Wednesday, November 22, 2017

More Catholic Than the Pope?

More Catholic Than the Pope?
By:  Eric Gajewski
“We are in the worst crisis in the Church ever because we are getting more near the arrival of the False Prophet and Antichrist…


I am sure many of you faithful Catholics have heard this loose but impotent argument coming from the Novus ordites blindly (or willfully) following Vatican II.  Do you think you are more Catholic than the Pope?  As if to state that a Pope could not lapse into error or heresy.  As if he were some sort of robot without free will.  God will protect him (they say)!  Funny, don’t recall reading that infallibly anywhere?  Well, if we take a look at our past we see a good number of examples of fallen away priests and even prelates.  Scripture, Tradition and Catholic prophecy (including approved Marian messages) all indicate that there would be an apostasy in the Catholic Church which would ultimately end in the biblical False Prophet and Antichrist.  Several Cardinals speaking on the 3rd secret of Fatima said the Apostasy begins AT THE TOP.  How many Catholics actually know that?  Very few!  How many upon hearing this actually believe it?  Even FEWER and yet they must in order to remain Catholic (concerning the great falling away).  The early Church Father speak to Rome falling away and eventually the Church going underground.  Nay, the path of false obedience has lead the many “identifying” as Catholic out on to a new road called “Apostasy”.  I want to discuss this argument of “Do you know better  than the Pope and other arguments within”.





Right to resist.  The Popes, prelates and priests are not robots.  How many times have I heard this general argument.  The Church cannot error!  Now, on the surface this is true but what about churchmen?  The answer is they can error and even lapse into heresy.  In fact, during the Great Apostasy soon to come the majority of clergy will lapse into full blown apostasy and become Apostates.  Catholics no more once the heresy becomes at least formal (objectively speaking). 

Do these people forget that every human being has free will and that they can actually choose false doctrine?  

My friends, it is not optional to resist a priest teaching heresy.  Not only must they be publicly “called out” they also must be avoided (if obstinate).  For where there is “poison” a Catholic cannot be as Archbishop Lefebvre (founder of the SSPX) rightly points out.   We are not only dealing with heresy in our times but a diabolical conspiracy to bring about a “New Age Religion’ onto the scene (the majority of the principles are in place now).   The question I will ask in return is “are these priests more Catholic than already defined Tradition!”  We show them their errors (as I have) from what the Church has infallibly taught beforehand and they simply ignore and keep the path of false obedience.  They ignore, block and call me names but this just change the reality they are material heretics (in the very least).  One priest on facebook actually said to his lemming followers that I need to go to Confession.  

And all of heaven rolled their eyes.  

I have had more than my share of “dialogue” with these Vatican II priests over the years and it truly boils down to that.  Ignorance and or/pride.



More Catholicity in the Greek/Russian Orthodox Church than the Conciliar Church.  That is a reality my friends.  Since Vatican II the Faith has been changed to adopt to a new one as Dr. Hesse points out in his lectures.  This new faith, has, as its basis, the principles of Masonism at work.  It is the building of this new city of man wherein soon the False Prophet and Antichrist will take over.  

At this point, it is important to remind everyone, that, the Second Vatican Council, was never infallible and perhaps will never stand as a “ecumenical council” given its errors and heresies.  

It is very similar to the Synod of Pistoia (late 1700s) which was condemned by Pius XI (even had a vernacular Mass).  Point blank…it was a “robber council”.  This masking of proper doctrine to suit another is only preparing men “from every supposed religion” to embrace the Antichrist.  Thus, Vatican II ecumenism is heretical.  It does not teach there is a need of conversion but rather it is rooted in Masonic dialogue, tolerance, convergence, coexistence etc.  So I can boldly state, on the basis, of this one heresy, you, ought not be, in any Vatican II church, where the priest nods their head in agreement to the Masonic madness.  Just as one ought not be in any schismatic sect a faithful Catholic these days in order to please Jesus must not be found in those buildings teaching Vatican II (it is in material schism).



The Faith is the measure of the Popes not vice versa.  The notion that a priest or Pope would automatically keep the Faith is silly.  There is Tradition, that is, what we have to know to stay Catholic.  If a Pope, prelate or priest wants to contradict Tradition than we are told to resist and avoid.  

