Tectonic Shifts & Fault Lines in
Pius XII’s Assisi Address
Dr. Carol Byrne, Great Britain
Ushering in a cult to man in the Catholic Church ...
When Pius XII addressed the participants of the Assisi Congress in 1956 (here and here), he did more than tell them a pleasing tale of progress. The analogy with the precursory signs of an impending earthquake is apt.
His speech contained proposals which, when put
into action, were to produce seismic changes of literally
Church-shattering proportions, causing the bastions of Tradition to
collapse. Yet, Pius XII did not seem to realize that the ground was
already shifting beneath him or that the tremors beneath the
ecclesiastical crust would soon lead to the “big one” (Vatican II) whose
epicenter was in Rome.
We will deal with each of Pius XII’s points in turn, beginning with his astounding statement that:
“The present-day liturgy interests itself also in a number of particular
problems concerning, for example, the relation of the liturgy with the
religious ideas of the world today, contemporary culture, social
questions and depth psychology.”(1)
Regardless of whether it was foreseen or not by Pius XII, a
preoccupation with other religions and “psycho-social” ideas in the
liturgy was bound to give rise not only to religious pluralism, but also
to the secularization of Catholic Faith and Morals.
Rise of ‘liturgical theology’
By giving the green light to ecumenism, (2) inculturation, the
acceptance of social and political factors as well as experimentation
with depth psychology in the liturgy, Pius XII initiated a tectonic
shift in liturgical practice. It was a move away from the idea of
liturgy as the expression of the objective truths of the Faith in favor
of a new world-view that appeals to the subjective dimensions of the
human mind.
In other words, the traditional theology based
on Revelation was beginning to give way to a “liturgical theology”
based on existential models of the human person as a valid criterion for
orthopraxis. From there it was just a short step to liturgy as the Cult
of Man and the de-Catholicizing of the Church via the sanctuary.
As subsequent history has shown, a liturgy shaped and influenced by the demands of extraneous religions (as would happen with the Novus Ordo Mass) would lose its Catholic identity as the expression of the one true Faith. And a liturgy in which feelings, emotions and a non-judgmental attitude to morality are emphasized would lead to the “opening to the world” (as Vatican II’s Gaudium et Spes later demanded), setting the stage for the moral dissolution of society.
What has depth psychology to do with the Catholic liturgy?
Depth psychology, which purported to be a therapeutic means of dealing with problems of the human mind, originated with the psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung – the former a Jewish atheist, the latter a founder of an esoteric and deeply anti-Christian religious cult.
By the mid 1950s, when Pius XII gave his blessing to depth psychology in his Assisi Address, a movement to blend Freudian and Jungian theories with Catholic pastoral practice was at its height among many priests and lay people in the Church. (3) One such project had fortunately failed a few years earlier with the abortive attempt of the Dominican Fr. Victor White to integrate Jung’s theories with Thomistic philosophy. (4) It failed because he tried to amalgamate two contradictory positions.
The ‘psychologization’ of the liturgy
It is worth considering that the practical application of depth psychology to the liturgy was logically doomed from the start because these modern psychological theories offered rival alternatives to the Christian-based psychology that had existed from the time of the Scriptures, the Desert Fathers, the Doctors of the Church, the Saints and the Scholastic Philosophers.
Pius XII could not have successfully integrated depth psychology into the liturgy for the following reasons:
As subsequent history has shown, a liturgy shaped and influenced by the demands of extraneous religions (as would happen with the Novus Ordo Mass) would lose its Catholic identity as the expression of the one true Faith. And a liturgy in which feelings, emotions and a non-judgmental attitude to morality are emphasized would lead to the “opening to the world” (as Vatican II’s Gaudium et Spes later demanded), setting the stage for the moral dissolution of society.
What has depth psychology to do with the Catholic liturgy?
Depth psychology, which purported to be a therapeutic means of dealing with problems of the human mind, originated with the psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung – the former a Jewish atheist, the latter a founder of an esoteric and deeply anti-Christian religious cult.
By the mid 1950s, when Pius XII gave his blessing to depth psychology in his Assisi Address, a movement to blend Freudian and Jungian theories with Catholic pastoral practice was at its height among many priests and lay people in the Church. (3) One such project had fortunately failed a few years earlier with the abortive attempt of the Dominican Fr. Victor White to integrate Jung’s theories with Thomistic philosophy. (4) It failed because he tried to amalgamate two contradictory positions.
The ‘psychologization’ of the liturgy
It is worth considering that the practical application of depth psychology to the liturgy was logically doomed from the start because these modern psychological theories offered rival alternatives to the Christian-based psychology that had existed from the time of the Scriptures, the Desert Fathers, the Doctors of the Church, the Saints and the Scholastic Philosophers.
