Police State: Parents Release Video Of What TSA Did To 10-Yr-Old Daughter, People Are FURIOUS
This blog is LOADED with the latest as it relates to the Police State activity. Orwell's 1984 coming to fruition
Kevin Payne, from San Diego, used his cell phone to video the encounter on Dec. 30 at the Raleigh-Durham International Airport.
“My dad was making funny faces silly faces in the mirror and I felt like screaming the whole time,” Payne’s daughter Vendela told NBC San Diego.
“I just kept it as calm, cool, compliant as possible, and she followed suit,’ Payne told San Diego Union Tribune. “Deep down I was absolutely fuming, but I knew letting emotions out was only going to worsen the situation for everybody.”
The YouTube Payne posted of the pat down has gone viral with over 70,000 views. In it, the father added descriptions on the screen to explain how the TSA agent kept going over the same parts of his daughter’s body multiple times.
“I know it’s to keep everybody on the plane safe, but she kept patting me down,” the 10-year-old told NBC. “Pat down, pat down. It was like, over and over.”
“In all, the pat-down and other extra screenings took about an hour, Payne said. The only way the family made it onto the plane was because it was delayed,” NBC San Diego reported.
Nico Melendez, a TSA spokesman, provided a statement to the San Diego Union-Tribune, which read: “Since pat-down screening is conducted to determine whether prohibited items are concealed under clothing, sufficient pressure must be applied in order to ensure detection.”
Payne is not persuaded. “The only difference between a standard adult pat-down and the search of his child was that the search of Vendela took almost twice as long as it probably should have,” he said.
10 Year Old Girl Aggressively Patted Down by TSA. Does this look right to You?
Secret Space Weapons Program Exposed as Ultimate Police State
Breaking: Retired Officer Leaks Major Intel On Civilian Camp Preparations Happening Now in California! Jade Helm Phase II and the Invasion
By Lisa Haven
In the video below YouTuber Paul Begley
claims he has received crucial information from a retired officer in
the San Francisco Bay area, who has just leaked some critical intel
about a coming civilian containment camp in the California area. These
camps can be used to round up political dissidents, and while they claim
it can be used for the backlash of El Nino and other storms, the
officer reveals that that’s not the purpose considering the details that
surround this covert camp.
I believe this is one video you’re going to want to see, and either way, this is your official warning…
As the chaos ensues globally, the elite are preparing for civilian interment and gun confiscations. If you don’t conform with the regime, you will be instantly interred and more than likely questioned, tortured and whatever else they deem necessary. If you are a Christian, gun owner, patriot or veteran, you can rest assured that they have a place for you at the FEMA camp.
Currently,
there are hundreds of FEMA camps across the US which are fully
operational and ready to take in prisoners at any moment. They are
staffed by full time guards and usually empty. They are operated by
FEMA, and should martial law ever be enacted, all it will take is the
presidents official signature on a proclamation and the attorney
general’s signature on a warrant to which a list of names will be
attached….That is the list of those whom they have deem as “domestic
terrorists” (patriots, Christians, conservatives and the like).
Through
the Rex 84 program many of our military bases were converted into
prison camps under the pretense that they were to be used in the event
of a “mass exodus” of illegal immigrants. Though this is what is
happening today, our Rex 84 camps remain empty, which leads many to
believe that their agenda is something other than illegal immigrants
crossing the border.
That said, a reporter from NewsChannel 13, Mark Mulholland and
his camera man Matt Soriano were threatened with arrest by a
corrections lieutenant in 2014, simply for having an “empty” prison in
the background of their video footage on Grant’s Cottage—a nearby
historical site where President Ulysses S. Grant died.
If
this so called “empty” prison was truly “empty” then why all the hassle
from the lieutenant? Furthermore the prison houses 0 prisoners, yet has
76 working officers?! Without a doubt this is another FEMA camp!!!
Check out the footage, if you have not yet seen it…. When Your Television Is Now Watching YOU!
While much has been made recently about “smart” devices, a new television set may just have crossed the line from smart into snooping. Smart phones have been around for years. To the average user the term indicates a phone that does more than make and receive phone calls and can access and surf the internet. With the increase in broadband usage more and more devices began to be connected to the internet. For example, in a typical home it is not uncommon for the computer, DVD player and wireless phones all to be using a home network to access the internet.