The notion a Pope can say anything because he is Pope is a heresy.  

It is Pope worship and the majority of false traditionalists fall into this category.  Yes, but by leaving those buildings that say “Catholic” on them you are committing mortal sin and they will say you have left the Church!  Seriously?  Have these people heard of the Arian crisis wherein nearly 9 out of every 10 bishops was a heretic to be avoided?  Pope Liberius even sided with the heretics of his time?  Was St. Athanasius “outside the Church”?  No, therefore it is those pointing the finger at us who have left the Church even though they remain in churches “appearing” to be “Catholic”.  

Read the book AA-1025 and you will see the Masonic/Marxist anti-apostles wanted Rome to become Protestant and they got it.

Protestant argument.  They see what is going on in the Conciliar Church and say this.  “You see this is why I choose a personal relationship with Christ rather than a church!”  They too, say this, as if, churchmen do not have free will.  Christ guaranteed the Church would last until He comes again, however, he didn’t say that every last churchmen would keep and hold this Faith.  Protestants don’t have the true Faith therefore they don’t “have” Christ as they seem to think.  Furthermore, Christ said shortly before His return that FEW would hold the Faith.  It is a similar argument I have heard in the past in my ministries where I hear “that priest is a sick pedophile”.  Guess what, I can find worst sins in your heretical church I assure you.  Not a great argument at all and can be easily refuted.  There is one Catholic Church that Christ founded, period.  It has been infiltrated by Her enemies to suit the Luciferian doctrine, that is, that man sits on his own throne.  Just wait till the Great apostasy wherein men apostatize and formally reject Christ by taking the mark of the beast.


What is the problem?  One of the main problems is that the Conciliarist Popes think that Tradition can evolve as Dr. Hesse rightly points out.  They believe doctrine can pastorally suit the times.  And boy have we seen this especially with Francis’s latest debacle.  St. Anthony the Great said once you say churchmen trying to adapt to the times then head for the hills and many are.  It is a sure sign of the end.  This is where we could break down evolution altogether but I don’t have the time.  Just know that the Conciliar Popes all have supported evolution which is bogus.  They are evolving doctrine again to suit the coming New Age Religion of Man wherein anything goes under the Man of Lawlessness (objectively speaking).



Theoretically speaking.  Can a Pope teach material heresy?  ABSOLUTELY… as the greatest of all theologian’s state (not Eric).  Once this is recognized than we must resist and avoid until he corrects himself (whomever it may be).  The problem is the majority are already following heresy and have been for some time.  These people must come to websites like my own and humble themselves to learn what was taught before Vatican II.  But due to pride the majority don’t which is the underlying sin to modernism for those scoring at home.  Could a true Pope be a formal heretic and remain Pope.  NOPE! Says the Faith and thus there are varying camps in the Church trying to prove that reality.  I do not prescribe to Sedevacantism but am very compassionate towards those sensible ones who realize they cant force that opinion infallibly upon another.  Having said that we are in the worst crisis in the Church ever because we are getting more near to the arrival of the False Prophet and Antichrist.  It makes sense.



Solution?  Prayer, sacrifice and baby steps.  You are not going to convince anyone following Vatican II that they are following the principles of a new religion overnight.  It is up to them of course to take the baby steps necessary to learn but it is also up to us to pray for them and help guide them when we can.  Dr. Hesse rightfully said of the Conciliar Cardinals and Bishops, that, “they are useful idiots”, who didn’t even bother to read the documents of Vatican II (that they were signing off on.)  This is what happens, when, Catholics don’t care about doctrine, which, in the end, means not caring about the Faith.  Or in some cases many confuse Masonism and Catholicism altogether.  Pope St. Pius X warned us of the new apostle of Vatican II which means he too was more “Catholic” than the Conciliar Popes.  I stand upon the firm ground of Tradition.  The Conciliar Church does not stand upon Tradition and ultimately will “morph” into the Apostate Church of Darkness (Blessed Emmerick’s writings)

It is important to rehash our understanding as Catholics on the issue of Papal Infallibility hence the talk below.  Fr. Hesse has credentials like no other and here he explains the true notion of Papal Infallibility.  Let us face it the infiltrated Vatican has turned into a circus (literally).  The “doctrines” are sweeter than the donuts (which are seducing the many) that you will find in the Conciliar concession stand.  We must resist and wait for the Storm to pass. More Catholic than the Pope you say?  Absolutely….



