Venial Sin and its Effects...
After mortal sin there is nothing
that we should avoid more carefully than venial sin. Although it is much less
serious than mortal sin, it is nevertheless a moral evil, and moral evil is the
greatest of all evils. Before this type of evil all others of the physical order
fade away as if they were nothing. Neither sickness nor death itself can be
compared to the evil of sin. It is necessary therefore to have clear ideas about
the nature, classes, malice and consequences of venial sin so that one can
cultivate a horror of it and put into practice the means necessary to avoid it.
Nature and Kinds
This is one of the most difficult
questions in all theology. For our purpose, however, it is sufficient to say
that, as distinct from mortal sin, venial sin consists in a simple deviation and
not a total aversion from the ultimate end. It is a sickness and not the death
of the soul. The sinner who commits a mortal sin is like the traveller who,
intending to reach a certain point, turns his back on it and begins to travel in
the opposite direction. But he who commits a venial sin merely departs from the
straight path without abandoning his orientation toward the goal to which he is
travelling.
It is possible to distinguish three
classes of venial sins:
1)
Those sins which by their very nature involve a disorder or
deviation, although only a slight one, such as a small lie which does no damage
to anyone.
2)
Those sins which, although of themselves gravely forbidden, because of
the smallness of the matter involved, constitute only a light disorder,
as to steal a small amount of money.
3)
Those sins which lack complete deliberation orfull consent of the will
in matters which would otherwise be serious sins, such as inadvertent or
semi‑deliberate impure thoughts.
The mere multiplication of venial
sins does not of itself change the species of the sin. A thousand venial sins do
not equal a single mortal sin. Nevertheless, a venial sin could become a mortal
sin for any one of the following reasons:
a) Because of an erroneous
conscience or a seriously doubtful conscience concerning the grave malice of a
deliberate act. Thus he who erroneously believes that an action which is
objectively only venially sinful is a mortal sin would commit a mortal sin if he
performed that action. One would also commit a mortal sin in performing an
action if he has serious doubts as to whether or not it is a mortal sin or only
a venial sin, for one is obliged to solve such a doubt before performing the
action.
b) By reason of an end which is
gravely evil, as would occur if one performs an act which is a light sin for
the purpose of causing another to commit a serious sin.
c) By reason of the proximate
danger of falling into mortal sin if one commits a particular venial sin, as
would be the case if one were to let himself become angry when he knows that he
will very likely end by inflicting grave damage or injury on his neighbour.
d) By reason of the grave scandal
which would be occasioned by the commission of a light sin, e.g., if a venial
sin committed by a priest were to become the occasion of a serious sin on the
part of a layman.
e) By formal contempt of a law
which binds under light obligation. Contempt is called formal if it is
directed against authority as such; it is called material if is directed
to some other element, such as a disdain for the thing forbidden because one
thinks it is of little importance.
f) By the accumulation of material
which may increase until it is grave matter.
Malice of Venial Sin
It is certain that there is a great
difference between the malice of a mortal sin and that of a venial sin. The
Church has condemned the following proposition of Baius: "There is no sin which
is venial by its very nature, but every sin merits eternal punishment.”
Nevertheless, venial sin does constitute a true offence against God, an
effective disobedience of His law, and an act of ingratitude for His great
benefits. On the one hand there is the will of God and His glory; on the other,
our own desires and selfishness. In the case of venial sin, we in effect choose
the latter.
It is true that we should not
prefer them if we knew that they would separate us radically from God (and in
this we have the distinction between venial and mortal sin, because the latter
consists in our turning away from God completely), but It is certain that the
lack of respect toward God is of itself very great even in the case of venial
sin. St. Teresa says in this regard:
From any sin, however small,
committed with full knowledge, may God deliver us, especially since we are
sinning against so great a Sovereign and realize that He is watching us. That
seems to me to be a sin of malice aforethought; it is as though one were to say:
"Lord, although this displeases Thee, I shall do it. I know that Thou seest it
and I know that Thou wouldst not have me do it; but although I understand this,
I would rather follow my own whim and desire than Thy will." If we commit a sin
in this way, however slight, it seems to me that our offense is not small but
very, very great.