Pius XII could not have successfully integrated depth psychology into the liturgy for the following reasons:
- It was conceived in the mind of Carl Jung as a “religion of the self” to give free rein to the libido and liberate the human psyche from the restrictions of a “rule-bound” Church, especially in the area of sexual morality;
- Jung’s ideas on religion were drawn from Gnostic sources, the occult, Eastern mysticism, ancient pagan cults of the earth goddesses, eroticism, medieval alchemy and various “New Age” philosophies;
- Jung regarded the Mass as simply a figment of the human psyche and attributed its transformative power to a dream experienced by a third century Gnostic alchemist, Zosimos of Panopolis; (5)
A charismatic Mass at Steubenville University
- Jung rejected the idea of a transcendent God and taught people to reject all external authority and search for the “god within;”
- Depth psychology reduced the intellectual faculties to the level of sensation, elevated feelings and emotions as the source of all truth, and led inevitably to the Pentecostal Movement and Charismatic liturgies;
- Needless to say, there would be no place for the traditional Roman Mass with its emphasis on rubrics and objective truth.
We will now consider some of the results of reliance on the “expertise” of psychologists in the Liturgical Movement’s quest to adapt the liturgy to the mentality of modern man and provide a sense of psychological well-being for the participants.
The first casualty of the “psychologization” of the liturgy is reverence for God. As depth psychology – even in the hands of Catholic practitioners – induces people to turn in upon themselves and seek “self-discovery,” it follows that only a people-centered liturgy would be considered a suitable medium of worship. Hence the virtual absence in the modern liturgy of exterior signs of reverence in the presence of God, such as kneeling, genuflexion, silence, modesty of dress and behavior etc.
As a hedonistic society cannot abide condemnations of the sins of the flesh, references to asceticism or self-mortification, or reminders of Hell, these too had to be excised from the liturgy because they were deemed incompatible with the psychology of modern man. For the same reason anything too ornate or smacking of “medievalism” was summarily dismissed. (6)
The world invades the Church
The Assisi Address can be regarded as an invitation and incentive to import worldly elements into the liturgy. But wherever humanistic psychology replaces spiritual discernment (the “psychology of the saints”), the result has been disastrous for religious vocations and has produced a situation from which the Church has still not recovered.
It brought havoc to Catholic Religious Orders in the U.S. in the 1960s because it encouraged individual autonomy and promoted the questioning of all authority, thereby challenging institutional hierarchies and their power to command obedience in matters of Faith and Morals.
Every Religious Order and seminary that had been “psychologically engineered” underwent a mass exodus of nuns and priests seeking “liberation” from their vows. They dug deep into their own psyches and emerged from their introspection with predictable conclusions: They no longer wanted to be bound by “rules” that prevented them from unleashing their libido.
This happened in the first place to the Jesuits and, then, to the Sisters of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in California, followed by the Franciscans, the Christian Brothers and many other men’s and women’s Orders throughout the world. (7)
Nuns modify their habits to adapt to the world
Depth psychology: designed to modify behavior & alter belief
Liturgists have been exploiting depth psychology in the liturgy for decades on a massive scale. Through psychology they thought they could re-program individuals by influencing their subconscious minds, coercing them by stealth into accepting what they wanted them to accept, change the Church and control the future of the liturgy. To add insult to injury, those who refused to be thus coerced and adhered to the traditional liturgy were psychoanalyzed as suffering from a new form of mental disorder.
With his recommendation for depth psychology, Pius XII shifted the tectonic plates of the Church’s liturgical tradition. It may seem to some people a fairly inconsequential action, but as with tectonic shifts in the geological order, it takes only a move of a few feet to flatten whole cities.
To be continued...
Related:
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/03/teilhard-de-chardin-precursor-of.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/07/video-when-mothra-meets-new-liturgy.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/02/why-traditional-latin-mass.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/05/resistance-missing-mass-spiritual.html
http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/05/what-to-do-sundays-when-there-is-no.html
The
Official ORDER of the EAGLE Page
Please share blogs and help spread information Crusaders!
TradCatKnight is the most viewed
& followed traditional catholic page worldwide.
This is the HOME of the New Crusade
keeping you up to date on the latest Endtime
News stories worldwide as we head closer to the GREAT CHASTISEMENTS foretold by the Blessed Virgin Mary at Fatima.
Please Help Keep TradCatKnight Alive
& Growing:
Donate below for a chance to win a
gift via TradCatKnight’s
Monthly raffle. Minimum contribution
is 20$ for the raffle.
Winner announced on every last radio
show of the month!
Well this is a right topic been raised by the church everyone must be cautious and careful about the tectonic plates for sure
ReplyDelete