The Hapsburg Emperors...
By: MadMonarchist
Emperor Frederick III: Known as “Frederick the Peaceful”,
Frederick III was the first Hapsburg to be elected Holy Roman Emperor
and the last to be crowned by the Pope in the city of Rome in 1452.
Known as an aloof, distant sort of man with a tendency to be indecisive,
Pope Pius II sardonically said that he wished to “conquer the world
while remaining seated”. Still, it seems to have worked for him and some
have a tendency to unjustly dismiss Frederick III. He was not so much
slow as methodical, not so much unimaginative as cautious, careful,
sober and realistic. He negotiated a concordat with the Pope that
governed Hapsburg Church-State relations for nearly four hundred years
and his patience and determination allowed him to triumph over seemingly
insurmountable obstacles. His brother rebelled against him and defeated
him at every turn, yet Frederick III persevered and maintained himself
on the throne. He failed to defeat the Hungarians, who won numerous
victories over his forces, yet he survived and did manage to pull off a
real long-term victory over Burgundy, securing an advantageous marriage
for his son and the inheritance of that choice piece of real-estate. He
died in 1493.
Emperor Maximilian I: One of the great ones, Kaiser Max is the
real-life reason behind the famous saying, ‘Others make war, but thou,
oh happy Austria, only marries’. His reign as Emperor dates from 1508
but he had been in charge of the Hapsburg dynasty for much longer. He
was Duke of Burgundy thanks to the marriage contract won at gunpoint by
his father and so from 1477 he was already ruler of a large slice of
France and the Low Countries. When King Louis XI of France tried to take
Burgundy from him, Max went to war and sent the French packing. He
fought the French again in the Italian Wars and seized the Tyrol when he
was asked to settle a dispute between the Tyrolese and the Bavarians.
Perhaps most significantly, he married his son, Philip the Handsome, to
Juana of Castile, daughter of Fernando and Isabella, thus securing Spain
for the House of Hapsburg. He tried to make the Holy Roman Empire into a
more unitary state and to use matrimonial alliances to gain mastery
over France but was less successful in those endeavors. He also lost the
Hapsburg ancestral lands to Switzerland but, the foundations he laid
ended up bringing about a Hapsburg empire second to none in the western
world.
Emperor Charles V: A giant in western history, Charles V was
elected Emperor in 1519 but had already inherited a massive empire from
Spain to the Low Countries to Austria itself. A sincerely religious man
but a worldly and practical one as well, it is no understatement to say
that Emperor Charles V saved Christendom on more than one occasion.
During his eventful reign, he was almost constantly at war and was
usually victorious. He defeated the Turks in the south, won a crushing
victory over the French at Pavia in the west, broke the power of the
Pope in Italy and subdued rebellious princes in Germany. A cosmopolitan
man who almost defied classification, he was also in charge when
Lutheranism first appeared and famously rebuked the monk at the Diet of
Worms. He urged the Catholic Church to make reforms such as would make
it easier for the Lutherans to get along with it but to no avail. He
fought the Protestants for a time but ended by making peace with them so
as to focus on external enemies. He was the last Emperor to actually be
crowned, done in Bologna by Pope Clement VII after he had conquered
Italy and forced the Pope’s submission. The Spanish empire expanded in
the New World but so many conflicts did cause considerable financial
problems in the future. Still, a giant historical figure who became
something of a legend in Spain and Germany alike.
What Happened to the Habsburgs?
Emperor Ferdinand I: The brother of Charles V, he oversaw the
German half of the Hapsburg empire, inheriting it when his brother
abdicated while the Spanish half went to his nephew King Philip II. He
also gained the thrones of Bohemia, Hungary and Croatia but a faction of
the Hungarians allied with the Ottoman Sultan and rebelled against him.
Vienna was besieged but in the end the Austrians were victorious.
Ferdinand also negotiated the peace on behalf of his brother with the
Protestants in Germany, allowing them to maintain their religion. He
tried to centralize power and build-up an absolute monarchy in the Holy
Roman Empire but had to deal with rebellions in Bohemia and Hungary. He
sympathized with many of the positions of the Protestants but still
supported the “Counter-Reformation” and invited the Jesuits into Vienna
and Prague toward that end so the idea some have entertained that he was
a crypto-Protestant is an exaggeration. He was a practical man who did
his best to defend and consolidate the Hapsburg realm and to keep the
Turks out of Central Europe. He died in 1564 after a reign that was
difficult and not without setbacks but which had been successful when it
counted most. Overall, an astute monarch.
