Videos: Jerusalem is conquered in the First Crusade
Videos: Jerusalem is conquered in the First Crusade
nobility.org
It was decided that the assault should begin during the night of
13-14 July…. The first task of the assailants was to bring their wooden
castles right up to the walls…. All night long and during the day of the
14th the Crusaders concentrated on their task, suffering
heavily from the stones and the liquid fire of the defence, and
answering with a heavy bombardment from their own mangonels.
Raymond IV, Count of Toulouse
By the evening of the 14th Raymond [of Toulouse]’s men had
succeeded in wheeling their tower over the ditch against the wall. But
the defence was fierce; for it seems that Iftikhar himself commanded in
this sector. Raymond could not establish a foothold on the wall itself.
Next morning, Godfrey’s tower closed in on the north wall, close to the
present Gate of Flowers.
Godfrey de Bouillon at the Siege of Jerusalem, 1099.
Godfrey and his brother, Eustace of Boulogne, commanded from the
upper storey. About midday they succeeded in making a bridge from the
tower to the top of the wall; and two Flemish knights, Litold and
Gilbert of Tournai, led the pick of the Lotharingian army across,
followed soon by Godfrey himself. Once a sector of the wall was
captured, scaling ladders enabled many more of the assailants to climb
into the city.
A Letter from the First Crusade: The Conquest of Jerusalem, 1099
Tancred of Hauteville, Prince of Galilea
While Godfrey remained on the wall encouraging the newcomers and
sending men to open the Gate of the Column to the main forces of the
Crusade, Tancred and his men, who had been close behind the Lorrainers,
penetrated deep into the city street. The Moslems, seeing their defences
broken, fled towards…where the Dome of the Rock and Mosque of al-Aqsa
stood, intending to use the latter as their last fortress. But they had
no time to put it into as state of defence. As they crowded in and up on
the roof, Tancred was upon them.
Steven Runciman, The First Crusade (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1951), 226-7.
