More Catholic Than the Pope?

More Catholic Than the Pope?

By:  Eric Gajewski

“We are in the worst crisis in the Church ever because we are getting more near the arrival of the False Prophet and Antichrist…”

I am sure many of you faithful Catholics have heard this loose but impotent argument coming from the Novus ordites blindly (or willfully) following Vatican II.  Do you think you are more Catholic than the Pope?  As if to state that a Pope could not lapse into error or heresy.  As if he were some sort of robot without free will.  God will protect him (they say)!  Funny, don’t recall reading that infallibly anywhere?  Well, if we take a look at our past we see a good number of examples of fallen away priests and even prelates.  Scripture, Tradition and Catholic prophecy (including approved Marian messages) all indicate that there would be an apostasy in the Catholic Church which would ultimately end in the biblical False Prophet and Antichrist.  Several Cardinals speaking on the 3^rd secret of Fatima said the Apostasy begins AT THE TOP.  How many Catholics actually know that?  Very few!  How many upon hearing this actually believe it?  Even FEWER and yet they must in order to remain Catholic (concerning the great falling away).  The early Church Father speak to Rome falling away and eventually the Church going underground.  Nay, the path of false obedience has lead the many “identifying” as Catholic out on to a new road called “Apostasy”.  I want to discuss this argument of “Do you know better  than the Pope and other arguments within”.

Right to resist.  The Popes, prelates and priests are not robots.  How many times have I heard this general argument.  The Church cannot error!  Now, on the surface this is true but what about churchmen?  The answer is they can error and even lapse into heresy.  In fact, during the Great Apostasy soon to come the majority of clergy will lapse into full blown apostasy and become Apostates.  Catholics no more once the heresy becomes at least formal (objectively speaking). 

Do these people forget that every human being has free will and that they can actually choose false doctrine?  

My friends, it is not optional to resist a priest teaching heresy.  Not only must they be publicly “called out” they also must be avoided (if obstinate).  For where there is “poison” a Catholic cannot be as Archbishop Lefebvre (founder of the SSPX) rightly points out.   We are not only dealing with heresy in our times but a diabolical conspiracy to bring about a “New Age Religion’ onto the scene (the majority of the principles are in place now).   The question I will ask in return is “are these priests more Catholic than already defined Tradition!”  We show them their errors (as I have) from what the Church has infallibly taught beforehand and they simply ignore and keep the path of false obedience.  They ignore, block and call me names but this just change the reality they are material heretics (in the very least).  One priest on facebook actually said to his lemming followers that I need to go to Confession.  

And all of heaven rolled their eyes.  

I have had more than my share of “dialogue” with these Vatican II priests over the years and it truly boils down to that.  Ignorance and or/pride.

More Catholicity in the Greek/Russian Orthodox Church than the Conciliar Church.  That is a reality my friends.  Since Vatican II the Faith has been changed to adopt to a new one as Dr. Hesse points out in his lectures.  This new faith, has, as its basis, the principles of Masonism at work.  It is the building of this new city of man wherein soon the False Prophet and Antichrist will take over.  

At this point, it is important to remind everyone, that, the Second Vatican Council, was never infallible and perhaps will never stand as a “ecumenical council” given its errors and heresies.  

It is very similar to the Synod of Pistoia (late 1700s) which was condemned by Pius XI (even had a vernacular Mass).  Point blank…it was a “robber council”.  This masking of proper doctrine to suit another is only preparing men “from every supposed religion” to embrace the Antichrist.  Thus, Vatican II ecumenism is heretical.  It does not teach there is a need of conversion but rather it is rooted in Masonic dialogue, tolerance, convergence, coexistence etc.  So I can boldly state, on the basis, of this one heresy, you, ought not be, in any Vatican II church, where the priest nods their head in agreement to the Masonic madness.  Just as one ought not be in any schismatic sect a faithful Catholic these days in order to please Jesus must not be found in those buildings teaching Vatican II (it is in material schism).

The Faith is the measure of the Popes not vice versa.  The notion that a priest or Pope would automatically keep the Faith is silly.  There is Tradition, that is, what we have to know to stay Catholic.  If a Pope, prelate or priest wants to contradict Tradition than we are told to resist and avoid.  

The notion a Pope can say anything because he is Pope is a heresy.  

It is Pope worship and the majority of false traditionalists fall into this category.  Yes, but by leaving those buildings that say “Catholic” on them you are committing mortal sin and they will say you have left the Church!  Seriously?  Have these people heard of the Arian crisis wherein nearly 9 out of every 10 bishops was a heretic to be avoided?  Pope Liberius even sided with the heretics of his time?  Was St. Athanasius “outside the Church”?  No, therefore it is those pointing the finger at us who have left the Church even though they remain in churches “appearing” to be “Catholic”.  

Read the book AA-1025 and you will see the Masonic/Marxist anti-apostles wanted Rome to become Protestant and they got it.

Protestant argument.  They see what is going on in the Conciliar Church and say this.  “You see this is why I choose a personal relationship with Christ rather than a church!”  They too, say this, as if, churchmen do not have free will.  Christ guaranteed the Church would last until He comes again, however, he didn’t say that every last churchmen would keep and hold this Faith.  Protestants don’t have the true Faith therefore they don’t “have” Christ as they seem to think.  Furthermore, Christ said shortly before His return that FEW would hold the Faith.  It is a similar argument I have heard in the past in my ministries where I hear “that priest is a sick pedophile”.  Guess what, I can find worst sins in your heretical church I assure you.  Not a great argument at all and can be easily refuted.  There is one Catholic Church that Christ founded, period.  It has been infiltrated by Her enemies to suit the Luciferian doctrine, that is, that man sits on his own throne.  Just wait till the Great apostasy wherein men apostatize and formally reject Christ by taking the mark of the beast.

