False Friends of Tradition
By: Eric Gajewski
Everyone seems to have a varying
opinion on who holds “Tradition”. The
ultimate question is that which pertains to the Second Vatican Council. Does this Council correspond as a whole to
Tradition or not? The answer to those
who have studied Modernism and Masonry of course is no. The others are simply ignorant or simply
“hold on” to something that isn’t there.
There are many false friends of Tradition who do not want to be labeled
as such but it is truth. Quite frankly
anyone (mainstream media or otherwise) who labels us as heretics/schismatics or
Lefebvrists simply aren’t Catholic at all and this is the truth of the
situation. Archbishop Lefebvre said we
must avoid (cannot commune with them) such groups/persons because of their infidelity to Tradition and now
we have compromiser Bishop Fellay suggesting that we say something different
than the Archbishop. Let us examine.
At this point in the game in order
to be truly holding on to Tradition one must be rejecting all of the errors.
True friends of Tradition must reject the novelties and heresies in the Council and those subsequently taught by the
Vatican II Popes but also must reject the Council specifically. The Neo-SSPX, ICK, FSSP and the others do not
do as such therefore they are false friends of tradition objectively speaking.
Archbishop Lefebvre said it was poisonous to get caught up in these groups
still making excuse for the council but now the Neo-SSPX tries to put a new spin
on who the Archbishop truly was. As a side
note, there was a recent report by Pseudo Traditionalist Sandro Magister that
the Neo-SSPX “likes” Francis in spite of all his hellish heresy. It is such delusion in which these pseudo
traditionalists rest in. I, personally
do not “like” anyone who is openly destroying the Catholic Faith. I love them in the sense I will pray and
suffer for their eyes to be open but these Modernists are sending souls to hell
and these pseudo trads are simply accomplices.
Is it sufficient to obtain the title
of “traditionalist” otherwise known as Catholic by simply going to the Latin
Mass? Absolutely, not! Our Faith is always about doctrine
first. The Second Vatican Council does
not correspond to our Catholic Faith but rather a modernist’s new one. The Second Vatican Council does not
correspond to our Gospel but rather the Sillonist’s as Pope St. Pius X
warned. These people whether Pope,
prelate, priest or laity following the Second Vatican Council are simply not
Catholic (objectively speaking). The Social Justice Program of Vatican II is
the same as the New Age Maitreya’s. The
problem of not knowing the difference between the Novus Ordo Religion of
Vatican II and the Catholic Religion still remains the main problem.
And so while the Pseudo
traditionalist’s still try and fit in to something not Catholic (many of them
still attending the new Mass) real Catholics who can see clearly as eagles keep
exposing and keep their distance from the poison. There is overwhelming evidence that Bishop
Fellay is a pseudo traditionalist and the direction the Neo-SSPX has taken the
last few years is only proof. We have
uncovered his errors enough here at TradCatKnight. The point of this short piece is to once
again reaffirm that the majority who label themselves “traditionalist” or one
who holds to the Tradition of the Church simply are not and do not. It is
painful to hear for those who do not agree but unfortunately it is in our
disagreement on Doctrine and often times over the New Mass which will keep us
from you and for good reason (in light of knowing compromise is grievous sin).
Father Gruner once spoke of the “false friends of Fatima” and now I speak of
all these “false friends of Tradition” who do not help the Church but only harm
it in the end.
