ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE: LIBERALISM IS NOT ONLY A SIN, IT IS A RELIGION
ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE: LIBERALISM IS NOT ONLY A SIN, IT IS A RELIGION
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Allow
me first to express my gratitude to the Reverend Father who has had the
attention to introduce myself. Yes, as he has said, my life has been
guided, I hope so. Through the Holy Ghost, this grace I owe my good and
especially Christian parents, and God. He is the one who directs our
lives, is not it? And therefore, it is he who should return the good we
can do, but unfortunately, not always what we do is only good. So I
appreciate you kindly present what God has given me and, as you said, I
intend to continue in fidelity to the Church. I have no other purpose
than to be faithful to what I have been taught, ie baptismal grace.
Ladies
and gentlemen, surely have had the opportunity to read the book by Don
Felix Sarda and Salvany "Liberalism is a sin." No doubt already know the
little story of this book. Naturally the modernists of the time-this
book was written under Pope St. Pius X-felt that this book was an insult
to them and, therefore, sought to be included in the Index. Therefore
it was reported in Rome and found that, contrary to what they thought
the book was approved by ecclesiastical authority, for the Roman
authority, therefore, saved the honor of the author who said that
liberalism was a sin . Well, during these minutes, I would also try to
show not only that liberalism is a sin and a grave sin that affects the
honor of God, which affects the honor of Our Lord Jesus Christ, but
LIBERALISM IS A RELIGION. Because we are dying, we are dying of
liberalism and its consequences.
Two
centuries ago, this liberalism has spread everywhere in our society, in
our families, in our schools. Everywhere extends this poison that
destroys the commandments of God, which destroys all that is the beauty,
the greatness of Christian civilization. So good is somehow fence it,
as I also said Pope Leo XIII about Freemasonry in his encyclical Humanus
Genus ". He said: We must wrest his mask and display them as they are
so that we avoid the mistakes. Well, I think that liberalism, which is a
fruit of Freemasonry, also needs to be unmasked and be submitted as it
is, so as to understand their risk and danger to follow. This is
what I would do tonight in short, not to abuse your patience, but I will
try to clarify something the situation where the Church is today
because of the problem of liberalism.
Liberalism
has its goddess. Goddess What is liberalism? Freedom. You will recall
worship, adoration made during the French Revolution in the cathedral
of Notre Dame to the goddess of reason, ie, freedom, freedom of man. And
it is this freedom that has his statue at the entrance to New York,
which they celebrated in an incredible way a few months ago. The free
man. The man freed at last from every law and mainly the Law of God.
Finally free to think whatever you want, to do what I want, to do as you
like. This is the goddess of the religion of liberalism.
Liberalism
has its priesthood, the priesthood are Masons. Secretly organized
priesthood, priesthood extremely effective. Masons are thousands and
thousands. The Masonic sect B'nai B'rith, which is so much talk now,
having her ticket to Rome frequently and who was present at yesterday's
meeting in Assisi, she alone has 160,000 members worldwide and is an
exclusively Jewish Masonic sect. And if you read to Leon de Poncins
in the Russian revolution described by him, shows very well, with
specific facts, that was the sect of the B'nai B'rith in 1917 which
provided the money for the Russian Revolution and resulted in the murder
of the imperial family of Russia. It also tells who met in New York to
decide whether the money would allow to wipe out the imperial family.
Consequently, its influence is extremely serious, and considering that
this is only one of the Masonic sects. The Big East, I know that you
know it as well or better than I, is spread throughout the world. This
is the priesthood of Liberalism.
Liberalism
has its dogmas. Wants no dogmas, rejected the dogmas, but they are
dogmas. These tenets, these principles are the declaration of the rights
of man. And these are the rights of liberalism. The popes have
instructed us on what is the Declaration of Human Rights: is the
instrument invented by Freemasonry against God, precisely to liberate
man from the law of God. It is freedom from sin, virtually that is.
From now on, the man is free from sin, can disobey God without worrying
about the Law of God, and therefore no matter the sin or not to sin,
because it does not matter. Freedom! Freedom! Religious freedom, freedom
of religion, freedom of conscience, moral free, freedom of thought,
freedom of the press, these are the famous freedoms that have been
written in the Declaration of Human Rights which have been condemned by
the popes for a century and a half . Thus liberalism has its dogmas, has
its principle which does not resign, has its moral, which is an
anti-Decalogue, the moral is simply immorality.
