"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven,
saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth....
[Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]

Friday, May 22, 2015

Schools in France Want Muslim Students to Dress Like Prostitutes

Schools in France Want Muslim Students to Dress Like Prostitutes
by Jonas E. Alexis for VeteransToday
Two Muslim students at the Birmingham Metropolitan College campus in Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands. The college has banned Muslim girls from wearing a veil.

Note: I have had to censor some language from the original article that I thought may be offensive to our viewers
Long before the birth of Western Civilization, a Greek dramatist by the name of Euripides discovered a metaphysical and universal principle, and it has been used by ideologues in almost every century. Euripides argued in The Bacchae that you can destroy a culture and indeed an entire society through sexual subversion and destruction of the moral order.

If you think that Euripides is wrong, then pick up the writings and biographies of people like Aleister Crowley, Sigmund Freud, Wilhelm Reich and Alfred Kinsey. You will soon discover that those people harnessed that sexual corruption and unleashed it upon much of the West, most specifically England and America.[1] Jewish writer Elizabeth Wurtzel calls this sexual corruption
The question, then, is simply this: How does this “sexual corruption” work?
When women take off their skirts and get naked and start “dancing on the mountainside,” as Euripides would have put it, or start twerking on stage (like Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, Beyonce, Rihanna, etc.), then you can be sure that the moral law, which is ingrained in the human heart, is being subdued by a powerful force. The supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei knew about this power. He said that
“If they [the Zionist regime in America] arouse sexual desires in any given country, if they spread unrestrained mixing of men and women, and if they lead youth to behavior to which they are naturally inclined by instincts, there will no longer be any need for artillery and guns against that nation.”

If you think that the supreme leader is out of touch with reality, let us bring in Benjamin Netanyahu himself. He said:
“If you want to advance regime change in Iran, you don’t have to go through the C.I.A. cloak-and-dagger stuff — what you want to do is take very large, very strong transponders and just beam ‘Melrose Place’ and ‘Beverly Hills 2050’ and all that into Tehran and into Iran, because that is subversive stuff. They watch it — the young kids watch it, the young people. They want to have the same nice clothes and the same houses and swimming pools and so on.”[2]

You see, Netanyahu is not that stupid here. He knows that this “subversive stuff” can destroy lives—and he has enough evidence to justify the theory. He knows that Samson, one of Israel’s undefeatable heroes, was eventually defeated through this “subversive stuff.”
“Samson and Delilah is a good place to start. Israel was invincible military…so the Philistines decided to get the Israelite leader by other than military means. They seduced him sexually. Once Samson succumbed to Delilah’s wiles, he lost his power, and Israel lost its leader. He was no longer on the field of battle, but rather, to use Milton’s phrase, ‘eyeless in Gaza, grinding at the mill with slaves.’”[3]

In 2002, the Israeli military forces did something very similar in Gaza. When they took over Palestinian TV stations in Ramallah in the West Bank, they immediately shut down all other TV stations and started broadcasting pornography. E. Michael Jones writes,
“The story of the Palestinian TV stations has a curiously Biblical ring. The Israelis turned the tables. They knew a blind opponent is no opponent. They knew, as did the ancient Greeks, that lust makes a man blind. St. Thomas Aquinas said lust ‘darkens the mind.’ Suddenly, Israel’s use of pornography against the Palestinians isn’t so obscure.

“Pornography is a weapon ‘Jews with an atavistic fear of Christian authority’ [he is quoting Nathan Abrams here] have used to weaken the dominant culture and, therefore, assure that Jews, always a minority, are unmolested by their ‘Christian’ neighbors. They are well-versed in the military use of pornography.

“The corrosive effects of Wilhelm Reich’s philosophy of control through sexual demoralization are still with us, promoted by Jews as a form of political control to weaken the power of the non-Jewish majority. The Israelis broadcast pornography over Palestinian TV stations, says one report, ‘to keep Palestinian youths away from joining the resistance against Israeli occupation and apartheid.’
“According to the Palestinian intelligence officer, the CIA discussed the issue with the Israelis repeatedly, but ‘the idea first came from the Israeli side who suggested that only these things could take Palestinian youths away from their hostile fixation on Israel…

“Pornography weakens the majority culture by moral subversion. Jews often lead in the application of new technology. That meant using high resolution photography, the VCR, and the Internet to deliver pornography just as it meant dynamite, forgery, and smuggling to bring down the Czar in Russia.
“English professor Jay Gertzman, whose father and uncle were arrested on obscenity charges in Philadelphia in the ‘50s, writes about the influence of Jews in the sex book trade in Bookleggers and Smuthounds: The Trade in Erotica 1920-1940:
“‘While few Jews are radical, many radicals (and pornographers) are Jews. Writes non-Jew Ernest van den Haag in The Jewish Mystique, ‘Out of one hundred Jews, five may be radicals, but out of then radicals, five are likely to be Jewish.’”[4]

The central issue here is that Netanyahu’s “subversive stuff” is powerful, and the current regime knows it. This is one reason why they start producing this “subversive stuff” in places like Germany even to first-graders! Listen to the German newspaper Spiegel:
“When it comes to sex, Germans are not known for being squeamish. Yet a sex-education book that has been circulating in Berlin elementary schools has some parents up in arms.
The book, ‘Where Do You Come From?’ (‘Wo kommst du her?’), which is recommended for ages 5 and up, shows a couple, Lisa and Lars, in various stages of arousal. The text also veers toward the explicit.