Emperor Maximilian II: Elected the same year his father and
predecessor died, Kaiser Max II at times seemed to be unsure whether he
wanted to be a Catholic or a Protestant. He seemed so favorably inclined
to the Lutherans that his father had to assure the Pope that Maximilian
would not succeed him if he actually became a Protestant. As it
happened, Max II remained at least nominally Catholic throughout his
life. There were Protestant as well as Catholic electors and no law
stipulating that an Emperor had to be a Catholic. In the end, he was on
good terms with the Protestants and still elected Emperor as a Catholic
with the Pope confirming his election. He then pushed for the Pope to
accept Protestant practices such as doing away with clerical celibacy
and giving communion in both kinds. When the Council of Trent issued its
documents, he refused to have them published and tried to get his
Spanish cousin to ease up on the Protestants in Holland. In the end, he
angered the Catholics and still never managed to totally appease the
Protestants and he was unable to take the remainder of Hungary back from
the Turks. He died while trying to press his claim to the Kingdom of
Poland in 1576. His reign was a rather well meaning mess that
accomplished little.
Emperor Rudolf II: One of the more unusual Hapsburg emperors.
Most regarded him as aloof, excessively formal and rather stiff. He was
certainly reclusive and rather eccentric and not the most dutiful of
monarchs. He never married so never produced an heir and delegated most
of his daily tasks to others while he obsessed over machinery, astrology
and alchemy (and religious people should remember when being lectured
by modern scientists that astrology and alchemy were at one time
considered solid, scientific “fact”). He was tolerant towards
Protestants and Jews and was never really a serious, practicing Catholic
but his actual state of mind became harder to determine and more
erratic. He was prone to fits of depression and became almost obsessive
in his fascination with alchemy. He naively tried to remain neutral in
the growing tensions between Catholics and Protestants and tried to
bring everyone together for a war against the Ottoman Turks but it got
him nowhere and soon Hungary was in rebellion again. In Bohemia he
granted concessions to the Protestants but they only demanded more and
joined forces with the Hungarians to force Rudolf from power. He died in
1612 powerless and possibly mad.
The Habsburg Empire
Emperor Matthias: Put in charge of Hungary by his brother,
Matthias aligned with the Protestant rebels, gained control of more
disaffected territories and finally forced Rudolf from power. In 1612 he
was elected Emperor but the methods he had used to gain power soon
caused him problems. He had to deal with rebellious forces in Hungary,
Slavonia, Croatia as those who he had granted concessions to before
demanded more from him. His hope was to reconcile the Catholics and
Protestants but the Protestants did not want to be reconciled, nor did
the more zealous Catholics of the House of Hapsburg who wanted to wipe
out Protestantism, an idea which even Charles V had deemed impractical.
Poor Matthias was, in a way, hoisted on his own petard. He had
inadvertently stirred up ambitions among the rebellious to unseat his
ineffective brother only to see his own reign crippled by divisions and
rebellion. His brother, Archduke Rudolf III of Austria, Grand Master of
the Teutonic Knights, was one of the leaders in this area and succeeded
in gaining power as Emperor Matthias grew old and feeble. He died in
1619 and any thought of reconciliation died with him.
Emperor Ferdinand II: One thing was certainly clear when
Ferdinand II was elected Emperor in 1619; any concessions to
Protestantism would be stopped. Kaiser Ferdinand II was a staunch,
devout Catholic, Jesuit-educated and a man who wished to see Catholicism
restored throughout Germany. Religious liberty was not his thing and he
was not big on the idea of sharing power with the nobility either and
he wasted no time in tearing up the agreements of his predecessors and
enforcing an imperial smack-down on the Protestants in his territory.