ADDENDUM (QUOTES SUPPORTING RESISTANCE):
Fr. Francisco de Vitoria, O.P. states: "A Pope must be resisted who publicly destroys the Church. What should be done when the Pope, because of his bad customs, destroys the Church? What should be done if the Pope wanted, without reason, to abrogate Positive Law?"

His answer is: "He would certainly sin; he should neither be permitted to act in such fashion nor should he be obeyed in what was evil; but he should be resisted with a courteous reprehension. Consequently, ... if he wanted to destroy the Church or the like, he should not be permitted to act in that fashion, but one would be obliged to resist him. The reason for this is that he does not have the power to destroy. Therefore, if there is evidence that he is doing so, it is licit to resist him. The result of all this is that if the Pope destroys the Church by his orders and actions, he can be resisted and the execution of his mandates prevented." 

Fr. Francisco Suarez, S.J., also defends this position: "If [the Pope] gives an order contrary to good customs, he should not be obeyed; if he attempts to do something manifestly opposed to justice and the common good, it will be licit to resist him; if he attacks by force, by force he can be repelled, with a moderation appropriate to a just defense." 

St. Robert Bellarmine, the great paladin of the Counter-Reformation, maintains: "Just as it is licit to resist a Pontiff that aggresses the body, it is also licit to resist one who aggresses the souls or who disturbs civil order, or, above all, one who attempts to destroy the Church. I say that it is licit to resist him by not doing what he orders and preventing his will from being executed. It is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts proper to a superior." 

Fr. Cornelius a Lapide, S.J., argues: "Superiors can, with humble charity, be admonished by their inferiors in the defense of truth; that is what St. Augustine, St. Cyprian, St. Gregory, St. Thomas and others declare about this passage (Gal. 2:11). ... St. Augustine wrote (Epistula 19 ad Hieronymum): ‘By teaching that superiors should not refuse to be reprehended by inferiors, St. Peter gave posterity an example more rare and holier than that of St. Paul as he taught that, in the defense of truth and with charity, inferiors may have the audacity to resist superiors without fear.’"

RELATED:
http://www.catholicapologetics.info/modernproblems/vatican2/resist.htm



 COMMENT BELOW!

***AFTER each blog going forward (on the website itself) you will see a section that says "comment". You can click that and then make a post "anonymously" or use your google+ account....if you select anonymous you can then simply add your name to the top of your message to identify yourself...COMMENTING NOW PERMITTED
If I get booted off of social media this is a way to stay in contact…




Donations: Please get behind TradCatKnight financially if you feel you have benefited from the material I present.  I appreciate all your prayers and support!  I also appreciate the letters coming in as well!  For CASH contributions please email me at apostleofmary@hotmail.com for the mailing address.

121 comments:

  1. LET US GET THE DISCUSSION GOING HERE...

    ReplyDelete
  2. What a grave responsibility that Popes, Bishops and Priests have to care for souls. The teachings from the Saints and Holy Popes in this article should be well known by all the faithful.

    If it was, we would not be in this faith crises situation to begin with. That being said; we as the Faithful have a grave duty to pray and do penance in order to obtain the graces to be given by God to our Prelates who lead us. Until more of the Faithful turn to prayer and away from the world, things will get worse.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I know of several Catholics who say that they are lovers of Tradition and the Latin Mass but go to a diocesan church that offers one Latin Mass on Sunday, or go to an FSSP type church, but when you point out to them that the conciliar church can yank their Latin Mass out from under them at any time, and that the priests do not reject Vatican II, they refuse to believe that there is anything wrong with that. I pray for them daily.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. YES FALSE TRADS ARE REALLY MATERIAL HERETICS....MOST WHO IDENTIFY AS TRADS REALLY ARENT DUE TO IMPROPER DOCTRINE

