Vatican II: Traditionalist Misinterpretation or Modernist Denial?
The Popes themselves openly imply/state Vatican II is FreeMasonry (as official interpreters) yet we are protestants for not accepting the Council?
The protestants are those following Vatican II and they are in "hard denial"...
Over the past few weeks there have impotent attempts by those still "clinging" to Vatican II to suggest we are protestants for "taking the texts of Vatican II out of context" or simply misinterpreting. Yet, these obstinate apologists/defenders can not deny that the authoritative figures themselves say the Council was a "counter-syllabus". It is clear Vatican II was the pastoral implementation of the Novus Ordo Religion and is leading souls in to the FORMAL ONE WORLD RELIGION OF APOSTASY!
Vatican II NewChurch has a "new theology", a "new evangelization", a "new mass", "new rites", "new catechism", "new bibles", "new code of canon law", "points of new doctrine", is "church of new advent"....
As Catholics we are taught to hold on to Tradition and reject/resist and novelty or contagion entering into the Church. In reality, when you piece of all this together Vatican II represents a whole new subjectivst, evolutionary Faith/Gospel which is man centered (Masonic/Marxist). The texts themselves PROVE this and the Vatican II Popes only state our case. Archbishop Lefebvre points out this reality:
Archbishop Lefebvre (founder of SSPX whose true position now rests with the Resistance)
“You will recognize the tree by its fruit.” The fruits are before us, evident, clear. The
fruits which come from the Second Vatican Council and the postconciliar
reforms are bitter fruits, fruits that destroy the Church. When
someone tells me, “Do not touch the Council; speak, rather, of the
postconciliar reforms,” I reply that those who made the reforms- it was
not I who made the reforms – say themselves: “We are making them in the
name of the Council. We made the liturgical reform in the name of the
Council; we reformed the catechism in the name of the council.” And
these are the Church’s authorities. It is they, consequently, who
legitimately interpret the Council.
Click to enlarge!
But we call upon those who term themselves modern humanists, and who
have renounced the transcendent value of the highest realities, to give
the council credit at least for one quality and to recognize our own new
type of humanism: we, too, in fact, we more than any others, honour
mankind; We have the cult of man. - Address of Paul VI, Council’s Last
General Meeting, December 7, 1965, Italian Translation.
*The CULT of MAN is MASONRY; when you say you are in full communion with Vatican II/Modernist Rome you are saying you are in communion with Masonry the ENEMY of the CATHOLIC RELIGION
Humanism is the philosophy of Masonry and soon the Vatican II NewChurch will surrender to "secular humanism" (Apostate; a "Church" free of dogma) and thus fulfilling Our Lady's words of :Rome will lose the Faith (Dogma of Faith as implied in the real 3rd secret of Fatima) and become the Seat of Antichrist.
Thomism=Catholic Religion
Catholic Religion= Cult of God
FreeMasonry= Cult of Man; teaches humanism; impotent humanitarianism as St. Pope Pius X warned
*The CULT of MAN is MASONRY; when you say you are in full communion with Vatican II/Modernist Rome you are saying you are in communion with Masonry the ENEMY of the CATHOLIC RELIGION
Humanism is the philosophy of Masonry and soon the Vatican II NewChurch will surrender to "secular humanism" (Apostate; a "Church" free of dogma) and thus fulfilling Our Lady's words of :Rome will lose the Faith (Dogma of Faith as implied in the real 3rd secret of Fatima) and become the Seat of Antichrist.
Thomism=Catholic Religion
Catholic Religion= Cult of God
FreeMasonry= Cult of Man; teaches humanism; impotent humanitarianism as St. Pope Pius X warned
Pope Benedict XVI, Liberal, Revolutionary, Evolutionist, Progressivist
If one is looking for a global diagnosis of the text [of Gaudium et spes], one could say that it (along with the texts on religious liberty and world religions) is a revision of the Syllabus of Pius IX, a kind of counter-Syllabus ....