Nevertheless, it is necessary to
distinguish between venial sins committed out of weakness, surprise or lack of
advertence and deliberation, and those which are committed coldly and with the
complete awareness that one thereby displeases God. We can never completely
avoid the former, and God, who knows very well the clay of which we are made,
readily forgives us these sins of weakness. The only thing that one can do about
these faults is to try to diminish their number as far as possible and to avoid
discouragement, which would be fatal for one who is striving for perfection and
always presupposes a self‑love which is more or less dissimulated. St. Francis
de Sales says in this respect:
Although it is reasonable to feel
discouragement and to be sorry for having committed any faults, this
discouragement should not be sour, angry, acrimonious or choleric; and this is
the great defect of those who, seeing themselves angry, become impatient with
their own impatience and become angry at their own anger....
Believe me, Philothea, that just as
the sweet and cordial reproaches of a father make more of an impression on a son
than his rage and anger, so also, if we reproach our heart when it commits some
fault with sweet and peaceful reproaches, using more compassion than anger and
arousing the heart to amend, we shall succeed in arousing a repentance which is
much more performed and penetrating than that which could be aroused with
resentment, anger and anxiety.... Therefore, when your heart falls., raise it
sweetly, humbling yourself greatly in the presence of God by the recognition of
your misery, without being surprised at your fall; for what is so strange that
sickness should be sick, that weakness should be weak, and that misery should
be wretched. Nevertheless, detest with all your heart the offense which you have
committed against God and, filled with courage and confidence in His mercy,
begin again the practice of that virtue which you have abandoned.
If one acts in this way, reacting
promptly against those faults of weakness with a profound repentance full of
meekness, humility and confidence in the mercy of God, they will leave scarcely
any trace in the soul, and they will not constitute a serious obstacle in the
path of our sanctification.
But when venial sins are committed
coldly, with perfect deliberation and advertence, they constitute an insuperable
obstacle to perfection. They make it impossible to proceed along the road to
sanctity. Those sins sadden the Holy Ghost, as St. Paul says,[2]
and they completely paralyse His sanctifying work in the soul. Father Lallemant
says in this regard:
One is astonished to see so many
religious who, after having lived forty or fifty years in the state of grace,
saying Mass every day and practicing all the holy exercises of the religious
life, and, consequently, possessing all the gifts of the Holy Ghost in a very
high degree‑one is astonished, I say, to see that these religious give no
recognition to the gifts of the Holy Ghost in their acts and in their conduct;
to see that their life is completely natural; that, when they are corrected or
when they are discouraged, they show their resentment; that they show so much
concern for the praise, the esteem and the applause of the world; that they
delight in it, and they love and seek its comfort and everything that will
appeal to their self‑love.
There is no reason to be
astonished. The venial sins which they commit continuously bind the gifts of the
Holy Ghost, and it is no wonder that the effects of the gifts are not evident in
them. It is true that these gifts grow together with charity habitually and in
their physical being, but they do not grow actually and in the perfection which
corresponds to the fervor of charity and increases merit in us, because venial
sins, being opposed to the fervor of charity, impede the operation of the gifts
of the Holy Ghost.
If these religious would strive for
purity of heart, the fervor of charity would increase in them more and more and
the gifts of the Holy Ghost shine forth in their conduct; but this will never be
very apparent in them, living as they do without recollection, without
attention to their interior life, letting themselves be led and guided by their
inclinations, and avoiding only the more grave sins while being careless about
little things.
The Effects of Venial Sin
Venial sin has four effects in this
life and certain effects in the life to come.
1)
It deprives us of
many actual graces which
God would otherwise have given us. This privation sometimes results in our
falling into a temptation which we could have avoided by means of that actual
grace of which we were deprived. At other times it may result in the loss of a
new advance in the spiritual life. It likewise results in a lessening of the
degree of glory which we would have attained through resistance to that
temptation or through the increase in grace. Only in the light of eternity—and
then there is no remedy—shall we realize what we have lost as a result of
deliberate venial sins.
2)
It lessens the
fervor of charity and one's generosity in the service of God.
This fervor and generosity presuppose a sincere desire for perfection and a
constant striving for it, which are totally incompatible with voluntary venial
sin, because the latter implies a rejection of that lofty ideal and a deliberate
halt in the struggle for greater holiness.
3)
It increases the
difficulties in the exercise of virtue.