When this happens, the devices share an IP address which can be linked to other devices on the same network. This is one of the reasons security experts warn about the importance of individuals securing their home wireless network. There have been instances where a person logged into an unsecured wireless network and illegally downloaded videos or music. The authorities were then able to trace the download to the IP address and threaten to prosecute the homeowner for the downloads. Over the years, advertisers and others have been attempting to take advantage of this connectivity by tracking individual habits to use for targeted advertising. This individual surfing information has been used to recommend choices to customers such as when Netflix recommends films to a person based on their viewing habits. MORE
Eye in the sky computes your emotions
“We nicknamed it ‘the creepy study,’ because we just wanted to be out about it, just so everyone’s aware,” said Hedgcock, an associate professor of marketing. “It sounds creepy.”
The facial encoding data is part of a larger student research project underway in the Tippie College of Business that uses automated technology to read emotions by measuring slight movements in the facial muscles, such as a movement of the eyebrow or a widening of a lip.Hedgcock believes the University of Iowa is the world’s only business school with this kind of real-time software that converts images of people’s faces into readings for different moods. If it works, experts see huge potential for facial encoding in the worlds of marketing, advertising and political campaigns.
What
looks like a security camera is actually scanning faces and collecting
data on the mood of passersby. (Photo: The University of Iowa/Special to
The Register)
If his students eventually deem the technology a stinker, it’s no big deal, Hedgcock says. But if the process is proven and adopted by marketing firms, his students will have a leg up when they go on the job hunt.
“If it does work, they walk out there and they know something that no one else knows how to do,” he says. “It’s not written in a textbook. It doesn’t exist anywhere.”
Finding a niche
Hedgcock wanted to emphasize privacy with his students, so the camera doesn’t record video or images of the people it measures. It simply kicks out data measuring what it sees, and it sees a lot — millions of rows of data so far.Students have used the mood measurements in a variety of ways. From the first-floor camera, they crunched the data to see if the weather affects mood and if mood affects food sales at the business school’s snack bar.
University of Iowa business school students (Photo: Bryon Houlgrave/The Register)
But students say the best use of the technology isn’t in a generic space such as a hallway on campus. People walking to and from classes or meetings aren’t exactly the most expressive.
Students say the technology is likely most effective with a more specific aim, such as judging reaction to a short advertisement or a political debate — occasions more likely to elicit an emotional response.
Students paired up with Frank N. Magid Associates, a market research firm with offices in Marion, Ia. The company is known for its work gauging viewer sentiment about local television stations and their on-air personalities.
While it may never fully replace more conventional methods of judging consumer preference such as surveys and dial tests, Magid leaders say they believe facial encoding could be a supplement to their current suite of measurement tools.
“We don’t see it as a replacement for common sense,” said Bob Crawford, senior vice president for research at the firm. “But it’s just another arrow in our quiver that we could take a look at.
“We don’t know the accuracy yet. But it is a big deal.”
Junior Marcy Kreda, a marketing major, ran an experiment comparing facial encoding with more traditional forms of evaluating newscasts, such as dial testing. But that’s an application she determined was also less than ideal.
“I think it’s useful in certain situations,” Kreda said. “I don’t think it’s very useful in evaluating newscasts, because when you watch the news you’re not very expressive.”
Hedgcock believes facial encoding may be best suited for answering questions consumers are unwilling or unable to answer themselves.
For example, instead of asking someone whether they liked a specific advertisement, facial encoding can isolate which points in the video elicited specific emotional responses — a precision that may be difficult to articulate with other measures.
“The reality is with a huge percentage of marketing, we can just ask people,” Hedgcock says. “So why get into the creepy factor? I can look at your behaviors, or I can just ask you.”
Realizing the limitations
The biggest problem with the business school’s mounted camera is that most people aren’t walking around with outright frowns or glowing smiles on their faces.“Everyone in this building is doing the same thing,” senior marketing major Lynn Tatge said. “Most of the time people aren’t going to be super excited to be here.
“If I’m mad about a test, maybe my face shows it, but I don’t know.”
So, it’s no surprise that “neutral” ranks as the program’s most frequent mood output.
University
of Iowa assistant professor William Hedgcock explains the experiment
his students are engaged with using facial recognition software. (Photo:
Bryon Houlgrave/The Register)
There are also issues with angles from the ceiling-mounted camera’s height. They’ve had better luck using a webcam and scanning subjects head-on.
And there are lingering questions about the tool’s accuracy. How can you be sure that someone is actually happy, sad or frustrated?
“We believe the actual accuracy, if we’re being generous, is probably around 35 percent. So it’s got some distance to travel in our opinion,” said Dan Hill, president of Sensory Logic, a market research firm in Minneapolis that has used the manual version of measuring facial expressions to read emotions.