Undoubtedly, many things have changed since then. The new ecclesiastical policy of Pius XI established a certain openness toward the liberal conception of the State. In a silent but persevering combat, Exegesis and Church History increasingly adopted the postulates of liberal science; on the other hand, in face of the great political upheavals of the 20th century, Liberalism was obliged to accept notable corrections.
This happened because, first in central Europe, conditioned by the situation, the unilateral dependence on the positions taken by the Church through the initiatives of Pius IX and Pius X against the new period of History opened by the French Revolution was to a large extent corrected via facti. But a fundamental new document regarding relations with the world as it had been since 1789 was still lacking.
In reality, the mentality that preceded the revolution still reigned in the countries with strong Catholic majorities; today almost no one denies that the Spanish and Italian concordats [accords between Church and State] tried to conserve too many things from a conception of the world that for a long time had not corresponded to reality. Likewise, almost no one can deny that this dependence on an obsolete conception of relations between the Church and State was matched by similar anachronisms in the domain of education and the attitude taken toward the modern historical-critical method ....
Let us content ourselves here with stating that the text [of Gaudium et spes] plays the role of a counter-Syllabus to the measure that it represents an attempt to officially reconcile the Church with the world as it had become after 1789. On one hand, this visualization alone clarifies the ghetto complex that we mentioned before. On the other hand, it permits us to understand the meaning of this new relationship between the Church and the Modern World. "World" is understood here, at depth, as the spirit of modern times. The consciousness of being a detached group that existed in the Church viewed this spirit as something separate from herself and, after the hot as well as cold wars were over, she sought dialogue and cooperation with it.
(Les Principes de la Theologie Catholique - Esquisse et Materiaux, Paris: Tequi, 1982, pp. 426-427).
Undoubtedly, many things have changed since then. The new ecclesiastical policy of Pius XI established a certain openness toward the liberal conception of the State. In a silent but persevering combat, Exegesis and Church History increasingly adopted the postulates of liberal science; on the other hand, in face of the great political upheavals of the 20th century, Liberalism was obliged to accept notable corrections.
This happened because, first in central Europe, conditioned by the situation, the unilateral dependence on the positions taken by the Church through the initiatives of Pius IX and Pius X against the new period of History opened by the French Revolution was to a large extent corrected via facti. But a fundamental new document regarding relations with the world as it had been since 1789 was still lacking.
In reality, the mentality that preceded the revolution still reigned in the countries with strong Catholic majorities; today almost no one denies that the Spanish and Italian concordats [accords between Church and State] tried to conserve too many things from a conception of the world that for a long time had not corresponded to reality. Likewise, almost no one can deny that this dependence on an obsolete conception of relations between the Church and State was matched by similar anachronisms in the domain of education and the attitude taken toward the modern historical-critical method ....
Let us content ourselves here with stating that the text [of Gaudium et spes] plays the role of a counter-Syllabus to the measure that it represents an attempt to officially reconcile the Church with the world as it had become after 1789. On one hand, this visualization alone clarifies the ghetto complex that we mentioned before. On the other hand, it permits us to understand the meaning of this new relationship between the Church and the Modern World. "World" is understood here, at depth, as the spirit of modern times. The consciousness of being a detached group that existed in the Church viewed this spirit as something separate from herself and, after the hot as well as cold wars were over, she sought dialogue and cooperation with it.
(Les Principes de la Theologie Catholique - Esquisse et Materiaux, Paris: Tequi, 1982, pp. 426-427).
The Vatican II Popes love being blessed by Protestants and even Witchdoctor's. HEY! After all Vatican II teaches "the Church" is a sign or symbol of the WHOLE HUMAN FAMILY! That is right Vatican II "pastorally" taught even atheists are in this NewChurch. The HERETICAL Ecumenical program is about dialoque not conversion (that is FACT) and yet why aren't REAL CATHOLICS (those rejecting the Council) said to be "in communion" (not that we want to be) with the false/counterfeit church"?? Just more Vatican II hypocrisy; this is purely evil....
