Go Ye Out Unto The Nations And Dialogue?

Go Ye Out Unto The Nations And Dialogue?

By: Eric Gajewski

Referenced article: http://www.romereports.com/2017/03/11/cardinal-saraiva-pope-francis-will-remember-from-fatima-a-message-that-the-world-has-forgotten

Shocker.  Antipope Francis stealing the cover of “Rolling Stone”.  In addition to this search for popularity we have the latest talk of “married priests” coming which would break the tradition of the Latin Church.  Seriously, what will these heretics not touch?  Oh wait, I forgot to mention he did not kneel before our God during Eucharistic Adoration this past week.  Surprised?  You shouldn’t be because he has professed that he doesn’t even believe in a Catholic God  (but rather a  “god spray”).  Could you seriously imagine "the look" that the true Saints of God would have given not only after Vatican II BUT also after the disastrous/heretical Masonic ecumenical program was put into play?  John Paul II, who taught numerous material heresies, was the main cheerleader behind this false movement.  He accounted for too many scandals for us to recall but I am sure Christ didn’t appreciate Him being removed from the Altar (for Buddha) and likewise think positively about JPII being blessed by a witchdoctor (common practice amongst VII'ers to be blessed by heretics and pagans).  These acts alone truly demonstrate, in act, how the Vatican II Popes never held the Faith (although they say they did).

VATICAN II PROFOUNDLY WRONG This fight between the Church and the liberals and modernism is the fight over Vatican II. It is as simple of that. And the consequences are far-reaching. The more one analyzes the documents of Vatican II, and the more one analyzes their interpretation by the authorities of the Church, the more one realizes that what is at stake is not merely superficial errors, a few mistakes, ecumenism, religious liberty, collegiality, a certain Liberalism, but rather a wholesale perversion of the mind, a whole new philosophy based on modern philosophy, on subjectivism. A book just published by a German theologian is most instructive. It shows how the Pope's thinking, especially in a retreat he preached at the Vatican, is subjectivist from start to finish, and when afterwards one reads his speeches, one realizes that indeed that is his thinking. It might appear Catholic, but Catholic it is not. No. The Pope's notion of God, the Pope's notion of Our Lord, come up from the depths of his consciousness, and not from any objective revelation to which he adheres with his mind. No. He constructs the notion of God. He said recently in a document —incredible —that the idea of the Trinity could only have arisen quite late, because man's interior psychology had to be capable of defining the Trinity. Hence the idea of the Trinity did not come from a revelation from outside, it came from man's consciousness inside, it welled up from inside man, it came from the depths of man's consciousness! Incredible! A wholly different version of Revelation, of Faith, of philosophy! Very grave! A total perversion! How we are going to get out of all this, I have no idea, but in any case it is a fact, and as this German theologian shows (who has, I believe, another two parts of his book to write on the Holy Father's thought), it is truly frightening. So, they are no small errors. We are not dealing in trifles. We are into a line of philosophical thinking that goes back to Kant, Descartes, the whole line of modern philosophers who paved the way for the Revolution. Archbishop Lefebvre's address to his priests given in Econe, Switzerland on September 6, 1990

We should remember Fatima but not as the enemy.  The enemy is within and has long been within.  Why would you embrace their illicit and invalid judgements on those actually trying to keep Tradition?  Why would you accept their “narrative” on Fatima?  Why do people still view these abominable Novus ordo websites thinking they will find truth there?  It surely is a sign of the times and a sign that Our Lord is not so far off in terms of His second coming.  At this point you must be taught by pre Vatican II encyclicals, bibles and catechisms.  It is a truly a temptation to try and enter into these heretical buildings and try to commune with those professing the Novus Ordo religion.  The Church teaches us that the worst kind of heretic is the one who professes only one heresy and hides behind the banner of orthodoxy.  Does this describe Vatican II an what has transpired since then?  Absolutely not.  Modernism is the synthesis of all heresies.  This is what we are dealing with and yet so many still make excuses for the Popes, prelates and priests following Vatican II.

“Some say the Council was good and has good, but only the reform is bad. But that is not true! Why? Because when Rome gave the reform, they always say the reforms they do, they do in the name of the Council. In the name of the Council! It is evident that all reform came from the Council, and if the reform is bad, it is impossible that the Council is good and all reforms are bad. Because that is the authentic interpretation of the Council by Rome!” Archbishop Lefebvre

Go out and dialogue.  I do not recall this in our Gospel do you?  Go out unto the world and eat donuts together discussing all of the latest politics.  Then, just simply agree on points of religion that we can and call it a day.  Im good your good we are all good.  On the basis of the one HERESY you ought not be in ANY Vatican II church.  It runs contrary to the true Gospel.  Galatians 1:8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema.  Vatican II’s social gospel is not ours.  It is from man, the world and the devil.  Man is trying to set the stage for their new false messiah to arrive shortly.  They have to get rid of Christianity altogether and create a culture of “equality”.  Yes, even amongst religions.  How else will the Antichrist be able to “teach” his followers his new 5 step self realization program?  All will be invited to the devils dinner table.  Dialogue, coexistence and convergence are all Vatican II Newspeak.  The Saints stand against Vatican II what about you?  The real Saints are those heroically taking a stand in these last days against the New Religion not playing pussyfoot or simply going along with it.  Where do you stand?

Lefebvre on Vatican II ecumenism:  

http://archives.sspx.org/archbishop_lefebvre/public_statement_ab_lefebvre_june_1988.htm

"The current Pope and bishops no longer hand down Our Lord Jesus Christ, but rather a sentimental, superficial, charismatic religiosity, through which, as a general rule, the true grace of the Holy Ghost no longer passes. This new religion is not the Catholic religion; it is sterile, incapable of sanctifying society and the family." (Lefebvre, Spiritual Journey, p.9)

Fr Hesse: Vatican II Ecumenism vs Catholic Dogma