Neocons Clamor for More Goy Blood
In 2003, an Israeli newspaper credited 25 American-Jewish intellectuals with starting the
Iraq war which has since cost $2.5 trillion and over 200,000 lives. Former CIA analyst
Philip Giraldi says the same group is clamoring for another war, against Iran.
“These individuals largely constitute a cabal of sanctimonious chairborne warriors
who prefer to do the heavy thinking while they let others do the fighting and dying.”
[Makow note- Please direct any resentment you may feel at the many Jews Giraldi mentions here, rather than Jews in general, most of whom are not consulted.]
by Phil Giraldi
(abridged by henrymakow.com)
I spoke recently at a conference on America’s war
party where afterward an elderly gentleman came up to me and asked, “We
all know it’s American Jews with all their money and power who are
supporting every war in the Middle East? Shouldn’t we start calling them
out?”
My answer is always the same: any organization… knows
that to touch the livewire of Israel and American Jews guarantees a
quick trip to obscurity. Jewish groups and deep pocket individual donors
not only control the politicians, they own and run the media and
entertainment industries, meaning that no one will hear about or from
the offending party ever again. They are particularly sensitive on the
issue of so-called “dual loyalty,” particularly as the expression itself
is a bit of a sham since it is pretty clear that some of them only have
real loyalty to Israel.
Most recently, some pundits, including myself, have been
warning of an impending war with Iran. To be sure, the urging to strike
Iran comes from many quarters, to include generals in the Administration
who always think first in terms of settling problems through force,
from a Saudi government obsessed with fear over Iranian hegemony, and,
of course, from Israel itself. But what makes the war engine run is
provided by American Jews who have taken upon themselves the onerous
task of starting a war with a country that does not conceivably threaten
the United States. They have been very successful at faking the Iranian
threat, so much so that nearly all Republican and most Democratic
congressmen, as well as much of the media, seem to be convinced that
Iran needs to be dealt with firmly, most definitely by using the U.S.
military, and the sooner the better.
And while they are doing it, the issue that nearly all the
Iran haters are Jewish has somehow fallen out of sight, as if it does
not matter. But it should matter. A recent article in the New Yorker
on stopping the impending war with Iran strangely suggests that the
current generation “Iran hawks” might be a force of moderation regarding
policy options given the lessons learned from Iraq. The article cites
as hardliners on Iran David Frum, Max Boot, Bill Kristol (left) and Bret
Stephens.
Daniel Larison over at The American Conservative has a good review of the New Yorker piece entitled “Yes, Iran Hawks Want Conflict with Iran,”
which identifies the four above cited hawks by name before describing
them as “…a Who’s Who of consistently lousy foreign policy thinking. If
they have been right about any major foreign policy issue in the last
twenty years, it would be news to the entire world. Every single one of
them hates the nuclear deal with Iran with a passion, and they have
argued in favor of military action against Iran at one point or another.
There is zero evidence that any of them would oppose attacking Iran.”
And I would add a few more names, Mark Dubowitz, Michael
Ledeen and Reuel Marc Gerecht of the Foundation for Defense of
Democracies; Daniel Pipes of the Middle East Forum; John Podhoretz of Commentary
magazine; Elliot Abrams of the Council on Foreign Relations; Meyrav
Wurmser of the Middle East Media Research Institute; Kimberly Kagan of
the Institute for the Study of War; and Frederick Kagan, Danielle Pletka
and David Wurmser of the American Enterprise Institute. And you can
also throw into the hopper entire organizations like The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Washington Institute for Near East Policy
(WINEP) and the Hudson Institute. And yep, they’re all Jewish, plus
most of them would self-describe as neo-conservatives. And I might add
that only one of the named individuals has ever served in any branch of
the American military – David Wurmser was once in the Navy reserve.
These individuals largely constitute a cabal of sanctimonious chairborne
warriors who prefer to do the heavy thinking while they let others do
the fighting and dying.
