BENEDICT vs. BERGOGLIO
By: Fr. Paul Kramer
There are among the cardinals some of them who still have the
Catholic faith (even some whose understanding of it is sometimes gravely
erroneous or even materially heretical on various points) -- they are
giving subtle indications that there there is something very wrong with
Bergoglio, and they are greatly disquieted. They certainly hold him under
grave suspicion of formal heresy. I believe they are prudently waiting
for the moment when the die will be
cast
in such a manner that there will be no longer any possibility for doubt
or denial -- when "Pope" Francis will commit the Church formally into
heresy. It will be clear that Francis cannot possibly be pope because
he will omit an act that for a pope would constitute a formal act of
defection of the Papacy.
Then the greatest schism will take place when Bergoglio, the
spearhead and standard bearer of the Apostasy will lead the stampede of
the CINOs (Catholics in Name Only) into crass and manifest heresy. Then,
finally, it will become clear to faithful Catholics that Bergoglio is
the heretic and schismatic antipope; and the still Catholic cardinals
will recognize the fact of the nullity of Bergoglio's election and the
invalidity of Pope Benedict's "renunciation".
The invalidity
of Benedict's "renunciation" is already patent in the fact that he
explicitly declared his intention to partially retain the munus of the
petrine office; which office cannot be vacated unless its holder fully
and entirely relinquishes the munus, and thereby vacates the office.
This is so because the petrine munus consists of the official duties of
the pope, and thus pertains essentially to the papal office, and
singularly resides in the person of the Supreme Pontiff. Hence, one who
explicitly declares his intention not to entirely relinquish the munus
thus expresses his intention to retain what essentially pertains to the
office, and consequently does not vacate the office.
The fact
of the nullity of Benedict's renunciation will only be confirmed in the
minds of faithful Catholics when the defection of Bergoglio into
obstinate and manifest formal heresy becomes patently and immediately
evident to all -- then the faithful Catholic cardinals in the Sacred
College will be able to be secure in their rejection of Jorge Bergoglio
and acknowledgment that Benedict XVI, in spite of his personal
materially heretical opinions, still retains the munus, grace, and
charism of the Papacy which have preserved him from any act of formal
papal defection.
Ben or Berg: who is the least worst masonic puppet? They have both ends of the spectrum covered and are 2 sides of the same coin, Ben the classicist, and Berg the populist, neither of whom have served that Catholic Church. Why? Because they are each ruled by the fear and worldliness of MAN, as Bugnini's playbook laid out long time ago around the NOmass: "MAN at his ease" is a far cry from the SACRIFICE of GOD for man. Apologists fiddle while, well, you know...
ReplyDeleteJohn 13:27.
ReplyDeleteIt would be difficult to find a more crass and manifest expression of heresy than Pope John Paull II insitution of the 'all religions and creeds' exercise at Asissi in the 1980s. This has now proliferated into the ideology of ecumenism in all those organisations that were represented at Asissi. They all look to St John Paul II to be confirmed in their errors
ReplyDelete