The Bohemians revolted first, declared Ferdinand deposed and tried to
replace him but he still managed to be elected emperor first and soon
fighting broke out that spread quickly. This was the start of the Thirty
Years War as Catholics and Protestants struggled for the domination of
Germany and really all of Central Europe. The forces of Kaiser Ferdinand
seemed to always be successful only to have a new enemy arise to snatch
final victory from their grasp. At White Mountain the Catholic imperial
forces led by the Belgian general Tilly were victorious over the
Protestants in Bohemia but then Denmark got involved. Spain came to help
Austria and under Wallenstein the imperial forces were victorious
again. But, then Sweden got involved and King Gustavus Adolphus dealt
the Catholics a devastating blow. Tilly was defeated, Wallenstein was
recalled and finally the Swedes were checked with the death of their
King. However, just as Ferdinand II was about to declare victory, France
intervened and in 1637 Emperor Ferdinand II died and both sides were
exhausted.
Emperor Ferdinand III: Under his father, Ferdinand III has taken
command of the imperial army and won a smashing victory over the Swedes,
proving himself to be a capable commander. It was left to him to see
the Thirty Years War brought to an end, not with the victory he had
hoped but with a negotiated peace. The only thing that was really
settled was that nothing was going to be settled and Germany would
remain religiously divided between the Catholics and Protestants. It
also changed the nature of the (German) Empire for whereas his
predecessors like his father Ferdinand II, Ferdinand I and Maximilian I
had tried to centralize power, Ferdinand III was obliged to do the
opposite. In order to gain more support against the Swedes and then the
French, he conceded much greater local autonomy to the various German
rulers so that, once again, the empire existed more on paper than in
reality. It became more of an idea and less of an actual pan-German
empire. But, it was a matter of necessity for Ferdinand III and he did
his best to stay strong and keep up the fight, even after the official
peace, by helping Spain against France in Italy and helping the Catholic
Poles against Sweden. However, it would be wrong to expect too much
from the reign of Ferdinand III as the whole Hapsburg realm was
exhausted by the Thirty Years War and the whole of Germany was in ruins
and would be a long, long time in recovery. He did the best he could
under such circumstances and should be appreciated for that.
Emperor Leopold I: Fortunately, Hapsburg fortunes turned around
after the election in 1658 of Emperor Leopold I, though it was due in
large part to a man who was not a Hapsburg and not even a
German-Austrian but a rather frail, French-born Italian by the name of
Prince Eugene of Savoy who happened to be one of the greatest captains
in military history. Leopold I was a very learned man, conservative, a
great lover of music as well as being devoutly religious. All in all, a
fine combination. Hungary, Bohemia and Croatia rallied to him and there
was a conflict with Sweden but the great rivals of his reign would be
Turkey and Louis XIV of France. The Turks were first dealt with thanks
to another brilliant general, the Italian Field Marshal Raimondo
Montecuccoli. Next was Louis XIV of France who was blocked by the Prince
of Orange who then managed a major coup in becoming King William III of
England, Scotland and Ireland. He also had to deal with a rebellion in
Hungary led by Protestant nobles who disliked Leopold’s efforts to
enforce Catholic uniformity. This was used as a pretext by the Turks to
launch a major invasion of Central Europe resulting in the attack on
Vienna which was turned back thanks to the timely arrival of the Poles
under King John Sobieski. Prince Eugene followed up with more victories
over the Turks, pushing them out of Hungary and further south. He would
go on to more fame in the War of Spanish Succession against France.
Leopold I would not live to see the end of it but he had shown good
sense, picked good commanders, consolidated power for his house and
supported the Church. He was very intelligent and smart enough to know
to leave military matters in the hands of those best suited for it while
he focused on music, religion and government. A good man and a good
emperor, he died in 1705.
Emperors of the House of Hapsburg
Emperor Joseph I: Not much is usually said about Joseph I who
suffered from bad timing as an emperor. He started out overseeing events
already set in motion by his father and then died before seeing the
conclusion of his own plans. However, he certainly had plans, the
foremost of which was the establishment of Austria as a great power. He
carried on with the War of Spanish Succession in the hope of seeing the
Hapsburgs maintained on the throne of Spain which, in the end, did not
happen though thanks to Prince Eugene of Savoy he did gain a commanding
position in Italy. Considered a reformer in his youth, he was not a
radical but did enact some needed changes in the Hapsburg government and
he did manage to bring order to the chronically chaotic state of the
Austrian economy. His efforts to dominate Italy brought him to the brink
of war with the Pope (not an unusual occurrence) but he was obliged to
make peace when rebellion broke out in Hungary (also not an unusual
occurrence). Once again, Hungarian rebels aligned with the Turks and
Joseph I was obliged to roll back some of the power gained by the
imperial monarchy in order to win the support necessary to pacify
Hungary and keep the Turks from getting any big ideas. Although not
often mentioned, it was also Emperor Joseph I who got the ball rolling
on the Pragmatic Sanction to secure the hereditary succession of the
lands of Austria. He died, his work not yet finished, in 1711.