But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t have value.
“The students are making the right journey,” Hill said. “It’s a cool idea, it’s moving there, but it’s not really there.”
Seeing the possibilities
Hill says the dictum that “actions speak louder than words” is the very reason why reading facial expressions is so powerful. He’s used the technique to evaluate professional athletes’ attitudes during draft time, to gauge witnesses and juries during trial and to inform would-be bosses on hiring decisions.“Your emotions turn on when something is meaningful,” he said. “You can figure out when people are emotionally engaged.”
That’s why he and other experts believe a more proven facial encoding software will be invaluable in politics, because it could possibly judge which stances or verbiage voters are drawn to from a candidate.
“I think it’s a good application because politics is very emotional,” Hill said. “There are a lot of so-called independents who really tilt one way or the other, but they like the idea that they’re independent.”
Hedgcock says political strategists are already interested in neuromarketing, the marketing field that uses measurements of the human body — brain scans, respiratory rates and changes in the skin — to measure a consumer’s reaction.
But not many campaigns are interested in talking publicly about those ideas, Hedgcock says, because they can be viewed as too Big Brotherly or manipulative.
For now, the professor is putting aside any concerns about the “creepy” factor.
“Every academic I know in this area of neuromarketing would say the last thing we need to worry about is over manipulating,” he said. “The bigger concern is does it even work?”
Oregon man serving prison sentence for collecting rainwater on his own property
An Oregon landowner has been subjected to a 30-day prison sentence for
what he says was a simple act of collecting rainwater on his own
property. CNS News reports that Gary Harrington was convicted of
nine misdemeanors and sentenced to 30 days in prison, as well as slapped
with a $1,500 fine, for diverting snow runoff and rainwater into three
reservoirs on his property, a move that local officials say violates an
antiquated law governing personal water use.
Known as the "Rain
Main," Harrington reportedly built the reservoirs, which hold some 13
million gallons of water, for his own personal use. One of the
reservoirs he stocked with largemouth bass for leisure purposes, and
when wildfires emerge in the area, he says the water from this and the
other two reservoirs can be used for mitigatory purposes. In
Harrington's mind, the operation is perfectly legal and a legitimate use
of his own property.
But the state of Oregon disagrees, claiming
that Harrington is actually diverting water intended for the Big Butte
Creek watershed and its tributaries, which are governed by the nearby
city of Medford, onto his own property. Some have even accused
Harrington of hoarding natural resources that do not belong to him,
insisting that he should instead allow water that runs onto his property
to flow into the city's water coffers for redistribution.
"They issued me my permits," stated Harrington to CNS News
about the legality of his water collection efforts. "I had my permits
in hand and they retracted them just arbitrarily, basically. They took
them back and said, 'No, you can't have them.' So I've been fighting it
ever since."
Water controllers cite outdated 1920s law in pursuit of Harrington
State water managers, however, have cited a 1925 law that provisions exclusive ownership of all "core sources of water" by the city of Medford, not private landowners. They say Harrington's three water reservoirs are included under this provision, and that water flowing through his property belongs to the state.But Harrington insists that his water collection efforts are legal, and that water stored on his property serves a primary purpose of dealing with frequent wildfires. Harrington also uses the water in his dwelling for non-potable purposes, similar to rain collection efforts that involve diverting water from roofs and other non-porous surfaces into barrels or storage tanks.
"I'm sacrificing my liberty so we can stand up as a country and stand for our liberty," Harrington announced before a small crowd gathered outside the Jackson County jail, prior to beginning his sentence.
Harrington had previously been fighting the state after being issued a three-year bench probation back in 2007. This probation mandated that Harrington close up his reservoirs and stop collecting water, which he shortly thereafter violated after reinstating the reservoirs. This, says the state, is the impetus behind Harrington's booking, and the reason why he was pursued so aggressively in this matter.
"Mr. Harrington has operated these three reservoirs in flagrant violation of Oregon law for more than a decade," stated Oregon Water Resources Department Deputy Director Tom Paul to the Medford Mail Tribune, as quoted by Mother Nature Network (MNN). "What we're after is compliance with Oregon water law, regardless of what the public thinks of Mr. Harrington."
According to CNS News, Harrington plans to fight his sentence tooth and nail, and has vowed not to "lay over and die." Doing so, he says, will allow the government bullies to become even bigger bullies, further threatening individual liberty in the state of Oregon.