      Delete
  4. This is WORSE than the Arian Crisisby far. I am ready for whatever Lord

    ReplyDelete
  5. This article is spot on. I love Fr. Hesse. The modernist’s hide behind a false “hermeneutics of continuity”. I believe they are being purposefully deceitful. What about you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I BELIEVE SOME OF THEM ARE IN ON THIS APOSTASY DELIBERATELY YES

      Delete
  6. Glad I found this page. Some of the other sites are way to soft these days. It does seem this apostasy is coming to a head doesn’t it?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anyone know of a traditional catholic community preparing for the times ahead?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I DONT THINK YOU WILL FIND ADVERTISEMENTS AND GIVEN HOW ONE PRIEST CAN CHANGE ON DOCTRINE DIFFICULT TO SAY WHERE TO GO

      Delete
  8. Do people actually doubt what Cardinal Ciappiand Odi said on the real third secret of Fatima? I mean do they think they were lying?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Jesus said Few would hold the Faith in the end and I think we see where this is going, thanks Eric

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hope you have a blessed Thanksgiving! TCK is my first stop everyday online, George K

    ReplyDelete
  11. Just when I thought I might have a good thanksgiving, just kidding. Do not despair God is in control.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you for allowing comments Eric. I realize you have a lot of haters and detractors so I thank you. How have you been,Caroline D

    ReplyDelete
  13. Rome will lose the Faith and become the Seat of Antichrist ~Lasalette

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ugh! Any idea when the Vatican/world will disclose that the “aliens” are here as you suggest. I can see it going that way now more than ever? Will Trump disclose too?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Fr. Gruner (rest his soul) always spoke about false obedience. Archbishop Lefebvretoo. There are too many who just don’t want to see the obvious probably why God is going to punish us

    ReplyDelete
  16. According to these modernists they do seem to think the Pope is infallible in anything he says. Maybe that’s why they wear Super Francis T-shirts as if he is a super hero, Katy

    ReplyDelete
  17. Eric can I get your address I want to send you something?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Maybe they will “canonize” him soon?

    ReplyDelete
  19. The modernists are on a collision course with God’s wrath. Hell awaits them but they don’t even believe in hell as traditionally defined. Adam

    ReplyDelete
  20. I am so tired of hearing the name Francis. These modernists need slapped upside the face like Pope St. Pius X said.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Just found your website via youtube. I am enjoying everything thus far, thank you

    ReplyDelete
  22. Archbishop Lefebvre, pray for us. If he were alive what would he say?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Some modernist priest actually told you to go to confession for showing him what the Church teaches before Vatican II. HAHA…that is hilarious

    ReplyDelete
  24. Is the Byzantine church okay to go to?

    ReplyDelete
  25. I am glad you made mention that the Second Vatican Council was not infallible. So many people do not understand this. When do you think Vatican II will be made “null and void”?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Synod of Pistoia condemned- http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12116c.htm

    ReplyDelete
  27. I passed a car on the street today with a coexistence sticker- perfect follower for the coming antichrist

    ReplyDelete
  28. Who is your favorite Pope and why Eric?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. POPE ST PIUS X...FIRM YET GENTLE...EXPOSED THESE HERETICS WE SEE NOW

      Delete
  29. Is the new radio show still going to be up Friday? Hope you have a great Thanks giving

    ReplyDelete
  30. Sadly, I know too many Pope Worshipers in my own family. They don’t realize they are defending modernism, freemasonry and Protestantism while calling themselves
    Catholic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. THEY ARE EVERYWHERE ITS TOUGH HAVING A SERIOUS THEOLOGICAL CONVERSATION WITH THEM AS EMOTIONAL AS THEY ARE

      Delete
  31. This sums it up- “They have the buildings we have the Faith”. I will die by this quote.

    ReplyDelete
  32. The modernists love to misuse words in order to deceive the unknowing into accepting their heresies.

