Heresy Charge Against "Black Pope" -- Pope Francis and Cardinal Müller Are Presented With Heresy Charge Against Jesuit General
In todays comical news...they are all guilty of heresy. Welcome to apostasy of Vatican II en route to the formalized One World Religion!
Venerable Bartholomew Holzhauser (17th Century): These
are the evil times, a century full of dangers and calamities. Heresy is
everywhere, and the followers of heresy are in power almost everywhere.
but God will permit a great evil against His Church: Heretics and
tyrants will come suddenly and unexpectedly; they will break into the
Church. They will enter Italy and lay Rome waste; they will burn down
churches and destroy everything.
Next Sunday, Pope Francis will visit the small diocese of Carpi in the
Po Valley. A courageous priest of this diocese is currently pestering
the Pope. He raises the question with a memorandum of whether the new
Jesuit Father General, Arturo Sosa Absacal, spreads heresies.
Memorandum against the "Black Pope"
The priest is Don Roberto Bertacchini and is a pupil of three priests of
stature, the German Jesuit, Father Heinrich Pfeiffer, art historian at
the Gregoriana in
Rome, and the two Italian Jesuits, Father Francesco Tata, former
religious prosecutor of Italy, and Father Piersandro Vanzan, Augustine
connoisseur and leading author of the Roman Jesuit paper, Civiltà Cattolica . The
reference to his Jesuit teachers is not without significance in the
matter. Bertacchini was ordained priest in 2009 by the then Archbishop
Carlo Ghidelli of Lanciano-Ortona.
Last week, as the Vaticanist Sandro Magister reports, Don Bertacchini
sent both Pope Francis and Cardinal Gerhard Müller a memorandum. On six
pages, the priest critically comments on a recent interview of the new General Superior of the Jesuit Order, who has been in office since October 2016. The Venezuelan Arturo Sosa Abasca stands very close to Pope Francis, himself Jesuit.
Does the Jesuit General Want a "Christianity without Christ"?
The Jesuit general had represented theses in the interview, which are
"so serious that they can not be passed over without silence, without
making one's self complicit." Bertacchini accuses the "Black Pope", as
the Jesuit general is traditionally called, of speaking of "a
Christianity without Christ".
Magister published Bertacchini's memorandum . Giuseppe
Rusconi, the Swiss Vaticanista, published the interview where he
criticized him last February 18. Arturo Sosa had reviewed the text and
released it for publication.
Bertacchini's criticism is centered
on the massive doubts expressed by the Jesuit General about the
credibility of the Holy Scriptures. Arturo Sosa made fun of it. Rusconi
addressed himself to criticism of the controversial papal Amoris laetitia . The
words of Jesus were opposed to the admission of remarried divorced
persons to the Sacraments. Sosa replied sloppily that nobody could know
exactly what Jesus had said "really," because no one had "a tape
recorder" with him.
According to Bertacchini, the Jesuit General says that the words of
Jesus on the indissolubility of marriage are not a theological fixed
point, but only the point of departure for the doctrine, which must then
be developed "comfortably." In this way, however, the exact opposite
could be represented, in other words the compatibility of divorce and
Christian life."
Jesuit genius "too smart" to openly represent a heresy
Bertacchini emphasizes that Arturo Sosa Absacal SJ, "is too smart to
fall into an obvious heresy, which in some respects is even worse. It
is, therefore, necessary to follow the thread of his reasoning."
In an interview, the Jesuit General asked whether the evangelists were
credible or not. His answer: One must distinguish. He thus implied, by
way of a roundabout way, that it is not said, about the credibility of
the Gospels. He thus questions the truthfulness of Jesus' whole doctrine
of faith. The Jesuit had been careful to go into details. He remained
general, but nevertheless offered a statement destructive in its
core. If we consider that, in all his statements on marriage and the
newly remarried divorced, Pope Francis never cited the words of the Lord
on the indissolubility of marriage, the thrust of the Jesuit General
would be clear. Bertacchini added:
"If the Pope does not quote these passages, it means that he has made a distinction and does not consider it authentic. They are therefore not binding. But all the popes have taught the contrary! So what? They will be wrong. Or they have said true things and taught for their time, but not for ours. "
The Jesuit General does not say it apertis verbis, but interprets it and lets it show through.
"This gives the Pope's a reading to the family pastoral, which deviates from the traditional doctrine."
Jesuit General: "We know today that Jesus never taught that marriage is indissoluble"
Sosa asserts nothing less than that
"We know today," that Jesus probably, probably almost certainly, never taught that marriage is indissoluble. The evangelists would have misunderstood this."
"On the other hand, the Sensus fidei tells us that the evangelists are credible. Our Jesuit General, however, rejects this credibility and
even ignores the fact that St. Paul received this doctrine from the
teaching as directly following Jesus, and passed it on to his
congregations." (1 Cor 7: 10-11).
According to Bertacchini, the consensus of the Synoptics is "too clear"
in the rejection of adultery. Moreover, St. Paul reaffirms this
doctrine in the Epistle to the Ephesians and even strengthens it. He
reaffirmed it by quoting the passage from the book of Genesis, which
Jesus also quoted, and strengthened it because Christ loved the Church
in an indissoluble way, so much so that he gave his life for it and
beyond his earthly life. This faithfulness of the Lord is what Paul
calls the model of marital fidelity.
There is, therefore, evidently a continuity between the pre-Easter and
the post-Easter teachings. Equally obvious is the break with Judaism,
which retained the possibility of the repudiation. Bertacching asks the
following questions: "If Paul himself refers to Jesus for this break,
what is the meaning of the Gospels? Where should this leap come from
which determined the practice of the early Church, if not of Christ?"
It should be remembered that divorce was also permitted in the
Greco-Roman sphere, and that a form of the concubinage existed, which
could easily lead to a later marriage, like the life of St Augustine
shows. The rejection of a abandonment, divorce, concubinage constitutes a
cultural breach, a phenomenon which is decisive in the history of
culture, what should it point back to, if not to Jesus? And if Jesus is
the Christ, why should the faithfulness of the Gospels be doubted?
"Apart from this, if Jesus is not to have said these words, from whence
comes the drastic commentary of the disciples in Matthew 19:10 (" then
it is not good to marry at all?") Among these disciples was also the
evangelist himself who does not strike a good figure. They understood
late what Jesus taught them because they were then still dependent on
the traditions of their time that Jesus criticizes. "From a historical
point of view, the pericope Mt 19, 3-12 is credible in every respect,"
the priest said.
Bertacchini then goes into detail on the "dogmatic horizon" of the
statements of the Jesuit General. In it, he expanded his criticism and
extends it to a recent article in the Roman Jesuit journal Civilta Cattolica, with the Jesuit Giancarlo Pani, where the prohibition of female priesthood is
questioned. Bertacchini criticizes the fact that the solemn gospel,
which calls for infallibility, is questioned without hesitation. The
priest criticizes this work of subversion with the aim of destroying
safe dams.
What will Pope Francis do with the inscription of Don Roberto Bertacchini? What will CDF Prefect Müller do with it?
TCK: The blind leading the blind
The whole Novus ordo lives in the land of material heresy
