Who's Been Changing The Inside of Roman Catholic Churches? And Why?
Expose on Judeo-Masonry
Expose on Judeo-Masonry
A Pictorial
Comparison of the Altar/Sanctuary of pre-Vatican II Catholic churches with
table/worship space in Masonic lodges, post Vatican II Novus Ordo "Catholic" churches,
Anglican churches and the United Nations mediation room
[T]he temerity of those
who would introduce novel liturgical practices, or call for the revival of
obsolete rites out of harmony with prevailing laws and rubrics, deserve severe
reproof.…Thus to cite some instances,
one
would be straying from the straight path were he to wish the altar restored to
its primitive table form.…(emphasis
added)
—Pope Pius XII (from Mediator Dei, 1947 encyclical on the liturgy)
—Pope Pius XII (from Mediator Dei, 1947 encyclical on the liturgy)
[T]he divine cult, in the form directed by the liturgy,
ceremonial, ritual and regulations of the Roman Church, will shortly undergo a
transformation at an ecumenical council (!), which will restore it to the
venerable simplicity of the golden age of the apostles in accordance with
the dictates of conscience and modern civilization.
(emphasis added)
—Canon Roca ( apostate priest excommunicated for his
involvement with the secret societies; statement circa 1880)
—Canon Roca ( apostate priest excommunicated for his
involvement with the secret societies; statement circa 1880)
The Look of pre-1958 Roman Catholic churches
Here are two pictures of an altar in the sanctuary of a Roman
Catholic Church as all Catholic churches appeared pre-1958. Catholic Churches
looked exactly like this going back to the 1500s when Pope Pius V codified the
Tridentine (traditional) Latin Mass, and essentially like this back to the time
of the Apostles when Mass was said using the tomb of a Christian martyr as the
altar.
Notice that the Priest says Mass facing the crucifix and the tabernacle,
where Catholics believe Christ is truly present in the Eucharist (Host), with
his back to the people. Notice the steps where, after the prayers at the foot of
the altar, the priest would ascend to the altar to offer Mass to God.
(The
picture at right was taken at Our Lady of Fatima Chapel in Richmond, Virginia.)
The Look Inside of Masonic Temples
The Look of
post Vatican II, post 1969 (Novus Order) or New Order churches
Now look at pictures of Catholic Churches as they appear today
in all parish churches under the control of a "Vatican II-New Church" bishop.
The picture on the left immediately below is a Catholic parish in transition from the "traditional Roman Catholic" look to the Masonic oriented look. Notice the Masonic-style table that has been inelegantly plopped in the middle of the sanctuary. This was the first step -- to just intrude the Masonic type table into the sanctuary. It would have been a little obvious and abrupt if, in 1969 when Paul VI ordered the "New Mass", the order would have been given to tear out all the traditional altars. So the first step of gradualism—inserting the table in front of the altar—was taken. (In many churches, the next step was this…)
The picture immediately below at the upper right position is from St. Hugo's Parish in Michigan. Both pictures on the right immediately below represent the final goal of the Vatican II "New Church". This type of deformation has taken place at all parish churches which have been subjected to demolition and remodeling since Vatican Council II. The picture at bottom right was taken at St. Jude's Parish in Radford, Virginia. This look is really the final goal of the "Vatican II" New Church; notice the strange and perhaps occult symbolism formed by the windows behind the table in the bottom right picture. Notice that the tabernacle is totally gone from the "sanctuaries" of both churches pictured on the right immediately below. Notice the two forms of the "presider's chair to the back left of the Novus Ordo, or New Church" tables, where a man sits in the place of prominence, instead of Christ in the tabernacle. Notice that the crucifix is gone in both New churches, and that at St. Jude's in Radford, Virginia, even any form of a cross is gone. Notice that it is evident in the St. Jude's picture that chairs with no kneelers have replaced the pews with kneelers found in pre-1958 Catholic Church's. Scroll back up and compare the "post-Vatican II" New Churches below, with the Masonic Lodges, and then with the pre-1958 Catholic Church look depicted in the pictures at the top of this page.
The Look of Anglican churches
Next look at two pictures of Anglican Churches, as they have
been constituted for centuries since Thomas Cranmer helped wife-hopper and
wife-murderer King Henry VIII replace the Roman Catholic Church with the
Anglican Church in England. Catholics attending parish churches will be
astounded to find that this is not a modern Catholic Church
—it looks exactly
like one, replete with the burlap/cloth banners. This picture was taken at the
Anglican Church in Lichfield, England. The picture to the left was taken at the
Anglican Church in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Catholics will notice that this
looks exactly like a New Mass, imposed on the parishes since 1969 by Paul VI,
and maintained by John Paul II. Notice the golden cup in front of the Anglican
minister—the same "cup" is now found at all New Masses in the parishes—the cup which has replaced the Chalice used during the traditional Latin Mass in
all pre-1958 Catholic Churches. 