What is the problem?  One of the main problems is that the Conciliarist Popes think that Tradition can evolve as Dr. Hesse rightly points out.  They believe doctrine can pastorally suit the times.  And boy have we seen this especially with Francis’s latest debacle.  St. Anthony the Great said once you say churchmen trying to adapt to the times then head for the hills and many are.  It is a sure sign of the end.  This is where we could break down evolution altogether but I don’t have the time.  Just know that the Conciliar Popes all have supported evolution which is bogus.  They are evolving doctrine again to suit the coming New Age Religion of Man wherein anything goes under the Man of Lawlessness (objectively speaking).

Theoretically speaking.  Can a Pope teach material heresy?  ABSOLUTELY… as the greatest of all theologian’s state (not Eric).  Once this is recognized than we must resist and avoid until he corrects himself (whomever it may be).  The problem is the majority are already following heresy and have been for some time.  These people must come to websites like my own and humble themselves to learn what was taught before Vatican II.  But due to pride the majority don’t which is the underlying sin to modernism for those scoring at home.  Could a true Pope be a formal heretic and remain Pope.  NOPE! Says the Faith and thus there are varying camps in the Church trying to prove that reality.  I do not prescribe to Sedevacantism but am very compassionate towards those sensible ones who realize they cant force that opinion infallibly upon another.  Having said that we are in the worst crisis in the Church ever because we are getting more near to the arrival of the False Prophet and Antichrist.  It makes sense.

Solution?  Prayer, sacrifice and baby steps.  You are not going to convince anyone following Vatican II that they are following the principles of a new religion overnight.  It is up to them of course to take the baby steps necessary to learn but it is also up to us to pray for them and help guide them when we can.  Dr. Hesse rightfully said of the Conciliar Cardinals and Bishops, that, “they are useful idiots”, who didn’t even bother to read the documents of Vatican II (that they were signing off on.)  This is what happens, when, Catholics don’t care about doctrine, which, in the end, means not caring about the Faith.  Or in some cases many confuse Masonism and Catholicism altogether.  Pope St. Pius X warned us of the new apostle of Vatican II which means he too was more “Catholic” than the Conciliar Popes.  I stand upon the firm ground of Tradition.  The Conciliar Church does not stand upon Tradition and ultimately will “morph” into the Apostate Church of Darkness (Blessed Emmerick’s writings)

It is important to rehash our understanding as Catholics on the issue of Papal Infallibility hence the talk below.  Fr. Hesse has credentials like no other and here he explains the true notion of Papal Infallibility.  Let us face it the infiltrated Vatican has turned into a circus (literally).  The “doctrines” are sweeter than the donuts (which are seducing the many) that you will find in the Conciliar concession stand.  We must resist and wait for the Storm to pass. More Catholic than the Pope you say?  Absolutely….

ADDENDUM (QUOTES SUPPORTING RESISTANCE):

Fr. Francisco de Vitoria, O.P. states: "A Pope must be resisted who publicly destroys the Church. What should be done when the Pope, because of his bad customs, destroys the Church? What should be done if the Pope wanted, without reason, to abrogate Positive Law?"

His answer is: "He would certainly sin; he should neither be permitted to act in such fashion nor should he be obeyed in what was evil; but he should be resisted with a courteous reprehension. Consequently, ... if he wanted to destroy the Church or the like, he should not be permitted to act in that fashion, but one would be obliged to resist him. The reason for this is that he does not have the power to destroy. Therefore, if there is evidence that he is doing so, it is licit to resist him. The result of all this is that if the Pope destroys the Church by his orders and actions, he can be resisted and the execution of his mandates prevented." 

Fr. Francisco Suarez, S.J., also defends this position: "If [the Pope] gives an order contrary to good customs, he should not be obeyed; if he attempts to do something manifestly opposed to justice and the common good, it will be licit to resist him; if he attacks by force, by force he can be repelled, with a moderation appropriate to a just defense." 

St. Robert Bellarmine, the great paladin of the Counter-Reformation, maintains: "Just as it is licit to resist a Pontiff that aggresses the body, it is also licit to resist one who aggresses the souls or who disturbs civil order, or, above all, one who attempts to destroy the Church. I say that it is licit to resist him by not doing what he orders and preventing his will from being executed. It is not licit, however, to judge, punish or depose him, since these are acts proper to a superior." 

Fr. Cornelius a Lapide, S.J., argues: "Superiors can, with humble charity, be admonished by their inferiors in the defense of truth; that is what St. Augustine, St. Cyprian, St. Gregory, St. Thomas and others declare about this passage (Gal. 2:11). ... St. Augustine wrote (Epistula 19 ad Hieronymum): ‘By teaching that superiors should not refuse to be reprehended by inferiors, St. Peter gave posterity an example more rare and holier than that of St. Paul as he taught that, in the defense of truth and with charity, inferiors may have the audacity to resist superiors without fear.’"

RELATED:
http://www.catholicapologetics.info/modernproblems/vatican2/resist.htm

 COMMENT BELOW!

***AFTER each blog going forward (on the website itself) you will see a section that says "comment". You can click that and then make a post "anonymously" or use your google+ account....if you select anonymous you can then simply add your name to the top of your message to identify yourself...COMMENTING NOW PERMITTED

If I get booted off of social media this is a way to stay in contact…

Donations: Please get behind TradCatKnight financially if you feel you have benefited from the material I present.  I appreciate all your prayers and support!  I also appreciate the letters coming in as well!  For CASH contributions please email me at apostleofmary@hotmail.com for the mailing address.