“The book was shown to first-graders at an elementary school in the Berlin neighborhood of Kreuzberg. Parents began to complain about the racy content, but the school did nothing — until it was reported in the local press and the Berlin Senate, the city-state’s administrative body, began receiving complaints.

“It’s not the first bout of controversy over sex education in Berlin. Two years ago, the Berlin Senate provoked uproar from church groups and other organizations when it presented local primary-school educators with a media kit about ‘sexual diversity.’ The material discussed homo- and transsexuality — and, particularly controversially, suggested that teachers ask seventh-graders to do pantomime role-playing on themes such as ‘orgasm,’ ‘porno’ and ‘sadomasochism.’”[5]

Many of the pictures are very graphic, and you can check them out both in Spiegel and other news outlets such as the Atlantic.[6] I contacted my German friend, Dr. Fredrick Toben, to get his take on this. He wrote back and said:
“Parents are protesting against such stuff being taught compulsorily in schools – and those who refuse to have their children exposed to it are fined – if the fine is not paid, then it’s off to prison. It reminds me of how in Australian government and private schools there is now compulsory Holocaust education!

“It’s the secular state trying to cope with the vacuum left by eliminating moral education that was covered through religious education. This is where philosophy comes in – the atheist doesn’t seem to understand that we need to have a transcendental/metaphysical belief system, that questions about God/Nature need to be addressed, etc.”

So, the sex industry basically controls much of the West. In fact, one can reasonably say that students in much of the Western World have fallen into what one might called immodest apparel. Schools in France want Muslims to do the same. Recently,
“A 15-year-old French Muslim girl has been banned from her classroom for wearing a long black skirt, seen as going against France’s law guaranteeing secularism. She missed two days this month in a dispute over her skirt, French education officials said Wednesday, and the issue remains unresolved…
“The student, identified as Sarah, was among a group of at least five girls who arrived at the Leo Lagrange school in recent weeks with long skirts — and Islamic headscarves which they removed before entering school…
“The students were asked to change into ‘neutral clothing’ before coming to class. Sarah complied, then stopped coming to class, the Academy Services said.”[7]
In the Zionist scheme of things, “neutral clothing” means sex appeal. “Neutral clothing” means following pop stars and celebrities wearing virtually nothing. “Neutral clothing,” as Madonna would have put it, means drawing men to their death.

Parents, who obvioulsy have been living on a steady-diet of pop culture, are also getting in to the act, though somewhat indirectly:
“Haven Middle School administrators notified parents that female students are no longer allowed to wear shorts, leggings, or yoga pants because those articles of clothing might be ‘too distracting’ for their male peers. That’s sparked a protest among parents and students in the Evanston, Illinois area, who are arguing it’s not girls’ responsibility to accommodate the boys in their classes.

“More than 500 students have signed onto a petition protesting the new dress code policy, which they say is sexist because it’s only targeting girls’ clothing. Some female students have chosen to defy the ban and are wearing leggings and yoga pants to school in protest. A poster plastered in Haven Middle School reads, ‘Are my pants lowering your test scores?’
“Two parents, Juliet and Kevin Bond, sent a letter to the school principal arguing that this approach toward the dress code is furthering unhealthy attitudes about sexuality.” 

“Mad Max director George Miller enlisted the help of activist, feminist icon Ensler in order to ensure that Fury Road wasn’t just another story about helpless female victims; it’s a story about empowered survivors.”[10]
Actress Rosie Huntington-Whiteley, who plays in the movie, acknowledged,
“We were so lucky that George arranged for Eve Ensler, to fly in and work with us girls for about a week. We did extensive research with her…
“We were able to pick her brain for a week. She told us the most tragic stories I’ve ever heard in my life, which gave us so much background to our characters. We really wanted to kind of showcase that. It was a privilege to have her around to make these characters something more then just five beautiful girls.”[11]

Michael Jones wrote back in 2003:
The V***** Monologues is not something that students study; it is something that is done to students to produce behavioral and psychic effects. Its main purpose is to break down their modesty and corrupt their morals. The students were being acted upon (even if by other students) in a way that was calculated to modify their behavior, not clarify their thought. If anything, the play was an attempt to short-circuit the thinking process. It was a deliberate attempt to subvert reason by shock and arousal of passion.

