Msgr. Pozzo: Fellay Is Working for Us
Msgr. Pozzo: Secretary of the Commission Ecclesia Dei (Pseudo Trad groups) |
I am sure some of you are aware of the recent statements of Archbishop. Guido Pozzo, Secretary of the Commission Ecclesia Dei, about the relations between the Vatican and the SSPX. (See the last comment at the bottom of the interview in French
here; still not available in
English)
Pseduo-Traditionalist Bishop Fellay is a traitor to Archbishop Lefebvre and Tradition |
Perhaps what many of you don’t know about is the reaction this news report is causing. I am sending you a selection, which was received from a the discussion forum – CathInfo, run by grassroots of SSPX – to give you a sample of how the waters are getting hotter and hotter in the grassroots.
Had Bishop Fellay pulled these antics while Lefebvre was still alive the Archbishop would have kicked him to the curb... |
From CathInfo, March 21, 2015
Bombshell from Msgr. Pozzo - Reveals Bp. Fellay's Hand
From the once-Catholic French newspaper, La Croix, 21/3/2015:
You should not be attending, supporting, donating
or following the Neo-SSPX or its pseudo-traditionalist
apologists like the Remnant, Rorate, etc any longer!
"We appreciate the information released by the General House of the
Society of St. Pius X, which is very clear," says Monsignor Guido Pozzo
(Secretary of Ecclesia Dei).
"Currently," adds Monsignor Guido Pozzo, the dialogue "continues"
with the Society of St. Pius X. "Several meetings have been held and
are planned with certain prelates to examine more deeply the problems
that remain to be clarified, in a relationship of trust," says the
secretary of the Pontifical Commission
Ecclesia Dei, for whom, aside from the remaining doctrinal difficulties, the problems are "internal to the Society."
"The Pope." says Pozzo, "is waiting for the SSPX to decide to enter (the
Church), and we are always available, with a canonical project which is
already known," namely the creation of a personal prelature. "We still need a little more time, he concludes, "for things to become clear internally (within the SSPX) and for Bishop Fellay to obtain a sufficiently broad consensus before performing this action.
Commentary from Resistance supporters of Cathinfo:
J.Paul
This statement is crystal clear: The deal has been agreed to and is
waiting for Bishop Fellay to manipulate the majority of the Society into
following him into Conciliar Rome.
TradCatKnight supports the Resistance
who are still maintaining Archbishop Lefebvre's
hardline stance against modernist Rome!
It is all in this short statement. All of the speculations answered. No
wonder Menzingen came right out of the corner ready to dance to the
Roman hora. Finish that seminary and the gate will close behind them.
All of that money and all of the hopes for Tradition, on an express
cruise to the Mediterranean.
And there you have it! The culmination of the Krah-Fellay Initiative.
Matthew
Pardon my drama, but this is a bombshell!
...Bp. Fellay has artfully, including through his agents, convinced
countless SSPX devotees that there is no deal pending, that nothing has
changed in the SSPX, etc. and then Msgr. Pozzo publicly admits that
indeed the plan is for +Fellay to get the SSPX on the same page, then
he'll be back for a deal!
J.Paul
Matthew: "Pardon my drama, but this is a bombshell!"
We are betrayed from within, and Pozzo confirms it. He clearly reveals
that doctrine is no longer an issue, only some structural problems
within the Society.
Menzingen gave up defending Tradition and doctrine a long time ago after succumbing to prudential practicaria fever in 2012.
And you can bet that there are plenty of priests who know the score and yet remain silent.
Pilar
Orinoco said:
"The Pope." says Pozzo, "is waiting for the SSPX...and for Bishop Fellay
to obtain a sufficiently broad consensus, before performing this
action."
That is exactly what we need to remember when we are talking about
abandoning the SSPX. Think of who we are abandoning it to. If there were
no resistance inside the SSPX, there would be no question that it would
already have been swallowed up by the false Rome.
...I am an old trad from Archbishop Lefebvre's time. I consider myself a
Lefebvrist, if there is such a thing, dyed in the wool. His position is
mine and I love the SSPX as I love him. That "internal to the Society"
problem that Msgr. Pozzo refers to, will not exist anymore if everyone
who feels like I do leaves the Society at this time. As a Third Order
member of the Society, I say no to the new Rome, no deal, no accepting
the NO as legitimate, no new code of canon law, no new Sacraments and
rites of exorcism, no hermeneutic of continuity! Every one of my daily
Masses is a resistance Mass even though it is in a Society chapel.
Archbishop Lefebvre was the founder of the resistance and after God and
Our Lady, it is he that I beg to help us in this situation.