This is a result of the two previous effects. Deprived of many actual graces
which are necessary to keep us on the path of the good and having lost a good
part of its fervour and generosity in the service of God, the soul is gradually
weakened and loses more and more of its spiritual energy. Virtue appears to be
more difficult, the effort required for growing in holiness becomes more and
more demanding, the experience of past failures for which we ourselves are
responsible disheartens the soul, and while the world attracts the soul with its
seductions and the devil intensifies his attacks, the soul ultimately abandons
the path of perfection and perhaps gives itself without resistance to sin.
4)
It predisposes for
mortal sin. This is
clearly testified in Scripture when it is stated that he who wastes the little
he has is gradually stripped bare.[3]
Experience confirms this proof. The soul seldom falls directly and immediately,
however violent the attack of its enemies. Usually, the ultimate fall of a soul
has been prepared little by little. The soul has gradually lost ground to the
enemy, it has been losing its strength through voluntary imprudence in matters
which it considered of little importance, it has been losing the divine
inspirations, and little by little it has lowered its defenses until the moment
arrives in which the enemy, in one furious assault, conquers the city.
5)
The reason for the sufferings of purgatory is the punishment and
purification of the soul. Every sin, in addition to the fault, carries with it
the guilt of punishment which must be satisfied in this life or in the next. The
punishment due to mortal sins already pardoned and that of venial sins, whether
pardoned or not, not satisfied in this life is satisfied in purgatory. God
cannot renounce His justice, and the soul must pay its debt completely before it
can be admitted to beatific joy. And the pains which the soul will have to
suffer in purgatory for those faults which on earth it considered light and of
small importance surpass the greatest pains which one could suffer in this
world. St. Thomas says this expressly when he teaches that there are two types
of pain in purgatory: the one consists in the delay in the reception of the
beatific vision and the other which consists in the torment caused by a material
fire. And the smallest amount of either one surpasses the greatest suffering in
this world.
6)
The increases of grace, of which the soul is deprived in this life
because of venial sins, will have a repercussion in eternity. The soul in heaven
will have a lesser glory than it could have attained had it been more
faithful to grace in this life. For that reason, for all eternity it will be
giving less glory to God than it could have. The degree of glory is in direct
relation to the degree of grace attained in this life,
Combating Venial Sin
It is above all necessary to
conceive a great horror for venial sin. We shall never begin to make serious
progress in our sanctification until we have done this. To this end, it will be
of great help to consider often what we have said concerning its malice and
consequences. We must return again and again to the battle against venial sin
and never give it up even for an instant.
Actually, because of pauses and
vacations in the life of fervor and of constant vigilance, one readily
cultivates indolence and cowardice. It is necessary to be faithful to the
examination of conscience, both general and particular; to increase one's spirit
of sacrifice; to be faithful to the practice of prayer; to safeguard external
and internal recollection to the extent that the duties of our state permit; and
to remember the example of the saints, who would rather have died than commit a
deliberate venial sin. When we have succeeded in cultivating this disposition in
our soul in a permanent and habitual manner, when we are disposed with
promptness and facility to practice any sacrifice necessary to avoid deliberate
venial sin, we shall arrive at the second negative degree of piety, which
consists in flight from venial sin. It is not an easy task. If in the first
degree—the avoidance of mortal sin—such a great struggle was necessary, what can
we say about the avoidance and flight from venial sin? But however difficult it
may be, it is possible to approach that ideal by means of a constant struggle
and humble prayer until one has reached the same status as that which was
achieved by the saints.
IMPERFECTIONS
Although this matter is greatly
disputed among theologians, we believe that moral imperfection is something
distinct from venial sin. An act which is good in itself does not cease to be
good even though it could have been better. Venial sin, on the other hand, is
something intrinsically evil, however light an evil may be. There is a great
difference between the two. In theory the distinction between venial sin and
imperfection seems very clear. In practice, nevertheless, the fully voluntary
imperfection has harmful effects on the spiritual life and is of itself
sufficient to impede the flight of the soul to sanctity. St. John of the Cross
treats of this matter with great clarity when he distinguishes between venial
sin and imperfection:
But all the other voluntary
desires, whether they be of mortal sin, which are the gravest, or of venial sin,
which are less grave, or whether they be only of imperfections, which are the
least grave of all, must be driven away every one, and the soul must be free
from them all, howsoever slight they be, if it is to come to this complete
union; and the reason is that the state of this divine union consists in the
soul's total transformation, according to the will, in the will of God, so that
there may be naught in the soul that is contrary to the will of God, but that,
in all and through all, its movement may be that of the will of God alone. . . .