Also
has its political liberalism, democracy policy, policy number and is
the number that is sending the people that apparently governs, thus
subjugating best to better dominate and dispossess through omnipotent
state, a totalitarian state, totalitarian socialism goes against the
right to property, which gradually ruin property rights that citizens do
work for the state nearly a third of the year. And so, we have
virtually slaves citizens of the totalitarian state, this is the policy
of liberalism, which they call freedom.
Liberalism has its teaching and want your teaching to be atheist, secular and universal for everyone. Teaching only.
Liberalism
has its economy, led by international finance. As countries implement
liberal morality, liberal economics, liberal education, liberal laws and
finances involved next government to hold, even with huge debts. Take
the example of Argentina, which is the economic brink, a devaluation
unlikely, do not know the first day of what will be worth the money to
make ends meet. An untenable situation but since socialism has come,
international banks finance, maintain, and Mr. Alfonsin has big economic
problems. He deferred payment maturities international banking. There
are no problems. But with the government of General Videla was instead a
Catholic general, then he dipped financially ruined it. And so it is to
do with Pinochet, though. Pinochet is a man of order, a Catholic who
wants to defend the order in your country. Well, by all means trying to
ruin the country economically and all this in an international way.
But
this international finance is very dangerous, very powerful, holds even
Russia. Master the-world and can say here, since even a few days ago
the news appeared in the papers, the Vatican has been ruined by the
economy. In the times of Cardinal Villot, some Masons who had
penetrated through Marcinkus in Vatican banks under protection, or
rather the ingenuity of Pope John XXIII, were introduced in the
Vatican's finances by Banco Ambrosiano and the famous lodge P2 and
advised the Vatican to transfer their bank accounts in Canada. It was
almost to found a banking institute Vatican money. Once founded the
institute started functioning and broke ... break did Vatican and the
money disappeared. Vatican capital disappeared! The cardinal himself
evaded Villot not say. He said we have gone bankrupt, we lost
everything. We have been forced to lay off employees of the Vatican. The
Vatican has broken and certainly found the brink of annihilation. But
of course, the Masons were thereand International Banking said: Do
not worry, here we are, if they need money, here have so much money as
may be desired, we will argue ... Although these days the Vatican said
that their financial situation was still very poor, yet they have
resisted.Naturally this explains the pressures near the Vatican
exercised in the appointment of bishops to appoint this or that cardinal
bishop to appoint such or such another, and also to get it done as soon
as the Pope does, who practically is now serving Freemasonry. We must
call things as they are serving this Masonic liberalism. I saw yesterday
at the ceremony of Assisi that indicates how far they want to go
through the Masons religious freedom, reaching a kind of superreligión,
as this is the goal liberal freemasonry, which has its myths.
Superreligión, world super-government, here the purpose seeking to
intervene in everything that has some influence in the world.
About
this superreligión ... do not know if you are aware of the meeting held
on September 29, not October but September 29 in Assisi. It was chaired
by Prince Philip, husband of Queen of England, who led the meeting.
It's awful, worse than what took place yesterday, as this took place a
month earlier in the same place, at the Basilica of St. Francis of
Assisi, with the five major religions, five major religions gathered
under the aegis of a Mason, as Philip of Edinburgh is a Mason and has
assembled these five great religions with the authorization of the
Vatican in the church of St. Francis of Assisi, with the excuse of
protecting nature, but the headlines of every newspaper Italians
announced "The superreligión chaired by Prince Philip." And in this
ceremony was outrageous things present was the Superior General of the
Franciscans as this was celebrated at home, Father Franco Zerini, which
calls the ceremony "ecological harmony of humankind". Finally, she told
renounce their religions and their doctrines and dogmas abdicate this
fatal pretense of wanting each man reveal the way, the truth and the
life. And in the case of Christianity must scandalous abdication of the
claim that a man who lived two thousand years ago was himself while the
way, the truth and the life. This was said in the church of San
Francisco a month ago! A blasphemy! Henceforth, for our Lord Jesus
Christ ended the pretense of being the way, the truth and the life.