Emperor Charles VI: What potential and what a waste! Emperor
Charles VI often seems left out of history as little more than a prelude
to the reign of his daughter. This is somewhat understandable given
that much of his early life was spent more like a pretender to a crown
he never achieved. It was his overriding goal in life to become the King
of Spain and he did live in the country for a time, mostly ruling over
Catalonia and the British and Portuguese supported his bid for the
throne. However, despite many victories, the war did not end the way
Charles wanted. When Joseph I died he went back to Austria to be elected
emperor and the British suddenly dropped their support for him. They
did not want to see French power expanded but nor did they wish to see
the same monarch ruling over both Spain and Austria. He married but had
only daughters and became obsessed with securing the succession for his
daughter, Maria Theresa, by issuing the Pragmatic Sanction and trying to
get all the major powers to recognize it. Although not often
recognized, Charles VI was quite an accomplished emperor. He defeated
the Turks and gained the Banat for Hungary as well as taking Serbia and
some other territories. He consolidated the Hapsburg position in Italy
by trading Sardinia for Sicily with the House of Savoy and set Austria
out on what might have been the start of a colonial foreign policy by
founding a trading company for the West Indies. However, he emptied the
Austrian treasury trying to bribe everyone in recognizing the Pragmatic
Sanction as well as granting other concessions (Britain demanded he step
back from trying colonialism). It was not always money well spent as
most powers ended up adhering to or rejecting it as their own national
interest dictated. He died in 1740.
Emperor Francis I: The reign of Francis I was one in which he
would be overshadowed by his wife and by a Bavarian rival for the
imperial throne. When Charles VI died his daughter Maria Theresa
succeeded him in his hereditary positions (Archduchess of Austria, Queen
of Hungary etc) but it was uncertain what would be the place of her
husband, Francis Stephen of Lorraine. He had practically been raised to
be the husband of Maria Theresa (his brother was the original choice but
died) and he did his part to gain friends and fortune for the
Hapsburgs, gaining the favor of British elites by joining the Freemasons
and challenging France over the Polish succession by which he traded
Lorraine for Tuscany in Italy. When his father-in-law died, the Bavarian
Charles VII was elected Emperor but quickly lost most of his territory
to Austrian troops as Marie Theresa was more than prepared to fight for
her land and titles (or those she wanted for her husband). Bavaria might
have remained an Austrian possession were it not for the intervention
of King Frederick the Great of Prussia. Maria Theresa managed to have
Francis I elected emperor in 1745 and he was co-regent of her hereditary
dominions but it was really Maria Theresa who ruled, which was well
enough because she was pretty darn good at it, being a principled,
decisive, religious and all around great ruler. Emperor Francis mostly
“ruled” from behind a desk doing paperwork and though he was not a
faithful husband he still did his part to secure the Hapsburg-Lorraine
succession by fathering sixteen children with Maria Theresa, among them
two future emperors and an ill-fated future Queen of France. He died in
1765, some time before his wife.
Emperor Joseph II: Known as the “People’s Emperor”, Joseph II
will always be remembered as one of the “Enlightened Despots”. His
personality changed after the death of his beloved first wife, making
him more cold and aloof. He tried to apply reason to government which
earned him friends and enemies alike. At home and abroad his desire was
to make Austria a great power, centralize government and unify his
diverse domains. His public popularity came for his emancipation of the
serfs, granting of religious freedom (up to a point) and providing
social welfare for the poor. Yet, he was also a very authoritarian man
and a very absolutist monarch who would tolerate no opposition. His
efforts to place the Catholic Church under state control earned him many
lasting enemies among the clerical faction and Church histories to this
day often speak more harshly of Joseph II than predecessors who
actually made war on the Pope or never practiced their religion at all.
