Latest "War On Terror" Propaganda...
US Backed Terror Group Planning Nuke Attack on…US
By: Gordon Duff (VeteransToday)
Lo
and behold, the United States has been financing and training terrorist
groups now set on exploding a nuclear weapon inside the United States.
Does anyone believe that’s an accident?
And if they aren’t
able to buy one on their own, I can think of places they can get one
other than “Pakistan,” like “Israel” for instance. Israel loves setting
off nuclear weapons, inside the US and elsewhere, they have a well
established history of this:
Mapping 9/11 Fort Lee
Whether officially
announced or not, it is clearly US policy to help ISIS take total
control of Syria. This would give them another major city, a highly
credible air force, a port on the Mediterranean and the right to claim
vast oil and gas reserves under Western Syria and offshore, one of the
better kept secrets behind the current conflict.
Does any nation deserved to be “nuked”
more than America? Imagine saying that 20 years ago, hell, after saying
something like that people might think you were as crazy as Rand Paul
or John McCain. Now people simply answer the question.
TEHRAN (FNA)- The ISIL
terrorist group has claimed it is ‘infinitely’ closer to buying a
nuclear bomb from Pakistan, media reports said. An article, apparently
penned by British hostage John Cantlie for the terror group’s magazine,
Dabiq, says the scenario is ‘more possible today than it was just one
year ago’, Daily Mail reported.
Cantlie, a
photojournalist who has been held captive for more than two years, has
appeared in multiple propaganda videos and articles for the Takfiri
group.
It is claimed in the
article that the ISIL has billions of dollars in the bank that enables
the terrorist group to buy a nuclear bomb ‘through weapons dealers with
links to corrupt officials’ in Pakistan. It describes how the device
could be smuggled into North America overland and by boat.
Saudi Arabia is a
main backer and financier of ISIL and other Takfiri terrorist groups in
the region, and US officials had earlier warned that Saudi Arabia had
also made a similar decision to purchase “off-the-shelf” nuclear weapons
from Pakistan.
“There
has been a long-standing agreement in place with the Pakistanis and the
Saudis have now made the strategic decision to move forward,” British
newspaper Sunday Times quoted a former US defense official as saying in a
report.
“Hundreds
of people at (CIA headquarters in) Langley” were trying to discover if
Islamabad had already supplied the Persian Gulf nation with nuclear
technology or arms, another unnamed US intelligence official said.
Over the past three
decades Saudi Arabia has financed considerable amounts of Islamabad’s
nuclear program and provided it with billions of dollars of subsidized
oil.
“Given
their close relations and close military links, it’s long been assumed
that if the Saudis wanted, they would call in a commitment, moral or
otherwise, for Pakistan to supply them immediately with nuclear
warheads,” British former Foreign Secretary Lord David Owen was quoted
as saying.
Western military leaders “all assume the Saudis have made the decision to go nuclear,” he added. “The
fear is that other Middle Eastern powers — Turkey and Egypt — may feel
compelled to do the same and we will see a new, even more dangerous,
arms race,” he noted.
Back in March, Saudi Arabia became the world’s biggest importer of weapons, according to an arms trade report.
According to the
Global Defense Trade Report, Saudi Arabia spent over $6.4 billion on
weapons purchases in 2014, putting India in the second place. Over the
past year, the Saudi kingdom increased its arms imports by 54 percent.
According to a separate report,
Muhammad Khilewi, an official in the Saudi mission to the UN, who
requested US asylum in 1994, provided documents which allegedly
described the Kingdom’s long-time support for Iraq’s nuclear weapons
program during Saddam Hussein’s regime. Around $5 billion were given to
the regime on the condition that functional nuclear technology and, if
possible, nuclear weapons be transferred to Saudi Arabia.
In Addition,
Three weeks after the first supposed attack by Islamic State supporters in the US,
in which two ISIS "soldiers" wounded a security guard before they were
killed in Garland, Texas, the time has come to raise the fear stakes. In an article posted in the terrorist group's English-language online magazine Dabiq (which as can be see below seems to have gotten its design cues straight from Madison Avenue and is just missing glossy pages filled with 'scratch and sniff' perfume ads ) ISIS claimed that it has enough money to buy a nuclear weapon from Pakistan and "carry out an attack inside the United States next year."
In the article, the ISIS columnist said the weapon could be smuggled into the United States via its southern border with Mexico.
Curiously, the author of the piece is John Cantlie, a British photojournalist who was abducted by ISIS in 2012 and has been held hostage by the organization ever since; he has appeared in several videos since his kidnapping and criticized Western powers.
Source:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-25/isis-planning-us-nuclear-attack-next-12-months-report
Chemical jihad? ‘Growing chance’ of chlorine bomb attacks in UK – security experts
Counter-terrorism police are taking steps to diminish the danger of bombs laced with chlorine, The Times of London has learned.
Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, formerly of the Army’s Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Regiment and is currently one of the leading chem warfare experts, is calling on the authorities to strengthen controls on the sale of chlorine.
“As more jihadists return to this country there is a growing chance of a chlorine bomb attack. That to me outs it through the threshold where we should look into this seriously,” he told the Times.
Source:
http://rt.com/uk/261865-uk-chlorine-bomb-jihad/
Aaron Russo, a one time Presidential hopeful explains the whole "War on Terror" Farce
9-11 was a CIA/Mossad Operation...
No comments:
Post a Comment