Siscoe Saga....
Fr. Kramer
Siscoe, says "a traditional priest" (anonymous), "refuted" what he
claims to be my "central argument" -- but con-artist Siscoe does not
say what (according to him) is my "central argument" (!) So, the
anonymous priest also allegedly "agrees" with Siscoe's unstated
"refutation" of my unspecified "central argument"; and all this clownery
which says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING proves that my unspecified "central
argument" is an ERROR !!!
Siscoe, has said NOTHING -- yet he expects people to believe on blind faith that his UNSTATED ARGUMENT refutes my UNSPECIFIED "CENTRAL ARGUMENT". Siscoe is plainly hysterical.
Siscoe, has said NOTHING -- yet he expects people to believe on blind faith that his UNSTATED ARGUMENT refutes my UNSPECIFIED "CENTRAL ARGUMENT". Siscoe is plainly hysterical.