PLANET X INCOMING: NEW WARNING FOR PACIFIC NORTHWEST, MEGAQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

Fresh warnings over 'The Big One' as study finds seafloor sediments off the Pacific Northwest could unleash a megaquake AND a tsunami

BREAKING: DUTCHSINSE WEST COAST ON WATCH

(EXPRESS UK) The threat of ‘The Big One’ has long loomed over the Pacific Northwest, where several major cities from Vancouver down to northern California are cradled by the 620-mile-long Cascadia Subduction Zone. The geological record shows the area is due for a major earthquake, which would likely be followed by a massive tsunami. Now, a new study has confirmed the region just off the coast of Washington has the ingredients for a megaquake.

The Cascadia Subduction Zone last experienced a large earthquake in the 1700s – and, it’s thought to generate a major event roughly every 200 to 530 years.

While it’s impossible to pinpoint the exact timing, experts have long warned the region could soon see another major quake.

In the study, led by a team at the University of Texas at Austin, researchers found that such a quake may be more likely to strike off the coast of Washington and northern Oregon than regions further south along the subduction zone.

Seismic data and sediment samples found that sediments are tightly packed on the plate off the northern sites.

There, little water sits in the pore spaces between the grains, leaving the plates more prone to the build-up of stress.

Under these conditions, the sediments are better able to stick together, and move together in the event of an earthquake – meaning they’re also able to move massive amounts of seawater.

‘We observed very compact sediments offshore of Washington and northern Oregon that could support earthquake rupture over a long distance and close to the trench, which increases both earthquake and tsunami hazards,’ said lead author Shuoshuo Han, a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas Institute for Geophysics (UTIG).

In a subduction zone, such as Cascadia, one tectonic plate is ‘diving’ beneath another.

The thick sediment layer on top of the subducting oceanic plate is scraped off as it moves, causing the sediments to pile onto the top plate in a wedge of material.

The rest travels down with the bottom plate, the researchers say.

The Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) 'megathrust' fault is a 1,000km-long line that stretches from Northern Vancouver Island to Cape Mendocino California.

It separates the Juan de Fuca, a 700-mile chunk in the Pacific Ocean, and North America plates.

For more than 300 years, the two plates have been pushing against one another. 

Eventually, the Juan de Fuca will be pushed underneath the North America plate, causing the region to sink at least six feet.

The Cascadia Subduction Zone last experienced a large earthquake in the 1700s – and, it’s thought to generate a major event roughly every 200 to 530 years.

Using nearly five-mile-long seismic streamers, the team observed up to four miles of sediment layers lying atop the Cascadia subduction zone.

While the sediments are tightly compacted off Washington and northern Oregon, they’re less compact off central Oregon.

With more pore space between the grains in this area, there would likely be much less stress accumulated there in the event of a rupture, meaning smaller earthquakes.

Lead researcher Shoushou Han in front of an array of air guns, which use soundwaves to image the seafloor

The higher stress region, however, has the makings for both a large earthquake and a subsequent tsunami.

‘That combination of both storing and more stress and the ability for it to propagate farther is important for both generating large earthquakes and for propagating to very shallow depths,’ said Nathan Bangs, a senior research scientist at UTIG and study co-author.

The ability of an offshore earthquake to propagate to shallow depths is what gives rise to huge tsunamis, such as the devastating wave that hit Tohoku, Japan in 2011 after a magnitude 9.0 earthquake.

According to co-author Demian Saffer, a professor at Penn State University, ‘The results are consistent with existing constraints on earthquake behaviour, offer an explanation for differences in structural style along the margin, and may provide clues about the propensity for shallow earthquake slip in different regions.’

COMMENT BELOW!!