The United Nations Meditation Room and Popes
Paul VI and John Paul II at the UN
And finally, we come to the photos of the UN General Assembly Hall and the UN meditation room. On the left immediately below is the UN Meditation Room. Notice the similarity of the "barren" look and "sterile" feel between the UN Meditation Room, the masonic temples, the Anglican Churches and the Vatican II New "Catholic" Churches.
On the right is a picture from October 4, 1965, of Paul VI sitting beneath three UN officials just before he spoke at the UN assembly. (Later that day he would
go
to Yankee Stadium for an outdoor Mass before 80,000 people.) In that address he called the UN "the last, best
hope of mankind," and, according to Catholic author Piers Compton, "propagated
the social gospel so dear to the heart of revolutionaries, without a single
reference to the religious doctrines that they [the revolutionaries] found so
pernicious." (The Broken Cross) Paul VI also wore the breastplate of the Jewish High Priest
Caiphas while visiting the UN. (Caiphas was the High Priest who condemned Christ
to death 2000 years ago in the secret, illegal middle-of-the-night trial which
took place right after Judas betrayed Christ with a kiss in the Garden of
Gethesemane, and right before Caiphas ordered that Christ be taken to Pontius
Pilate.) Once the photos of Paul VI wearing the breastplate of Caiphas
circulated, Abbe de Nantes of France challenged Paul him about this, and the
breastplate was never seen in public again. The late traditional Mexican priest,
Fr. Joaquin Saenz y Arriaga, wrote that
Paul VI knows very well
what this "Breastplate of Judgement,' the Ephod signifies; he knows its origins
in the ritualistic dress of the Ancient Covenant [that is, the old testament];
he is not ignorant of the fact that Masons today use it as a distinctive mark
of their high priest.
The late writer William Strojie
wondered whether Paul VI wore the breast plate of Caiphas because, just as
Caiphas was condemning Christ to death and handing Him over to the worldly
powers (Pontius Pilate, the Roman authority), Paul VI was attempting to condemn
the Church (the Mystical Body of Christ) to death, and handing it over to the
worldly powers (the United Nations). Concurrent with this was his greatly
trumpeted handing over of the Papal tiara "for the poor" (November 14, 1964);
likewise, he gave his pectoral cross and fisherman's ring to UN Secretary
General U Thant, who, in turn, sold them to a Jewish businessman in the Midwest.
(Rama Coomaraswamy, The Destruction of Christian Tradition. Compton notes
that the the pair purchased for $64,000 and some of
the gems from them were later seen adorning a Hollywood actress.)
Significantly, after his speech and before heading to Yankee Stadium, Paul VI went to the meditation room, but just what he did in there is disputed. Most commentators writing about this interlude report that he prayed (which is creepy enough in itself), but others maintain that something far darker occurred. Compton, who believes that Paul VI was a conscious enemy of the Catholic Church, was at that time happy with the success the conspiracy had had at the soon-to-be closing Vatican II—the goal of subverting the Church was well in hand. The UN address can be see as Paul VI's veiled communication to his brother conspirators around the world that it was time to rejoice. With this in mind, Compton writes: "It now remained to round off a truly historic visit with an initiatory rite that would put the seal on this newly admitted realization." According to Compton, the purpose of the occult ritual that took place in the meditation room:
represented the early stage of a
scheme, the fulfillment of which would be...the erection of the Temple of
Understanding, on fifty acres of the Potomac in Washington, D.C....The
underlying purpose of the Temple was plainly revealed by its...All-Seeing
Eye...that represented six world faiths -- Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism,
Confucianism, and Christianity...
The Temple of
Understanding calls itself a "spiritual United Nations," and is another group
that has NGO status at the UN. It was conceived in 1960, and besides Paul
VI, other founders and supporters have included John XXIII (photo,below left),
Mother Teresa, U
Thant,
Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlat Nehru,
Trappist monk Thomas Merton, the Dali Lama, former-First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt,
Dr. Albert Schweitzer, Planned Parenthood's Margaret Sanger, socialist Norman
Thomas, séance-obsessed Episcopal Bishop James Pike, and billionaire John D.
Rockefeller, who largely bankrolled the seed money for the organization. Just as
the United Nations constitutes the precursor of a one world government, so. too,
the syncretistic Temple of Understanding can be seen as the basis for a one
world religion.