Matthew
Who are the troublemakers and dissidents?
Bishop Fellay and Menzingen...
You can not have confidence
in the Neo-SSPX anymore
I don't share the "down with the SSPX!" mentality myself. I'm saddened
by its current leadership and direction, and I don't hold much (human)
hope for THOSE individuals -- but I realize that when the SSPX is fully
regularized, it will be a great blow to Tradition. Some people forget
this, and feign like they "don't care" -- like a child who's emotionally
stinging from betrayal by his mother and/or father.
I'm not rooting for any kind of evil. Charity rejoices in the truth, not
in destruction of something that was formerly good. The DEVIL is
rejoicing as the Neo-SSPX falls apart. I certainly won't be. "Serves 'em
right!" is not a Catholic attitude.
You are not going to get "Reel Answers"
from the pseudo traditionalist publication
the Remnant...
I'm running my Independent chapel (which doubles as a Resistance
chapel), planning for the worst -- but in the meantime I'm staying
charitable and friendly with my local SSPX chapel and priest, as well as
availing myself of the Mass and sacraments that chapel provides -- for
myself and my growing family. Though I'll admit, my chapel (and the
priest there) is one of the good ones. Our priest hasn't done anything
different, nor does he desire reconciliation with neo-modernist Rome.
J.Paul
Pilar said: Orinoco said:
..."That is exactly what we need to remember when we are talking about
abandoning the SSPX. Think of who we are abandoning it to. If there had
been no resistance inside the SSPX, there would be no question that it
would already have been swallowed up by the false Rome."
I do appreciate your sentiments, however, We have not, and are not abandoning the Society to anyone.
The reality is that the Society has abandoned us, and has abandoned
sound doctrine, and has abandoned true combat against the
modernists...They will move on and leave folks who are unaccepting, such
as yourself, behind, and they will not speak of you, or treat you
kindly. The reality is that the Society that was, is, no longer what it
was, and much too much has changed for it to return to its former self
...
There are too many priests who are of the new orientation. It would take
a re-formation of each one, which is an impossible task.
The tide is ebbing in Menzingen. It will be soon, when we have to move, or be left stranded by the mutineers.
Militia Jesu
I will place the discussion at the doctrinal level:
Vatican 2 NewChurch, objectively speaking
is NOT the Catholic Church. The Neo-SSPX
has changed their doctrinal position on this.
“Do you agree with the great encyclicals of all the popes who preceded you? Do you agree with
Quanta Cura of Pius IX, Immortale Dei and Libertas of Leo XIII,
Pascendi Gregis of Pius X, Quas Primas of Pius XI, Humani Generis
of Pius XII? Are you in full communion with these Popes and their
teachings? Do you still accept the entire Anti-Modernist Oath? Are you
in favor of the social reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ? If you do not
accept the doctrine of your predecessors, it is useless to talk! As long
as you do not accept the correction of the Council, in consideration of
the doctrine of these Popes, your predecessors, no dialogue is
possible. It is useless.” --- Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
or following the Neo-SSPX or its pseudo-traditionalist
apologists like the Remnant, Rorate, etc any longer!
who are still maintaining Archbishop Lefebvre's
hardline stance against modernist Rome!
Bishop Fellay and Menzingen...
You can not have confidence
in the Neo-SSPX anymore
from the pseudo traditionalist publication
the Remnant...
is NOT the Catholic Church. The Neo-SSPX
has changed their doctrinal position on this.
The Neo-SSPX Revisited
TradCatKnight: The most followed traditional catholic page on the Internet & HOME of the New Crusade! |
Don’t forget to signup to my other social media outlets:
google.com/+EricGajewski
tradcatknight.blogspot.com
google.com/+EricGajewski
The Maurice Pinay blogspot has been tracking Bishop Fellay's business partner, the Jew Maximililan Krah and his Zionist handler. The money trail leads to the Rothschilds, Jaidhofer Foundation and Zionist fundraising.
ReplyDeleteThis raises the question of the Neo SSPX as a money laundering facility for Rothschild interests and Zionist operations.
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com.au/2012/05/sspx-superior-bishop-fellays-zionist.html
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/maximilian-krahs-handler-oren-heiman-co.html
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com.au/2012/11/the-rothschild-gutmann-money-behind.html
http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com.au/2010/11/bishop-fellays-lawyerbusiness-partner.html
Never been to any type of SSPX chapel. Bishop Fellay is an obvious Freemason.Anyone remember the pic of him & Fr.Ratzinger shaking hands? It was a freemasonic hand gesture. (Look it up)
ReplyDelete