforms, its official orientations, which concern us more than the personal attitude of the Pope, which is difficult to discern. "This Council represents, both in the opinion of the Roman authorities as in our own, A NEW CHURCH which they call themselves the "CONCILIAR CHURCH". "We believe that we can affirm, taking into consideration the internal and external critique (review) on Vatican II, that is, in analysing the texts and in studying its circumstances and its consequences, that the Council, turning its back on Tradition and breaking with the Church of the past, is a SCHISMATIC COUNCIL. 

Can Catholics adhere to the new position of the Neo-SSPX that the Second Vatican Council is understood in light of "tradition"/legitimate. Can we accept this new position of 95% adherence to the modernists new "playbook". Father Hesse, notable theologian (Doctorate of Canon Law/Theology) answers...

So where is the true Archbishop Lefebvre position on Modernist Rome to be found? The one which clearly follows true prudence and logic? The one which states we cannot rejoin the "mainstream" church without Romes full repentance of Vatican II modernism/liberalism which would include an intent of removal of the diabolical second Vatican Council, the New Mass, new Code of Canon Law, new Canonizations, etc? It is found in the Resistance. One ought not be attending Neo-SSPX masses any longer. Compromise with the Catholic Faith is mortal sin; compromise never ended well in Scripture nor in Church history. The theological ineptitude of the Society leaders continues...

What an EXAMPLE to give our children to let them brush up against modernist heretics all to "prove we are catholic". We need not prove anything to those who objectively speaking cannot tell that they are following  a new religion. We must pray and suffer them! We are Catholic; we are what remains of the Catholic Church; we are the visible church NOT the Conciliar Church. The Neo-SSPX has lost the Faith my friends and it shows up directly in official statements coming from the top or indirectly in these videos demonstrated.  
#EagleoftheFortress #EagleoftheWest

Bishop Williamson: Bishop Fellay the Traitor

At this point, my good friends, what does it matter if they are recognized, they no longer reject the second Vatican Council wholesale and no longer see heresy but mere mistakes and error. You are endangering your own soul by attending Neo-SSPX chapels on the basis of the compromise "issue" alone. I am always amused when listening to the new version the Society priests have over "who" Archbishop  Lefebvre was and "what actually" his position or stance on Modernist Rome was. The Neo-SSPX leaders continually distort what the Archbishop has said and continually sells their propaganda to the unfortunate "goers" of the chapels in their weak, theologically unfounded attempt to be recognized by non catholics (at this point). Personally, I do not want my name nor website to be associated with compromisers and "closet liberals"...

Related:
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/10/all-you-need-to-know-about-bishop-fellay.html

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/02/sspx-lacks-common-honesty-regarding-its.html

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/10/neo-sspx-latest.html

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-neo-sspx-zionist-connection.html

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-neo-sspx-and-denial-of-sacraments.html

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-neo-sspx-more-humility.html

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/04/false-resistance-or-masked-pseudo.html

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/02/why-we-should-leave-sspx.html

http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/01/against-pseudo-traditionalism.html

1988: "The Catholic faithful have a strict right to know that the priests to whom they have recourse are not in communion with a counterfeit Church which is evolutionary, pentecostalist, syncretist." (Abp. Lefebvre, Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin, Prefect of the Congregation of Bishops. Econe, 6th July, 1988.)

The REAL ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE:

Woe! Woe! Woe! An Eagle cries! Repent Rome, Repent....
COMPROMISE is MORTAL SIN


In addition please continue to pray for Bishop Tissier who seems to be a potential "last hope" within the Neo-Society who still maintains Archbishop Lefebvre's hardline stance against modernist Rome. The Resistance would gladly embrace him. Here is a recent sermon (Jan 1, 2015) reaffirming the Conciliar Church is NOT the Catholic Church.

Q: What are your requirements in order for TradCatknight to once again support the Neo-SSPX?

TradCatKnight: Supports the Resistance
& denounces compromise with noncatholics.
This is the HOME of the New Crusade

(Primary-1) The Neo-SSPX must formally and publicly declare Vatican II a heretical/schismatic (null and void) Council. that Vatican II NewChurch is NOT the Catholic Church
(2) They must once again reaffirm formally and publicly that we have had Modernist Popes who objectively speaking are not Catholics and they they have been teaching heresy not just error.
(3) They must reaffirm Lefebvre's position that a practical agreement can not be made until Modernist Rome rejects Vatican II/New Mass(true conversion)

(Secondary point-(4) : They must formally and publicly make an apology for their illicit removals of those priests and laity who did not want to go along with the "new" watered down position of the SSPX. They must apologize for their unacceptable behavior.

 

Fr. Hewko - RED LIGHT Position on the Neo-SSPX