Exposing Pseudo-Traditionalism: "Resistance" from within??

Exposing Pseudo-Traditionalism: "Resistance" from within??

Refuting the impotent pseudo traditionalist movement of supposed Resistance from within. This position is illogical and is found no where in catholic teaching. 

Neo-SSPX, Rorate, Remnant, FSSP and the other pseudo traditionalist groups need to brush up on true catholic teaching.

Recently, someone from the real Resistance sent a message over to the Remnant implying that we cannot accept the Council at all and the Remnant responded. We take a look at this poisoned response from the men who compromise the Catholic Faith. The "bigger picture" is their unwillingness to understand the fight is in principle. There can be NO UNITY in COMPROMISE!  Where there is NOVELTY there is sure sign of HERESY... 

Comment left on the Remnant's FB page:
"I hope the SSPX is rejecting Vatican 2 - everything is so murky these days. From what I have read, the FSSP does not reject Vatican 2 and this is a big problem, an impossible problem. Father Hesse is pretty clear on this. As much as it would be nice to all get together, agreeing that Vatican 2 is Catholic dogma is just unacceptable."

Remnant's reply:
"Quite the contrary, thank God (poison!). Much of Vatican II is reiteration of previous and infallible teachings of Mother Church, which is why Archbishop Lefebvre could sign the documents of Vatican II in the first place (he later regretted and said it was heretical/schismatic). The SSPX accepts far and away much more of Vatican II than do the contracepting, cherry-picking cafeteria Catholics of the post-conciliar era. There's the irony. There are a number of rank novelties (UH NO! Heresy and whole new religion) in 5 of the 16 documents of Vatican II on which the SSPX rightfully has been demanding clarification from the Vatican—these include religious liberty, collegiality, ecumenism, etc. But to say that the SSPX "REJECTS" the Second Vatican Council as some sort of illegitimate Council is flat out false, and not at all helpful to their situation.(there you have it form horses mouth!) The SSPX certainly holds, as we do, that Vatican II was a disaster (even as Pope Benedict and Paul VI admitted it was) and the “spirit of Vatican II”(theres that nasty spirit of vatican 2 I warned you on, LOL) is an evil one indeed, but we must be so careful with our terms. The SSPX does NOT reject Vatican II, (Archbishop Lefebvre did NEO-SSPX IS NOT the SSPX) but rather has issued strong and clarion calls for clarifications (cant clarify Masonry any better)on the problematic, non-infallible, and non-binding novelties (no heresies) of Vatican II. There is a huge difference." (which is why we tell you to stay from them, just proved my point!)  

TradCatKnight: The Second Vatican Council closely resembles the synod of Pistoia in 1786 which had a "bunch" of "rank novelties" and yet why was this not accepted by the Church?  According to the Remnant, Neo-SSPX and other pseudo trads this synod would have been accepted because it held portions of Catholic teaching in it? Do we get the message brethren?  The illogicality of these false traditionalists is glaring. St. Vincent of Lerins said, "NOVELTY is the springing up of heresy; ALL novelty in FAITH is SURE MARK of HERESY! So how do they say "we can accept the Council?" How do they say "good thing the neo-SSPX does not reject the Council?" This only further demonstrates their poison. What is worse is the fact we are dealing with the modernists new faith; we are dealing with a WHOLE NEW MAN CENTERED religion which is not the Catholic Religion. So if there is novelty as Mr. Matt admits then there is heresy and if there is heresy this council was not Catholic. THANK YOU REMNANT you just proved via your own admittance of novelty that the Resistance and Archbishop Lefebvre is right in a CATEGORICAL REFUSAL of the Council!  These Pseudo trad groups are poison... get off their pages, out of their churches and quit donating to them.

Resource (Auctorem Fidei) Pius VI rejecting synod of Pistoia

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02068b.htm  

http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/auctorem-fidei-pius-vi-1794.htm
http://www.novusordowatch.org/piusvi-auctorem-fidei.pdf

The following is a "link" with a list of 85 by Pope Pius VI. condemned errors of the Synod of Pistoia !!!

http://denzinger.patristica.net/#n1500

The papal bull Auctorem Fidei was a forceful condemnation of the errors of the robber synod of Pistoia which had taken place in 1786 in Pistoia (Tuscany), Italy. Like the modernist Second Vatican Council (1962-65) of the Novus Ordo Church, the synod of Pistoia introduced novelties under a veil of ambiguity, thus injecting the poison of error all the more cunningly into unwary souls. Pope Pius VI (1775-99) fired back with this apostolic constitution. Perhaps Mr. Matt, Bishop Fellay and the other compromised pseudo-traditionalist groups should re-read and acquaint themselves with Church history and how the Church (not Eric) responded (categorical refusal)!