    ReplyDelete
  33. On top of reading AA-105 also read Bella Dodd’s School of Darkness.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The PEDOS are largely Masons and Marxists! Jennifer

    ReplyDelete
  35. This is literally my third attempt trying to comment. It is somewhat difficult. Any ways. When do you see Benedict XVI fleeing Rome as you suggest? What time frame?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. COULD BE SOON...PERHAPS A CELESTIAL SIGN WILL COME SOON

      Delete
  36. I tried to find that facebook group you mentioned but no luck, please advise?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.facebook.com/groups/1423605931036182/

      Delete
  37. Glad you are on podcast now. What topics are you covering this week?

    ReplyDelete
  38. It is truly time to head for the hills and I mean it. Bill W

    ReplyDelete
  39. What catechism do you recommend?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Does Dr. Hesse have any books I could read? I am new to this, thank you in advance

    ReplyDelete
  41. Most “Catholics” do not properly understand what the church teaches on Papal Infallibility. It is no wonder so many of them think the Pope can say whatever they want

    ReplyDelete
  42. What a time to be alive. I thank God for the grace to see through this deception. I pray harder for my friends and family who are not quite there yet. We have to be humble but in charity point out all the heresies.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Look at how many dioceses are actually celebrating Luther now? We are in a free for all fall now. Vatican II wasn’t enough for these men of novelty.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Is the condemnation against women being priests infallible?

    ReplyDelete
  45. Thank you for all you do Eric, TCK is the best.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Stopping in to show my support. Do not back down everyone. Let us not let Jesus down.

    ReplyDelete
  47. How does Bishop Fellay not see through the Francis false mercy and humble routine?

    ReplyDelete
  48. This is funny because I had a few people tell me the same thing last week. You think you know better than the Pope. How blind

    ReplyDelete
  49. I suggest everyone here begin to take prepping more seriously going into the New Year. I get a bad feeling about 2018 especially the economy.

    ReplyDelete
  50. St Athanasius and his followers did not leave the church, they were excommunicated for believieng in the divinity of Jesus. Archbishop Lefebvre walked away from the church and consecrated bishops outside of Rome's authority. These are two very different things. Both people are defenders of the faith but the way in which they defended it was different. Also like Luther (Martin) before him, some of Marcel Lefebvre's followers seem to have gone further than he initially intended. Many trads haven't even studied he Arian crisis for themselves, they just listen to what the sspx tells them about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FALSE! HE DID SO OUT OF A STATE OF NECCESITY AND CANON LAW SUPPOORTED THAT DECISION THE EXCOMMUNICATIONS WERE INVALID AND ILLICIT. WHAT HOGWASH YOU MODERNIST

      Delete
    2. Read what I wrote again, I'm referring to the excommunication of St. Athanasius not Lefebvre! You have a good day :)

      Delete
    3. LEFEBVRE NEVER LEFT THE CHURCH MR MODERNIST!

      Delete
    4. Canon lawyer Pete Vere;

      After discussing the life and history of Abp. Marcel Lefebvre in his article, Vere addresses the "state of necessity" argument put forth by the SSPX to justify its disobedience to the Holy See. Archbishop Lefebvre claimed a state of necessity justified his illicit consecrations of four bishops in 1988, using canons 1323 and 1324, which provide that in emergency cases, the canonical penalty that attaches to certain prohibited actions either ceases to apply or is lessened.

      But the Holy See disagreed with his assessment. The Pope rejected the idea that a state of emergency existed such that it warranted Lefebvre's illicit consecration of bishops without the Pope's permission.

      This is an important point in resolving the dispute between Abp. Lefebvre and Pope John Paul II, for where there exists a difference in interpreting the application of canon law, canon 16 states clearly: "Laws are authentically interpreted by the legislator and by that person to whom the legislator entrusts the power of authentic interpretation."

      Lefebvre was fully aware that the Holy Father — the highest legislator in the Church — had rejected the archbishop's interpretation of canon law. It is the Pope who has final say in interpreting canon law — yet not only did Lefebvre reject this fact, he also discounted the Holy Father's interpretation of the canons in question, placing himself — Marcel Lefebvre — in the position of supreme legislator, preferring his own personal interpretation of canon law over that of the Pope.

      Therefore, because the idea of a state of necessity in Lefebvre's circumstances was rejected by Pope John Paul II, I came to realize that I could not legitimately invoke the state of necessity canons in defense of Lefebvre's consecration of bishops without Rome's permission.