To unify his people he tried to make German the official language of all
Hapsburg lands, which did not go over well, and he tried to make the
House of Hapsburg supreme in Germany, going to war with Frederick the
Great of Prussia in the process. He also fought less consequential wars
against the Turks and Hungarian rebels, which were practically family
traditions. He planned a rescue operation to save his sister, Queen
Marie Antoinette from the French Revolution but his offer was refused by
the brave royal couple who were reluctant to leave (at least at that
stage). A patron of the arts, particularly music, Joseph II was called
the “Musical King” and is most remembered now for his commissioning of
work from Mozart. He died in 1790 adored by the lowest but hated by many
for his interference in religion and Germanization policy. Still, he
set the example which almost all subsequent Hapsburg Emperors tried to
emulate.
Habsburg Tribute
Emperor Leopold II: Succeeding his elder brother, Leopold II had
to put down rebellions from Belgium to Hungary because of the unpopular
policies of his brother and he repealed the most provocative of these
but maintained the majority of them. He too was a proponent of
“enlightened” absolute monarchy and had originally been trained for the
priesthood. He ruled as Grand Duke of Tuscany where his aloof nature
made him less than popular, despite abolishing the death penalty and
instituting public health programs. As Emperor, he was cold and
calculating, refusing aid to French royalists and preferring to try to
eliminate Prussia as a rival in Germany than punishing republican
France. He also refused to allow any Papal Bulls read in his territory
without first approving of the document. Still, the treatment of his
sister and brother-in-law stirred his fury as an absolute monarch and he
agreed to make common cause with the other Crowned Heads of Europe to
stop the spread of republicanism. He died before any concerted action
could be taken in 1792 at the age of only 44. Whereas his brother Joe
had been much more single-minded and uncompromising, Kaiser Leo II was
always prepared to keep flexible and to always consider the “politics”
of any given situation. Unlike his brother, he certainly did his part to
secure the succession, having sixteen children just like his own
parents did. Overall, Emperor Leopold II might not have been the sort of
monarch to be widely admired but he was probably the right man for the
job at that time.
Emperor Francis II/I: The last Holy Roman (German) Emperor and
the first Emperor of Austria, Francis succeeded his father after being
raised in extremely strict fashion by his uncle Emperor Joseph II whom
he nonetheless idolized. Emperor Francis can be a hard man to
understand. He seemed not to really care that his aunt was guillotined
by revolutionaries and yet the honor of his house was of paramount
importance to him. His empire was well known for its vast network of
spies and powerful secret police, yet he was an approachable monarch who
always made time for any of his subjects who wished to speak with him.
Most of his reign was dominated by the war with Napoleonic France and he
was Napoleon’s most intractable enemy on the continent. When Napoleon
became so successful that he determined to make himself emperor, Francis
II feared that he might be able to so dominate Germany as to win
election so he dissolved the Holy Roman Empire and thenceforth ruled as
Emperor Francis I of Austria. It was a bitter blow to have to cede
territory to France and worse still to give his own daughter to Napoleon
in marriage. However, he saw the Austrian Empire through the crisis and
by his own very conservative nature, helped ensure that the peace was
practical and based on a respect for traditional authority. In the end,
his prestige also allowed the Austrian Emperors to become the hereditary
presidents of the German Confederation. He was a good, solid emperor
and though sometimes accused of being paranoid and tyrannical, the fact
is that he had reason to be and the steps he took prevented Austria from
falling apart due to radical nationalism. He died in 1835.
Emperor Ferdinand I: Although often dismissed, I have a bit of a
soft spot for Kaiser Ferdinand, sometimes known as “Ferdinand the Good”.
True, he was handicapped in a number of ways and suffered from very
severe epilepsy, however, he was not as totally incompetent as some seem
to think. He could speak several different languages, could write very
well and was a considerate and very religious man. Married to the
Italian Princess Maria Anna of Savoy, she was a devoted wife who took
good care of her husband, really being more of a nurse than a
traditional wife but he loved and appreciated her for her attentiveness
in what was really a sacrifice for her. If all had remained calm and
tranquil, it might have been possible for Ferdinand I to remain on the
throne with considerable help but that all changed with the outbreak of
the Revolutions of 1848. He realized that he was not up to the task and
the best thing to do would be to abdicate in favor of someone young and
fit who could handle the situation. So he did, handing power over to his
nephew after which he retired to Prague and lived quietly the rest of
his life. While there, he also proved to be a help to the local economy
and actually proved to be quite an astute businessman, amassing a
fortune that supported the family for the rest of the Hapsburg reign. He
died in 1875.
