The Republic vs. The Catholic Monarchy: The Will of the People vs. The Will of God
Walter Adams
“In the Legislative Assembly, the more violent revolutionaries had congregated, at first simply by chance, on the higher benches to the left of the president’s chair, from which they became known as “the Left” or “the Mountain.” (The persistence to this day of the former term, along with its opposite, “The Right,” is a forceful reminder of how much the legacy of the French Revolution is still with us.) Perhaps in a feeble attempt to diffuse political labels and hatreds, when the National Convention met, the president’s chair had been set up on the opposite side of the Riding School, so the high benches where the radicals had set were now on his right. But they held resolutely to their benches, and so marked had the political connotation of the term “the Left” already become that it did not matter to anyone that the Left in the National Convention was now physically on the right. The deputies opposite them were the Girondins, who at first had been the radicals, and were quite uncomfortable with their new role as conservatives. Those in between, because their seats were lower down, were known as “the Plain.” As they skulked lower and lower with the passing months in an increasingly desperate effort to keep out of sight and trouble, some wits began calling them ‘the Marsh.’ “
So shifted The Will of the People during the French Revolution. Rather,
one might say, so shifted The Dictatorship of The People through The
People’s representatives during the French Revolution. For “The People”
were now free of their Monarch and were duly “represented” by supposed
leaders proclaiming Liberty, Fraternity, and Equality! Those leaders of
The People knew what The People needed and implemented their program
through one of the most unmerciful dictatorial regimes in history. Poor
Louis XVI could not have even imagined using his Monarchical powers to
demonstrate such totalitarian control as did The People after they came
to power. No wonder Lenin, more than a century later, so admired the
French Revolutionaries. He was, as well, all about The People. You might
recall that in both revolutions, the French and the Russian, The People
executed their respective Monarchs (more or less with their families)
in favor of more “free” Republics.
What was once considered revolutionary (liberal, in modern jargon) in
the French scheme had come to be viewed over time as conservative. The
median continued to move leftward. Radical became more leftward radical,
while conservative shifted left and became… well… more leftward
radical. Eventually, the Girondins, those formerly considered heroically
revolutionary, had to run for the hills for now being too conservative
as those further to the left assumed more control of the apparatus that
would eventually yield The Reign of Terror. This Reign (as distinct from
the much kinder Reign of their former Catholic King) came complete with
the almost non-stop, up and down rhythm of guillotines for the
non-revolutionary People, including, and especially, those loyal to the
Catholic Church and the ancien régime. The revolutionaries, having
severed themselves from their Catholic King and Queen (Louis XVI and
Marie Antoinette), or, more literally, having severed the heads of their
Catholic King and Queen, had now set The People free. The Church with
her Monarchs would no longer tell The People what is right and what is
wrong. The People will be free to determine their own course.
Their freedom, however, was merely a freedom to drift into darkness in
the same manner that a boat tied to an anchor for safe-keeping is
“freed” during a storm to drift away, lost on the high seas to perish
(in a shipwreck of “democratic” totalitarianism). For this is the
historical record of The People every time they try to “free” themselves
from God (as represented through His Church), be that in the vulgar and
grotesque Sixties Revolution in America, the early 20th century
Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, the 18th century French Revolution, the
16th century Protestant Revolution, or even all the way back to the Adam
and Eve Revolution at the dawn of mankind.
“Freedom,” by turning the authentic order
of God on its head such that morality, i.e., determining what is right
and what is wrong, is dictated by “the Will of the People” from below
rather than by God from above, leads to anarchy and then to slavery. No
wonder God told Adam and Eve that they were free to eat of any of the
trees in the garden except for the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and
Evil. For, God, and God alone, establishes the authentic order for what
is right and what is wrong. Only by setting ourselves firmly in that
Divine Order do we then find our Freedom “to eat of the fruits of all
the other trees in the Garden.”
Therein is the issue and the subtle but
distinct point of separation between the Catholic Monarchy and the
Democratic Republic. Note that I am not saying, between the Catholic
Monarchy and Democracy, for there is no reason that the Monarchy cannot
hold dear to itself robust democracies at the state and local level. To
frame the issue as “Monarchy vs. Democracy” as so many do, is to frame
it poorly if not completely incorrectly. Democracy can exist in both
models. The issue has to do not with “Monarchy vs. Democracy” but with
“the Will of God vs. the Will of the People” as defined by the proper
order of things. This is fundamentally important. As we have seen in our
historical example, missing the proper order of things can lead one to a
life under tyranny, if one is not ultimately relieved from it all by
the guillotine in the hands of The People.