The photo below shows
John Paul II addressing the UN General Assembly in 1995. He, too, is an ardent
supporter of the United Nations, despite its abysmal record of propping up
tyrannies (while allegedly championing freedom), trampling upon human rights
(while claiming to uphold them), stirring up conflicts (while sending in its
"peacekeepers") and the largest and being the world's most visible promoter of the New World
Order. Former UN Under Secretary General Robert Muller, a member of the Novus
Ordo church who promotes the late Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin's condemned
evolutionary theology, is a favorite of John Paul II. Muller, who has been
called the UN's "prophet of hope" wrote the "Framework for Planetary and
Cosmic Consciousness" and is belongs to ex-Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev's
Gorbachev Foundation. He blasphemously has referred to the United Nations as
"the body of Christ." As a token of his esteem, John Paul II gave Muller a
pectoral cross.Thant,
Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlat Nehru,
Trappist monk Thomas Merton, the Dali Lama, former-First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt,
Dr. Albert Schweitzer, Planned Parenthood's Margaret Sanger, socialist Norman
Thomas, séance-obsessed Episcopal Bishop James Pike, and billionaire John D.
Rockefeller, who largely bankrolled the seed money for the organization. Just as
the United Nations constitutes the precursor of a one world government, so. too,
the syncretistic Temple of Understanding can be seen as the basis for a one
world religion.
In fact, in
the early 1990s he
stated: "By the end of this decade we will
live under the first one world government that has ever existed in the society
of nations…a government with absolute
authority to decide the basic issues of human survival. One world government
is inevitable." (Cited, Malachi Martin, The Keys of This Blood,
emphasis added. Although John Paul II supposedly believes in free will,
this quote is deterministic in tone, sounding eerily like the Communist
Manifesto, where Marx and Engels—who, by virtue
of their materialism, were strict determinists—declared that the
eventual communism conquest of the world is inevitable.)
Such
a statement is consistent with other statements coming out of Rome since Vatican
II. John XIII's Pacem in Terris (1963), the call was made "Men's
common interests make it imperative that at long last a world-wide community of
nations be established." Two years later, Paul VI, during his United Nations
speech, would echo this, saying that the UN "is the obligatory path for modern
civilization and world peace."
And the Iraqi War has given
John Paul II's Vatican an occasion to once again promote the concept of world
government:
Archbishop
Renato Martino, president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, said:
"The crisis situation of the U.N., caused by the war in Iraq, does not
contradict but reinforces the appeal in 'Pacem in Terris' for a world political
authority." (U.N.'s
role needed now more than ever,
says Archbishop Martino," Zenit, 4/11/03)
He went on to say that the UN
should be a "subsidiary world authority" to guarantee "a manner of world
government that favors peace" and that "it is time to undertake a constitutional
engineering of humanity so that the United Nations can carry out its
irreplaceable role."
While world government is a concept
embraced by John Paul II and the two Vatican II
predecessors whose names he took, this no more resembles the traditional
thinking of Popes concerning international relations than does the United
Nations' meditation room resemble the interior of a Catholic Church. The notion
of a singular global rule was addressed in 1920, by the reigning pontiff, Pope
Benedict XV, (photo, right) who declared:
predecessors whose names he took, this no more resembles the traditional
thinking of Popes concerning international relations than does the United
Nations' meditation room resemble the interior of a Catholic Church. The notion
of a singular global rule was addressed in 1920, by the reigning pontiff, Pope
Benedict XV, (photo, right) who declared:
The coming of a world state is
longed for, and confidently expected, by all the worst and most distorted
elements. This state, based on the principles of absolute equality of men and a
community of possessions, would banish all national loyalties. In it no
acknowledgement would be made of the authority of a father over his children, or
of God over human society. If these ideas are put into practice, there will
inevitably follow a reign of unheard-of terror.
Related:
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/06/exposed-masonic-handshake.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/09/freemasonry-communism-we-triumphed-at.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-goal-of-ecclesiastical-masonry.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2014/10/list-of-masons-in-hierarchy-of-catholic.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/04/papacy-and-freemasonry.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/06/grand-master-of-freemasonry-wants-to.html
The
Official ORDER of the EAGLE Page
Please share blogs and help spread information Crusaders!
TradCatKnight is the most viewed
& followed traditional catholic page worldwide.
This is the HOME of the New Crusade
keeping you up to date on the latest Endtime
News stories worldwide as we head closer to the GREAT CHASTISEMENTS foretold by the Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima.
Please Help Keep TradCatKnight Alive
& Growing:
Donate below for a chance to win a
gift via TradCatKnight’s
Monthly raffle. Minimum contribution
is 20$ for the raffle.
Winner announced on every last radio
show of the month!
No comments:
Post a Comment