Emperor Francis Joseph I: One of the longest ruling monarchs in
modern European history, the events of the reign of Francis Joseph would
be too numerous to mention. He started out by suppressing
revolutionaries and remained ever vigilant to threat of rebellion
thereafter. Despite rising ethnic unrest, Francis Joseph made the
Austrian Empire a workable power with growing industry and a scientific
and artistic community that was second to none. However, in 1859 he
acted rashly in allowing himself to be provoked into war with France and
Sardinia in northern Italy, losing Lombardy in the process and a short
time later went to war with Denmark alongside the other German states.
The aftermath of this led to a short, disastrous war with Prussia which
saw Austria removed from German affairs in 1864. Any attempt at a
revival was dashed by the continuing danger of rebellion in Hungary
which Emperor Francis Joseph tried to put to rest by (rather
reluctantly) agreeing to the Compromise of 1867 which saw the Austrian
Empire become the “Dual-Monarchy” of Austria-Hungary with each having
separate and co-equal governments. In 1882 he signed on to the Triple
Alliance, a monarchist defense pact, with the German Empire and the
Kingdom of Italy. In 1908 Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia which angered
Serbia and Russia (as well as Italy since they did not receive the
territorial compensations they had been promised) and pan-Slavism, led
by Serbia and backed up by Russia would become the dominant concern of
the latter years of Francis Joseph’s reign. He was always a dutiful
monarch and he learned from experience. He also became more sincerely
religious as he aged, possibly because of the many tragedies he faced in
his private life, though he was still not above using the imperial veto
to influence papal elections. Holding on to what he had been given
became his primary concern and the strength and preservation of the
monarchy was never far from his thoughts. When World War I came, he
probably viewed some sort of showdown with Serbia as inevitable but he
was still reluctant and had to be lied to before actually giving the
order to go to war. Too old, by that time, to play much of a part, he
died in 1916.
Emperor Charles I: Known as the “Peace Emperor”, it is rather
illustrative of his life that this nickname was due to intentions rather
than actual achievements. He was thrust into the position of heir to
the throne when Archduke Francis Ferdinand was shot in 1914 but already
displayed admirable qualities that would have served him well as
monarch. He was an accomplished soldier, known for his concern for the
welfare of his troops, his devotion to his wife and family and his deep
faith. When the Pope called for a peace without victors, only Charles
and the King of the Belgians took it seriously and made the attempt.
Unfortunately, it was a rather naïve and futile gesture that almost
brought about the early destruction of Austria-Hungary. His intentions
were noble and his virtue was far above his contemporaries but it was
simply beyond the realm of possibility that the Allies would have agreed
to such a proposal at that stage and even more ludicrous to think they
would have kept his secret when making the attempt public proved so
helpful to the Allied cause. The Germans were furious at such a betrayal
and made plans to invade and occupy Austria-Hungary at a moment’s
notice (it would not have been dissimilar to what happened to Italy in
1943). From that point, Austria-Hungary was more like Germany’s prisoner
than Germany’s ally and Emperor Charles had little choice but to see
things through to the end. He dismissed the old army leadership and took
command himself while also proposing new domestic plans in an effort to
regain the loyalty of the various ethnic minorities. However, it was to
no avail and the Allies had already agreed to the post-war
dismemberment of Austria-Hungary in any event. After a final, crushing
blow in 1918 the empire simply collapsed in on itself and Emperor
Charles was forced to relinquish power and go into exile. However, he
did not abdicate as he viewed the monarchy as a sacred trust that he
could not abandon. In 1921 he tried twice to regain his throne as King
of Hungary but was blocked by the ruling regent. He died in Portugal a
year later at the age of only 34. In 2004 Charles, the last Hapsburg
Emperor, was formally beatified by Pope John Paul II. He was a saintly
man and, like a number of “last” monarchs, too good for his own good in a
number of ways.
Emperor Karl of Austria, King of Hungary
TradCatKnight: "The Eagles Are Gathering"
What about His Imperial Royal Highness Archduke Imre de Habsbourg-Lorraine of Austria?
ReplyDelete