Monday, October 30, 2017

Fr. Gruner, in the last year of his life, had information that a Mason had infiltrated the Fatima Center.

Fr. Gruner, in the last year of his life, had information that a Mason had infiltrated the Fatima Center. 
With permission, I am going forward with information conveyed to me by a personal friend of Fr. Nicholas Gruner. Christopher Graham has conveyed to me that in the summer of 2014 --- in the last year of Father Gruner's life, he (Fr. Gruner) had been told by "someone" (Mr. Graham now wishes that he had asked Father, who that "someone" was) that he (Father Gruner) was working along side a Freemason who had infiltrated the Fatima Center. 



Father Gruner indicated that he did not know who this Freemason was.
So we have more to add to the tally of first hand information coming from Father Gruner himself as spoken to confidants and friends.

Mr. Graham has also definitively conveyed to me that he knows from personal communication with Father Gruner himself that Fr. Gruner did not believe Francis I to be a legitimate pope, but was, rather, an anti-pope.

Whether we agree with the late beloved Father Gruner or not, let us at least treat with seriousness his considered judgments based on what he knew and on the information he had received.

Perhaps we need to start acting like things are NOT THE SAME as they have "always" been.

I am republishing below the videos in which Father Gruner gives his assessment of Francis and the situation with regard to the papacy. The first one, however, is Father Gruner's clear statement about the Catholic Teaching on Freemasonry:




SOURCE

44 comments:

  1. Andrew Cesanek seemed like an alright guy but his tactics in splitting from the Servants of Jesus and Mary were questionable at best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. THE CANADIAN FLAVOR HAS ADOPTED THE PSEUDO TRAD FLAVOR....

      Delete
  2. What is done in the dark (the Freemason that infiltrated the Fatima Center),will come to light.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is not surprising, Eric. Father Gruner was bound to come under attacks - and he surely did - of all kinds. However, no matter how much the agents of the other side shout, the truth is still the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Love Fr. Gruner. I wish he still were alive. I hope Fr. Kramer can carry on his mission

    ReplyDelete
  5. "is he a formal heretic or a material heretic? He should know better, he's certainly ignorant if he say's that and he could be a heretic if he does know and he's contradicting it, but I am not in a position to know which of those two positions he holds, maybe one day I will be, but I don't have that right now." (Fr. Gruner, "Questions about Pope Francis" October 8, 2014)

    Obviously where Fr. Gruner and Fr. Kramer differed was that, Fr. Gruner didn't elevate on his own authority his personal private speculation (or opinion) that Francis was not The Pope to a position that must be held with certitude, which is why Fr. Gruner could still say Francis was Pope (in the last week of his life) without disimulating.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. fR. kRAMER HAS NEVER CLAIMED TO BE INFALLIBLE AND NO FR GRUNER HELD FRANCIS WAS AN ANTIPOPE AS WE HAVE BEEN DOCUMENTING THE LAST MONTH OR SO

      Delete
    2. Well it's obvious by Fr. Gruner's public statements that if he did believe Francis was not the Pope, it was only as a private probable opinion and not something he felt he could hold in public with absolute certitude.

      Delete
    3. he mentioned in his talks see louie verrichhios blog even....we both covered this my formaer spiritual director fr kramer who was very close to fr gruner confirms

      Delete
    4. dont even need to go into the whole formal heretic argument, bxvi was forced out of office and his supposed resignation is invalid

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    6. Sullivan you are the troll running around calling me a falser prophet everywhere go troll elsewhere no one takes you seriously. I remember our talk on the phone you are clueless. Fr. Gruner held Francis was an antipope further comments will be deleted!

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  6. I have no doubts the Fatima Center has been infiltrated. Why did they let Rosicrucian Ron Paul talk at one of their conferences?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Pray the Rosary everyone. Keep focus on your soul. So much is happening in the Church right now it is hard to process

    ReplyDelete
  8. What is the source?

    ReplyDelete
  9. FreeMasonry is Luciferian. I have friends who are Masons who are completely clueless to the agendas coming from the top. It is a false brotherhood

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yes alot of secret societies in cohoots against the church

      Delete
  10. Anyone else suspect Fr. Gruner’s death may have been murder?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, absolutely. I thought it stunk to high heaven from the get-go. For one thing, I personally believe Our Lady would have prevailed upon Our Lord to take Fr. home during Her month of May, or on the 13th of another month, NOT on the 29th of April.

      Delete
  11. Eric, love the website. I’m new here and it keeps getting better daily. Love you brother

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hope you are enjoying the content...love you too

      Delete
  12. When does the new radio show come out this week? Last week’s was very good. Any idea what you will cover this week?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Keep exposing Freemasonry. Most people have no idea just how bad it is. The Jews are behind Masonry and ifyou don’t believe me research it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. they are...i hope everyone researches themselves

      Delete
  14. How often will you be doing these interviews Eric? I like the written format but the radio shows were even better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. depends upon time and when the guests get back to me...

      Delete