      Delete
    5. The canon lawyer stated is a heretical modernist like rome is? Just like you are? So why should any faithful Catholic accept such an answer , all 3 of you are heretics so your assessmnets are meaningless when you dont have the proper norm of Faith. Jp 2 was one of the worst popes we have ever had and taught too many heresies to keep up with and you take his particular judgement serious? You are all heretics quit commenting it will only be removed....you need prayer friend you are outside the church objectively speaking

      Delete
    6. anyone following the vatican 2 new religion has objectively speaking put themselves outside the church. You follow a new religion and state Lefebvre was in error - you all are nuts Pope included, end of thread:)

      Delete
    7. CANON HESSE AND FR. kRAMER COVER WHY jP2 DID EVEN KNOW HIS OWN CANON LAW AND STATE HOW THESE EXCOMMUNICATIONS ARE INVALID AND ILLICIT
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vJ0HP5ZMXE

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    9. i said i dont pray it as often as i should meaning i havent been saying it 3 times a day which is probably twice more than you. Jp2 was a a material heretic and was no saint a future pope will have to revisit these fraudlaent canonizations. You are a haeretic and void of Gods grace and further comments due to your pride will be deleted, praying for you my modernist friend!
      you see how your comment was removed? lets see how more prideful you want to be heretic

      Delete
  51. Matt.24, 15 - 35

    “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’[a] spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand— 16 then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. 17 Let no one on the housetop go down to take anything out of the house. 18 Let no one in the field go back to get their cloak. 19 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! 20 Pray that your flight will not take place in winter or on the Sabbath. 21 For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now—and never to be equaled again.

    22 “If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened. 23 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it. 24 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 25 See, I have told you ahead of time.

    26 “So if anyone tells you, ‘There he is, out in the wilderness,’ do not go out; or, ‘Here he is, in the inner rooms,’ do not believe it. 27 For as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. 28 Wherever there is a carcass, there the vultures will gather.

    29 “Immediately after the distress of those days

    “‘the sun will be darkened,
    and the moon will not give its light;
    the stars will fall from the sky,
    and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’[b]
    30 “Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth[c] will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory.[d] 31 And he will send his angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.

    32 “Now learn this lesson from the fig tree: As soon as its twigs get tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near. 33 Even so, when you see all these things, you know that it[e] is near, right at the door. 34 Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. 35 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.

    Pray God Bless

    ReplyDelete
  52. John Douglas (MacArthur) Michael(Archangel) TuttleNovember 23, 2017 at 10:02 AM

    I attend the traditional Mass in Columbus Ohio at Holy Family parish which is located in downtown Columbus and is a diocesan Catholic Church. We Catholics faithful to tradition are not about to let the modernists force us out of the Catholic Churches that have been built in our diocese with the money donated by our parents and grandparents. We have 14 priests in our diocese who can and do say the Traditional Mass and we have written our Bishop and told him that we intend to spread the Latin Mass to every parish in our diocese. We are in the process of doing just that! Join the battle! Let's get militant and throw these heretics out of our Churches! The Mexican Christeros should be our model! Viva Christo Rey!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. why would you want to attend a church that follows vatican 2? cant commune with those who do..you can fight outside the church but shouldnt be attending their sacraments

      Delete
    2. John Douglas (MacArthur) Michael(Archangel) TuttleNovember 23, 2017 at 10:36 AM

      do you think that the traditional latin mass offered by a validly ordained priest is a sacrament of the novus ordo church

      Delete
    3. the novus ordo sacraments are doubtful cant approach doubtful sacraments secondly the question is whether something is licit or not. The conciliar church is loaded with heresy cant be communing in those buildings, worshipping together with those folk

      Delete
    4. Eric, If you lived near a church that offered the Novus Ordo mass, and you learned that there is a person who frequent this church to steal the euacharist for desecration and black masses, what would you do? Would you report it and stop it? Or Would you say, oh those are doubtful sacraments, no problem?