“The V***** Monologues, in other words, is not academic discourse. It is social engineering. It is the orchestration of obscenity for political purposes. As social engineering, The V***** Monologues has more in common with the Tuskeegee Syphilis experiments than the performance of a play by Shakespeare. As such, it has no place in any public forum, much less at a university, much less at a Catholic university.”[13]

Steven Klein studio
The biggest question is this: who is implicitly pushing the removal of dress codes in schools in America? The ACLU, a largely Jewish organization. If you think this is inconceivable, then perhaps you should read Murray Friedman’s The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and Public Policy, in which it is argued that Jewish organizations completely subvert the largely Protestant mores in America.

One of the key figures during that time was none other than Leo Pfeffer, “the son of an immigrant Orthodox rabbi,” who, at the age of 15, “was deeply troubled by the daily Bible reading by Miss Knox, ‘probably a Protestant lady.’”[14] Jewish organizations, Friedman writes, “have successfully challenged Bible reading in the public schools and any form of state aid to parochial schools.”[15]
What we are progressively seeing is that the public school system in America has largely been subverted by Jewish ideology, and we all know the consequences of that. Things have gotten so bad over the years that basically no one wants to enforce the law when it comes to dress codes. In fact, Ruthann Robson, a professor at CYNY, writes in the LA Times that having dress codes where saggy pants should not be allowed in schools is based on “anti-democratic principles.”[16]

The same thing seems to be happening in France, where decent Muslims have been stigmatized just because they happen to wear long skirts.
“Critics of France’s secularist laws in schools say they often thinly conceal a widespread bias against Muslims and immigrants in French society. Studies have revealed how Muslims face systematic discrimination on the basis of their race, creed and culture.

“Speaking to local newspaper L’Ardennais, Sarah said that her skirt was ‘nothing special, it’s very simple, there’s nothing conspicuous. There is no religious sign whatsoever.’”[17]
The regime is telling Sarah that she needs to adopt America’s model, where the masses are more captivated by Kim Kardashian’s buttocks than knowing what is happening in the real world.
Even the Huffington Post did not hesitate to say that Kardashian’s “biggest asset” is…well, you know the drill.[20]

In order to show her “biggest asset,” Kardashian, of course, had to work with “Steven Klein Studio.” Steven Klein is a Jewish photographer who has frequently worked with people like Madonna, Brad Pitt, Britney Spears, etc.
The conclusion of the whole matter is that the sex industry, which is largely controlled by the Dreadful Few, is assault just about every moral and orderly principle. For example, in the Catholic sense (Muslims seem to have the same principle), modest apparel
“protects the intimate center of the person. It means refusing to unveil what should remain hidden. It is ordered to chastity to whose sensitivity it bears witness. It guides how one looks at others and behaves towards them, in conformity with the dignity of persons and their solidarity.”[21]
The sex industry, however, says the opposite. Children and students ought to be used as sex toys, and those who oppose this weltanschauung will be castigated as bigots and fools. This is why they have demonized decent Muslims in much of the Western world. 

[1] For a cultural history on this, see E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 2000).
[2] Quoted in Robert Mackey, “Kerry Reminds Congress Netanyahu Advised U.S. to Invade Iraq,” NY Times, February 25, 2015.
[3] E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1055.
[4] Ibid., 1055, 1056
[5] “Oversexed Education: First-Graders Shown Explicit Sex-Ed Book,” Spiegel International, April 25, 2013.
[6] Lindsay Abrams, “How a German Elementary School Taught Sex Ed,” Atlantic, April 30, 2013.
[7] Elaine Ganley, “French School Bans Muslim Girl From Wearing Long Skirt, Prompting Twitter Backlash,” Huffington Post, April 29, 2015.
[8] Andres Jauregui, “Sex Doll Portraits Evoke A Future Where Humans Love Robots, Artist Says,” Huffington Post, May 20, 2015.
[9] Cavan Sieczkowski, “Charlize Theron On Why ‘Mad Max’ Is An ‘Incredible Feminist Movie,’” Huffington Post, May 15, 2015.
[10] Joanna Robinson, “How Mad Max: Fury Road Could Become the Most Surprising Feminist Triumph of the Year,” Vanity Fair, May 3, 2015.
[11] Ibid.
[12] E. Michael Jones, “The V***** Monologues at Notre Dame Culture Wars, April 2003.
[13] Ibid.
[14] Murray Friedman, The Neoconservative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 23.
[15] Ibid., 43.
[16] Ruthann Robson, “School Dress Codes: Miniskirt Madness,” LA Times, September 5, 2013.
[17] Tharoor, “A French Muslim girl was kicked out of class because her skirt was too long,” Washington Post, April 29, 2015.
[18] Ishaan Tharoor, “A French Muslim girl was kicked out of class because her skirt was too long,” Washington Post, April 29, 2015.
[19] For a scholarly study on this, see for example Hugh B. Urban, Magia Sexualis: Sex, Magic, and Liberation in Modern Esotericism (Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2006).
[20] “Kim Kardashian Bares Her Butt Again In Leaked Love Magazine Photo,” Huffington Post, February 3, 2015.
[21] Cited in Jones, “The V***** Monologues at Notre Dame Culture Wars, April 2003.



No comments:

Post a Comment