Friday, March 23, 2018

‘Controlled Opposition’—
The Soviet ‘Trust’ Model for Infiltration & Manipulation

‘Controlled Opposition’—
The Soviet ‘Trust’ Model for Infiltration & Manipulation

The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpts: pages 64-66

The early 20th century so-called “Trust” model utilized by the Soviet Union to infiltrate and destroy its enemies is the foundation for the very techniques often used both by American intelligence agencies—along with Israel’s clandestine service, Mossad and its conduits such as the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith—to infiltrate and destroy (or otherwise control the activities of) domestic dissident movements deemed hostile to the interests of Zionism and Globalism.



Those who fail to understand this age-old tactic will never be able to fathom the extent to which the American political system has been manipulated by these alien forces.
Although—even today—there are persons and organizations active within the so-called “nationalist” and “revisionist” and “patriotic” movements in America, who seem to “say the right things,” the truth is that many of those in question are actually witting—sometimes unwitting— agents of discord, being used for the purposes of intelligence gathering, propaganda and disinformation, all designed to establish further influence upon the American system for the purpose of consolidating the power of The Enemy Within.
Let us examine the Soviet “Trust” and how it operated.This little- known counterintelligence operation known as “the Trust” was established by the Cheka, the predecessor to the Soviet KGB, as a means through which to set up and control a “phony opposition” in order to flush out genuine opponents of the Bolshevik regime which, as historians know, was under the control of non-Russians—mostly Jews.
When reading the following materials relating to the workings of the “Trust,” simply substitute the word “Israeli” for the word “Soviet” and the word “Mossad” for the names “Cheka” and “KGB” and you will under- stand how the “Trust” technique has been applied by the Mossad, in manipulating groups that “seem” to be opposing Israeli interests. (Likewise, a similar formula can be used substituting the terms “CIA” or “FBI” as it may be appropriate.)
A brief description of the operation of “The Trust” appears in Chekisty: A History of the KGB by John J. Dziak:
“Where no genuine internal opposition organization exists [a security service might] invent one—both to infiltrate the more dangerous . . . organizations abroad in order to blunt or channel their actions, and to surface real or potential internal dissidents. If an internal opposition already exists, it will be infiltrated in an attempt to control it, to provoke opponents into exposing themselves, and to cause the movement to serve state interests. ”
A more comprehensive account of “The Trust” appears in Dirty Tricks or Trump Cards: U.S. Covert Action and Counterintelligence, by Georgetown University Professor Roy Godson who is known for his close ties to the Israeli lobby in Washington:
“Sometimes, if circumstances allow and the practitioners are skillful, counterintelligence can target its deception not only at the internal and emigre opposition but also at the intelligence services and governments of foreign adversaries.The Soviet Trust was such an operation.
The Trust was created in the early 1920s and completely controlled by the Soviet secret service, the Cheka. Believing they were operating in league with an active and effective anti-Bolshevik movement, opponents of the regime within the USSR and in exile were lured by the Trust into exposing themselves and became targets of Soviet state security.
Using that information and controlling communications between Western intelligence agencies, the Russian emigre community, and Russian dissidents inside the country, the Cheka expertly neutralized anti-Communist opposition at home and abroad.
The Trust was also able to use its contacts with Western intelligence services to pass along misleading and false information on the internal state of the Soviet regime to those same services’ foreign ministries and governments. Essentially, the West was being told by its intelligence “assets” within the Soviet Union that support for the Bolshevik regime was weakening, and that the Soviet leaders were at heart nationalists who, if left in peace by the West, would gradually turn a state dedicated to revolution at home and abroad into one that would behave in a more traditional and predictable fashion . . .
The organization’s actual name was the Moscow Municipal Credit Association—thus, the Trust. It posed as a financial institution operating within the liberal economic environment of Lenin’s New Economic Policy. The bogus group’s clandestine name was the Monarchist Association of Central Russia. One ironic aspect of the Trust operation was that British and French intelligence services were paying the Russian emigres for the disinformation being supplied them by the Cheka through the Trust.Allegedly, at one point, money paid to these sources by the West was used to cover the expenses of the deception operation itself. In short, the West was paying to be deceived . . .
Given the fact that several generations of young KGB officers were shown that Trust operations were successful, it is not surprising that such operations were continued from the 1920s to the 1980s.”
The “Trust” model for infiltration has been applied by the Mossad and its allies in the CIA and the FBI in this country to other dissident movements targeted for infiltration and take-over. Intelligence units such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) are often part of the operation.
Careful study of recent ADL and SPLC bulletins will frequently (but not always) reveal precisely which “dissident” groups and leaders are being utilized (and promoted) to collect names and assemble dossiers on perceived or potential threats. The ADL and SPLC give a big “build- up” to their own controlled agents so as to give them “credibility.” In other words, the average person will assume that because the ADL and SPLC happen to be attacking an individual or organization, that is some- how “proof” that the individual or organization is legitimate, as evidenced by the ADL or SPLC attacks.Those who affiliate themselves with such “trust” operations do so at their own risk.
In the pages of The Judas Goats—The Enemy Within we will learn much more about the actions of Soviet-style “Trust” intrigues on American soil.We will name those who lead phony opposition groups. We will demonstrate that there has been a concerted effort to control— or destroy—genuine grass-roots American political opposition that threatens the power of Zionism and its (often-uneasy) allies in the glob- al corporate elite.We will meet some of the more infamous media shills who use their influence to defame those who stand in the way of the internationalist agenda. We will survey the way in which traditional American political movements have been infiltrated and taken over, subverted in their otherwise pro-American agenda.
None of this is going to be a pleasant story as it unfolds, but it is a story that must be told if Americans are going to reclaim their nation and their heritage….