      Delete
    5. I WOULDNT BE NEAR ANY HERETIC. THEY ARE TO BE AVOIDED. ONE COULD NEVER KNOW THE ATTENTION OF THE PRIEST SO ITS POSSIBLE IT STILL COULD BE INVALID. CATHOLICS SHOULDNT BE IN HERETICAL BUILDINGS WOULD ELIMINATE THE PROBLEM MUCH LIKE CATHOLICS CANT BE IN ANY RUSSIAN ORTHODOX BUILDING WHICH HAVE VALID SACRAMENTS

      Delete
  53. John Douglas (MacArthur) Michael(Archangel) TuttleNovember 23, 2017 at 12:13 PM

    Dear Eric,

    A traditional Latin Mass offered by a validly ordained priest in a 100 year old Catholic Church in a 110 year old Catholic diocese is a valid, sanctifying grace producing, true Catholic Mass. We who attend these Masses abhor all of the disorder that has been fostered in Catholic parishes around the world by the agents of Freemasonry who have infiltrated our Catholic Churches and are working diligently to bring the Church to ruin. There is no such thing as a conciliar church. There is only the one true Church of Christ - One,Holy,Catholic and Apostolic - outside of which there is no salvation! That Church is suffering and disfigured now just like Our Blessed Lord Jesus Christ. We Catholics who still believe all that the Catholic Church believes and has taught through the ages will, with God's help, prevail over these heretics and usurpers - but from inside the Catholic Churches that have been stolen by the heretical clergy, not outside the Church where there is no salvation. WE RESIST. The true Faith will be preserved. We will not run away from the CROSS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. any church teaching vatican 2 is a heretical church to be avoided. There is more catholicity in a russian orthodox church than in a vatican 2 conciliar church. The diocese mass has a heretical priest. Again your theology is flawed. You cannot be in HERETICAL buildings says the Faith!

      Delete
  54. Yes, my daughter living outside Pittsburg relates the same type of thing! They recently turned out en FORCE at the Cathedral! As eric reminds us, the Archbishop never left the Church! There are ways to be truly Catholic in the binds we are placed in. Reclaiming the buildings with the Tridentine Mass and solid Catholic teaching is certainly one! "Chapels" good as well!

    ReplyDelete
  55. These Independent Traditional Dominicans of the Holy Face were able to buy the historic Sacred Heart Church in Lawrence Mass. Was about to be let go. Instead they resotred the Novus Ordo insides to match the Traditional outside! The "Dominican Rite lives! It happens! http://www.willingshepherds.net/

    ReplyDelete
  56. It takes much prayer, contemplation, and thoughtful research to reach the conclusion of your post, Eric. I would have to admit if it was not by God's grace, loyalty to Christ, and the amazing workings of the Holy Spirit, I am not sure that I would be there myself. We need to be unwavering in our fidelity to the beliefs of our Fathers. We cannot compromise. And we have to avoid those faithful to Vatican II, whether they be local dioceses or local religious orders. It is absolutely essential in order for us to faithfully pass the truth to the future, for Rome, our beautiful harlot, has compromised and is plotting for our destruction. All traditionalist, pseudo or real, need to realize that those in Rome want to corral us in and destroy us, where ever we may go to mass or for sacraments. The communist agenda has intentionally infiltrated all camps, all traditionalists. They want all the data for who are on their rolls for which they will reserve a special fema cell and guillotine for or at least that is what it seems they are preparing. And we in turn need to see the present and future for what it is and could be. We may have to disappear in the wind, retire to impasseable peaks, hide. We will not have the consolation of our Tradition and we need to prepare for what could come. Katheleen Keating has not disappeared without reason. I believe she has met the enemy and understands how evil and dangerous he is and what he is preparing for. You are greatly helping many of us prepare, Eric. In the end though, it will be up to each individual and God's grace, who will be saved and who will perish. Keep up the fight, go to confession (just not to a Novo Ordo or compromised priest), and save the saveable.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Tracatknight,
    So,why is the Shaft of Satans penis in Vatican Square? Why when in Audience Hall are you looking into the eyes of the Serpent? Cain would be proud!
    The head sodomite in Rome is both foolish, and as foretold in Scripture, has become an Idol: Zechariah 11:15,17







    ReplyDelete