Metabolism synonymous with Transubstantiation. The last finding of the demolish theologians of the Eucharist - the situation is very serious!

Metabolism synonymous with Transubstantiation. The last finding of the demolish theologians of the Eucharist - the situation is very serious!

Fr. Cristoforo

If anyone has doubts that an attempt is being made to demolish the Eucharist, today he will have to change his mind. In fact, it seems to witness every day a continuous bombardment by the theologians of the neochiesa, to diminish, to denigrate, to profane with their mouth the Sacrament of the Holy Sacrifice of Christ. Sometimes I even cry from anger. These characters, are highly sponsored in the neochiesa universities, and go around to pronounce heresies, to inculcate perverted mentality, in the parishes, in diocesan meetings, in the Faculties of Theology, in the Seminaries.



The theologian Andrea Grillo today sponsors another French "neoteologist" who demolishes the Eucharist: Matthieu Rouillè d'Orfeuil; and he makes a review of his book entitled "Lieu, presence, resurrection". Grillo weaves the praises of this neo-scholar and elaborates his thought in his article.Read for yourself what these people give birth. I beg you. Read carefully:"The next question seems very predictable: what can change of bread in body, of wine in blood? Is there a natural, ordinary phenomenon that achieves this? So formulated, the enigma becomes very simple: what changes the bread in the body and the wine in blood is obviously this vital process that assimilates the food products that I eat to make them - not just "mine" - but to make them "me". What is called "metabolism" (ie: ultra-change) can very well be called transubstantiation. All the substance of the bread I eat has changed in the substance of my body; and all the substance of the wine I drink has changed in the substance of my blood. Speaking like this seems like a cunning; but we must ask ourselves if this language is really traditional. Did the theologians really reflect in this direction on the Eucharist and on this amazing conversion of substances? - or is it only a subtle but innovative game that one can not pretend to explain anything about the history of the Eucharist? We know very well, the Eucharist is, in the Church, a completely traditional reality: Paul has transmitted to us what he had received (cf 1Cor 11,23), and therefore we need to connect the Eucharistic thought to the highest degree, the discourse Eucharistic spirituality, a continuity of interpretations, at the risk of seeing reduced the whole theology of the sacrament that constitutes (according to the words of Irenaeus IV, 18.5, cf. CCC 1327) the norm of our doctrine, to a dangerous lightness. No, my task is to illustrate all the patristic and scholastic consequences of images and symbols. I would like to point out some milestones, to describe the logic of this tradition that starts from the metabolism to get to transubstantiation "(the whole article can be found here http://www.cittadellaeditrice.com/munera/nuova-teologia-eucaristica-3 -the-miracle-and-a-dish-m-rouille-dorfeuil /).

Did you understand the perversity of this thought? But that is not all. Read also here:

"It would be completely wrong to think that Thomas Aquinas, when he speaks of" transubstantiation ", is only interested in a physical transmutation of a very strange kind, that is the change of a crumb of bread, placed on the paten, in a mouthful of meat (change so much more paradoxical that, visibly, nothing is ever changed). Thomas knew very well that the Eucharist is not a case of illusionism, but the life of a body. He knew that transubstantiation is above all the vital, intimate reality of a visible and sensitive flesh, and not a game of priestly prestige, however pious it may be ".

It is very serious! The Holy Sacrifice is denigrated by comparing it to "illusionism", manipulating the words and the thought of St. Thomas Aquinas, attributing to him things that one would never have even dreamed of thinking.

They are diverted. They are perverse. They are traversers. They are HERETICAL! And the serious thing is that today these have free field everywhere. And they sow the poison of their heresy everywhere, starting from the Seminaries to the last Parish of this world. So that the Holy Sacrofice is definitively abolished. Because this is their only intent.

Only those who are faithful to the Truth are hindered and persecuted by the neocurrent. Let's get ready for the catacombs.

Fra Cristoforo