Modernism = Darwinism
By: PETER WILDER
What has Darwinism got in common with Modernism? Everything! They are two edges of the same blade.
A century ago, how could any Catholic dare
question the Church’s dogmatic teaching and not be excommunicated as a
heretic? The answer is that natural science has allegedly shown that
nothing in the realm of the created world is immutable. It has proved
thereby that the Church was wrong in dogmatically declaring that fully
operating living beings with stable natures were produced from nothing.
The knowledge now amassed from biology, physics, and chemistry is already sufficient to render the notion of creation ex nihilo totally
ridiculous. Magisterial teaching proclaiming such things as revealed
truth has to stop! Thanks to Charles Darwin, Catholics have been
liberated from centuries of ignorance imposed by the Church. Modernism
is doing nothing more than seeking emancipation for the downtrodden.
Only this morning, the parish priest told his congregation they had no
need to worry, all their sins would be forgiven them (with the caveat regarding sins against the Holy Spirit) on the basis of Mark 3:28: Truly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the children of man, and whatever blasphemies they utter. To follow this logic, no one needed to have gone to church in the first place!
The troubling question remains, of course, whether Darwin got it right. Did he? Ay, there’s the rub…
Caving in to "science"
It appears that data from the disciplines
of biology, physics and chemistry — now far more developed than they
were in his day — are demonstrating the fatal flaws in the evolutionary
hypothesis. Perhaps the God of Creation did not mislead his people for
so many thousands of years after all…
Needless to say the hierarchy not only is
unaware of this but refuse to listen to anyone who brings it to their
attention. Indeed, the Pontifical Academy of Science admits no one to
their number who contests evolution, and shields Church leaders from
anti-evolution dissidents. Moreover, the seal of obedience of
consecrated persons to their superiors guarantees that the hierarchy’s
acceptance of Darwinism cannot be questioned. (In any case, how many
clerics would want to debate such matters as the existence of
pseudo-genes and whether they have a function?) “Leave natural science
to trained scientists examining empirical facts,” they are told; “and
leave religion to theologians who can discern the supernatural from the
natural.”
Modern man bows down toward this pseudo science |
Looking at the situation today, why are
loyal Catholics so dismayed? What is seen today to be a catastrophe is
only a natural development of what went almost unnoticed years ago. As
the dragon slipped into the unguarded side-gate of Eden, so Darwin
under the trappings of “science” got into the Church. Some discerning
Catholics saw the signs, but tragically too few.
To accommodate the demands of evolutionary
“science” over the years the Church’s hierarchy has become increasingly
tolerant of what can now be clearly seen as abuses of Christ’s
teaching. It had already reached the point over half a century ago
where from the pulpit priests professed God creator of the world and
all its contents from nothing, whilst simultaneously denying that
doctrine in the schools. Successive generations of intelligent students
recognized the blatant hypocrisy of that position and did the logical
thing: they abandoned their religion.
Modernist progression
I wonder if readers have read Roberto de Mattei’s incisive writings, sometimes carried in Christian Order,
especially his recent articles. He is an Italian historian, much
respected in Catholic intellectual circles. I noticed Chris Ferrara
referred to him recently in one of his Remnant articles.
Mattei sees evolution as the Church’s number one enemy. The interest of
his articles is the light they throw upon the current problems facing
Catholics. They explain how the terms “Modernist” and “Modernism” apply
today to the quasi-totality of Catholics. They show why the shocking
statements made by members of the Curia — like Cardinal Kasper’s recent
admission that ambiguities were deliberately inserted into the
documents of Vatican II — are nothing new. In fact the former render a
service by merely articulating more clearly the thinking that has come
to shape the views of most of the “faithful.”
In tracing the recent history of Modernism his most significant points are:
1. Dominican,
Garrigou-Lagrange, one of the most respected theologians of the 20th
century, saw truth being reduced to “religious experience.” He wrote in
1946: “The truth… is no longer the conformity of judgment with
objective reality and its immutable laws, but…with the demands of
action and human life, which is continually evolving.”
2. Today’s Modernism comes
from Luther’s belief: “all that is dogma and theological reflection is
nothing other than the symbolic transcription of a collective
religious experience in continual evolution.”
3. The replacement of
doctrine by “feeling and experience.” As an example, he cites George
Tyrell (1861–1909) who after converting from Protestantism became a
Jesuit. He then challenged the Order’s teaching. For Tyrell religion is a
union of the heart with God that does without the truth of dogmas.