For if this soul desired any imperfection that God wills not, there would not
be made one will of God, since the soul would have a will for that which God has
not.
It is clear, then, that for the
soul to come to unite itself perfectly with God through love and will, it must
first be free from all desire of the will, howsoever slight. That is, it must
not intentionally and knowingly consent with the will to imperfections, and
it must have power and liberty to be able not so to consent intentionally. I say
"knowingly," because, unintentionally and unknowingly, or without having the
power to do otherwise, it may well fall into imperfections and venial sins, and
into the natural desires whereof we have spoken; for of such sins as these which
are not voluntary but surreptitious it is written that the just man shall fall
seven times in the day and shall rise up again.
But of the voluntary desires,
which, though they be for very small things, are, as I have said, intentional
venial sins, any one that is not conquered suffices to impede union. I mean, if
this habit be not mortified; for sometimes certain acts of different desires
have not as much power when the habits are mortified. Still, the soul will
attain to the stage of not having even these, for they likewise proceed from a
habit of imperfection. But some habits of voluntary imperfections, which are
never completely conquered, prevent not only the attainment of divine union but
also progress in perfection.
These
habitual imperfections are, for example a common custom of much speaking, or
some slight attachment which we never quite wish to conquer—such as that to a
person, a garment, a book, a cell, a particular kind of food, tittle‑tattle,
fancies for tasting, knowing or hearing certain things, and suchlike. A single
one of these imperfections, if the soul has become attached and habituated to
it, is of a great harm to growth and progress in virtue as though one were to
fall daily into a great number of other imperfections and casual venial sins
which do not proceed from a habitual indulgence in some harmful attachment;
these latter imperfections will not hinder the soul so much as will its
attachment to something. For as long as it has this, there is no possibility
that it will make progress in perfection, even though the imperfection be
extremely slight. For it comes to the same thing whether a bird be held by a
slender cord or by a stout one since, even if it be slender, the bird will be as
well held as though it were stout, for so long as it breaks it not and flies not
away. It is true that the slender one is the easier to break; still, easy
though it be, the bird will not fly away if it be not broken. And thus the soul
that has attachment to anything, however much virtue it possesses, will not
attain to the liberty of divine union.
As can be seen, St. John of the
Cross points out the basic reason why it is necessary to renounce absolutely all
voluntary imperfections. At the same time, he emphatically distinguishes
between voluntary imperfections and those which proceed from pure weakness or
inadvertence. He does well to distinguish between an isolated act, though
deliberately imperfect, and the deeply rooted habit of voluntary imperfection.
It is the latter which impedes perfect union with God.
Lack of Progress
The magnificent doctrine of this
great mystic finds confirmation in the Thomistic doctrine on the increase of
habits. According to St. Thomas, charity and all the other infused habits
increase only by a more intense act which flows from an actual grace itself more
intense than the habit. Otherwise, a more intense act of any virtue would be
impossible, because one cannot give what he does not have. It follows from this
that prayer is of extreme importance in this regard, because the only way in
which we can obtain actual grace is by impetration, since it does not fall under
merit in the proper sense of the word. Now imperfection is by its very nature a
remiss act or the voluntary negation of a more intense act. Consequently, it is
impossible to proceed in perfection if one does not renounce habitual voluntary
imperfections.
This is the reason why in practice
so many potential saints are frustrated and why there are so few true saints.
There are many souls who live habitually in the grace of God, who never commit
mortal sins and even exert every effort to avoid venial sins. Nevertheless, they
are paralyzed in the spiritual life, and they remain for many years in the same
imperfections or even grow in imperfections. How can we explain this phenomenon?
The answer is that they have not endeavored to root out their voluntary
imperfections; they have not tried to break that slender cord which keeps
them tied to the earth and prevents them from rising in flight to the heights.