NEOCON JEWS CLAMOR FOR GOY BLOOD
So it is safe to say that much of the agitation to do
something about Iran comes from Israel and from American Jews. Indeed, I
would opine that most of the fury from Congress re Iran comes from the
same source, with AIPAC showering our Solons on the Potomac with “fact
sheets” explaining how Iran is worthy of annihilation because it has
pledged to “destroy Israel,” which is both a lie and an impossibility as
Tehran does not have the resources to carry out such a task. The AIPAC
lies are then picked up and replayed by an obliging media, where nearly
every “expert” who speaks about the Middle East on television and radio
or who is interviewed for newspaper stories is Jewish.
One might also add that neocons as a group were founded by
Jews and are largely Jewish, hence their universal attachment to the
state of Israel. They first rose into prominence when they obtained a
number of national security positions during the Reagan Administration
and their ascendancy was completed when they staffed senior positions in
the Pentagon and White House under George W. Bush. Recall for a moment
Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and Scooter Libby. Yes, all Jewish and all
conduits for the false information that led to a war that has spread and
effectively destroyed much of the Middle East. Except for Israel, of
course. Philip Zelikow,
also Jewish, in a moment of candor, admitted that the Iraq War, in his
opinion, was fought for Israel. [Zelikow was in charge of the 9-11
cover-up. --Makow]
Add to the folly a Jewish U.S. Ambassador to Israel who identifies with the most right-wing Israeli settler elements, a White House-appointed chief
negotiator who is Jewish and a Jewish son-in-law who is also involved
in formulating Middle East policy. Is anyone providing an alternative
viewpoint to eternal and uncritical support for Benjamin Netanyahu and
his kleptocratic regime of racist thugs? I think not.
KEEP ZIONISTS OUT OF POSITIONS OF INFLUENCE
There are a couple of simple fixes for the dominant
involvement of American Jews in foreign policy issues where they have a
personal interest due to their ethnicity or family ties. First of all,
don’t put them into national security positions involving the Middle
East, where they will potentially be conflicted. Let them worry instead
about North Korea, which does not have a Jewish minority and which was
not involved in the holocaust. This type of solution was, in fact,
somewhat of a policy regarding the U.S. Ambassador position in Israel.
No Jew was appointed to avoid any conflict of interest prior to 1995, an
understanding that was violated by Bill Clinton (wouldn’t you know it!)
who named Martin Indyk to the post. Indyk was not even an American
citizen at the time and had to be naturalized quickly prior to being
approved by congress.
Those American Jews who are strongly attached to Israel and
somehow find themselves in senior policy-making positions involving the
Middle East and who actually possess any integrity on the issue should
recuse themselves, just as any judge would do if he were presiding over a
case in which he had a personal interest. Any American should be free
to exercise first amendment rights to debate possible options regarding
policy, up to and including embracing positions that damage the United
States and benefit a foreign nation. But if he or she is in a position
to actually create those policies, he or she should butt out and leave
the policy generation to those who have no personal baggage.
(Left, the once-real Donald Trump)
For those American Jews who lack any shred of integrity, the
media should be required to label them at the bottom of the television
screen whenever they pop up, e.g. Bill Kristol is “Jewish and an
outspoken supporter of the state of Israel.” That would be kind-of-like a
warning label on a bottle of rat poison – translating roughly as
“ingest even the tiniest little dosage of the nonsense spewed by Bill
Kristol at your own peril.”
As none of the above is likely to happen, the only
alternative is for American citizens who are tired of having their
country’s national security interests hijacked by a group that is in
thrall to a foreign government to become more assertive about what is
happening. Shine a little light into the darkness and recognize who is
being diddled and by whom. Call it like it is. And if someone’s feelings
are hurt, too bad. We don’t need a war with Iran because Israel wants
one and some rich and powerful American Jews are happy to deliver.
Seriously, we don’t need it.
James Perloff "Rothschild Israel Narrative & Zionist Endtime Deception"