4. Henri Brémond S.J.
(1865–1930) befriended Tyrell when the latter was excommunicated. The
former wrote to Tyrell that the ideal would be a “clerical life without
dogma.”
5. Henri de Lubac L.C. (1896-1991) followed the same line — the possibility of encountering God by one’s own efforts.
The message is clear. The Protestant
Revolution of the 16th century has become a prototype for a
Modernist/Evolutionist revolution in the Catholic Church today. The
latter started at the end of the 19th century with the Biblical School
of Jerusalem (Ecole biblique de Jérusalem), and Soviet
infiltration of seminaries in the early 1900’s. Evolutionary philosophy
was largely promoted at first by the Dominican order, and then by the
Jesuits. Finally it encroached upon teaching in Catholic schools,
monasteries and convents throughout the Church. No institution was
spared.
Evolutionism and Catholicism — irreconcilable!
Although this is perhaps a fair summary of
the current situation, it requires more than a basic grasp of Darwinism
to bring it into focus.
From the time of the Apostles, all of the
Fathers, Doctors, Popes and Council Fathers in their authoritative
teaching held that God created all things by fiat for man and that the
natural order did not begin until God had finished creating Adam and Eve as the crowning work of creation.
At the beginning of the so-called
Enlightenment, Rene Descartes became the first thinker of note in
Christendom to speculate, without evidence, that it would be more
reasonable to explain the origins of everything in nature in terms of
presently observed material processes, rather than by the creative
action of God. As the culmination of more than a century of
Enlightenment propaganda, the evolutionary hypothesis purported to
explain the origin of the world and living things by natural processes:
divine intervention was categorically excluded!
Today, those Catholics who consider
themselves members of the Mystical Body of Christ, as traditionally
defined, yet still believe in evolution, risk succumbing to a severe
psychological disorder. They are obliged to subscribe to two opposing
truths. God the omnipotent Creator; and the omnipotence of evolution.
The aberration is assumed to be justified by the worn expression; “God
used evolution to create.” Those ignorant of orthodox Church teaching
could possibly be excused for this incoherence, but not the qualified
custodians of the traditional Magisterium.
Evolutionism-as-Modernism — triumphant!
God created alone by his own omnipotent
power. No secondary productive causes such as the evolution of existing
beings into beings of a different nature were involved. Lateran IV and
Vatican I define this as a revealed truth. The majority Modernist
creed, however, adds the caveat “unless such assumed truth is
preempted by natural science.” The abandonment of the traditional
metaphysics of the Catholic tradition, noted by then-Cardinal Ratzinger
in 1989, has made it almost impossible for modern theologians to
recognize the absurdity of the Modernist’s unsupported assumption that
he can extrapolate from the material processes going on in nature today
to explain how everything in nature came to be in the beginning!
To make matters worse, for several decades,
arguments from the Church’s magisterial teaching have only carried
weight with the Catholic hierarchy where there is no clash with
evolutionary teaching. In this regard, the present Pope is no more
blameworthy than his predecessors. Although they were less outspoken on
some issues than Pope Francis, the end result is the same. Modernism
fuelled by evolutionism has triumphed within the Church.
It must be remembered that Pius XII did not
discount evolutionary cosmology, John Paul II in 1986 said that
evolution theory could be reconciled with Genesis, and Benedict XVI’s
2006 meeting at Castel Gandolfo entitled “Creation and Evolution”
claimed there was proof for evolution.
The silence on the subject from those in
the Church presenting themselves as traditionalists suggests that they
have not seen the connection between the success of Darwinism and the
Modernist destruction of orthodoxy — or are they too intimidated by
scientism?
Geological time-scale invalidated
Happily, one straightforward body of
evidence is enough to floor the evolutionary Goliath: and it is ready
and waiting for recognition by the Church. It is the research published
by the Russian Academy of Sciences (www.sedimentology.fr)
invalidating the standard geological time-scale — without which the
hypothesis of biological evolution is rendered completely untenable.
Had members of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences recognized the
importance of this research when it was first published, they could
have countered some of the negative effects of faith in the
evolutionary hypothesis on scientific research.
Petition to the Cardinals of the Roman Church regarding the grave improprieties of Francis http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/petition2CardinalsReFrancis
ReplyDelete