EUROPE FALLING APART: Europe’s women and children are offered on the altar of political correctness
INCLUDES:UK proposes six-year prison sentence for criticizing Islam
The notion has long been held that a nation can be judged by how it treats its weakest members. In OUR society, the consensus is largely that these are our children, women and the elderly (and some would extend that to animals, myself included).
The weakest are not, as the globalist, leftist elites would have us believe, the majority of war-hardened, reproductive-aged, young (82%) immigrant men (67%) flooding our shores from Africa and the Middle East recently.
Those have become opportunistic, economic freeloaders who have found little to no work (1.0% – 2.2%) in their industrialised, rich host countries such as Germany, Sweden or Austria.
Migrants on their way to Northern Europe – Mstyslav Chernov / Wikimedia commons
As a liberal, Judaeo-Christian society – as ANY modern society – Europe prides itself in its moral values and its ability to look after and protect its weak and its frail members. So why is there such a growing mountain of evidence to the contrary in the past few years?
Europe, once the bastion of Western culture and civilization, has now fallen to its lowest point since WWIIThe sheer volume of cases in some countries, such as Germany, is material enough for several in-depth studies, so in the interest of celerity I shall highlight just a few examples. A cursory look at past decades’ rape cases in the UK, Sweden, Germany and Austria see sentences ranging from 7 years to life imprisonment (min. served 15 years) for criminals indigenous to these countries.
Nowadays it seems clear, however, that the rules have changed and that there are several levels of omission, commission and submission perpetrated by the relevant authorities.
Omission – hiding key information or ignoring it, can be seen in the cases of Sweden or Germany, where rape and sexual abuse is reported and the authorities simply do not bother to pursue them at all, or ignore the relevant social – that is, immigration – factors in the case, due to political correctness issues.
Commission – aiding this sexual abuse either knowingly or through a horrific naiveté, is still taking place, most notably in Labour Party-run councils in the Midlands of England, where an avalanche of Pakistani gang grooming (prostitution rings) cases has taken the headlines again.
In Rotherham, political correctness, this modern leftist plague, was to blame. It is very likely that the more recent tragedy in Telford will prove very similar. One recent sentence, for an immigrant who groomed a 12 year old girl, was of just ONE year.
Submission – bending over backwards to accommodate these “newcomers”, as seen in the example above, is also rampant in other countries, such as the case in Austria of a 10 year old boy raped by an Iraqi man, has seen its sentence cut to just a few years. And we’ve already reported on a young Swedish mother whose sexual assailants will receive no more than 14 months in prison for their heinous acts.
Europe, once the bastion of Western culture and civilization, has now fallen to its lowest point since WWII, possibly even worse than that. The alleged values we once championed and fought for to help protect our most fragile, even a 90 year old grandmother, have metamorphosed into a web of deceit to shield monsters who despise our values of old and let them roam freely to cause increasingly evil havoc.
Our weakest are indeed suffering – not just economically, with impoverished education, tighter housing markets and higher taxes – but physically and emotionally. European citizens who have not become instruments of a suicidal plan have finally started waking up and are steadily showing signs of revolt against this madness – as exemplified by recent referenda and elections in the UK, Austria, Hungary and Italy.
The only questions are: Will it be enough, and do we still have time to claw back our once-great culture from increasingly inevitable oblivion?
As a footnote, given that the incoming population is majority Muslim, they incidentally have a terrible record on animal welfare, not least through their use of Halal butchery methods – which have not changed in 13 centuries. Animals are indeed the frailest in any society.
UK proposes six-year prison sentence for criticizing Islam
The draft law speaks only about criticizing “religion,” but everyone knows which religion is meant. No one is going to go to prison for criticizing Christianity or Judaism. This is more of Britain’s gallop toward Sharia and ruin.
“UK Proposes Six Year Prison Sentences for Online Posts Against Religion, Transgender,” by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, May 10, 2018:
People promoting “hostility” towards a religion or the transgendered online could get much harsher sentences, of up to six years in jail, especial if they have a large online audience according to new proposals.
The Sentencing Council for England and Wales has drafted changes to public order offences, including anyone perceived as targeting online a “protected characteristics” including “race; sex; disability; age; sexual orientation; religion or belief; pregnancy and maternity; and gender reassignment.”
The most severe punishments will be handed to those “in a position of trust, authority or influence and abuses their position to stir up hatred,” such as political leaders or figureheads and anyone whose offences are “persistent.”
If an “offender was a member of, or was associated with, a group promoting hostility based on race or religion,” their sentence will also be harsher.
The Sentencing Council believes that the use of social media, YouTube, and other “websites” to stir hatred is a growing problem – despite the number of prosecutions remain relatively low.
“Volumes of these offences are extremely low and there have been no offenders sentenced for some offences,” the Sentencing Council said.
“However, given the recent social climate and an enhanced focus on this type of offending, the council considers it would be useful for sentencers to be equipped with guidance on sentencing these offences,” they continue.
Adding: “Among the cases analysed there were a number of ‘hate speech’ type offences, where inflammatory speeches were given by influential figures with the intention of stirring up racial hatred.
“Other cases involved publication on YouTube of content inciting serious violence towards particular racial or religious groups, websites being published including abusive and insulting content, with some activity continuing over a long period of time and intended to reach global audiences.”…
SOURCE