The issue between the Monarchy and the Republic, then, is one of
authentic order, not one of democratic freedom. This is the arch-issue
that has plagued mankind in its rebellious spirit from the moment we
began our walk in the Garden. God establishes what is right and what is
wrong (“You may eat of any of the trees in the Garden, except for the
Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil”). Within that scheme, which
comes to us from the Will of God above and not from The Will of the
People below, we find our true democratic freedoms (“You are free to eat
of any of the trees, except…”). The Catholic Monarchy most closely
adheres to this authentic order by establishing God’s law (as known
infallibly through His Church in matters of faith and morals) from the
top down, which allows for the proper development of societal norms and a
life-giving culture. Within those boundaries, we are free to exercise
our People’s Will joyfully in the rest of the Garden where God blesses
us.
The Republic, on the other hand, with its
Will of the People, decides that, like the falling Adam and Eve, it
will eat of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. The Will of the
People will become its own god. Abortion is fine because that is “the
Will of the People.” Homosexuality and same sex “marriage” is fine
because defining it such is “the Will of the People.” Shutting down
religious organizations or otherwise telling them how they must change
their beliefs in order to accommodate “The Will of the People” is fine
because that is, well, “the Will of the People.” Never mind God.
According to the Will of the People in a
Republic, God is whoever we wish him to be, and he supports whatever we
choose because that is the “Will of the People.” Thus, in the Republic,
God obeys the Will of the People rather than the other way around. That,
my friends, is not an authentic order. It is disorder. Is it any wonder
that Republics tend to fall into disordered tyranny?
The Catholic Monarchy, though as subject to illicit and disordered
tendencies in the individual Monarchs as in any human being, is,
however, fundamentally and objectively better structured to secure the
authentic order of freedom, that of God (through His authoritatively
teaching Church) deciding what is right and what is wrong, and then
leaving us “in the garden” (rather than being escorted out) to enjoy our
democratic freedoms (of all the trees, except…) within that framework.
We must first establish The Will of God as a higher authority than the
Will of the People. There we will find true freedom.
This is the rub between the Monarchy and
the Republic. There is where the Republic generally fails. It fails in
fulfilling exactly its purpose for which it supposedly exists, that is,
to make us free. Just ask the victims of the hippie generation, of the
Bolshevik Revolution, of the French Republic, of the Protestant
Revolution, and even of the Adam and Eve Revolution.
You might fairly retort that I should ask
the victims of the inquisition about my Catholic Monarchical model;
yet, I will answer that “inquisition” is clearly as much a secular tool
as a religious one and that our historical examples demonstrate that it
is far more dangerous in the hands of seculars than churchmen. The
Spanish Inquisition killed a few thousand through its most violent ten
years, while the French anti-Gods sent more than 40,000 to the chopping
block in Paris alone. We will not even mention Lenin, whose model took
the murderous secular inquisition to astonishing new levels.
I fondly remember my youthful days on the
High Plains in the great state of Oklahoma. The dogmas of the Republic I
learned made absolute sense at the time. The reason they made sense is
“The People” in our area were generally the most solid, trustworthy,
God-fearing, salt of the earth folk anywhere in the country. It was easy
for me to believe that the Will of the People was effectively the same
as the Will of God because most of these farmers, ranchers, small
business owners, and teachers were, in fact, holding fast to the
authentic order or things.
However, I did not realize at that time
how precarious, shifting, and amorphous was the general Will of the
People. Initially naive, I ultimately realized that in the great
Republic, where the Constitution was supposedly the safe-guard of the
People, the Constitution itself was subject to The People, and The
People are capable of changing their mood on any given day. I never
imagined at that time that a new day would come about where that
shifting mood would reveal such an anti-God, secular sentiment as we are
witnessing today in America. Yes, that day has changed. It has changed
in a big way. The Will of the People is thoroughly corrupted. The People
are eating once again from that forbidden tree.
What was it again that Our Savior told us
to pray? “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in
heaven…” In America, we have our own version: “The People’s Kingdom
come, The People’s will be done, in heaven as on earth…”
Things are disordered in the Republic. It
is time to restructure our government to a Catholic Monarchy such that
we agree to leave that one tree alone. Then, and only then, will we be
truly free to enjoy the fruits of all the other trees in the Garden.
TradCatKnight: 'The Superiority of Monarchy"