With what accents of pity and sadness St. John of the Cross laments this
situation:
It is sad to see certain souls in
this plight; like rich vessels, they are laden with wealth and good works and
spiritual exercises, and with the virtues and the favors that God grants them;
and yet, because they have not the resolution to break with some whim or
attachment or affection (which all come to the same thing), they never make
progress or reach the port of perfection, though they would need to do no more
than make one good flight and thus to snap that cord of desire right off, or to
rid themselves of that sucking‑fish of desire which clings to them.
It is greatly to be lamented that,
when God has granted them strength to break other and stouter cords—namely,
affections for sins and vanities—they should fail to attain to such blessing
because they have not shaken off some childish thing which God had bidden them
conquer for love of Him, and which is nothing more than a thread or a hair. And,
what is worse, not only do they make no progress, but because of this attachment
they fall back, lose that which they have gained, and retrace that part of the
road along which they have traveled at the cost of so much time and labor; for
it is well‑known that, on this road, not to go forward is to turn back, and not
to be gaining is to be losing. This Our Lord desired to teach us when He said: "He
that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth."
He that takes not the trouble to repair the vessel, however slight be the crack
in it, is likely to spill all the liquid that is within it. The Preacher taught
us this clearly when He said: "He that contemneth small things shall fall by
little and little." For, as He Himself says, a great fire cometh from a
single spark. And thus one imperfection is sufficient to lead to another; and
these lead to yet more; wherefore you will hardly ever see a soul that is
negligent in conquering one desire, and that has not many more arising from the
same weakness and imperfection that this desire causes. In this way they are
continually falling; we have seen many persons to whom God has been granting
the favor of leading them a
long way, into a state of great detachment and liberty, yet who, merely through
beginning to indulge some slight attachment, under the pretext of doing good,
or in the guise of conversation and friendship, often lose their spirituality
and desire for God and holy solitude, fall from the joy and wholehearted
devotion which they had in their spiritual exercises, and cease not until they
have lost everything; and this because they broke not with that beginning of
sensual desire and pleasure and kept not themselves in solitude for God.
It is therefore absolutely
necessary to wage an unceasing battle against our voluntary imperfections if we
wish to arrive at perfect union with God. The soul must use all its efforts and
all its energies to make them disappear. It must tend always toward the more
perfect and try to do all things with the greatest possible intensity.
Naturally, this greater intensity should not be considered as a physical or
organic intensity, as if it were necessary to keep one's nervous system in a
state of constant tension or to make an act of love of God accompanied by
organic or psychic intensity. We are referring here simply to the perfection of
one's motives which lead one to act: doing all things with the greatest possible
purity of intention, with the greatest possible desire of glorifying God, with
the ardent desire that God's action invade or dominate us completely, that the
Holy Ghost take complete control of our souls and do with us as He wishes in
time and in eternity, without taking any account of our own tastes or desires.
It consists simply in an ever more perfect and docile abandonment to the will of
God until we are led by Him without the least resistance. And this will not
occur before the total death of our human egoism and our full transformation in
Christ, which will enable us to say with St. Paul: "It is now no longer 1
that live, but Christ liveth in me" (Gal. 2:20).
It is evident that this profound transformation of our being
and this complete death of our ego is an enterprise that surpasses human power,
even assisted by ordinary grace. As long as man takes the initiative in his
Christian life through the simple practice of the acquired virtues in a human
mode, it is impossible to attain that profound purification of our innermost
being. It is necessary that the Holy Ghost Himself effect this transformation in
its double aspect of the negative and the positive. St. John of the Cross
expressly states this, and the obvious conclusion which follows is that sanctity
is impossible outside the mystical life.
[1] Theology of Christian
Perfection, Antonio Royo Marin, O.P., Part III, ch. 2, pgs. 184 -
192
[2] And grieve not the holy Spirit
of God: whereby you are sealed unto the day of redemption (Eph. 4, 30).
[3] A workman that is a drunkard
shall not be rich: and he that contemnes small things, shall fall by
little and little (Ecclesiasticus 19, 1).
Apr 07 - Homily: Confession and Venial Sins
The very first chart is not theologically correct. Mortal sins and venial sins are distinguished by kind and not by degree. Please correct it.
ReplyDeleteThat is true, but there are distinguishing degrees in venial sin.
ReplyDeleteYes. There are different degrees of venial sin.
Delete