Finished. It's one last thing and finished. This is what was said in San
Francisco one month before yesterday's meeting. How not to see a
certain relationship between these two ceremonies? I can not believe
that the Vatican has approved a month before the ceremony, presided over
by the Duke of Edinburgh, with almost the same purpose as the second
meeting, but in a much more scandalous. So this is not a time for
meeting superreligión may come next? It's awful, truly we are facing the
compliance by the Vatican, the goal of Freemasonry.
The
influence of Freemasonry on the Vatican is also expressed at the time
of the council. You know that Cardinal Bea fua to visit the sect of the
B'nai B'rith at the beginning of the council to ask if they had one wish
about the Second Vatican Council. The Masons said yes, they asked that
the Vatican recognize religious freedom. Cardinal Bea said: well, they
are happy and promised that there would be the recognition of religious
freedom. Then Cardinal Bea was decorated by this sect of Freemasons with
the medal of freedom of religion. Cardinal Willebrand Likewise also
addressed the Council of Churches in Geneva, to ask what they wanted the
CVII. Masons of this advice, it is run by Masons, said: ask religious
freedom. And religious freedom was obtained.
All
this shows the pressures exerted on the Vatican to accept religious
freedom, for it has come ecumenism, and ecumenism, all the reforms that
have been made in the Church. The liturgical changes to please the
Protestants, the changes that have been introduced within the Church,
collegiality, assemblies, to please the protesters and also to the
democratic spirit of our time. Everything has come for this acceptance
of religious freedom and the principles of the world moderated, the same
principles that were once condemned by the popes. Clearly, this is what
is happening today and if we have the knowledge of what happened
between racks at the Vatican, you can not understand what is happening,
it is impossible. So we need to be informed and know perfectly what the
goal of the Masons: Es-as we are told the genus humanum encyclical "-
destroy all Christian institutions, destroy everything that Christianity
has contributed and made in society. Destroy everything, to remove
all Christian society, the Christian family, Christian peace, in order
to suppress all these things. This is your goal and the goal of the
demon, non serviam, not serve, I want freedom, I want to obey God's
law. This is what the devil said, I want freedom. Well, since there is
no religious freedom Our Lord said: Go and teach all nations, he who
believes will be saved, he that believeth not shall be damned. There is
no religious freedom, religious are not free-we must obey God We must
obey our Lord Jesus Christ. For the devil, the result was hell and the
same will be for those who disobey God. If the devil has been punished
with hell, so are all those who knowingly and willfully disobey the law
of God and the freedom to choose your life. Mocking God's law and God,
know the outcome to expect.
Ecumenism
is the end of the missionary spirit of the Church, and this is too
serious and contrary to the mission of the Church. The Church is
essentially missionary. Euntes. Go, teach, euntes, ite docete. Obviously
the change is radical, scary, and it is not surprising that there is no
longer missionary vocations. No wonder there are no more priestly
vocations.
I want to conclude
by referring to this sentence: Photius mori quam foedari. Rather die
than betray my country this is the currency of Britain Photius foedari
quam mori. Prefer to die rather than betray our calling, to betray Jesus
Christ. We want to be faithful to our baptismal promises and renounce
Satan and surrender to Jesus Christ forever. This is what I wanted to
say and all this without rancor toward those who do not share our
thoughts, our ideas. And would go even further, I have no personal
thoughts ... I have only the ideas of the Church. I always say to my
seminarians: Do not say "I am a disciple of Archbishop Lefebvre." No,
no, no! I am a disciple of the Church, of twenty centuries of Church.
The reporter who recently quizzed me I said "But lord, you are alone, is
isolated, how can presume to possess the truth? I am not alone, I have
twenty centuries of church with me. I've done nothing except to continue
what the Church has done. Archbishop Lefebvre is not, but an episcopal
voice, I am the echo of thousands, of millions and millions of bishops,
faithful in all ages of the Church past, just to continue the Church.
they who leave the faith of the Church, it is they who betray the
Church, those who abandon the true faith. Clearly.
I
will finish my book to confused Catholics that will appear soon in
Spanish: I wish that the end of my life, when I also will be judged by
Our Lord Jesus Christ for everything I ever did, that Our Lord will not
say, "you've used your priesthood and episcopate to destroy the Church,
but on the contrary, you can have the satisfaction of hearing him say
that I have spent my life building the Church rather than destroy. Thank
you.
