Pornographers & Perverts are Modern Literary Giants
Warning: Sensitive Material
(Left, D.H. Lawrence and James Joyce)
In a satanic cult, such as modern society has become, sickness is portrayed as health. Thus James Joyce who indulged in coprophilia is treated as a shining beacon for society.
An obsession with human excrement is one of the hallmarks
of Satanism, so it may be no coincidence that as scatology, and even
coprophilia, have been mainstreamed in sitcoms and popular culture
generally.
by Jude Duffy
(henrymakow.com)
James Joyce’s celebrated novel Ulysses was irredeemably filthy. So said D. H. Lawrence. In spite of Lawrence’s assessment, Ulysses was
widely hailed as a work of genius, and Joyce is still regarded as one
of the giants of 20th century literature. In Ireland, in particular,
liberal anti-Catholics predictably lionized him as a national martyr for
the cause of free expression against a repressive authoritarian
Church.
Yet Ulysses really was “filth”, or at least deeply
preoccupied with filth. The book dwells at considerable length on the
excretory bodily functions of the main characters.
Champions of Joyce, including the Anglo- Irish literary academic and homosexual activist, David Norris, left, insist that the author doesn’t devote any more attention to toilet matters in Ulysses
than they merit in the account of a normal day (which is what the book
purports to be.) But in truth, the stream of consciousness soliloquies
of the book’s heroine Molly Bloom suggest an author in the grip of a
rather unhealthy obsession with women’s excretory functions.
In any case Joyce’s own letters to his long-time lover and
eventual wife, Norah Barnacle, confirm that he had strong coprophiliac
tendencies: If asking one’s sexual partner to pooh on you isn’t filthy,
what exactly is? Faeces is synonymous with disease, foul smells, flies,
and so on, so to call Joyce’s fixation unhealthy is not simply a
figurative use of the term. This is all documented in Brenda Maddox’s
book Nora (1988) from Nora’s letters.
Needless to say, Joyce was not the first writer to have
perverse sexual appetites, but his “modernity” partly lies in his use of
the novel to seek public acceptance of his own perversions. More
remarkably still, the literary world, and eventually the wider society,
gave him the validation he sought.
His face has featured on Irish banknotes; he has a small
Dublin street named after him, and there are countless seminars devoted
to his books held throughout the world. Not bad for a writer Virginia
Woolf once likened to “a queasy undergraduate squeezing his pimples.”
NARCISSISM A FORM OF SATANISM
Both Joyce and Lawrence exemplified a very modern form of
inverted narcissism. Whereas in the past, the narcissist pretended to be
purer than he was, the modern advertises his sickness as a badge of
honour: ’Yes I’m turned on by pooh, what’s your problem with that
exactly? Get used to it! It makes me a dark and interesting sexual
subversive, give me my literary prize now!’
Lawrence denounced the old “hypocritical” morality, which he
claimed forced people to secretly masturbate instead of openly
fornicating. Ironically his most famous book, Lady Chatterley’s Lover,
was itself prime masturbatory fodder. It’s safe to say that many of
those who formed a long line in central London to buy the book on the
day it was legalized in the early 1960s were not doing so simply to seek
greater understanding of Lawrence’s philosophy of romantic vitalism.
Philip Larkin’s famous line: “Sexual
intercourse began in Nineteen Sixty Three (which was rather late for me)
– between the end of the Chatterley ban and the Beatle’s first LP”, though
clever, is almost an inversion of the truth: obviously sexual
intercourse had always existed – what “began” in 1963 after the lifting
of the Chatterley ban, was a new culture of mass media induced
auto-eroticism – the very thing Lawrence claimed to despise.
Since Joyce and Lawrence’s day, the cultural vocabulary has
radically changed to reflect the Luciferian rebellion they pioneered.
Terms like “transgressive” and “subversive” are now the highest
commendations. The critical establishment now demands that artists
continually “push boundaries”, thereby institutionalizing a form of
permanent cultural revolution . The most genuinely anti-establishment
thing a writer can do these days is write a book devoid of graphic
sexual or scatological content.
CULTURE OF A SATANIC CULT
The cultural revolutionaries have not restricted their onslaught to literature of course. Comedians
like Amy Schumer and Sarah Silverman, both Jewish, dwell on excretory
bodily functions and masturbation and respectable audiences laugh
uproariously. In modern society expressing shock is considered much more
shocking than purveying it. The window of acceptable discourse has
widened to encompass the most extreme forms of Reichian subversion.
An obsession with human excrement is one of the hallmarks of
Satanism, so it may be no coincidence that as scatology, and even
coprophilia, have been mainstreamed in sitcoms and popular culture
generally. Overt satanic references have become much more widespread in
the same programmes and movies. The notorious American sitcom Two And A Half Men
dwelt on scatological and satanic themes are featured quite regularly
in episodes of this deeply malevolent Jewish-produced show.
CONCLUSION
Although still exalted in literary circles, Joyce is not,
even as writers go, a major figure in popular culture – his books are
too labyrinthine and obscure for that. Nevertheless he did his bit to
alter the moral climate for the worse, by presenting the seedy pervert
as literary martyr.
(D.H. Lawrence who stood up for gender differences has many redeeming qualities. His criticism of Joyce is another.)
The same syndrome of the pornographer as hero of the cultural
revolution pervades western society generally . The corporate media
regularly retail stories of how previously benighted generations
objected to the daring obscenity of Lenny Bruce or Henry Miller, or in
more recent times, Madonna’s 1980s act. The moral of these stories is
always the same: If you condemn today’s “boundary pushing” by Miley,
Lady GaGa, or whoever, you too will end up a retrospective laughing
stock like those chumps who condemned Lenny Bruce and James Joyce.
All of which goes to prove that, for the time being at least,
the pornographers have won the culture war, and they get to write the
history books.
Jonathon Van Maren "Prevailing PORN Pandemic"
