"And I beheld, and heard the voice of one eagle flying through the midst of heaven, saying with a loud voice: Woe, woe, woe to the inhabitants of the earth.... [Apocalypse (Revelation) 8:13]
Sunday, April 1, 2018
More Proof the Neo-SSPX "Accepts" Vatican II
More Proof the Neo-SSPX "Accepts" Vatican II
it is a fact that the Society now accepts Vatican II as a "Catholic Council". Yet this was not Archbishop Lefebvre's position. Here is another priest making some good points.
How the new SSPX Accepts Vatican II
March 13, 2018 by Father Pivert
Francis has just
dedicated the Monday of Pentecost to Mary Mother of the Church. The
Fraternity of Saint Pius X immediately reported the information and
subtly used it to report that Archbishop Lefebvre had rejoiced at the
proclamation of Mary as Mother of the Church by the Council. Like what
would be good things to accept in this council ...!
But the
Fraternity of Saint Pius X is careful not to mention that Archbishop
Lefebvre wrote this in 1965, that is to say, before the mischief of the
Council was finally revealed by Paul VI's trip to the United Nations,
the proclamation of religious freedom, the schema on the Church in the
modern world, the declaration recognizing a value of salvation to
non-Christian religions and Judaism, the rallying of Cardinal Ottaviani
and the dismantling of the Holy Office, the closing of the Council with
the proclamation of the cult of man.
Archbishop Lefebvre hoped
that these horrors would not happen, as he still hoped in 1987 that the
modernists would not try to kill Tradition by refusing him bishops.
All the conferences of Archbishop Lefebvre after the Council will denounce these errors.
The
Society of Saint Pius X enthusiastically quotes the affirmations of
Archbishop Lefebvre that the honor given to the Blessed Virgin is
necessarily opposed to any proclamation of ecumenism or religious
freedom.
Archbishop Lefebvre still hoped that the conciliar
Fathers who had just proclaimed Mary Mother of the Church could not
contradict each other by proclaiming ecumenism and religious freedom.
But he had to disillusion at the fourth session which proved the
duplicity of the Council. This duplicity is its own mark, as it is the
mark of all revolutionaries. The Council was not a classic treason, it
was a subversion. Subversion of words, to allow that of ideas, of the
Church, of the whole faith.
All the conferences of Archbishop
Lefebvre after the council will denounce this subversion. The Fraternity
of Saint Pius X is not honest in not reporting words like these:
"We
did not succeed in purifying the Council of the modernist spirit that
had penetrated it, because it was those who had this modernist spirit
who were the editors of what was presented to us. But when a whole set
of documents is written with a false mind, with a modernist spirit, it
is practically impossible to expurgate it completely. It should be
completely recomposed to give it a Catholic spirit. (Conference, Ecône,
Dec. 14, 1978)
Or these writings: "It is therefore a strict duty
for any priest wishing to remain a Catholic to separate from this
conciliar Church, as long as it does not find the tradition of the
Magisterium of the Church and the Catholic faith. "( Spiritual Journey ,
The Divine Life, 29)" The [Council] is the greatest disaster of this
century and of all past ages since the founding of the Church. ( They
discouraged Him , Introduction)
If they had a little filial
piety, the superiors of the Society of Saint Pius X could point out the
miracle operated by Mary Mother of the Church, that of having aroused
Archbishop Lefebvre to save the faith perverted by the Council.
My
conclusion is that this seemingly trivial article of the Saint Pius X
Fraternity is the sure sign that the Society of Saint Pius X wants to
not only rally but accept the Council. Oh, yes, she will accept it by
pouting, making reservations like Bishop Schneider, but she will accept
it. His superiors have already accepted it.
