Great Christian Monarchs, Not So Long Ago
Today, anyone would be forgiven for regarding Christianity in Europe as a
lost cause. The number of people who are active Christians has declined
dramatically, particularly since the 1960's, in many countries the
majority are atheists and the fastest growing religion is Islam. Even
where Christian churches still operate, one would have to be fairly
generous to call them actually "Christian" at all.
In The Netherlands,
the largest Protestant church group claims only 8.6% of the population
and even among those, nearly half have said they do not believe God
exists and 1 out of every 6 members of the clergy are atheists! In
Britain, the Church of England announced not long ago that it would be
closing down many rural parishes other than for Christmas and Easter due
to lack of worshipers. In the Kingdom of Spain, once the strongest
bastion of Catholicism in Europe, while 92% are officially members of
the Catholic Church, only 3% regarded religion as one of their most
important values. Obviously, things are not what they used to be and
this has affected monarchies and republics alike. However, the 'last
stand' of traditional monarchy, in a way at least, the First World War,
shows us that strongly Christian monarchs were not at all uncommon even
in those days.
 |
| King Albert I of the Belgians |
In Great Britain, King George V would not have seemed too religious
compared to some other monarchs but that is mostly because he was not
the sort of man to let such things show very easily. He was, unlike his
own father but very much like his grandmother Queen Victoria, a faithful
husband who took his marriage vows seriously. He had a faith in God
that can be seen in his private letters, particularly during times of
great difficulty. Queen Wilhelmina of The Netherlands, was a monarch of
very sincere faith, even if many did not know the extent of it until
after she was gone from reading her autobiography, written at the end of
her eventful life. Grand Duchess Marie-Adelaide of Luxembourg, on the
contrary, was widely known from the start for being an ardently faithful
Catholic. One of her first acts as Grand Duchess was to refuse Royal
Assent to a bill that would have removed Catholicism from the schools.
After being (quite unjustly) forced to abdicate after the First World
War she joined the Little Sisters of the Poor in Italy. King Albert I of
the Belgians was another such monarch, a very sincere and devout
Catholic whose faith permeated every aspect of his life. He often spoke
of a life in the service of God as being the greatest calling of all and
impressed upon his children the importance of their Christian faith and
that disaster had always befallen those peoples who turned away from
God.
 |
| Czar Nicholas II of Russia |
Among the other monarchs of the major Allied powers, King Victor
Emmanuel III of Italy has often been labeled as less-than seriously
religious. However, rather like George V, he was not a man who was very
easy to understand. In fact, he was a faithful husband (unlike his
predecessors) and a practicing Catholic who would challenge anyone who
expressed anti-clerical views in his presence. It is true though that
there was difficulty in overcoming the decades of unfortunate animosity
between the Church and State in Italy. His wife, Queen Elena, was a
Catholic convert and had all the zeal of a convert so that she currently
has a cause for canonization underway today. One can notice something
of a history in the House of Savoy of royal spouses becoming saints.
And, of course, no monarch in the ranks of the Allies has had his piety
so publicly recognized as Czar Nicholas II of Russia, recognized as a
"Passion-bearer" by the Russian Orthodox Church. Czar Nicholas II, like
the others mentioned, was a faithful husband and a more extremely
devoted husband and father than most. Here again was a man whose
sincerity of faith was on display in everything he did and, for a man
often criticized for indecisiveness, was one think in his life that he
was, to the very last, absolutely unshakable on. Prayer and the Orthodox
Church were pillars of his life and reign and he did nothing without
them, even to the ultimate end of becoming a martyr with his family for
them. Given the political situation as it was and has been in Russia,
Nicholas II has been criticized and vilified more than most and yet, it
says something that even his worst enemies have been forced to admit
that the last Czar was a devout and godly man, a faithful husband and
father without blemish.
 |
| German Kaiser Wilhelm II |
On the side of the Central Powers, Christian monarchs were certainly not
lacking either. However, in the case of at least one, that fact might
take many by surprise. Very few people are the slightest bit aware of
what an openly devout Christian the German Kaiser Wilhelm II was. It is
something that is almost always left out of any discussion of the man.
Could this be intentional? If one were to go back in time and meet the
last King of Prussia, it is probably what would stand out the most. Like
the Czar, he had his youthful indiscretions but by the time he married
had become a more serious Christian and his life with Kaiserin Augusta
Victoria only strengthened that. She was extremely devout as well and
the two often prayed together in times of difficulty (which there was
plenty of). It is interesting to note that one of the biggest "warning
signs" about Hitler and Nazi Germany that the Kaiser noted was the lack
of any real bond with Christianity. His fellow Kaiser, Emperor Francis
Joseph of Austria, is a case that almost goes in the opposite direction.
Whereas most have no idea how staunch a Christian the German Kaiser
was, many assume that the Kaiser of Austria had a better relationship
with the Church than was actually the case. He had his personal failings
of course and was a source of strength for the Church to be sure but
relations between the two were not always cordial. He earned papal
criticism for violating the territory of the Papal States and earned
quite a push-back from Pope St Pius X after he came to the Throne of St
Peter following Francis Joseph using his imperial-veto to block the
candidate that was originally elected. After that, this special
privilege was revoked.
 |
| Emperor Charles I of Austria-Hungary |
Still, those disagreements were invariably of a political nature and
Emperor Francis Joseph was always unwavering in his support of Catholic
doctrine and very aware of his duties and responsibilities as a Catholic
monarch. He was a staunch Christian and his sincerity only increased
with time (and that was a lot for someone as old as he came to be). It
was his nephew and successor, Emperor Charles I of Austria-Hungary, who
would gain the most recognition for his devout Christian faith. Again,
for Charles, it was something strengthened by his family life, something
he and his wife, Empress Zita, had in common and worked to instill in
their children. They were devoted to each other and helped each other in
their devotion to God. You can see his deep Christian faith on display
throughout his life and his short reign on the Hapsburg thrones. His
effort to make peace may have been ill-advised and doomed to failure,
but the fact that he made it at all says much about his character. No
one who knew Emperor Charles could not but come away impressed by the
sincerity of his devotion to God and this faith sustained him in the
time of his exile. The Catholic Church has never made a habit of
canonizing monarchs (though it has certainly happened much more often
than for presidents, which is 'never') and it says much as well that
even in the very anti-monarchy early 21st Century that Emperor Charles
would be beatified by Pope John Paul II in 2004. When the Catholic
Church wished to hold up to the world an example of Christian leadership
in the political sphere, they held up a Hapsburg monarch.
Cases such as the last Czar of Russia or Emperor of Austria may be well
known but for the others, sadly, their very open and devout Christian
faith is all too often ignored. This should not be the case and, as can
be seen, such faith, while not universal, was certainly not a rare
exception. Today it can often seem like Christianity is banned from the
halls of power, and often times it actually is, but it is then all the
more important to remember that this was not always the case and it was
not the case not all that long ago. Today, future monarchs are being
raised in an environment very hostile to Christianity but even now there
are still faithful Christians among the monarchs of Europe, even if
they are not allowed to be very open about it. What is important, I
think, to take away from all of this is our own responsibility. If we
want God to give us good, Christian monarch as in days past, we might
first try becoming a good, Christian public or at least aim to make an
effort at such similar to how our forefathers did.
