Lent 2017 – A reform of the Church
Speaking about repentance, Jesus emphasized twice: “Unless you repent, you will all perish!” And He continued with the Parable of the Barren Fig Tree: “Then he said to the keeper of his vineyard, ‘Look, for three years I have come seeking fruit on this fig tree and find none. Cut it down; why does it use up the ground?’ But he answered and said to him, ‘Sir, let it alone this year also, until I dig around it and fertilize it. And if it bears fruit, well. But if not, after that you can cut it down.’” (Lk 13:1-9) This parable concerns you too. Jesus gives you a chance this year also, in this Lenten time. Unless you bear fruits worthy of repentance, you will suffer the same fate as the barren fig tree. You will be cut down, thrown out of God’s vineyard and thrown into the fire.
John XXIII and his aggiornamento opened the Church to secular thinking. Today, suicidal aggiornamento is being accomplished by Pope Francis who kisses the feet of transsexuals and promotes Islamization in every parish.
In 1911, when Roncalli (John XXIII) worked as a history lecturer, his name was placed on the Index along with the names of the Modernists because he spread heresies in the seminary in Bergamo. He had adopted the heresies of L. Duchesne. Roncalli did not renounce the heretical spirit. He fully opened the door to it through the Second Vatican Council. Today we reap its pernicious fruits. He committed the most serious crime – he abused supreme papal authority and the authority of the Council to perpetrate gradual suicide of the Church. He abused Catholic thought which would not even allow of the possibility that the Pope or the Council could err.
Today, after more than 50 years, if we want to show true repentance, we have to admit: John XXIII was a heretic; Vatican II was a heretical Council. The First Commandment tells us to worship the one God; however, the Council tells us to have a regard for pagan cults, i.e. to worship their demons. Vatican II is also responsible for the post-conciliar Islamization of Europe.
Today, Francis completes the process of suicide of the Church. The fruits of Vatican II are what sociologists term a post-Christian world and post-Christian culture. However, there is no post-Islamic world or post-Islamic culture! If lifeless Christianity wants to establish dialogue or live in co-existence with aggressive Islam, it is only a matter of a few years before the Crescent and Sharia reign over Europe.
Some liken the Western post-Christian world to a patient whose immoral and godless lifestyle caused him serious health problems. However, this patient rejects treatment which requires a change in lifestyle, and chooses euthanasia. Embracing the aggiornamento of Vatican II, the Church cast out the spirit of repentance and developed a fatal spiritual illness. However, she stubbornly rejects treatment which requires repentance, i.e. a change of life. She chooses spiritual euthanasia. The bishops and priests neglect to emphasize the essential truths of the Christian faith. They neglect to warn the believers of the reality of death, judgment and eternity. They neglect to warn them of the cunning of sin and of its tragic fruits – i.e. temporal and eternal suffering. They preach mere philosophies or psychologies, and replace the saving mission with absurd interreligious dialogue. Only if we admit at last the reality of sin in us, and the fact that it keeps deceiving and enslaving us, will we truly understand the unicity of salvation in the redemptive sacrifice of Christ on the cross.
Without repentance the Spirit of God cannot restore the Catholic Church!
Only a Church restored through repentance has the strength to resist the process of Islamization as well as the aggiornamento with the spirit of the world. Such a Church can then carry out true mission to save the immortal souls. We are committed by the command of Christ to proclaim the Gospel to all, not only Buddhists, Hindus or Muslims, but also to the Jews! Christ alone can remove sin from our heart. No Buddha or Muhammad can do so.
The question of the current papacy
On 15 December 2016, Francis and his close co-workers came out with a proposal of so-called decentralization, when the Pope will be only a symbol of unity. Is there still a way out of the crisis of the papacy which has reached its climax under Francis? Throughout history, there have been more than 30 antipopes, a long period of double or triple papacy… Nevertheless, the nature of the papacy has been preserved.
Thank God for the four Cardinals who have stood in defence of the moral foundations even at the cost of being disgraced. One of the options is that after making a true gesture of repentance they themselves, alone or together with some other Cardinals who stand in internal unity with them, will elect a new Pope. A liberal group could nowadays only elect a heretical antipope, who would of course be invalid just as the current pseudo Pope Francis is invalid! According to the Dogmatic Bull of Paul IV, Francis, being a manifest heretic, does not hold the Petrine office validly.
God has many ways of saving us, but there is one condition on our part: to show true repentance.
At the time when there were three Popes, John Huss, a Czech priest, called for a moral reform of the clergy and hierarchy. They imputed to him heresies which he had never preached. They burned him at the stake and refused to repent. Then another priest, Martin Luther, spoke out and half of Catholic believers abandoned the Church.
Then came the Council of Trent held by saints! The result was a reform and many saints.
Then came the II Vatican Council held by heretics. The result was deformation and many heretics.
The duty to repent is above all the duty of every cardinal, every bishop and every priest. The act of repentance is an act of humility and truth. One has to admit one’s mistake: I was deceived but now I stand in the light of God, by the cross of Christ, and I give Him my fault and sin. The external gesture of repentance is verbal and written renunciation of heresies and the confession of the faith of the apostles, saints and martyrs. Let this oath be taken in the presence of two witnesses and endorsed by both your and their signatures. This oath can be compared to the Antimodernist Oath of St Pius X. The oath is the condition for the removal of the spiritual curse which for the time being rests on a large number of church representatives. The oath should also be taken by every priest! The oath expresses the essence and provides guidelines for a spiritual reform. Bear in mind that a copy of this document will be written in the Book of Life together with your name. In the hour of death, when every cardinal, bishop and priest will stand before the judgment seat of God, they will be confronted with this document.
Jesus says clearly: “Unless you repent, you will all perish.” (Lk 13:3)
The most important thing for you is to save your immortal soul and not to be eternally condemned! Maybe this Lenten call for repentance is the last chance for you. Jesus warns you in the Parable of the Barren Fig Tree! Be you a priest, bishop or cardinal, if you refuse to repent you pass a sentence of eternal death – eternal condemnation – on yourself!
(see video: http://vkpatriarhat.org.ua/en/?p=14045)