It is clear these modernists like Benedict XVI "want to be" and "are" friends of this world... any wonder why the FreeMasons/Marxists "praised" the Council (its universalism) and every Pope since Vatican II?
James 4:4
Adulterers, know you not that the friendship of this world is the enemy of God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of this world, becometh an enemy of God.
Adulterers, know you not that the friendship of this world is the enemy of God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of this world, becometh an enemy of God.
Vatican II "self condemnation": What did the Catholic Church say about any "new direction"?
CONDEMNATION OF "NEW", VATICAN 2 AND THE MODERNISM ENSUED BY POPE LEO XIII REITERATED BY POPE ST. PIUS X
Let them combat novelties of words, remembering the admonitions of Leo XIII: "It is impossible to approve in Catholic publications a style inspired by unsound novelty which seems to deride the piety of the faithful and dwells on the introduction of a new order of Christian life, on new directions of the Church, on new aspirations of the modern soul, on a new social vocation of the clergy, on a new Christian civilization, and many other things of the same kind."[32] Language of the kind here indicated is not to be tolerated either in books or in lectures. POPE ST PIUS X- PASCENDI
Archbishop Lefebvre's WHOLESALE REJECTION of Vatican II
Our Declaration of Faith
This Reform, since it has issued from Liberalism and from Modernism, is entirely corrupt; it comes from heresy and results in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is thus impossible for any faithful Catholic who is aware of these things to adopt this Reform, or to submit to it in any way at all. To ensure our salvation, the only attitude of fidelity to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, is a categorical refusal to accept the Reform.
This Reform, since it has issued from Liberalism and from Modernism, is entirely corrupt; it comes from heresy and results in heresy, even if all its acts are not formally heretical. It is thus impossible for any faithful Catholic who is aware of these things to adopt this Reform, or to submit to it in any way at all. To ensure our salvation, the only attitude of fidelity to the Church and to Catholic doctrine, is a categorical refusal to accept the Reform.
Hunker Down: Vatican II the revolt, an apostasy from the Catholic Faith, is paving the way for the False Prophet (Yeshua Ben Joseph) and New Age antichrist Maitreya. A formal schism is close, the GREAT APOSTASY!
2 Thessalonians 2:3
Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition...
Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition...
Archbishop Lefebvre:
The more one analyzes
the documents of Vatican II, and the more one analyzes their
interpretation by the authorities of the Church, the more one realizes
that what is at stake is not merely superficial errors, a few mistakes,
ecumenism, religious liberty, collegiality, a certain Liberalism, but
rather a wholesale perversion of the mind, a whole new philosophy based on modern philosophy, on subjectivism.
The Vatican II Modernists are in HARD DENIAL of what the Church authorities admit to. There is NO WAY around it YET they try impotently to convince others otherwise. From such turn away my friends!
Modernists, objectively speaking, are "not in the Church" therefore "they have left the Church"...
St. Francis of Assisi ENDTIMES Prophecy
Those who preserve their fervour and adhere to virtue with love and zeal for the truth, will suffer injuries and, persecutions as rebels and schismatics
http://www.novusordowatch.org/francis.htm
Related:
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/07/those-following-vatican-ii-follow-new.html
The
Official ORDER of the EAGLE Page
TradCatKnight Radio (MP3) orderoftheeagle.wordpress.com/mp3/
Please share blogs and help spread information Crusaders!
TradCatKnight is the most viewed
& followed traditional catholic page worldwide.
This is the HOME of the New Crusade
keeping you up to date on the latest Endtime
News stories worldwide as we head closer to the GREAT CHASTISEMENTS foretold by the Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima.
Please Help Keep TradCatKnight Alive
& Growing:
Donate below for a chance to win a
gift via TradCatKnight’s
Monthly raffle. Minimum contribution
is 20$ for the raffle.
Winner announced on every last radio
show of the month!
No comments:
Post a Comment