Friday, June 8, 2018

"Ludicrous." Reader Finds Chris Ferrara's Dismissal of the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation. "Surely, the Vatican Would Not be Deceptive.....they just left something out." Join the Tin-Foil Crowd and Find Out What Actually Happened to the Messenger of Our Lady!

"Ludicrous." Reader Finds Chris Ferrara's Dismissal of the Sister Lucy Truth Investigation. "Surely, the Vatican Would Not be Deceptive.....they just left something out." Join the Tin-Foil Crowd and Find Out What Actually Happened to the Messenger of Our Lady! 

   NOTHING TO SEE HERE........MOVE ON.......


Here is the section of the commentary posted by Chris Ferrara concerning those who believe that the "Sister Lucy" post-1958 was not the same as the actual woman who was the seer at Fatima. 

In the pictures above notice that there is about 20 years difference between them. Notice how Chris indicates how hard it was for him to accept that THE VATICAN WOULD ACTUALLY DECEIVE PEOPLE ABOUT THE THIRD SECRET. Wow.....I don't know how many hours of research it would take me to realize that.......but, not to worry, the comic folk who have never really imposed heresy or evil practices or anything like that....just have not revealed everything....THAT'S IT.....the Fourth Secret!!!!! 
Conclusion, and I realize that it is a whopping one, Chris Ferrara and Michael Matt and associates like Salza and Siscoe have spent their "apologetic effort" trying to convince us to stay within the Novus Ordo or to get back in it because there is plenty of room for everyone. Marxist Social Workers who do not believe in Hell or the Supernatural AND Gallicans who can keep their traditions  within the Multi-Ring Circus which is the Conciliar "Church".  
Here is the section: 

Symond's link in red here:
Even Christopher Ferrara has publicly stated the impostor theory is “ludicrous!” Instead, however, of
to:
Ferrara's Comment in combox here about halfway down:
By the way, I am not a conspiracy nut of any sort. The "Sister Lucy double" conspiracy theory being aired here is ludicrous. Like Antonio Socci, I did not want to believe that what the Vatican published in 2000 was less than complete. But, like him, I did a 180 after reviewing the massive evidence that something must be missing.


SOURCE