Trump’s presidential persona based on Alex Jones


By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 22, 2018 Anno Domini
The Judeo-masonic establishment felt enough success with their controlled opposition character Alex Jones that they went and modelled a presidential puppet after him.
That must be quite the honour for the Zionist-created Likudnik cartoon character Alex Jones, who couldn’t contain his glee when Trump was elected President of the United States of America in 2017—something which Jones helped make happen, due to his unwavering support for a presidential candidate. Up until then, he had never in his public life endorsed a presidential candidate. During a live broadcast of Infowars on election night, Jones looked like a giddy school girl when it was announced that Trump had won. For once, Jones showed us that night his real emotions.
True, Alex Jones is not as big (figuratively) as he once was, despite his followers’ relentless boasting of his Youtube subscription numbers. But the intelligence-manufactured model for his persona continues to be a success, as it has thwarted any real progression of dissident paleo-conservatives (truthers, patriots, constitutionalists, etc.)—thwarted them coming together and causing real change in the world by way of siphoning off their pent up rage and frustration and prematurely ejaculating it in a place where its seed is squandered among barren swine and mindless boobs. There has been no fertile land upon which the truther movement has been able to plant and successfully nurture seeds of truth to maturity, other than in the ever-shrinking traditional Church communities (Catholic and Orthodox alike). Since 1996, the counter-intelligence operative Alex Jones has hindered and suppressed any meaningful resistance to the New World Order conspiracy. That has been his primary function. If you haven’t figured this much out by now, there is no point in reading on. Click away now and meander over to any one of the establishment-controlled websites: Breitbart, Zerohedge, or even Infowars.
Moving on. Trump’s appearance on the Alex Jones show during his election run was a symbolic passing of the torch, if you will, of the continuation of the psychological warfare assault on the American people and the world. Now instead of an over-the-top, loud-mouthed radio host cathartically transmuting our energy and telling us everything we want to hear, the President will assume the role. But this time, we will think we have finally changed things and bucked the system—something Alex Jones failed to do, no matter how many times he repeated to his parrots that “we are defeating the New World Order” or that “the empire is on the run.”
It’s no coincidence that Alex Jones is tied to the same Jewish-Russian organized crime syndicate that Trump is. It’s also no coincidence that Trump and Jones share virtually all of the same political views. So it is that Jones has worked in tandem with the supposedly anti-establishment Trump-Roger Stone-Netanyahu dirty trickstering, Likudnik tag team. (By the way, it turns out that Roger Stone—that pathetic, buggering swinger—is directly tied to the Jewish-Russian Meyer Lansky organized crime syndicate. More on that in my upcoming fourth part of my series on Trump and the Mossad.) One wonders if the Alex Jones operation dually has served as a proving grounds for a future president. Even in Nixon’s days, Roger Stone was working behind the scenes preparing for a fake populist president who would come into power under the guise of being anti-establishment. Ronald Reagan was a step in that direction but didn’t quite meet the establishment expectations for a controlled opposition puppet. Trump sure has, though, hasn’t he? Look how many people on the Right he has fooled. Nearly all of them. And look how many of those he has fooled who once also followed Alex Jones but later abandoned him after realizing he was a fraud. They broke free from one tier of deception but then immersed themselves in another tier when they bought that Trump was the real deal. They don’t see the dialectic at work in their overly simplistic analysis of the world conspiracy.
If the Trump persona truly is based on the Alex Jones persona, perhaps we can make a prediction of where Trump’s presidency will go. Right now, Alex Jones, as a character, appears to be on the decline. The truly awakened individuals that once followed him are long gone and now all he has left are mindless “red-pilled” idiots, of mostly millennial, hillbilly, and pothead extraction. His out-of-control behaviour is, perhaps, doing the most damage to his status and reputation. The publicity of his custody-trial with ex-wife Violet revealed a lot about the artificiality of his public character. He is currently married to what appears to be a former hooker. His strange relationship with Hollywood sleaze Charlie Sheen went public a few years ago, and now his former employers are bringing to light even more darker truths of the Alex Jones character. In essence, he is self-destructing. Could Donald Trump follow a similar path? Many think he already is. Both Jones and Trump share the pathology of narcissism, which makes them their own worst enemies—and at the complete mercy of their handlers.